5/19/2015 Segmentation of the Legacy C Area Disassembly Spent Fuel Pool Prepared by: Jon Guy, N&CSE Spent Fuel Project Lead UNCLASSIFIED DOES NOT CONTAIN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nuclear Power Plants. Nuclear Power Plant Turbine and Generator Spinning turbine blades and generator Boiling water Steam.
Advertisements

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement.
Application of ANI Guideline William Wendland, P.E. American Nuclear Insurers Glastonbury, Connecticut USA Philadelphia, PA June 2007 “ RETS – REMP.
Role of Activity & Use Limitations in Clean Energy Development at Disposal Sites Elizabeth Callahan Acting Division Director, Policy and Program Planning,
1 KRB-A (Grundremmingen, Germany). 2 Type:Boiling Water Reactor Power: 250 MW(e) Started in 1966, shut down in 1977 First commercial power reactor in.
Idaho Cleanup Project _____________________ ICP Spent Nuclear Fuel Examination Barbara Beller for Kathleen Hain, PBS-12 FPD April 15, NSNFP Strategy Meeting.
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
TEXAS COMMISSION on ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PROPOSED STUCTURE FOR CHAPTER 217 < Subchapter A Administrative Provisions < Subchapter B Design Bases < Subchapter.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
Copyright [insert date set by system] by [CH2M HILL Entity] Company Confidential Update on Fukushima Daiichi NPP 1 – Preparations for Core Debris Removal.
N O L UTI O NS OI ZS LLC An EnergySolutions Company Zion Status Update for Zion Community Advisory Panel November 25, 2013 Patrick Daly.
Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel Status Presented by Sen Moy National SNF Strategy Meeting April 14,
February 26, August 27, 2013 Entergy announces it will cease operations December 29, 2014 Permanent Shutdown April 2016 Implement.
Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants Case Study: Dounreay Nuclear Facility Case Study: Dounreay Nuclear Facility Samuel Chapman Heriot-Watt University.
Legacy Waste Retrieval And Treatment Processing Methods At RSRL Harwell Site Author : Marc Rigby Presented by : Malcolm Adam 28 th May 2009.
Nuclear Reactors Health Physics Society - Power Reactor Section Radiation Science Education.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
National Institute of Cryogenics and Isotope Technologies
1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
 A nuclear reactor produces and controls the release of energy from splitting the atoms of certain elements. In a nuclear power reactor, the energy released.
Nuclear Reactors Health Physics Society - Power Reactor Section Radiation Science Education.
Mid-long term R&D step by step plan in order to implement the recycling at the maximum extension possible Gunnar Olsson and Lise-Lotte Spontón TW5-TSW-001,
Onsite Transportation At SRS Robert W. Watkins Manager Packaging & Transportation Services Contractors Transportation Management Association 2015 July.
Control Selection Techniques Employed for D&D Projects with Emphasis on Nuclear Criticality Safety Controls Brenda L. Hawks Engineering Director Oak Ridge.
Nuclear Waste Katherine Sanchez Navarro – General Supervisor Shannon McLaughlin – Historian Aleeza Momin – Biologist Rebecca Johnson – Chemist Shahzeb.
Occupational Health and Safety
TEAM 1 NONAMECOUNTRY 1SU RUI (LEADER)CHINA 2TENG IYU LIN (PRESENTER)MALAYSIA 3MUHAMMAD TARIQ AZIZ (RAPPORTEUR)PAKISTAN 4NORAISHAH PUNGUTMALAYSIA 5MOHAMMAD.
Carol L. Sohn Senior Nuclear Safety Advisor, Office of Science, SC-33 1 May 5, 2011 Review of Science Sites Hazard Categorization.
Presentation for Semi-Annual National Spent Nuclear Fuel Meeting April 14, 2005 Sen Moy, DOE-RL Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel.
Calvert Cliffs Unit 3 Status Summary for PPRAC Meeting 26 August 2008.
Group New Projects Related to Decommissioning. 29 th May 2008 KNPP Richard Benbow – Head of Kozloduy PMU.
Nuclear Power Plants. History of nuclear power 1938– Scientists study Uranium nucleus 1941 – Manhattan Project begins 1942 – Controlled nuclear chain.
May Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Boyd D. Christensen Battelle Energy Alliance, Idaho National Laboratory.
Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel and Cesium/Strontium Capsule Status Presented by Sen Moy - RL National SNF Meeting November 8, 2005.
National Spent Nuclear Fuel Strategy Meeting April 15, 2009 Dawn Gillas Federal Program Manager Nuclear Material Programs Division DOE-SR SRS Spent Nuclear.
MODULE “COST ESTIMATION, CALCULATION AND COST CONTROL” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da.
Small Modular Reactor Licensing Design Specific Review Standards 11/29/20121 Joseph Colaccino Acting Deputy Director Division of Advanced Reactors and.
Group Presentation to 27 th - 29 th May 2009 International Nuclear Forum BULGARIAN NUCLEAR ENERGY – NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND WORLD ENERGY SAFETY.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” QUALITY ASSURANCE SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
1 Resuming Operations at WIPP Frank Marcinowski Acting Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for The Office of Environmental.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Nuclear Waste. What is Nuclear Waste? Waste that results from the use of radioactive materials -Nuclear energy -Nuclear weapons -Hospitals, Universities,
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Safety and Licensing of Spent Fuel Storage Facilities Vonna Ordaz, U.S. NRC Presented at International Conference on Management of Spent Fuel from Nuclear.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Module IX Basic Concepts for Emergency preparedness and Response for a nuclear accident or.
1 A Consultancy on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation ~ Experience on aftermath of Fukushima Daiichi NPS accident.
Unit 1 Physics Detailed Study 3.3 Chapter 12.3: Nuclear Fissions Reactors.
Hazard Categorization Reduction via Nature of the Process Argument Chelise Van De Graaff J. Todd Taylor Chad Pope, PhD, PE Idaho National Laboratory.
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Nuclear energy. OECD Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris 1960) Convention on Civil.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.9h – slide 1 of 24 Session I.4.9h Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 9hFuel Cycle – Spent Fuel IAEA Post.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
Management System Part II: Inventory of Radiation Sources – Regulatory Authority Information System (RAIS)
Calder Hall Sellafield Decommissioning Martin Adam Heriot-Watt Edinburgh 2008.
Evaluation of the Impact to the Safety Basis of Research Conducted in Production Facilities at the Y-12 National Security Complex Rebecca N. Bell Senior.
The Challenge of Getting What You Asked For Integrated Safety Management Summit Knoxville TN August 24-27, 2009 Presented By: Patrice McEahern HNF
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم الهيئة العربية للطاقة الذرية ورشة عمل حول ادارة النفايات المشعة والتخلص الامن منها Workshop on Management and Safe Disposal of Radioactive.
Arkansas Department of Emergency Management Arkansas’ Homeland Security & Preparedness Agency Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of 2013 Public Assistance.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
South Carolina Nuclear Advisory Council SRS Update and FY 2017 Budget Service ● Safety ● Security ● Stewardship ● SRNL ● Sustainability April 14, 2016.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
EFCOG Startup and Commissioning Task Team Introduction
Preliminary Decommissioning Plan for the Canadian Light Source
The ORR/RA and the Authorization Basis May 2005 Revision
OPERATIONAL READINESS PROCESS FOR OPERATIONS MANAGERS AND OSBs
Anastasia Savidou, Eleni Ntalla, A. Chanousis
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
Presentation transcript:

5/19/2015 Segmentation of the Legacy C Area Disassembly Spent Fuel Pool Prepared by: Jon Guy, N&CSE Spent Fuel Project Lead UNCLASSIFIED DOES NOT CONTAIN UNCLASSIFIED CONTROLLED NUCLEAR INFORMATION DC & Reviewing Official: Les Yerger/ L-Area N&CSE. Date: 4/09/2012. Guidance: IG-SR-03, 2/04

5/19/2015 C Reactor Area Background The C Reactor Facility began operation in early 1955 for the production of nuclear materials. C Reactor was retired from operation in 1985 with no capability for restart.

5/19/2015 C Area Current Mission Tritium contaminated moderator is stored inside the C Reactor Facility Irradiated Stainless Steel and Aluminum reactor components are stored in the Reactor Tank and Disassembly Spent Fuel Pool(~3.5 million Gallon) The C Area 105 Building and specific peripheral buildings are considered to be in a Surveillance and Maintenance Mode awaiting closure by Area Completion Projects

5/19/2015 C Area Safety Basis C Area is considered a Hazard Category 2 facility. The current Safety Document is a Basis for Interim Operation(BIO) and a TSR Major hazards: – Legacy reactor contaminated moderator storage (Tritium) – Activated Reactor Components (Stainless Steel and Aluminum) – A small fissile material exist in the dirt layer at bottom of the Disassembly Spent Fuel Pool

C Reactor Area Safety Basis C-Area – Not continuously manned – Surveillances are completed quarterly – Disassembly Spent Fuel Pool locked with limited access permitted. Safety Analysis for C Reactor very conservative – No return on Investment – No real need identified for new approach 5/19/2015

Why Safety Basis is being revised Site-wide footprint reduction tied to elimination of the potential ground water release from C Area Disassembly Basin. Area Completion Projects would be permitted to evaporate the basin water and grout activated scrap “in place” within the Disassembly Basin. Segmentation of the Disassembly Basin and categorization as a Radiological Facility eases requirements in accordance with the reduced risk. Return on Investment significant for this project. – Reduce engineering, maintenance and construction cost during evaporation and grouting.

5/19/2015 C Reactor Safety Basis Revision Plan C Reactor Safety Basis – Removed reference to the Disassembly Spent Fuel pool and any associated controls – Acknowledged that a new Auditable Safety Analysis would be the Safety Basis for the segmented Disassembly Basin.

5/19/2015 C Reactor BIO Revision Plan Prepare a Hazard Determination document to support segmentation and downgrade – Activated Reactor components (Example Co 60) – Source Term of water and legacy dirt layer – Additional source terms included in proposed segment. (example: Legacy Spent Fuel Pool Sand Filters Prepare an Auditable Safety Analysis for the segmented C- Area Disassembly Spent Fuel pool – Auditable Safety Analysis is the safety basis document for facilities categorized as Radiological. – Also act as final Hazard Determination Approve a Downgrade of the new Segment from Hazard Cat 2 to radiological

5/19/2015 Main Issues for Downgrade Activated Stainless Steel can contain higher than Hazard Cat 3 quantities of some isotopes. – Solid material not releasable from storage location – Grout addition maintains water shielding over activated material

Main Issues for Downgrade Fissile material in dirt layer at the bottom of basin – New Nuclear Criticality Safety Analysis used to show criticality event not credible Hydrogen generation due to legacy reactor components interaction with grout – Engineering analysis performed to show not a credible event 5/19/2015

Main Issues for Downgrade Actual physical separation of the new segment from the rest of the C Reactor facility. – The fuel transfer canal between the spent fuel pool and reactor area remained open – Disassembly Final Storage area had open weirs that needed to be sealed. – There was no physical barrier separating the new segment outside the building. 5/19/2015

Major Implementation Items for Segmentation Fuel Transfer canal grouted closed Final Storage grouted closed Activated reactor components were located and lowered to maintain water shielding A new fence will be installed to establish the new segment.

5/19/2015 Before and After C Area Final Storage Before After

Before and After Fuel Transfer Canal 5/19/2015 BeforeAfter

Activated Scrap after Lowering 5/19/2015

Status The BIO has been revised and Approved The Auditable Safety Analysis and Segment down grade are approved All implementation items are complete. De-watering and grouting of the Disassembly Spent Fuel pool is ongoing.

Questions: 5/19/2015