Phenotypic Structure of Grain Size and Shape Variation in M5 mutant lines of spring wheat Kenzhebayeva Saule, Kazakh National University named after al-Farabi,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Qualitative and Quantitative traits
Advertisements

Seed Sampling Techniques and Population Size V.L. Bradley and R.C. Johnson Western Regional Plant Introduction Station.
Genotype-phenotype association with FaST-LMM in the DE Today we will work through example analyses and discuss our results.
Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the.
Breeding and Genetics Tools Dr. Brent Hulke Research Geneticist.
Hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) resistance to pre-harvest sprouting: diversity and development of method for testing of breeding material L.Legzdiņa,
Crop water deficits and winter wheat plant height: Integration of field experiments and modeling. G.S. McMaster 1, G.W. Buchleiter 1, M. Moragues 2, S.D.
Genotype and genotype x environment interaction of some rice grain qualities in Tanzania Nkori J.M. Kibanda 1 and Ashura Luzi-Kihupi 2 1 Rice Breeder 2.
Cultivation of Tylosema esculentum (Marama bean) Trials
Quantitative Genetics
TOPIC FOUR: INHERITANCE OF A SINGLE GENE Why can’t we all just get along and, say, call an inbred line in the F 6­ generation simply ‘an F 6 line’? Well.
Review Session Monday, November 8 Shantz 242 E (the usual place) 5:00-7:00 PM I’ll answer questions on my material, then Chad will answer questions on.
Module 7: Estimating Genetic Variances – Why estimate genetic variances? – Single factor mating designs PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding.
Census A survey to collect data on the entire population.   Data The facts and figures collected, analyzed, and summarized for presentation and.
Biodiversity in Agroecosystems Milano, February 2011 UNIVERSITY of FLORENCE Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental Science EVALUATION OF THE.
Class Meeting #11 Data Analysis. Types of Statistics Descriptive Statistics used to describe things, frequently groups of people.  Central Tendency 
Breeding for Yield PLS 664 Spring Issues How do we build yield potential into a cross? How do we select for yield in the generations prior to yield.
Crop adaptation to future climates: Climate ready wheat Jairo A Palta CSIRO - Principal Research Scientist – Adjunct Research Professor, UWA 21 Nov 2014.
1 Phenotypic Variation Variation of a trait can be separated into genetic and environmental components Genotypic variance  g 2 = variation in phenotype.
Characterization of diverse rice accessions for protein content and its correlation with starch properties Maxwell Darko Asante, PhD CSIR-Crops Research.
Descriptive Statistics
Acknowledgements This study was performed with financial support of EEA grant EEZ08AP-27 and European Social Fund co-financed project 2009/0218/1DP/ /09/APIA/VIAA/099.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Mandana Tayefe, Ebrahim Amiri, and Azin Nasrollah Zade
BREEDING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY. Breeding? Application of genetics principles for improvement Application of genetics principles for improvement “Accelerated”
Root biomass and grain yield of Pavon 76 wheat and its Near isogenic Lines in Organic and Synthetic Fertilizer Systems Ruth Kaggwa-Asiimwe 1, Mario Gutierrez-Rodriguez.
Fig. S1 The non-metric multi-dimensional scaling of 24 double haploid (DH) lines (colored in grey) in the background of 225 DH lines (colored in blue)
Acknowledgements This study was performed with financial support of European Social Fund co-financed project 2009/0218/1DP/ /09/APIA/VIAA/099.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Project Nr. 2009/0218/1DP/ /09/APIA/VIAA/099 Cereal breeding for organic farming: crop traits related with competitiveness against weeds Dace Piliksere.
Lecture 21: Quantitative Traits I Date: 11/05/02  Review: covariance, regression, etc  Introduction to quantitative genetics.
STATISTICS AND OPTIMIZATION Dr. Asawer A. Alwasiti.
Morphological Characteristics of High Yielding Rice Varieties
APPLIED CONCEPTS IN PLANT BREEDING
IV. Variation in Quantitative Traits A. Quantitative Effects.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Mobilization of Stem Reserves in Diploid, Tetraploid, and Hexaploid Wheat B. Ehdaie, G.A. Alloush and J.G. Waines Department of Botany and Plant Sciences,
Evaluation of advanced Cowpea lines for agronomic traits, yields, and response to cowpea scab caused by Sphaceloma spp. Dry Land Legume Research Program.
STT2073 Plant Breeding and Improvement. Quality vs Quantity Quality: Appearance of fruit/plant/seed – size, colour – flavour, taste, texture – shelflife.
THE INHERITANCE OF PLANT HEIGHT IN HEXAPLOID WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) Nataša LJUBIČIĆ 1*, Sofija PETROVIĆ 1, Miodrag DIMITRIJEVIĆ 1, Nikola HRISTOV.
Lu Feng Plant and Soil Science Department Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX Effects of irrigation and plant density on yield, quality and within-boll yield.
Evaluation of early drought tolerant maize genotypes under low nitrogen conditions Nyasha E. Goredema1, Ms Nakai Goredema2, Ezekia Svotwa1, Gabriel Soropa1,
PHENOTYPING FOR ADAPTATION TO DROUGHT AND LOW-PHOSPHORUS SOILS IN COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP.) Nouhoun Belko1, Ousmane Boukar1, Christian.
CORRELATION.
Biotechnology 101 Wendy Srnic,
Mutation-induced variability for improved yield and rust resistance in wheat in hot irrigated environments Abdelbagi M. Ali1, 2, Izzat S.A. Tahir2, Abdalla.
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Triticum dicoccum: "A Low G.I. Food for the Diabetics"
Introduction to Expert Systems
Proportion of intermediate diameter roots
Increasing Genetic Gains in Wheat through Physiological Genetics and Breeding Sivakumar Sukumaran1, Matthew Reynolds1, Jose Crossa1, Marta Lopes2, Diego.
Third International, AGRONOMY CONGRESS Agriculture Diversification, Climate Change Management and Livelihoods November 26-30, 2012, New Delhi, India Hyperspectral.
Responses of Wheat Genotypes to Phosphorus In Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems In the Pacific Northwest Julia L. Piaskowski, Washington State.
Drought Resistance Evaluation of Diverse Wheat Germplasm
INTRODUCTION Radio-sensitivity of selected cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) genotypes to varying gamma irradiation doses L. Horn1,2 and H. Shimelis2 1. Directorate.
Long-term crop rotations suppress soybean sudden death
Spring 2009: Section 5 – Lecture 1
PRINCIPLES OF CROP PRODUCTION ABT-320 (3 CREDIT HOURS)
Segregation (p. 311 and 312) Segregation = separation
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Basic Estimation Techniques
Relationship between mean yield, coefficient of variation, mean square error and plot size in wheat field experiments Coefficient of variation: Relative.
Selective Plant Breeding
Understanding Multi-Environment Trials
Growth Stress Response (Agronomical Stress Response)
Filled Grains/ Panicle
ID: 154 Mirza Mofazzal Islam, PhD Chief Scientific Officer and Head
Genetics of Quantitative Traits
Presentation transcript:

Phenotypic Structure of Grain Size and Shape Variation in M5 mutant lines of spring wheat Kenzhebayeva Saule, Kazakh National University named after al-Farabi, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Cereal crops of importance in the Kazakhstan Kazakhstan is one of the major wheat producers and exporters in Central Asia. Wheat area is about 13 million ha. The bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) accounts 91% and durum wheat is 9% of total area. Spring wheat occupies 95 percent of the total wheat area in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan producted 13,5-20,1 million tons of grain. Average grain yield is (9 centner/ha), it is not stable. Nine major wheat agroecological zones have been recognized in Kazakhstan on the basis of different wheat types, growing season, hydrothermic and soil conditions.

Kazakhstan Wheat Regions

Introduction Availability of genetic variability is the prerequisite for any breeding program. Besides conventional methods, induced mutation has been extensively used for creating new genetic variation in crop plants. To date, 264 mutant cultivars of bred wheat have been released (FAO/IAEA, 2012). Mutation induction with radiation was the most commonly used method to develop direct mutant cultivars. Mutation breeding is one of an important tool in crop improvement with increased agronomic values.

Grain size and shape are two of the main targets for wheat breeding. They affects many milling characteristics and end-use qualities in wheat. Wheat seed size also influences the seedling vigour and establishment in field. Grain size is characterized by grain size variables (i.e., TGW, area, width and factor form density (FFD). Grain shape means a relative proportion of the grain main growth axes. Grain shape is generally estimated by the grain shape variables (i.e., ratio of L/W and length), vertical perimeter, sphericity and horizontal axes proportion.

Material and methods  Based on radiation sensitivity studies, dose of 100 and 200 Gy was chosen to irradiate of cv. Zhenis of spring wheat to obtain M 3 mutant lines. Initially, irradiation of dried seeds was performed in an ionizing device (PXM -γ 20, 60 Co gamma rays) at the Kazakh Nuclear Center. The plants were grown in field experimental plots.  The selection of individual high-yielding potential mutant lines was done every generation from M 3 taking into account the following yield parameters: Grain weight per plant, greater number of grain per main spike, greater weight of grains per main spike compared to the parental variety. The best genotypes were chosen according to their elements of yield.

Material and methods M5 seeds of the selected M3 lines were used in this study to assess grain morphometric variations in mutant germplasm developed through gamma radiation by 100 and 200 Gy doses.

Grain morphometric analysis Morphometric measurements were performed on 50 to 60 grains/line using Image system for grain analysis (the analyzer regent Instrument 2007,USA). Grain area (GA), Grain length (GL), TGW and grain width (GW), were measured. The ratio of average GL/GW was calculated. Factor form density (FFD) describes the differences in grain density and the deviation of a shape from a cylindrical form and is given by: grain weight/(grain length*grain width) (Giura and Saulescu, 1996).

Phenotypic variations in thousand grain weight, g, in M5 mutant lines of spring wheat developed using 100 and 200 Gy doses and background cv. Zhenis TGW g to g in 100 Gy germplasm, with a mean value of 41,54 g (SD ± 1.77, n=15). 2 lines (№5(4) and №24(2) differed significantly from cv. Zhenis being characterized by higher values than the parental variety (1.31 and 1.36 times). TGW showed greater degree of variation compared to 100 Gy germplasm. The mean value ranged from to g with a mean value of 44,23 g (SD ± 1.96, n=15). 3 lines (№43(4), (№49(4) and №49(6) differed significantly from cv. Zhenis being characterized by higher values than cv. Zhenis (on 1.96, 1.25 and 1.30 times, respectively).

Phenotypic variations in grain area in M5 mutant lines of spring wheat developed using 100 and 200 Gy doses and background cv. Zhenis 100 Gy 200 Gy GA in wheat 100 Gy mutant germplasm were from mm to mm (mean=20.15 mm; SD=1.88 mm; n=15) the range of 7.5%- 31.9% higher than the mean value of cv. Zhenis. There were highly significant differences between the parental cv. Zhenis and all mutant lines for GA. The GA was the highest in three lines (№26(6), №26(9) and №36(1) characterizing value greater than 22 mm which was higher by 1.26 and 1.32 times than that of cv. Zhenis. The mean value of in (GA) in 200y G mutant germplasm ranged from to mm (mean=22.14 mm; SD=0.88 mm; n=15). The highest GA was the in seven M5 mutant lines (№43(4), №45(1), №49(6), №51(1), №51(2), №51(8) and №53(2).

Correlation coefficient between grain area and TGW in M5 mutant lines of spring wheat developed using 100 and 200 Gy doses and genetic background cv. Zhenis ,54-0,98-0,96-0,12-0,850,300,98-0,75-0,130,980,480,160,120, ,56-0,50-0,010,98-0,52-0,43-0,930,300, ,14-0, Gy 200 Gy cv. Zhenis №5(4) №6(4) №6(5) №6(13) №13(3) №18(5) №24(1) №24(2) №25(2) №26(6) №26(7) №26(9) №26(10) №30(1), №36(1) №24(1) №26(6) №36(1) Zhenis №43(1) №43(3) №43(4) №45(1) №45(2) №45(3) №48(3) №49(2) №49(4) №49(6) №50(7) №51(1) №51(2) №51(8) №53(2) №45(2) №49(6) №53(2)

Phenotypic Variation in Grain Size and Shape in mutant germplasm. 100 Gy 200 Gy

Phenotypic variations in GRAIN LENGTH in M5 mutant lines developed using 100 Gy and 200 Gy doses and genetic background of cv. Zhenis The average of GL which largely describe grain shape ranged from 6.51 mm to 7.15 mm (mean = 6.80 mm, SD=0.22, n=15). This trait that was higher in the range of 6.9% -17.4% than the mean value of cv. Zhenis. GL was the highest in four M5 mutant lines (№26(6), №26(7), №26(9) and №36(1) having value higher by 1.16 and 1.17 times than cv. Zhenis. GL ranged from 7.48 to 8.22 mm (mean = 7.83 mm, SD=0.49, n=15). The GL was the highest in four M5 mutant lines (№51(1), (№51(8), №53(2) and №51(2) with a value of greater than 8 mm that is higher compared with cv. Zhenis in the range of 22.8%-35.0%.

Correlation coefficient between grain length and TGW in M5 100 Gy germpasm M5 200 Gy germpasm ,76-0,290,56-0,070, ,930,84-0, ,800,960,620,07-0,97-0,46-0,43-0,240,120,29-0, cv. Zhenis №5(4) №6(4) №6(5) №6(13) №13(3) №18(5) №24(1) №24(2) №25(2) №26(6) №26(7) №26(9) №26(10) №30(1) №36(1) №18(5) №24(1) №25(2) №26(10) Zhenis №43(1) №43(3) №43(4) №45(1) №45(2) №45(3) №48(3) №49(2) №49(4) №49(6) №50(7) №51(1) №51(2) №51(8) №53(2) №43(1) №43(3) №51(8) №53(2)

Phenotypic variations in grain width in M5 mutant lines developed using 100 Gy and 200 Gy doses and genetic background of cv. Zhenis 100 Gy 200 Gy The range of GW was 3.22 to 3.88 mm (mean = 3.60 mm, SD=0.18, n=15). The GW was the highest in three M5 lines (№24(2), №26(7) and №26(9) with means compared with cv. Zhenis that is higher in the range of 21.7% %. The range of GW was 3.64 mm to 3.91 mm in M5 germplasm developed using 200 Gy (mean = 3.75 mm, SD=0.08, n=15). Four M5 lines (№51(1), №51(2), (№51(8) and №53(2) showed the highest GW in the range of 21.4 up to 24.9%.

Correlation coefficient between grain width and TGW in M5 100 Gy germpasm M5 200 Gy germpasm 1.000,510, ,46-0,470,510,420,030,93-0, ,780, ,660,40-0,22-0,75-0,520,130,03-0,

Phenotypic variations in ratio of GL and GW in M5 mutant lines developed using 100 Gy and 200 Gy doses and genetic background of cv. Zhenis The range of ratio of GL and GW was 1.77 to The ratio was the highest in three M5 lines (№6(13), №25(2) and №36(1). cv. Zhenis The range of ratio of GL and GW was 2.03 to The ratio was the highest in three M5 lines (№43(1), №43(4), №48(3), №51(2), and №51(8). cv. Zhenis

Phenotypic variations in Factor form density (FFD) in M5 mutant lines developed using 100 Gy and 200 Gy doses and genetic background of cv. Zhenis FFD to FFD from to

Effect of 100 Gy and 200 Gy on the mean value of grain length, width, length/width ratio and area in M5 mutant germpalsm developed on background cv. Zhenis (n=15 for each).

Relation between grain length and width, relation between L/W and length Simple linear correlation coefficients (Spearman’s rho) In M5 100 Gy germpasm In M5 200 Gy germpasm

Conclusions and 200 Gy gamma radiation can induce significant Phenotypic variations in grain size and grain shape. The mutants developed by means of 100 and 200 Gy had significantly higher, particularly GA, GL, and GW than the parental cv. Zhenis. 2. GL and GA are the most phenotypic variable traits and their variations are also significantly gamma dose dependent, variations in GW and L/W ratio are moderately and the least variable, respectively. 200 Gy gamma is more effective dose to induce positive g 3.TGW is highly positively correlated with two morphological traits, GA and GW in lines №6(5), №53(2), and №49(6) in germplasm developed using 100 and 200 Gy, respectively. 4.There was a more positive association between GL and GW, GL and ratio L/W in mutant germpasm developed by 200 Gy (r=0.90 and r=0.56) than gempasm developed by 100 Gy (r=0.55 and r=0.01) 5.The L/W ratio shows very weak and middle correlation with GL and GW (r =0.011 and r =0.559, P < 0.001), respectively in M5 population obtained with the 100 Gy treatment. The L/W ratio very weakly and weakly correlated with either of the two main grain size variables (TGW and grain area, r =0.021 and r=0.258, P < 0.001) suggesting that the relative proportions of the main growth axes of the grain, which largely describe grain shape, is independent of grain size.

Acknowledgements 1.This work was funded by Ministry of Education and Sciences of Kazakhstan under the project “Development and study of wheat mutant lines to identify their valuable breeding forms and new alleles of genes controlling key adaptive properties”. 2.National IAEA KAZ5003 “Increasing Micronutrient Content and Bioavailabilityin Wheat Germplasm by Means of an Integrated Approach” ( ).