LA GRAD Act LCTCS Conference LA Board of Regents March 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
Advertisements

Missouri Higher Education Issues and Initiatives 2013.
Michigan National Guard
Trustees Academy August 30, 2010 Indiana Commission for Higher Education HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING IN INDIANA: THE ROLE OF THE INDIANA COMMISSION FOR HIGHER.
Review Period: January 1, 2014 – December 31, STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS.
WCHRI Graduate Studentship Competition 2014 WCHRI Grants Contacts: Chelsey Van Weerden, Research Grants Administrator Lorin Charlton,
Academic Scholars/Other Scholarships PHF Conference Center July 22, 2014 Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education.
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
The Florida College System House Bill 7135: Relating to Postsecondary Education Julie Alexander & Carrie Henderson April 20,
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Budget & Performance Funding Formula Overview August 19, 2011.
State Council of Higher Education for Virginia January 2006State Council of Higher Education for Virginia Higher Education Restructuring Act Educational.
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
Successful Practices Network Career & Technical Education CTE Program Approval NYS Board of Regents Approved New Regulations for Career.
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Governance Commission Budget, Formula Funding, & Efficiencies September 28, 2011.
Perkins Postsecondary Reserve Fund Grants WELDING PROGRAM OF STUDY.
Articulating CTE Courses A New Approach Linda Corr-Mahugh Articulation Specialist Business/Marketing Pathway Specialist Montana OCHE/OPI October 2009.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Financing a University Education CSU-UC Joint Counselor Conference September DRAFT.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Cohort 6 Informational Webinar June 10, 2015.
LA GRAD Act October 26, 2010 Creating a Culture of Student Success Louisiana Innovation Council 1.
BIDDER’S WORKSHOP CAREER AND YOUTH SERVICES. The Workforce Development Board (WDB) 7/1/2015 The Golden Sierra Workforce Board provides (WIOA) oversight.
Outreach Program Grants Administration 101 Kathryn Umali, MPH, CHES U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Health Resources & Services Administration.
Analysis of States’ Use of Student Enrollments and Performance Criteria in Higher Education Funding May 2012 R EPORT FOR THE N EVADA L EGISLATURE ’ S C.
Revamping Your Local Application May 22, Georgia’s workforce is our number one asset. Career Technology Education in Georgia Georgia Department.
College of Education – Office of Research and Engagement Office of Research and Engagement.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Division of Florida Colleges Update Florida College Registrars and Admissions.
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Spring Quarter Department Chair Forum May 25, 2007.
Sponsored Programs Services (SPS) PROPOSALS. What is the PI’s role in the proposal?  Contact the central pre-award center,
MDCH/DELEG Michigan Nursing Corps Request for Proposals Webinar March 15, 2011 Collaboration of Michigan Department of Community Health and Michigan.
SHEEO Prof. Dev. Conference THECB August 13, 2004 Philadelphia 1 Affordability Strategies in the States Moderator: Laura King (Minnesota) Presenter: Deborah.
Welcome to the Radiation Protection Technology Information Session!
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
The University of Texas at San Antonio June 19, 2013 Merit Policy.
Sheila Lau Director of Articulation & Orientation November 17, 2011 Articulation Basics.
Student Employment Process, Procedures, Roles and Responsibilities St. Petersburg College.
Graduate Degree Progress & Clearance Graduate School Office Amy Gillett and Amy Corr.
Submitting Course Outlines for C-ID Designation Training for Articulation Officers Summer 2012.
NSF Early Career Award Submission Preparation March 21, 2014 Prepared by: Shelly Baczkowski
FY 2011 Budget Period Progress Report Cheri Daly
SUS Performance Funding Institute for Academic Leadership Joe Glover October 2015.
Click to edit Master title style SNAP-Ed NEOPB FFY GUIDANCE FUNDING APPLICATION REQUEST Informational Conference Call October 21, :30-11:30am.
The University of Akron. What is the College Credit Plus Program? The College Credit Plus Program was created by the Ohio Legislature to allow students.
Thesis Defense and Submission 1 Spring  Register for Spring semester  Deadline to submit thesis to GPS: Friday, April 22 nd at NOON  Deadline.
County LOGIN to DLGF Apps County IT Session June 30, : :00 a.m. IGC Auditorium 302 W. Washington St. Indianapolis, IN
Bright Futures Scholarship Program and Florida PrePaid College Plan ( )
Opened: December 1,  Select State Grants, Scholarships & Applications, and.
Preliminary Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature October 2015.
Gear Up for Graduation Graduate School Workshop Spring 2016.
Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Grant Writing Workshop Preparing The Application These workshops are funded by the USDA’s Agricultural.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
March Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust & Nunavut Wildlife Studies Fund  There are a number of documents that relate to the NWRT and NWSF:  1.)
PROPOSAL REVIEW AND SUBMISSION FYAP May 5, 2016 Julie Wammack Sponsored Research Administration.
Development of Statewide Community College Value- Added Accountability Measures Michael J. Keller Director of Policy Analysis and Research Maryland Higher.
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
Army Research Office (ARO): Young Investigator Program (YIP)
Tulare County Youth Commission
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
John Halpin, Associate Dean, Perkins & Work Experience
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Excelsior Scholarship Program
Federal work study supervisor training
Florida College System Performance Based Funding
UNCFSP/NLM HBCU ACCESS Project
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Stacey Silverman, PhD Academic Quality and Workforce February 1, 2019
Overview of Academic Staff Title Change Process
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting Part 1
Presentation transcript:

LA GRAD Act LCTCS Conference LA Board of Regents March

Today’s Objectives Importance of Attachments A & B Annual Report format GRAD Act scoring overview What’s new for year 3 Q & A 2

3 Granting Resources and Autonomy for Diplomas increased tuition authority operational autonomies clearly defined statewide performance goals. GRAD Act grants colleges and universities increased tuition authority and operational autonomies in exchange for commitment to meet clearly defined statewide performance goals. LA GRAD Act

1.Student Success 2. Articulation and Transfer 3. Workforce and Economic Development 4. Institutional Efficiency and Accountability LA GRAD Act Performance Objectives 4

GRAD Act Measures fourobjectives  For each of the four performance objectives, there are performance elements & measures.  GRAD Act measures  Vary by institutions’ specific role, scope & mission.  Institutions compete against themselves or  Meet established targets or  Improvement over previous years  There are three categories of measures: DESCRIPTIVE TRACKED TARGETED 5

Performance Objectives Elements Measures GRAD Act Performance Measures

GRAD Act Annual Report Format Annual reports are submitted to the BoR through the system office in both hard & electronic copy. Report Format (1)COVER LETTER from the institution head, including identification of point of contact for the report (2)NARRATIVES should be titled with specific Performance Objective. Narratives MAY incorporate data but WILL NOT be considered official submission of targeted data. NOTE: points may deducted for exceeding maximum number of pages. (3)DATA for the Measures will be submitted via the BoR GRAD Act Online Reporting System, except where noted. Some data will be preloaded by BoR into the system. Institutions must submit a printed copy of their data with their annual report. 7

GRAD Act Annual Review Timeline April: Institutions submit annual reports to their Management Boards May 1: Mgt Boards certify/verify reports & submit to BoR May/June: Regent’s staff completes scoring June: Preliminary designation at least 20 days prior to BoR Meeting June: Institution has up to 10 days prior to BoR meeting to respond to preliminary designation June 26 th /27 th : Final status determination after formal board review and action during BoR meeting July 15: BoR submits Annual Report to Governor & Legislature 8

GRAD Act Scoring A score is given for each applicable criterion. Points are assigned as follows: – Targeted measures: worth 2 points if a)target has been met OR b)target met within allowable tolerance OR c)if institution has shown progress in measure when comparing most recent 2 yr avg to the prior 3 yr average (this requires institution to submit 5 years of data) – Tracked & Descriptive measures: worth 1 point if required data are reported. – Narratives for each performance objective: worth up to 20% of total possible points in each performance objective. 9

GRAD Act Scoring Example Score for Performance Objective 1: Student Success POSSIBLE SCORE a. Score value total = 11 b. Objective narrative (20% of a.) = 2.2 c. a. + b. = 13.2 ACTUAL SCORE d. Score total = 9 e. Objective narrative score (up to b.) = 1.9 f. d. + e. = 10.9 PERCENT SCORE: Actual score(10.9)/Possible score(13.2) = 82.6= 83% 10

GRAD Act Scoring Percent change in Completers: “Rolling it up” When scoring completers, 2 issues arose: (1) small number of awards at some levels (especially certificates, diplomas, masters and doctorates) (2) wider variety of award levels at 4-year campuses compared to two-year and technical colleges Decision was made to collapse/combine degree levels so that the potential score value for completers would be the same for two- and four-year campuses. 11

GRAD Act Scoring Percent change in Completers (continued) 2 yr colleges and technical colleges: (4 possible points) – < Associate (certificate and diploma) 2 points – Associate (associate and post assoc) 2 points 4 yr and health science centers: (4 possible points) – Undergraduate (baccalaureate and post bacc) 2 points – Graduate (all levels above graduate) 2 points BoR will score both ways (levels segregated and collapsed) & the institution will be given the more favorable score. 12

Passing GRAD Act Passing GRAD Act Authority to raise tuition & eligible for autonomies Receive performance funding Institutions not passing GRAD Act may be eligible to earn up 75% their performance funds by entering into GRAD Act Improvement Contract Policy 13

GRAD Act – What’s New March 15: Last day for BoR data files to be submitted → Requests to submit data after this deadline must be submitted for Board approval Online reporting system: BoR has pre-populated year 3 data → campuses should review & address discrepancies → campuses should fill in any applicable fields that are not pre-populated → will be repository for GRAD Act data → BoR will use these data for annual report and in 6 year report to Governor & Legislature 14

GRAD Act – What’s New Tracked to Targeted/New Targeted Measures – BoR held several meetings with system liaisons – Goal was to respond to GRAD Act Agreement which states that consideration be given to converting applicable tracked measures to targeted measures after year 2 – Institutions were required to select a minimum of ONE new targeted measure for each of the 4 objectives – Late 2012/early 2013: Board approves new targeted measures, targets & end of agreement benchmarks 15

GRAD Act – Points to Remember ALWAYS refer to Attachments A & B when compiling data and preparing the annual report. For narratives, report on activities/outcomes that occurred during the reporting year in support of the Elements in the Performance Objective – refer to suggested items in Attachment B. If you have a question, don’t guess – ASK! 16

For more information…… LeAnn Detillier LeAnn Detillier, Assistant Commissioner for Program Administration * (225)