Slide 1 of 13 So... What’s Game Theory? Game theory refers to a branch of applied math that deals with the strategic interactions between various ‘agents’,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Game Theory
Advertisements

M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 3.1.Dynamic Games of Complete but Imperfect Information Lecture
ECON 100 Tutorial: Week 9 office: LUMS C85.
Clicker Question-A Chicken Game 0, 0 0, 1 1, 0 -10, -10 Swerve Hang Tough Swerve Hang Tough Player 2 Pllayer 1 Does either player have a dominant strategy?
Game Theory S-1.
3. Basic Topics in Game Theory. Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Outline 3.1 What is a Game ? The elements of a Game The Rules of the.
Non-Cooperative Game Theory To define a game, you need to know three things: –The set of players –The strategy sets of the players (i.e., the actions they.
6-1 LECTURE 6: MULTIAGENT INTERACTIONS An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
An Introduction to... Evolutionary Game Theory
1 Game Theory. 2 Agenda Game Theory Matrix Form of a Game Dominant Strategy and Dominated Strategy Nash Equilibrium Game Trees Subgame Perfection.
AP Economics Mr. Bernstein Module 65: Game Theory December 10, 2014.
Game Theory Eduardo Costa. Contents What is game theory? Representation of games Types of games Applications of game theory Interesting Examples.
EKONOMSKA ANALIZA PRAVA. Game Theory Outline of the lecture: I. What is game theory? II. Elements of a game III. Normal (matrix) and Extensive (tree)
Game Theory Asia Burrill, Marc Relford, Bridgette Mallet.
Multi-player, non-zero-sum games
Economics 202: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory 1.HW #6 on website. Due Thursday. 2.No new reading for Thursday, should be done with Ch 8, up to page.
Chapter 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Game Theory.
5/16/20151 Game Theory Game theory was developed by John Von Neumann and Oscar Morgenstern in Economists! One of the fundamental principles of.
Econ 2610: Principles of Microeconomics Yogesh Uppal
Eponine Lupo.  Game Theory is a mathematical theory that deals with models of conflict and cooperation.  It is a precise and logical description of.
Check your (Mis)understanding? Number 3.5 page 79 Answer Key claims that: For player 1 a strictly dominates c For player 2, y strictly dominates w and.
A camper awakens to the growl of a hungry bear and sees his friend putting on a pair of running shoes, “You can’t outrun a bear,” scoffs the camper. His.
Chapter 11 Game Theory and Asymmetric Information
Advanced Microeconomics Instructors: Wojtek Dorabialski & Olga Kiuila Lectures: Mon. & Wed. 9:45 – 11:20 room 201 Office hours: Mon. & Wed. 9:15 – 9:45.
Nash Equilibrium Econ 171. Suggested Viewing A Student’s Suggestion: Video game theory lecture Open Yale Economics Ben Pollack’s Game Theory Lectures.
An introduction to game theory Today: The fundamentals of game theory, including Nash equilibrium.
An introduction to game theory Today: The fundamentals of game theory, including Nash equilibrium.
1 Section 2d Game theory Game theory is a way of thinking about situations where there is interaction between individuals or institutions. The parties.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
QR 38, 2/22/07 Strategic form: dominant strategies I.Strategic form II.Finding Nash equilibria III.Strategic form games in IR.
Introduction to Game Theory Yale Braunstein Spring 2007.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
An introduction to game theory Today: The fundamentals of game theory, including Nash equilibrium.
Game Theory Statistics 802. Lecture Agenda Overview of games 2 player games representations 2 player zero-sum games Render/Stair/Hanna text CD QM for.
Starbucks, Beating The Prisoners Dillema Brooke Hatcher Econ 202 April 28 th, 2012.
Game Theory, Strategic Decision Making, and Behavioral Economics 11 Game Theory, Strategic Decision Making, and Behavioral Economics All men can see the.
Economics for Business II Day 12 – Some Macro Numbers and Answers Dr. Andrew L. H. Parkes “A Macroeconomic Understanding for use in Business” 卜安吉.
A Game-Theoretic Approach to Strategic Behavior. Chapter Outline ©2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 2 The Prisoner’s Dilemma: An Introduction.
Monetary Economics Game and Monetary Policymaking.
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection - Repeated Games -
Standard and Extended Form Games A Lesson in Multiagent System Based on Jose Vidal’s book Fundamentals of Multiagent Systems Henry Hexmoor, SIUC.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright  2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. GAME THEORY, STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING, AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS.
Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Lecture 2: two-person non.
Chapter 12 - Imperfect Competition: A Game-Theoretic Approach Copyright © 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
KRUGMAN'S MICROECONOMICS for AP* Game Theory Margaret Ray and David Anderson Micro: Econ: Module.
Chapter 10: Games and Strategic Behavior
1 What is Game Theory About? r Analysis of situations where conflict of interests is present r Goal is to prescribe how conflicts can be resolved 2 2 r.
Mohsen Afsharchi Multiagent Interaction. What are Multiagent Systems?
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 8: Games and Strategic Behavior 1.Describe the basic.
Intermediate Microeconomics Game Theory. So far we have only studied situations that were not “strategic”. The optimal behavior of any given individual.
Statistics Overview of games 2 player games representations 2 player zero-sum games Render/Stair/Hanna text CD QM for Windows software Modeling.
Choose one of the numbers below. You will get 1 point if your number is the closest number to 3/4 of the average of the numbers chosen by all class members,
Lec 23 Chapter 28 Game Theory.
Advanced Subjects in GT Outline of the tutorials Static Games of Complete Information Introduction to games Normal-form (strategic-form) representation.
Game Theory By Ben Cutting & Rohit Venkat.
Game theory Chapter 28 and 29
Game theory basics A Game describes situations of strategic interaction, where the payoff for one agent depends on its own actions as well as on the actions.
Game Theory M.Pajhouh Niya M.Ghotbi
Project BEST Game Theory.
Game Theory: The Competitive Dynamics of Strategy
11b Game Theory Must Know / Outcomes:
Introduction to Game Theory
Game theory Chapter 28 and 29
11b – Game Theory This web quiz may appear as two pages on tablets and laptops. I recommend that you view it as one page by clicking on the open book icon.
Learning 6.2 Game Theory.
Game Theory Lesson 15 Section 65.
Game Theory: The Nash Equilibrium
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 of 13 So... What’s Game Theory? Game theory refers to a branch of applied math that deals with the strategic interactions between various ‘agents’, or players. Agents choose strategies based on information about the strategies of other players in an attempt to maximize the return of their actions. Provides a formal model for economic social situations that involve the interactions of two or more parties in negotiations.

Slide 2 of 13 Let’s Lay Down Some Framework… Simultaneous vs. Sequential: Simultaneous games are those in which players act without knowledge of previous actions or outcomes. Sequential games refer to those in which players have some knowledge of previous actions Perfect Information: all players know the moves previously made by all other players (examples include chess, go, and mancala)

Slide 3 of 13 Games Can Get Funky Symmetric Games: Payoffs depend only on the strategies employed, not on the players employing them (examples: prisoner’s dilema, chicken) Asymmetric: non-identical strategy sets for each player (example: dictator game) Zero Sum Games: applicable to real-life situations; players can neither increase nor decrease available resources, but rather benefit at the expense of other players (examples: poker, chess) Non-zero games: combinations of strategies have a net sum that doesn’t = zero; one player’s gain does not necessarily correspond with another’s loss (example: prisoner’s dilemma)

Slide 4 of 13 Nash Equilibrium Solution concept for a game involving two or more players No player benefits from changing his or her strategy while other strategies remain unchanges Player A is making the best decision A can, taking into account Player B's decision, and B is making the best decision B can, taking into account A's decision.

Slide 5 of 13 How are Games Represented? Normal Form (Matrix) Used for games with only one decision by each player N player game = N-Dimensional matrix, with the payoffs for each player in the cell To the right, general matrix for a 2- player, 2-strategy game (Player 1) Strategy A (Player 1) Strategy B (Player 2) Strategy AP(A,A)P(B,A) (Player 2) Strategy BP(A,B)P(B,B)

Slide 6 of 13 How are Games Represented? Extensive Form (Tree) Used when order of decision is important or when each player has more than one move Used for many commonly known games  Chess  Checkers  Go  Tic-Tac-Toe Example 2-player, 2-branching tree on right

Slide 7 of 13 Prisoner’s Dilemma - Intro Two criminals can turn evidence on the other or remain silent If they both cooperate (remain silent), they each only get 1 year If one cooperates and one defects (turns evidence), the one that defected gets 0 years and the one that cooperated gets 5 years If they both defect, they each get 3 years What is the best strategy? (Player 1) Cooperate (Player 1) Defect (Player 2) Cooperate1,10,5 (Player 2) Defect0,53,3

Slide 8 of 13 Prisoner’s Dilemma - Analysis If other player cooperates, defecting gives less time in jail (0 vs. 1) If other player defects, defecting gives less time in jail (3 vs. 5) Defecting is a dominant strategy (best no matter what) What does this mean? For any single game, defection is the best option If the games are iterative, but independent (i.e. it is impossible for your strategy in one game affect your opponent’s strategy in another game), defection is the best option If games are iterative, but not independent?  Becomes a tree-based, multi-move game to which this analysis no longer applies (Player 1) Cooperate (Player 1) Defect (Player 2) Cooperate1,10,5 (Player 2) Defect0,53,3

Slide 9 of 13 Pirate Game: A Sample Complex Analysis A group of pirates splits up loot in the following manner Pirates are ranked #1 through #N by seniority Pirate 1 makes a proposal for splitting gold, which is voted on (“Yes” or “No”) by all pirates If at least half vote yes, proposal passes Otherwise, Pirate 1 is thrown overboard, everyone moves up a rank, and the process repeats Assuming pirates are rational and wish to maximize, in order of importance, survival, wealth, and rank, how would 5 pirates split up 100 gold pieces?

Slide 10 of 13 Pirate Game: A Sample Complex Analysis Of the proposals by pirate 1 which pass, which maximizes his utility? For at least 2 other pirates, utility from “Yes” must be more than utility from “No” Utility from “Yes” can be set by pirate 1 What is utility for pirates 2-5 for saying “No”?  Utility for those pirates from Pirate 2’s proposal

Slide 11 of 13 Pirate Game: A Sample Complex Analysis Work backwards Pirate 4 – Needs 0 extra votes  Distribution is {0,0,0,100,0}

Slide 12 of 13 Pirate Game: A Sample Complex Analysis Work backwards Pirate 4 – Needs 0 extra votes  Distribution is {0,0,0,100,0} Pirate 3 – Needs 1 extra vote  Can buy vote from 5 for 1 gold  Distribution is {0,0,99,0,1}

Slide 13 of 13 Pirate Game: A Sample Complex Analysis Work backwards Pirate 4 – Needs 0 extra votes  Distribution is {0,0,0,100,0} Pirate 3 – Needs 1 extra vote  Can buy vote from 5 for 1 gold  Distribution is {0,0,99,0,1} Pirate 2 – Needs 1 extra vote  Can buy vote from 4 for 1 gold  Distribution is {0,99,0,1,0}

Slide 14 of 13 Pirate Game: A Sample Complex Analysis Work backwards Pirate 4 – Needs 0 extra votes  Distribution is {0,0,0,100,0} Pirate 3 – Needs 1 extra vote  Can buy vote from 5 for 1 gold  Distribution is {0,0,99,0,1} Pirate 2 – Needs 1 extra vote  Can buy vote from 4 for 1 gold  Distribution is {0,99,0,1,0} Pirate 1 – Needs 2 extra votes  Can buy vote from 3 and 5 for 1 each  Distribution is {98,0,1,0,1}

Slide 15 of 13 Pirate Game: A Sample Complex Analysis Work backwards Pirate 4 – Needs 0 extra votes  Distribution is {0,0,0,100,0} Pirate 3 – Needs 1 extra vote  Can buy vote from 5 for 1 gold  Distribution is {0,0,99,0,1} Pirate 2 – Needs 1 extra vote  Can buy vote from 4 for 1 gold  Distribution is {0,99,0,1,0} Pirate 1 – Needs 2 extra votes  Can buy vote from 3 and 5 for 1 each  Distribution is {98,0,1,0,1} Final answer: {98,0,1,0,1}

Slide 16 of 13 The Stag Hunt Conflict modeling benefits of social cooperation: suggested by Rousseau as a model for the social contract Each player can choose to hunt a hare or a stag. If he hunts a stag, he must have the cooperation of his partner in order to succeed. An individual can get a hare by himself, but a hare is worth less than a stag Let’s examine a payoff matrix!

Slide 17 of 13 Stag Hunt: The Payoff StagHare Stag4,41,3 Hare3,13,3 Let a>b>or=d>c While each player choosing a hare would represent a Nash Equilibrium, it would not represent the maximum payoff Interestingly, the greatest payoff results from mutual cooperation between the players. This requires, however, an element of trust between members of society. StagHare StagA, aC, b HareB, cD, d