DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Co-phasing JWST during commissioning using Dispersed Hartmann Sensing or Dispersed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMSC 2006 Orlando Active Alignment System for the LSST William J. Gressler LSST Project National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) Scott Sandwith New.
Advertisements

M3 Instrument Design and Expected Performance Robert O. Green 12 May 2005.
Science with the Near-Infrared Camera on the James Webb Space Telescope Hubble Science Briefing Looking Forward to our Deepest View of the Universe: December.
Géraldine Guerri Post-doc CSL
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Towards Creation of a JWST Astrometric Reference Field: Calibration of HST/ACS Absolute Scale and Rotation Roeland van der Marel Jay Anderson, Colin Cox,
FLAO Alignment Procedures G. Brusa, S. Esposito FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Sivaramakrishnan JWST Commissioning STScI May Commissioning JWST Anand Sivaramakrishnan.
LBT AGW units Design Review Mar.2001 General Concept Performance specifications and goals The off-axis unit The mechanical support structure The control.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Requirements Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
NGAO Instrumentation Cost Drivers and Cost Savings September 2008 Sean Adkins.
NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 31 st March 2010.
PLATO kick-off meeting 09-Nov-2010 PLATO Payload overall architecture.
James Webb Space Telescope and its Instruments George Rieke (MIRI Expert) & Marcia Rieke (NIRCam Expert) Steward Observatory, University of Arizona The.
James Webb Space Telescope and its Instruments John Stansberry Steward Observatory, University of Arizona The First Light in the Universe: Discovering.
Some large-telescope design parameter considerations: Distributed pupil telescopes J.R.Kuhn Institute for Astronomy, UH How to “distribute the glass” in.
Freiburg, May 2011 EST Design Study. End of Phase-III Meeting European Solar Telescope Design Study End of Phase III Meeting WP Instrument.
Mark Clampin Observatory Project Scientist Goddard Space Flight Center 217 th American Astronomical Society Meeting JWST Telescope Optics: Progress Report.
Introducing JWST’s NIRISS: The Near InfraRed Imager & Slitless Spectrograph TIPS/JIM 2011 September 15 Alex Fullerton STScI / HIA.
Cophasing activities at Onera
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
Printed by ACS 2 Gyro Mode Data Analysis Cheryl Pavlovsky, Marco Sirianni, Ken Sembach, ACS Instrument Team and the 2 Gyro Mode Team.
19 February 2009 Cophasing sensor for synthetic aperture optics applications First steps of the development of a cophasing sensor for synthetic aperture.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
NIRCam ETU Testing at LMATC, Palo Alto Kailash C. Sahu.
The Observations of LAMOST Jianrong Shi NAOC 1/
IVC : a simulation and model-fitting tool for optical-IR interferometry Abstract I present a new software tool, called “Interferometry Visibility Computations”
The JWST Point Spread Function: Calculation Methods and Expected Properties TIPS/JIM Meeting Russell B. Makidon Stefano Casertano, Colin Cox, & Roeland.
First results of the tests campaign in VISIBLE in VISIBLE for the demonstrator 12 October 2007 SNAP Collaboration Meeting Paris Marie-Hélène Aumeunier.
Science with the new HST after SM4 WFC3 slitless spectroscopy Harald Kuntschner Martin Kümmel, Jeremy R. Walsh (ST-ECF) WFC3-team at STScI and NASA.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
AST 443/PHY 517 : Observational Techniques November 6, 2007 ASTROMETRY By: Jackie Faherty.
 PLATO PLAnetary Transits & Oscillations of stars Data onboard treatment PPLC study February 2009 on behalf of Reza Samadi for the PLATO data treatment.
1 High-order coronagraphic phase diversity: demonstration of COFFEE on SPHERE. B.Paul 1,2, J-F Sauvage 1, L. Mugnier 1, K. Dohlen 2, D. Mouillet 3, T.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.
1 JWST Functional Flow Diagrams and Schematic Block Diagrams.
D. Measurement Approach Phil Hinz Principal Investigator.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
NIRCam at a Glance. The JWST Observatory Coffee 5/02/2013 2/24, Diameter: 6.5 m.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s & A.
WFIRST DRM2 candidate design – payload summary At SDT7 3/1-2/2012 consensus for concepts w/out overlap w/ other mission, aka “DRM2” was: 1.1m aperture,
Large Dynamic Range Co- Phasing System Development for Segmented Telescope Mirrors Juan F Simar – ARC Phd Student Centre Spatial de Liège Université de.
Periscope Configuration
The INS NIRCam Team.
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
NIRISS NRM bad pixel tolerance analysis David Lafrenière 2012 February 21.
NIC3 FOM Dithered Observations of the Orion Nebula Eddie Bergeron, STScI.
WFC3 SMOV Report for TIPS 16 July 2009 John MacKenty This presentation contains material that is embargoed until after the SM4 ERO press conference. Images/spectra.
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
“Phase C” Design of the JWST/FGS Tunable Filter Imager TIPS/JIM June 15, 2006 Alex Fullerton STScI / UVic.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
X-ray Interferometer Mirror Module ISAL Study Pre-work Overview.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35-Diffraction.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
Integral Field Spectrograph Eric Prieto LAM. How to do 3D spectroscopy.
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Single Object Slitless Spectroscopy Simulations
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
JWST NIRCam Time Series Observations
Chris Willott, Loic Albert, René Doyon, and the FGS/NIRISS Team
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
The Medium Resolution Spectrometer on behalf of the MRS team
Instrument Characterization: Status
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
Coarse phasing JWST using Non- Redundant Tilts (NRT) in TFI a back-up method requiring no extra hardware Anand Sivaramakrishnan JWST TFI Science Team.
Presentation transcript:

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Co-phasing JWST during commissioning using Dispersed Hartmann Sensing or Dispersed Fringe Sensing Anand Sivaramakrishnan Telescopes Branch, Instrument Division Space Telescope Science Institute methods developed by Paul Atcheson, Scott Acton (Ball), Fang Shi (JPL)

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Commissioning Process – Operational Performance Assumptions <100  m seg piston, <200 nm rms WFE <100 nm rms WFE setpoint 150 nm rms WFE worst case decay 2. Coarse Phasing/ Fine Guiding <1  m rms WFE, <8 marcsec LOS jitter Commission Maintenance OTE arcsec 1-  pointing PM segments - <100  m, 1 arcmin wing deployment <100  m ROC, 0.5 arcmin tilt, 100  m piston SM - <3 mm linear position, 5 arcmin tilt PM/SM Deployment 4. Wavefront Monitoring 3. Fine Phasing 1. Coarse Alignment Accomplished in transit to L2 (20 days) As required (~1 hr weekly or monthly) Sensing requirements at each step determine interface parameters – FOV, etc. Control Sense >150  m seg piston, >250 nm rms WFE >1  m rms WFE range, <10 nm accuracy C >>150 nm rms WFE range, <10 nm measurement accuracy S S S C C From Atcheson (BATC)

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Where does Coarse Phasing fit in JWST commissioning? At end of Coarse Alignment < 100 micron segment piston < 200 nm RMS wavefront error (WFE) At end of Coarse Phasing < 1 micron RMS WFE < 8 mas Line of Sight (LOS) jitter Before coarse phasing After guiding After coarse phasing From Atcheson (BATC)

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Actuator Single actuator Gears Large coarse motion Small Fine motion Cryogenic Excellent repeatability

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Radius of Curvature actuator on Ball testbed telescope segment (TBT: same basic design as JWST, smaller size)

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Bipod Actuation Flexures attach actuator to back of segment

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Single segment on Ball testbed telescope segment 3 bipods = 1 hexapod RoC actuator in middle (hanging free from back surface)

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan What is Fringe Sensing? Circular aperture Cut it horizontally across a diameter Offset one half by some piston error (a ‘step’ across the cut) What is the PSF at various wavelengths? PSFs for same piston at different wavelengths

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan x L LL x How is the Fringe Formed? Increases Dark Band Segmented Telescope DFS Grism DFS Fringe Dispersion Wavefront Pistoned Piston Corrected From Fang Shi (JPL) Final data strip on detector

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan DFS fringes from Keck tbd From Fang Shi (JPL) Red dots show 12 subaperture locations, each seeing two segments

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan What is DHS? Place a PRISM over the edge between two adjacent segments prism tilts the resulting spot away from ‘on-axis’ location on detector When sent through GRISM the spot is smeared out in same as a DFS fringe On a different pair of segments use a diffent tilt prism this spot does not overlap the first spot a second DFS-like fringe is created Measure relative piston between all pairs of adjacent segments using a single exposure

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan -30 –20 –10 – microns Simulation code allows user to specify: Center wavelength Width of light spectrum Number of discrete wavelengths in the simulation Percent full well in the images Read noise Dark current Magnitude of star (affects noise due to dark current) Dispersion in X and Y directions Image sampling parameters Assume pupil is 35 mm dia. From Scott Acton (BATC) DHS Simulations

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan DHS observing sequence - summary 1 sensing, 1 check observation (best case) ~5 worst case Slew to target Lock with FGS (on 5x blur) Take two ~100s NIRCam exposures with two pupil wheel positions Downlink data, analyze, determine segment updates Upload actuator commands Take two ~100s NIRCam exposures with two pupil wheel positions Adjust all segments Take two ~100s NIRCam exposures with two pupil wheel positions Downlink data, analyze --- DONE (with good actuators)!

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan DFS for 18-Hex Example: Segment Group Two-grism approach provides optimal visibility for all operations –2 crossed dispersed grisms in NIRcam filter wheel (may have 1 in each of 2 channels) –7 images –First phases segments into rows –Then phases rows to each other –Fine phasing between each “big move” to remove residual tilts Position the groups along a 45º line so that fringes from vertical and horizontal dispersion grism won’t collide The spots are (from lower left): PARKING LOT, Group #1, #2, #3 (middle), #4 and #5 Spots are separated by 1 arcsec in x and y in the simulations Group #1 Group #2 Group #3 Group #4 Group # Tilt test segment pairs (cyan & magenta) away from PARKING LOT From Fang Shi (JPL) PARKING LOT

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan DFS observing block - summary 7 or more iterations (best case) ~20 worst case? · Slew to target · Move N segment pairs out of PARKING LOT · Guide w/FGS on some spot? · Take two NIRCam exposures with grisms in pupil wheel · Command segment tilts to re-arrange segment pairs · Take NIRCam exposures · Repeat till all required segment pairs have been observed · Downlink and analyze, prepare segment updates · Repeat 7 times (or more) till measurement meets spec......

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Simple FGS operation Catastrophic pupil misregistration of grism assembly is fatal Monotonic improvement of PSF with each iteration Measurement does not require actuation 5 days to coarse phase if actuators misbehave Ground verification needs work during I&T DHS is the baseline approach DHS Strengths/weaknesses

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan DFS strength/risks Strengths –Catastrophic pupil misalignment not an issue Risks –Non-monotonic image quality during process –Measurement requires actuation –Many more iterations with single grism –20 days to coarse phase if actuators misbehave (possibly fatal) DFS is the fallback approach