October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri1 Application of the pyramid wavefront sensor to the cophasing of large segmented telescopes F. Quirós-Pacheco,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The GMT NGS WFS design Presented by S. Esposito. The team L. Fini G. Agapito L. Carbonaro A. Puglisi L. Busoni V. Biliotti A. Riccardi S. Esposito E.
Advertisements

Fast & Furious: a potential wavefront reconstructor for extreme adaptive optics at ELTs Visa Korkiakoski and Christoph U. Keller Leiden Observatory Niek.
The Giant Magellan Telescope Phasing System
The adaptive secondary mirror. Current technology for MMT/LBT A. Riccardi 1, G. Brusa 1, C. Del Vecchio 1, P. Salinari 1, R. Biasi 2, M. Andrighettoni.
Halftoning for High-Contrast Imaging P. Martinez 1 C. Dorrer 2, E. Aller Carpentier 1, M. Kasper 1, A. Boccaletti 3, and K. Dohlen 4 1 European Southern.
Géraldine Guerri Post-doc CSL
Vision and Revision Wavefront Sensing from the Image Domain Benjamin
Na- Laser guide star AO with dynamical refocus
“TUNABLE FILTER TECNIQUE :” A phase ambiguity solution with PYramid Phasing Sensor (PYPS)
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
ASTRO 2233 Fall 2010 Adaptive Optics, Interferometry and Planet Detection Lecture 16 Thursday October 21, 2010.
A Short Presentation of Ongoing AO Work at Lund Observatory Mette Owner-Petersen Lund Observatory Workshop for “Forskarskolen i Rymdteknik” Gothenburg.
Don Gavel: Keck NGAO meeting April 25, LAO Activities Relevant To Keck NGAO Donald Gavel NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 26, 2007.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
Telescope Errors for NGAO Christopher Neyman & Ralf Flicker W. M. Keck Observatory Keck NGAO Team Meeting #4 January 22, 2007 Hualalai Conference Room,
Some large-telescope design parameter considerations: Distributed pupil telescopes J.R.Kuhn Institute for Astronomy, UH How to “distribute the glass” in.
Cophasing activities at Onera
8 September Observational Astronomy TELESCOPES, Active and adaptive optics Kitchin pp
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Adaptive Optics with Adaptive Filtering and Control Steve Gibson Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Los Angeles
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
19 February 2009 Cophasing sensor for synthetic aperture optics applications First steps of the development of a cophasing sensor for synthetic aperture.
Exoplanet Exploration Program Starshade and Coronagraph Technology Gaps and Paths to Close Them Peter Lawson and Nick Siegler Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
GLAO simulations at ESO European Southern Observatory
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
1 Manal Chebbo, Alastair Basden, Richard Myers, Nazim Bharmal, Tim Morris, Thierry Fusco, Jean-Francois Sauvage Fast E2E simulation tools and calibration.
IVC : a simulation and model-fitting tool for optical-IR interferometry Abstract I present a new software tool, called “Interferometry Visibility Computations”
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
An Approach to Stabilizing Large Telescopes for Stellar Interferometry It shakes like a…. [G. Vasisht, 31 March 2006] N. Di Lieto J. Sahlmann, G. Vasisht,
1 1 st Light AO 4 LBT Pyramid WFS Adaptive Secondary MMT Unit.
1 Characterization of the T/T conditions at Gemini Using AO data Jean-Pierre Véran Lisa Poyneer AO4ELT Conference - Paris June , 2009.
Strehl Ratio estimation. SR from H band images High Strehl PSF ->fitting with Zernike modes We suppose: No relevant loss of energy due to high modes (Z>36)
Gary Chanan Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Irvine 4 February 2000.
1 High-order coronagraphic phase diversity: demonstration of COFFEE on SPHERE. B.Paul 1,2, J-F Sauvage 1, L. Mugnier 1, K. Dohlen 2, D. Mouillet 3, T.
1 MCAO at CfAO meeting M. Le Louarn CfAO - UC Santa Cruz Nov
A global approach to ELT instrument developments J.-G. Cuby for the French ELT WG.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Experimental results of tomographic reconstruction on ONERA laboratory WFAO bench A. Costille*, C. Petit*, J.-M. Conan*, T. Fusco*, C. Kulcsár**, H.-F.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 1 Adaptive Optics Requirements, Concepts, and Performance.
Wide-field wavefront sensing in Solar Adaptive Optics - its modeling and its effects on reconstruction Clémentine Béchet, Michel Tallon, Iciar Montilla,
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
The Adaptive Mirror for the E-ELT
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova A study of Pyramid WFS behavior under imperfect illumination Valentina Viotto Demetrio Magrin Maria Bergomi Marco Dima.
Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
The Self-Coherent Camera: a focal plane wavefront sensor for EPICS
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Telescope Phasing Slides Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Large Dynamic Range Co-Phasing System Development for Segmented Telescope Mirrors Piston and Tip/Tilt expected errors The initial error after deployment.
Preparing the optical calibration of the M4-Deformable mirror for the E-ELT Briguglio, R., Pariani, G., Xompero, M., Riccardi, A. ADONI meeting, Firenze.
Characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence & Systems engineering François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz)
Smart co-phasing system for segmented mirror telescopes SPIE: Juan F Simar* a, Yvan Stockman a, Jean Surdej b a Centre Spatial de Liège, LIEGE.
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
SPHERE – SAXO Performance status
M. Beaulieu, L. Abe, P. Martinez, P. Baudoz C. Gouvret
Adaptive optics Now: Soon: High angular resolution
Calibration Plan Chris Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory April 20, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri1 Application of the pyramid wavefront sensor to the cophasing of large segmented telescopes F. Quirós-Pacheco, E. Pinna, S. Esposito, A. Puglisi, P. Stefanini, M. Bonaglia, F. Pieralli

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri2Contents Part I. Introduction – Segmentation: optical effects – The Active Phase Experiment (APE). Part II. Phasing with the Pyramid Phasing Sensor (PYPS) – PYPS simulations: effect of atmospheric turbulence – PYPS interaction matrix calibration issues – PYPS experimental closed-loop results obtained in Arcetri laboratories – Conclusions and Perspectives

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri3 Segmented Telescopes 10-m class telescopes: – Keck I, II and Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC) – 36 hexagonal segments (1.80m-diameter each) Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs): – Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT): 738 hexagonal segments (1.2m-diameter each) – European ELT (E-ELT): 42m-diameter primary mirror. >900 hexagonal segments (~1.45m-diameter each) KECK IIE-ELTTMT

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri4 Segmented Telescopes 10-m class telescopes: – Keck I and II – Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC) Optical design: – Ritchey-Chrétien (f/1.75) – Primary mirror: 36 hexagonal segments. – Segment diameter: 1.80 m KECK II GTC

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri5 Segmentation: optical effects Effects of segment misalignments on the Point Spread Function (PSF): – Appearance of additional diffraction patterns. Random piston errors → speckle distribution. Random tip/tilt errors → Regular structure of diffraction peaks. – Loss of the intensity in the central peak → loss of Strehl Ratio. For random piston errors δp (wf rms) (Chanan, Ap. Opt. 1999): ELT case → tighter tolerances. For high-contrast applications (e.g. exoplanet search) errors should be less than /40 rms. New phasing techniques are required. Simulated PSF for a 61-segmented mirror with a distribution of piston errors. (N. Yaitskova et. al., JOSAA 2003) Keck precision: <50 nm surf rms δp  1  m S R =68%

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri6 Active Alignment System Reconstruction Matrix (M) Positioning Actuators (Piston, Tip and Tilt) Measurement vector from position sensors Reference position vector + - S ref S e = S - S ref d = Me Actuator Commands (d) © Keck

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri7 Optical Phasing and Active Alignment Control Initial Optical Phasing: – After segments integration/replacement. – From big errors (>100  m) down to few nm. – Initial reference position is recorded. Active Alignment Control: – Closed-loop system to keep segments aligned during scientific observations. – Position sensors measure variations from reference position (e.g. due to gravity, thermal gradients, or small wind buffeting). – Sampling frequency: 2 or 3 Hz. Periodical Optical Phasing: – Required to follow-up drifts in position sensors. – Keck: two/three times per month. – ELTs: may be required at the beginning of each night. Optical closed-loop Phasing: – Under study for E-ELT – Optical phasing running during the scientific observation. – Small sampling frequency: ~0.03 Hz – A suitable star should be located within the FoV. Positioning Actuators (Piston, Tip and Tilt) © Keck

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri8 Active Phase Experiment (APE) APE is a technical instrument for the VLT. Part of ELT Design Study funded by FP6. Goals of the APE experiment: – Test new phasing sensors and their related phasing control algorithms for the ELT case. – Study the integration of phasing control into a global scheme of segmented-telescope active control (i.e. Active Optics, Field Stabilization, etc). Phasing sensors: – DIPSI (Curvature) – PYPS (Pyramid) – ZEUS (Phase contrast interferometer) – SHAPS (Shack-Hartmann) Active Segmented Mirror (ASM): – 61 hexagonal segments (4 rings). – Piston, tip and tilt control. – Precision: <2 nm piston; – Max stroke: >15  m. N. Yaitskova, et. al., SPIE Vol. 6267, 2006

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri9 The pyramid sensor is sensitive to phase steps: Analytical (E. Pinna, Tesi di Laurea, 2004) Numerical Experimental (S. Esposito et. al., O.L., 2005) Phasing with the pyramid segment Big local WF derivative!

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri10 PYPS phasing techniques Initial Phasing – Wavelength sweeping technique Huge capture range (>50  m) but low precision. – Segment sweeping technique For high-precision reference position. Periodical phasing – Mono-wavelength / Multi-wavelength techniques – Capture range in closed-loop operation: ±λ/2 – Filtering techniques developed to get rid of the atmospheric- turbulence disturbance in an efficient way. Calibration requirements – Interaction Matrix Acquisition Acquired on the sky (i.e. affected by atmospheric turbulence). Synthetically generated (i.e. based on a simulation tool). M. Bonaglia, tesi di Laurea, 2007PYPS Acceptance Test Report, 2007 PYPS Signal

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri11 Pyramid Phasing Sensor (PYPS)

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri12 PYPS simulations Evaluate the effect of atmospheric turb. Simulation characteristics: – Closed-loop control (piston, tip and tilt) of ASM’s segments. – PYPS end-to-end model. Sampling: 6 subapertures/side. Modulation radius: ~ / r 0 – Atmospheric turbulence: n f independent turbulence realizations averaged at each closed-loop iteration. nfnf Final WFEn tot =15n f Equivalent time * 560 nm750.5 min 1040 nm1501 min 4020 nm6004 min * Considering that two turbulence realizations become de-correlated after 0.4s

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri13 PYPS experiments at Arcetri Experimental Setup: – Reflecting phase screen: s=0.6’’ for 8-m telescope. Wind speed equivalent to 15 m/s – MEMS (Boston  SLM140): 12x12 squared segments. Pitch: 300  m. Piston: 20 nm resolution, max stroke 2  m (in wavefront). – Optical design: 3 mm system pupil. 10 segments across pupil.

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri14 Interaction Matrix Acquisition Interaction Matrix Masking (IMM): – Removes turbulence signal wide-spread over the whole pupil. – Allows to perform a parallel interaction matrix acquisition. Interaction Matrix acquired on the sky (i.e. affected by turbulence)

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri15 Mono-λ Closed-loop Phasing Narrow band filter selected: CW700nm-BW40nm Initial piston error: >100 nm wf rms A total of 50 MEMS segments controlled Filtering technique applied: – Low-order removal (LOR). – Removes low-order aberrations mostly due to turbulence. – Implementation: n z Zernikes (starting with piston) removed from to WFS signals at each closed-loop iteration.

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri16 LOR experimental results Lab conclusions: LOR filtering technique allows to reduce integration time by factor ~10. Expected on the sky: factor ~100. E. Pinna, F. Quirós-Pacheco, S. Esposito, A. Puglisi, P. Stefanini, Signal spatial filtering for co-phasing in seeing-limited conditions, Optics Letters (Accepted).

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri17 Synthetic IM Calibration Synthetic Calibration: – Interaction Matrix generated ‘synthetically’ using a calibrated end-to- end simulation tool. – Critical model parameters: Pupil registration (pupil radius and center coordinates) Sampling factor (number of subapertures). Experimental Results: – 36 MEMS actuators controlled in piston. – Integrator gain needs fine-tuning. – Synthetic and measured IMs provide a comparable final precision (<10 nm wf rms). SXSX SYSY Four simulated sub-pupils

October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri18 Conclusions and Perspectives Phasing control algorithms for the Pyramid Phasing Sensor (PYPS) validated in the laboratory. Atmospheric-turbulence filtering techniques that improve final phasing precision and converge time were developed and tested. Interaction Matrix Calibration: Both ‘on-sky’ and synthetic acquisition demonstrated. PYPS passed its Acceptance Test on April 2007 with a visiting committee from ESO. PYPS will be integrated on the APE bench (held at ESO Garching) by the end of the year. Garching: Experiments to compare different phasing sensors in first- half of Paranal: On-sky tests: End 2008 / Beginning 2009 (TBD).