Air Quality Surveillance Branch (AQSB) Air Monitoring Operations Patrick Vaca.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 3 Air Quality.
Advertisements

Current Activities on Urban Air Pollution in Cambodia
Earth Science 17.1A Atmosphere Characteristics
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
Monitoring Air Quality: Emissions and Odor From A Swine Finishing Livestock Facility.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Why do we lose analyzer data? Monitor malfunction DAS malfunction Power outages Environmental problems Wildlife damage Vandalism Operator error.
Twinning Project RO2006/IB/EN/09 1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Discussion Space Research Centre. Urbanization and Industrialization: in 2008, more than half of humans live in cities UN Population Report 2007.
Part 5. Human Activities Chapter 14 Human Effects: Air Pollution and Heat Islands.
Air Quality Monitoring In Singapore
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Gas Analyzer Theory of Operation
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
Ozone and Ozone Monitoring 2015 National Tribal Forum Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist III Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center Institute for.
1 Suburban air quality monitoring. Measuring Air Pollution in the Mid-Atlantic United States Bebhinn Do Meteorologist, NC DAQ Some slide material provided.
Division of Air Quality -- Ambient Monitoring -- EMC Member Continuing Education Session Donnie Redmond Section Chief March 7, 2012.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10.
Presented by: Mike Hamdan South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA Presented at: The Tribal Air Monitoring Training, Pechanga Reservation,
Dr. Martin T. Auer MTU Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Air Quality and Pollution Control.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Energy & Its Impact on Global Society Jerome K. Williams, Ph.D. Saint Leo University Dept. Mathematics & Sciences.
Chapter 14 Human Effects: Air Pollution and Heat Islands.
Criteria Pollutants Criteria pollutants selected because they are ubiquitous, have multiple sources, and "may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public.
AIR POLLUTION - CONTINUED. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to set standards for 6 “criteria” air pollutants. We have talked about two - particulates and.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Precursor Gas Quality Assurance Implementation Dennis K. Mikel EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Air Quality, Atmospheric Deposition, and Lake Tahoe October 15, 2003 Western Regional Pollution Prevention Network Grannlibakken, Lake Tahoe Jim Pederson.
Class #13: Friday, July 23 Air Pollution Chapter 18 1Class #13 Friday, July 23, 2010.
1 Dec. 8, 1997 LEADS Quality Assurance Summary Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A Management of Air Quality Monitoring Data Debbie Miller National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior.
Air Pollution Dr. R. B. Schultz.
What Does a Tribal Air Program Look Like? James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians Environmental Department.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. The Atmosphere: An Introduction to Meteorology, 12 th Lutgens Tarbuck Lectures by: Heather Gallacher, Cleveland.
Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS)
Modeling Overview For Barrio Logan Community Health Neighborhood Assessment Program Andrew Ranzieri Vlad Isakov Tony Servin Shuming Du October 10, 2001.
Field Methods of Monitoring Atmospheric Systems Measurement of Air Pollution Copyright © 2009 by DBS.
Inter-Tribal Environmental Council (ITEC) Clean Air Projects
Climate, Air Quality and Noise Graham Latonas Gartner Lee Limited RWDI Air Inc.
CARB Continuous PM 2.5 Monitoring Activity (BAM’s) Reggie Smith California Air Resources Board.
Estimate of Air Emissions from Shale Gas Development and Production in North Carolina July 8, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission.
Air Dispersion Modeling City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department Air Quality Program Director: Mary Lou Leonard.
Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.
2011 National Air Quality Conferences March , 2011 Development of the USEPA Quality Assurance Guidance for the Collection of Meteorological Data.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Integrating GHG Programs in an ISO EMS 33rd National Energy & Environmental Conference Loews Ventana Canyon Resort Tucson, Arizona Presented by:
Visual Correlation between Air Pollution and Population Density in Major Metropolitan Areas Texas A&M University, Department of Civil Engineering, Applications.
What’s on the Horizon? Allabelle Allison ITEP/TAMS Center.
An Overview of EPA’s Quality Assurance Guidance for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Data Analysis and Interpretation February 12 – 14, 2008, Tempe,
Air Quality Aneta Stefanovska Advisor in international and local eco-networks ETC –ACC visit and regional meeting of West Balkans countries Skopje,
Clean Air Act SAFE 210. Purpose Protect public health and regulate air emissions Addresses both stationary and mobile sources.
Division of Air Quality Ambient Monitoring Donnie Redmond Section Chief May 7, 2014.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
Janice Lam Snyder, SMAQMD December 11, 2015
1 Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Network Update Pat Vaca, Air Pollution Specialist
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
Fresno NCore Monitoring Deployment Status Presentation April 12, 2011 by: Joe Cruz Air Pollution Specialist, CARB.
Air Quality Monitoring ENV 4101/5105 Elements of Air Pollution 3/3/20161 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Atmospheric Deposition Unit 4451 Research on Air Pollution Distribution and Effects in California Mountains Andrzej Bytnerowicz, Michael Arbaugh, Nancy.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
What Causes Air Pollution?
Session 4: Air Pollution Measurements
Control of Air pollution
The Clean Air Act By Jessi Walker Per 2.
Major Air Pollutants: Part 1
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Air Pollutants 200 Air pollutants are recognized and assessed by the USEPA Listed in the Clean Air Act.
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Presentation transcript:

Air Quality Surveillance Branch (AQSB) Air Monitoring Operations Patrick Vaca

Air Quality Surveillance Branch u Branch Overview u Air Monitoring Fundamentals u Air Quality Monitoring Decisions u Air Quality Monitoring Program u Data Management u AQSB Programs and Special Projects

Air Quality Surveillance Branch u Chief, Bill Oslund u Mission: To support the Board’s control by providing air quality data to help define the nature, extent and trend of the state’s air pollution problem.

Branch Sections (5) u Air Quality Monitoring, North –Manager, Larry Molek u Air Quality Monitoring, Central – Manager, Pete Ouchida u Air Quality Monitoring, South – Manager, Curt Schreiber u Operations Support Section –Manager, Vacant u Special Purpose Monitoring – Manager, Ken Stroud

Regulations u California – Health and Safety Code u USEPA – 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 50 - NAAQS – 40 CFR 53 - Methods – 40 CFR 58 - Monitoring criteria

Definitions u Reference Method u Equivalent Method u Accuracy u Precision u Standard Conditions

Air Quality Monitoring Decisions u Monitoring Objectives u Network Design u Purpose of Monitoring Sites u Scales of Monitoring

Monitoring Objectives u To determine highest concentrations expected to occur in the area covered by network u To determine representative concentrations in areas of high population density u To determine impact on ambient pollution levels of significant source categories u To determine background concentration levels

Network Design u Eventual Use of the Data – Modeling – Baseline conditions – Land use decisions – Planning decisions u Previous Monitoring History

Network Design u Emission Sources – Stationary sources – Mobile sources – Growth and projected new sources u Fugitive Sources u Re-entrained Sources

Network Design u Pollutant Transport u Topography or Terrain u Climatology and Meteorology u Population Levels u Population Centers

Network Design u Available Monitoring Sites u Station Start-up Costs – Equipment – Lease space tenant improvements u Station Operation Costs – Equipment operation and maintenance – Station costs (lease payments, heating, etc..) – Support Personnel (spare parts, repair, etc..)

Purpose of Monitoring Sites u State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) u Nat’l Air Monitoring Stations (NAMS) u Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) u Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) u Special Purpose Monitoring (SPM)

Scales of Monitoring u Microscale – Concentrations in air volumes from several meters up to 100 meters u Middle Scale – Concentrations in air volumes from 100 meters up to about.5 Km u Neighborhood – Concentrations in air volumes from.5 Km to 4 Km

Scales of Monitoring u Urban – Concentrations in air volumes from 4 to 50 Km u Regional – Concentrations in rural air volumes from tens to hundreds of Km u National and Global – Concentrations in air volumes from representing a nation or the world as a whole

Monitoring Objectives and Scale Monitoring ObjectiveAppropriate Siting Scales Highest Concentration Population Source Impact General / Background Micro, Middle, Neighborhood (sometimes Urban) Neighborhood, Urban Micro, Middle, Neighborhood Neighborhood, Regional, Global

Station Configuration u ARB has a standard configuration u District may have their own configuration parameters

Station Siting u 40 CFR 58 - Siting Guidelines u If Not Properly Sited - Cannot Rely on Results u Each Pollutant Has Different Requirements Based on Pollutant Properties u Siting Criteria Also Dependent on: – Objective – Purpose – Scale

Air Monitoring Instrumentation u Gaseous – Ozone, CO, NO x, HC, SO 2 u Meteorological Instruments u Particulate u Toxics u Calibration Instrumentation

Ambient Air Monitoring Program u Criteria Pollutants u Meteorological u Particulate u Toxics u Acid Deposition

Criteria Pollutant Monitoring u Gaseous Criteria Pollutants – Ozone – Carbon Monoxide – Nitrogen Dioxide – Sulfur Dioxide

Ozone u Colorless gas with a pungent, irritating odor u Continuously monitored with analyzers that measure the amount of UV absorbed by molecular ozone u Sampling Method (Ultraviolet Photometry) u Equivalent Method

Ozone  Standards LevelTime 0.12 ppm 0.08 ppm 1 hr 8 hr California Federal 0.09 ppm 1 hr

Ozone u Analyzers – UV Analyzers – Mercury lamp (UV Source) – Analytical wavelength = 254 nm u Dasibi 1003AH u API 400

UV Analyzer

Carbon Monoxide u Colorless, odorless gas u Continuously monitored with analyzers that take advantage of its strong tendency to absorb IR radiation u Sampling Method (Non-Dispersive Infared Radiation, NDIR) u Reference Method

Carbon Monoxide  Standards LevelTime 9 ppm 35 ppm California Federal 9 ppm * 20 ppm 8 hr 1 hr 8 hr 1 hr * except Lake Tahoe: 6 ppm

Carbon Monoxide u Analyzers – NDIR – Gas Filter Correlation – Analytical wavelength 4.7  m u TECO 48 u Dasibi 3008

NDIR Analyzer

Nitrogen Dioxide u Reddish-brown gas, with irritating odor u Continuously monitored indirectly with analyzers that measure total oxides of nitrogen u Sampling Method (Gas Phase Chemiluminescence) u Reference Method

Nitrogen Dioxide u Standards Level Time ppm California Federal 0.25 ppm 1 hr annual average

Nitrogen Dioxide u Analyzers – Chemiluminescence – NO + O 3 NO 2 + h ( nm) – High energy to generate O 3 – Directly measure NO only – Reduce NO 2 to NO in converter – Measure total NO x – Calculate NO 2 by difference (NOx - NO) u TECO 14B and TECO 42

Chemiluminescence Analyzer

Sulfur Dioxide u Colorless gas, with a strong suffocating odor u Continuously monitored with analyzers that measure the level of fluorescence emitted by SO2 after being exposed to UV light u Sampling Method (UV Fluorescence) u Equivalent Method

Sulfur Dioxide u Standards LevelTime 0.03 ppm * 0.14 ppm ** 0.5 ppm ** California Federal 0.04 ppm 0.25 ppm 24 hr 1 hr annual average 24 hr 3 hr * primary; ** secondary

Sulfur Dioxide u Analyzers – Fluorescence analyzers – UV excitation light (210 nm) – Measure emitted light (350 nm) u TECO 43

Fluorescence Analyzer

Calibration Equipment u Required to perform nightly calibrations u Equipment –Dilution Calibration Systems –Pure Air Generator –Certified Cylinder Gases

Meteorological Monitoring Program u Transport of pollutants u Modeling u Ag Burn u Met One Instruments u EPA QA Handbook Volume IV

Meteorological Instruments u Wind Direction u Wind Speed u Temperature u Relative Humidity u Rain Fall u Atmospheric Pressure

Data Management u Data Quality Objectives (DQO’s) u Quality Control – Instrument technician training – Periodic training on existing and new equipment – Documentation – Equipment calibrations

Data Management u Quality of data – Accuracy and Precision – Completeness u Valid Hour and Day – 30 continuous minutes in any one hr – 24 hr period must have in each 8 hr segment ( , , ) at least 6 hrs of valid hourly data

Data Management u Data Review and Editing – Air Quality Data Acquisition System (AQDAS) » Collects and processes data from statewide air monitoring network – First, second, third level reviews – Checked against strip charts and calibrations – Complete data set – Reviewed for accuracy and consistency

Data Management u Data Submittal – Upload to Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) database – Air Quality Data Actions » data deletion » data correction

AQSB Programs and Special Projects u AQDAS II u Mobile Air Monitoring (Rover’s) u Remote Meteorological Monitoring (Profiler’s) u Saturation Sampling u Instrument Intercomparison Study u Mexico Border Monitoring

AQDAS II u Next generation data acquisition system u Network of Local Area Networks (LAN’s) using Environmental Monitoring Company (EMC) PC based software u Provide central database for air monitoring data u Data collected and edited on central system u Generate data in AIRS format

Mobile Air Monitoring (Rover) u Short to medium ambient air monitoring u Full air monitoring stations u Two platforms –GMC Van (Blue Rover) –Wells Cargo Trailer (White Rover) u Current deployments –Tecate, Mexico –San Diego (Barrio Logan District)

Blue Rover

White Rover

Saturation Sampling u Provide rapid and cost effective temporal and spacial distribution of pollutants u Sampler consists of (2) 5- liter tedlar bags, PC board, pump and battery u Samples for CO and particulates only

Remote Meteorological Monitoring (Profiler) u Provides upper air meteorological data u Remote sensing doppler radar w/ acoustic sources u Measures horizontal wind speed and direction and virtual temperature profiles

Instrument Intercomparison Study u Bakersfield monitoring station (Dec 98 to Jan 99) u Evaluated continuous real-time particulate samplers - for possible purchase u samplers u New technology (Off-shelf and Prototype) u California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQ) u Final report (July 99)

Mexico Border Monitoring u Assist U.S. EPA and SEDESOL (Mexican EPA) in establishing and operating monitoring stations in Tijuana and Mexicali, Mexico u Proposed network to consist of 6 stations in each area (4 full stations, 2 particulate stations) u 10 currently sites operational u Sites operated by contractor

Summary