Introduction to the ILC’s Conventional Magnets For the LCFOA meeting at SLAC Cherrill Spencer, ILC at SLAC 1 st May 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simona Bettoni and Remo Maccaferri, CERN Wiggler modeling Double-helix like option.
Advertisements

CIEMAT technological contributions to linear colliders Fernando ToralGandía, 3/12/2005.
Oct 24, 2007 C.Spencer Magnet EDR Planning 1 GDE Generating Magnet Work Packages: Planning for the Engineering Design Phase Cherrill Spencer, SLAC with.
Operations and Availability GG3. Key decisions Summary of Key Decisions for the Baseline Design The linac will have two parallel tunnels so that the support.
Conventional Magnets Technology Discussion Summary At the LCFOA meeting, 1May at SLAC Cherrill Spencer, ILC at SLAC 2nd May 2006.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Alignment.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Andy Ringwall 1/9/00 ME 217 NLC Magnet Project Andy Ringwall, SLAC, Liaison Jeff Rifkin, SLAC, Liaison Shun Takai,
SLAC ILC Accelerator: Luminosity Production Peter Tenenbaum HEP Program Review June 15, 2005.
EM vs. PM Quads Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Undulator.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Question 27: Outline the key steps for industrialization of machine components and the likely remaining vulnerabilities in achieving them. Achieving industrialization.
19 Nov 08,ILC08Cherrill Spencer Rotating Coil System Description 1 Short description of the SLAC rotating coil system used to measure the CIEMAT-made prototype.
Fermilab July 19, 2006 J. Tompkins -1- RDR Magnet Systems Group Vancouver GDE Meeting Overview J. Tompkins, FNAL.
Gek 16/6/041 ITRP Comments on Question 19 GEK 9/06/04 19) For the X-band (warm) technology, detail the status of the tests of the full rf delivery system.
March 7, 2007 LET Issues (Cai/Kubo/Zisman) Global Design Effort 1 Low-Emittance Tuning Issues and Plans Yunhai Cai, Kiyoshi Kubo and Michael S. Zisman.
Drive beam magnets powering strategy Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko CERN, Electronic Power Converter Group (TE-EPC) OUTLINE : Suggestion of.
ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets 11Mar '08, Weekly MtgCherrill Spencer Status Report ATF2 FD quads 1 Status Report on the ATF2 “Final Doublet” quads being made.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet and Girder Integration Lewis Doom, NSLS-II Project National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) will.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project James T Volk May 2002 Report to MAC on Magnets James T Volk Fermilab May 11, 2002 LBNL Jose Alonso, Jin-Young Jung.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Suggestion Directive from Magnet Systems Group for how to name ILC magnet types Cherrill Spencer, ILC 2 nd May 2006.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
F James T Volk June Permanent Magnets for Linear Colliders James T Volk Fermilab.
Luminosity expectations for the first years of CLIC operation CTC MJ.
Approaching the design of ILC conventional magnets for the RDR Cherrill Spencer, ILC 25 th April 2006.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 1 Impact of Crossing Angle Value on Magnets near the IP Overview of several unusual quadrupole designs that.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
1 The next steps – focusing points Define the scope, strategy and cost of the project implementation. Main input: The evolution of the physics findings.
ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets 14 Sep 2007Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. Cooling Solid Wire Sextupoles 1 Report of the effort to cool an old FFTB solid wire sextupole.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project James T Volk 10/03/2001 Report on Magnet Group Status May 7 th 2002 J Volk, C Spencer, B Parker.
TLCC Themes BAW-2, SLAC, 19 January 2011 Ross Walker Yamamoto 1.
F James T Volk Arpil Permanent Magnets for Linear Colliders James T Volk Fermilab.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
Iranian Light Source Facility, IPM, P.O. Box , Tehran, Iran
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Member of ATF2 Magnet Team
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
May 18, 2000 Stanford University Manufacturing Modeling Lab Shun Takai
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Member of ATF2 Magnet Team
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
DR Magnets & Power Supply System ILC-ADI Meeting March 14, 2012
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
A Cold SCU Phase-Shifter
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
JLEIC Magnet R&D Tim Michalski NP Community Panel Review of the EIC
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the ILC’s Conventional Magnets For the LCFOA meeting at SLAC Cherrill Spencer, ILC at SLAC 1 st May 2006

Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 2 Topics I will cover  Introduce the Magnet Systems Group  Show the INAUGURAL table of ILC MAGNET QUANTITIES  Indicate typical sizes of ILC conventional magnets  Describe our ILC magnet design and manufacturing philosophies  Describe our major technical challenges, in particular achieving high availabilities.  Further details will be dealt with in break-out session.

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 3 Current General Layout of a 500Gev ILC superconducting linac 31 km overall e- Damping Ring Beam Deliveries + 2 Interaction Regions Part of e+ source, e+ booster & auxiliary source TWO e+ Damping Rings Electromagnets are utilized throughout the ILC beamlines to bend and focus the electron and positron beams.

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 4 ILC Magnet Systems Group: who we are & our responsibilities  I am SLAC ’ s Magnet Engineer. Have been designing and fabricating accelerator magnets at SLAC for nearly 18 years. In particular been designing & costing magnets for linear colliders for past 9 years.  The ILC Technical Systems Groups will make engineering designs of the specified components, will provide information, design strategies and cost estimates to the Area groups and set engineering standards for the technical system.  ILC Magnet Systems Group presently comprises about 15 magnet & power supply experts from about 9 HEP labs in Americas, Europe & Asia.  Magnet Systems: Responsible for the design and costing of all magnet systems (including cold magnets), and associated power supplies, interlocks, cabling, cable trays, supports (including He vessel for cold magnets), and movers. Interface to control system at a serial digital interface. Responsibilities include specialty magnets such as the final focusing magnets, kicker systems, and undulator systems.

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 5 Process the Magnet Systems Group is going through  A beamline’s magnetic components are defined by a beam physicist: quantity, order along the beamline, number of magnetic poles and integrated strength (this set of parameters called a lattice and each ILC area has several lattices)  Magnet experts take the lattice description and transform it into a series of technical specs for real magnets. Do this for all ILC beamlines as lattices are released.  Identify styles of magnets: same physical magnet will produce a range of magnetic specs; count the number of magnets and styles; design each style of magnet=>current & resistance; then power supplies can be specified; finally power cables and cable trays will be specified.  When have understood the scope of the magnet systems then can develop appropriate ILC-wide design, manufacturing and QC philosophies for them.  In last 2 weeks have received most of the areas’ lattices: have made INAUGURAL COUNT OF ILC MAGNETS

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 6 The LCFOA is the first entity, worldwide, to see the inaugural ILC Magnet Count : quantities are PRELIMINARY and WILL change! ILC MAGNET COUNT: Inaugural Publication Magnet Type Grand TotalsSourcesDamping Rings 2 RTML2 Linacs2 BeamDel e-e+ e-DR2e+DR StylesQuantityStylQty StyleQty StyleQty Styl eQtyStylQty Dipole Quad Sextupole Solenoid Corrector Pulsed/Kickers/Sept a Wiggler Octupole/Undulator Totals Totals w/o correctors ILC Magnet count for 250Gev on 250Gev beams with baseline configuration Compiled by Cherrill Spencer, ILC Magnet Systems Group, Inaugural Publication: 1May 2006 Preliminary Magnet Count

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 7 Further Details on the ILC Magnet Count  Of the 22,544 magnets, 1559 of them will be superconducting. i.e. ~21,000 will be conventional  10,160 of the magnets are conventional “correctors”. They are mostly stand-alone weak dipoles that will likely be solid wire, sheet-metal core dipoles. The ILC is a one-shot accelerator and experience with SLAC’s linear collider informs us that many of the quads throughout the ILC need to have nearby steering dipoles in order to maintain the beam collisions at the interaction point.  Putting aside the 10,160 correctors leaves 10,840 conventional magnets of 146 different styles to be designed and fabricated in 5-7 years  9504 magnets bend or focus beams with energy <5.1Gev, so they are quite modest in physical size. E.g m long

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 8 Typical Size of an ILC conventional quadrupole Overall length about 60 cm, overall height about 40 cm. Copper conductor is 0.255” square with 0.125” hole.

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 9 Typical Size of an ILC conventional dipole, some will be larger Units are inches

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 10 Quantities associated with various styles  Presently there are 163 different styles of magnets. The magnet engineers will strenuously be working with the beam physicists to reduce the number of styles.  About 10 corrector styles will have several 100 each Considering non-corrector magnets:  Only 1 style has over 1000 magnets (-> 3000 e+ quads)  About 6 styles have over 500 magnets  About 60 styles have 100 to 200 magnets  About 80 styles have 2-99 magnets

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 11 ILC-wide Magnet Design Philosophy (in formation) ILC magnets are approx 93% water or air cooled conventional electromagnets; and approx 7% superconducting magnets All preliminary design done by ILC; detailed engineering and drafting: some magnets by ILC, other magnets by industry Our major production challenges:  Produce ~22544 magnets over 5-7 years  Make them extremely reliable  Minimize cost while maintaining performance To meet these challenges we will:  Identify failure modes using FMEA, design in reliability  Have uniform standards for common materials such as ferrite, steel, conductor, cooling hoses- MUST BE FOLLOWED WHEREVER MAGNET BEING MADE  Have standard designs for common parts such as terminal blocks, coil retainers, LCW manifolds  Have a restricted list of approved off-the-shelf parts: water fittings, insulation, epoxies

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 12 ILC-wide Magnet Manufacturing Philosophy (in formation)  Most electromagnets will be fabricated by commercial companies situated all over the world. Some technically difficult magnets will be fabricated at HEP labs.  There are so any magnets it will saturate the worldwide capacity for accelerator magnets and USA companies should be able to submit successful bids (in my opinion).  Will have on-site high capacity + comprehensive incoming magnet inspection and measurement facility (still under discussion)

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 13 Technical Challenges of ILC Magnets  Alignment with respect to beam path Focusing elements must preserve beam size: beam to pass down magnetic center Offset of quadrupoles from beam axis must be adjusted by correction (steering) elements Sub  level achieved with mechanical ‘movers’ in certain areas  Stability Geometry– if magnet core is not mechanically stable its magnetic center will wander Field reproducibility  Over time  With respect to changes in current  Reliability Meeting all of the demanding beam physics requirements for magnet performance can be defeated by MTBF… Magnet reliability requirements are very challenging – to be discussed in more detail in what follows.  Cost A critical technical requirement is a design which is cost efficient Designs must be developed to meet lattice requirements, reliability, and cost optimization. INDUSTRIAL INPUT WILL BE VERY HELPFUL on last two.

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 14 Technical Challenges of ILC Magnets (cont)  High radiation expected in several beamlines  The most intense radiation environment is due to stray particles in the Damping Rings where the average radiation level two inches from the beam-pipe might be 2 Mega-Rads per hour, and the peak level at isolated locations might be as high as 60 Mega-Rads per hour. Therefore need rad-hard materials- prototypes could be useful for testing materials.  Many dipoles in Beam Delivery have very low gap fields- concerns about remnant fields & reproducibility of the integrated strength. Must be low field to minimize synchrotron radiation emitted by e- or e+.  Come to the magnet break-out session to see examples of technically difficult conventional magnets.

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 15 MOST CHALLENGING ASPECT OF ILC CONVENTIONAL MAGNETS: MAKING THEM RELIABLE ENOUGH  Consider the availability requirements of the ILC as set out in the BaselineConfigDoc.  A simulation of the whole ILC has been developed and the model’s output tells you how long the ILC will be down if its components have certain mean time between failures (MTBF) and certain times to repair (Mean Time to Repair, MTTR).  OVERALL ILC UPTIME GOAL IS 85% during the official runs of 9 months per year

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 16 Availability: Average ratio of the time that the system or component is usable to the total amount of time that is needed. MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure): MTBF is a basic measure of reliability for repairable items. It can be described as the number of hours that pass before a component, assembly, or system fails. MTTR (Mean Time To Repair): MTTR is the average time required to perform corrective repair on the removable items in a product or system. Failure rate = MTBF -1 = Availability of N magnets = (Availability of one magnet) N Availability DEFINITIONS Expected Downtime in hours = (1-Availability) x Operation hour/year

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 17 How to improve availability Perfect A = 1–> reached by having a ZERO repair time Have to increase MTBF AND reduce MTTR Repair time is influenced by detailed design of the magnet– this must be paid attention to during design stage. SLAC magnet failure data showed MTBFs of individual SLAC magnets varying between ~600,000 hours and 12,000,000 hours. Availability model demands individual magnet MTBF of 20,000,000 hours, so that magnet system as a whole will be available 99.2% of the time. Our not-available “allowance” is 0.8% Therefore is paramount that we learn how to design and fabricate more reliable magnets, else the ILC will never usefully run!!!!

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 18 When we really get to design the ILC magnets we will have to do FMEAs on basic magnet styles  Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) process considers each mode of failure of every component of the system, identifies their causes and ascertains the effects of each failure mode on system operation (ALL ILC components should have FMEA done on them).  The final designs will have best cost/performance trade-offs  Come to the magnet break-out session to learn more about availability, FMEA and a prototype HA magnet we already made and tested

1st May 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Intro to ILC Conv Magnets 19 CONCLUSIONS  The ILC has a huge number of magnets and we are desirous of working closely with commercial magnet companies to ensure they are made in a timely fashion, work reliably, and do not cost us “an arm and a leg”!  Please join me at the magnet breakout session for initial discussions