1 NDIA SE Division Development Planning Working Group/Mission Analysis Committee Meeting 13 February 2013

2 Agenda Introduction MA Committee Overview NDIA Systems Engineering Conference MA Committee 2013 Task Plan MA Committee 2013 Tasks and Discussion Final Comments and Adjourn

NDIA SE Division Organization 3

DPWG/Mission Analysis Committee Tentative Meeting Dates for 2012 in the Washington, DC area –Wednesday, February 13 (today) –Wednesday, April 17 –Wednesday, June 19 –Wednesday, August 21 NDIA SE Conference –October 28 – 31 in Arlington, VA 4

MA Committee Website The MA Committee website has been updated –Includes all meetings since the inception of the committee and support documentation NDIA.org –Divisions Systems Engineering Division –Mission Analysis 5

NDIA Systems Engineering Conference October 28 – 31, 2013 Hyatt Regency Crystal City Arlington, VA Early Systems Engineering Track –Abstracts due May 31, 2013 – abstracts/4870http://application.ndia.org/ abstracts/4870 6

Mission Analysis Committee Task Plan Projects Working Group Proposed 2013 Tasks: Support NDIA SED DPWG activities  Complete S&T/IRAD Final Report  OCI Discussion Forum  ASD R&E Defense Marketplace Innovation Engagement WG  Lab Engagement WG Pre-MDD Architecture Tradespace Pre-Milestone A Program Protection Planning Deliverables/Products Final report on the Integration of S&T/IRAD to support Development Planning Final report Addendums following 2013 follow- on WGs/Forums Schedule / Resources Working Groups/Forums  ASD R&E Defense Marketplace Innovation Engagement WG – April ‘13  OCI Discussion Forum – June ‘13  Lab Engagement WG – August ‘13 Reports  Complete S&T/IRAD Final Report – February ’13  Addendums – 60 days after WG/Forum Completion Issues / Concerns: Diminishing number of contributing committee members Inadequate resources to work both DPWG and assigned committee efforts

DPWG Workshop Action Items Action Team Action Lead Status 1. Generate the DPWG Workshop Formal ReportNDIALohseDraft report in work 2. Address the Issue of OCI (as a barrier to collaboration)NDIARosenbluth Roedler Identifying “genuine” OCI requirements and key language 3. Address the Issue of IP (as a barrier to collaboration)NDIARosenbluth Roedler DPWG Industry team collecting Industry input 4. Improve and Communicate the Systems Engineering Process in the Development Planning Timeframe (including SE as a part of S&T/IR&D) NDIALohseApplying NDIA DPWG Development Planning Analytics Table 5. Identify Methods to Better Leverage Tactical and Strategic S&T/IR&D in Development Planning NDIALohse Guise Initial efforts in work 6. Identify Methods of Collaboration and Communication Mechanisms NDIA/Gov’tLohse Guise AFRL Partnering with AFRL for 2013 continued efforts 7. Provide Suggestions for Improving the 6.1/6.2 Investment Strategy NDIA/Gov’tLohse OASD R&E Partnering with OASD R&E for 2013 continued efforts 8. Collaborate Across Government and NDIA DPWGsNDIA/Gov’tLohse Michealson Sedmak Partnering with the Gov’t DPWG for 2013 continued efforts All Efforts To Be Coordinated Across Government and Industry

OCI Discussion Forum Hold discussion forum with OSD and Service acquisition agents to understand their respective Organization Conflict of Interest (OCI) perspectives 9 April 19, 2010

NDIA DPWG Action List ASD R&E Defense Marketplace Innovation Engagement WG Action: Provide Suggestions for Improving the 6.1/6.2 Investment Strategy Action Lead: John Lohse and Gov’t S&T Representative (OASD R&E) Objectives: –Increase Industry involvement in the MURI (Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative) process Enable Industry to be a submitter of 6.1 topics as an input to the Gov’t S&T planning effort Provide methods of facilitation (e.g. NDIA SE Division forums, Industry days, etc.) Understand the 6.1/6.2 funding model –Increase Industry awareness and use of Defense Innovation Marketplace Provide methods of communication (e.g. NDIA SE Division meeting and conference briefings) –Identify methods/framework for increased Industry involvement with universities in the Gov’t 6.1 to 6.2 environment to expedite the technology maturation timeline This was a statement made that earlier Industry involvement would help expedite tech maturity. It seems to be a big change to the S&T funding process. Some comments: –Is this something we want to pursue? –Is more “alignment” sufficient, or do we really want “involvement”? –If there is something that prevents us from doing this, we can just state that in our formal report. –Include connections to UARCs and the SERC (Request from Mr. Nic Torelli who suggested involving Mr. Scott Lucero in this effort.) Method: –Joint Industry/Gov’t Working Group comprised of Industry and Gov’t S&T representatives to meet the above objectives –Due date: TBD

Action: Identify Methods of Collaboration and Communication Mechanisms Action Leaders: John Lohse, Garry Roedler, and Louisa Guise Objectives: –Identify methods of collaboration Investigate and report on the concept of having mission focused consortiums (collaborative mission analysis) Understand and report on the USAF Model for Industry engagement –Form a joint team to work with AFRL to mature collaboration and publicize their model –Address the timing of information exchange to support IR&D planning cycles –Identify better methods to communicate collaboration opportunities Identify communication opportunities and work with the Gov’t to implement them –Specific opportunities currently exist with AFRL and Defense Marketplace Innovation (under Mr. Kurjanowicz) Determine methods to “push” the communication to the right audience –Need to define the “correct” audience and then define the methods to push the communication. This may tie into the AFRL action above. Use Industry Associations to help get the word out –Identify appropriate Industry associations and develop an implementation plan. This may tie into the AFRL action above. Methods: –Joint NDIA/AFRL/Government DPWG collaborative engagement to meet the above objectives –Due Date: TBD 11 NDIA DPWG Action List Lab Engagement WG

Pre-MDD Architecture Tradespace

Pre-MDD Enablers and Analytics

Pre-MDD Activities

Pre-Milestone A Program Protection Planning (PPP) Identify PPP Enablers, Analytics, and Activities in the Pre-Milestone A timeframe –Defense Acquisition Guidebook Systems Security Engineering (SSE) Process (page 1150) 15

New Business And Adjourn 16