Mars Atmospheric Research Meeting in Hokkaido Univ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparing TitanWRF and Cassini Results at the End of the Cassini Prime Mission Claire E. Newman, Mark I. Richardson, Anthony D. Toigo and Christopher Lee.
Advertisements

What we now know: Difference between weather and climate.
Thoughts on Climate Theory Based on collaborations with Wenyu Zhou, Dargan Frierson, Sarah Kang, Erica Staehling, Gang Chen, Steve Garner, Ming Zhao Isaac.
Predicting Martian Dune Characteristics Using Global and Mesoscale MarsWRF Output Claire Newman working with Nick Lancaster, Dave Rubin and Mark Richardson.
A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Parameterization of convective momentum transport and energy conservation in GCMs N. McFarlane Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
Hurricanes Innovative Grid-Enable Multiple-scale Hurricane modeling system Konstantinos Menelaou International Hurricane Research Center Department of.
Sensitivity of High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations SCOTT A. BRAUN AND WEI-KUO TAO PRESENTATION.
Low clouds in the atmosphere: Never a dull moment Stephan de Roode (GRS) stratocumulus cumulus.
DARGAN M. W. FRIERSON DEPARTMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES DAY 16: 05/20/2010 ATM S 111, Global Warming: Understanding the Forecast.
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
General Circulation of the Martian Atmosphere: Dynamics and Dust Melissa J. Strausberg 25 August 2005.
Mars Aerodynamic Roughness Maps and Their Effects on Boundary Layer Properties in A GCM Nicholas Heavens (with Mark Richardson and Anthony Toigo) 9 May.
Earth Systems Science Chapter 6 I. Modeling the Atmosphere-Ocean System 1.Statistical vs physical models; analytical vs numerical models; equilibrium vs.
General Circulation and Climate Zones Martin Visbeck DEES, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
METR112-Climate Modeling Basic concepts of climate Modeling Components and parameterization in the model sensitivity of the model.
METR112-Climate Modeling Basic concepts of climate Modeling Components and parameterization in the model sensitivity of the model.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
MGCM & group: AFCB, Sept SJSU 1 The Mars General Circulation Modeling Group Alison F.C. Bridger SJSU.
Implications of global climate change over the mountain areas of western North America Professor Clifford Mass, Eric Salathe, Richard Steed University.
The General Circulation of the Atmosphere Tapio Schneider.
Coupled Ocean- Atmosphere General/Global Circulation Models ~100km horizontal res’n; Finer (~2) for ocean than atmosphere. ~20 layers atmosphere; ~20 layers.
Coupled Ocean- Atmosphere General/Global Circulation Models ~100km horizontal res’n; Finer (~2) for ocean than atmosphere. ~20 layers atmosphere; ~20 layers.
Thermal Structure of the Atmosphere: Lapse Rate, Convection, Clouds, Storms.
How do gravity waves determine the global distributions of winds, temperature, density and turbulence within a planetary atmosphere? What is the fundamental.
JSS17BIO1Huttula Lecture set Temperature models.
Lapse Rates and Stability of the Atmosphere
The Future of Arctic Sea Ice Authors: Wieslaw Maslowski, Jaclyn Clement Kinney, Matthew Higgins, and Andrew Roberts Brian Rosa – Atmospheric Sciences.
*K. Ikeda (CCSR, Univ. of Tokyo) M. Yamamoto (RIAM, Kyushu Univ.)
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
Clouds, Aerosols and Precipitation GRP Meeting August 2011 Susan C van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins,
Report to WGOMD on GFDL Ocean Modelling Activities Stephen Griffies NOAA/GFDL (and CSIRO) IPCC AR4 activities Model developments.
EGU General Assembly C. Cassardo 1, M. Galli 1, N. Vela 1 and S. K. Park 2,3 1 Department of General Physics, University of Torino, Italy 2 Department.
Preliminary Results of Global Climate Simulations With a High- Resolution Atmospheric Model P. B. Duffy, B. Govindasamy, J. Milovich, K. Taylor, S. Thompson,
Atmospheric Properties II Martin Visbeck DEES, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Introduction 2) The methodology of the inter-comparison 3) Phase 1 : cases study Inter-comparison of numerical models.
MODERN CLIMATE AND HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE OF MARS. A.V.Rodin, A.A.Fedorova, N.A.Evdokimova, A.V.Burlakov, O.I.Korablev 1Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology,
Future Climate Projections. Lewis Richardson ( ) In the 1920s, he proposed solving the weather prediction equations using numerical methods. Worked.
WRF Volcano modelling studies, NCAS Leeds Ralph Burton, Stephen Mobbs, Alan Gadian, Barbara Brooks.
Vertical Wavenumber Spectrum of Gravity Waves at the Northern High Latitude Region in the Martian Atmosphere Hiroki Ando.
Modeling the Atmospheric Boundary Layer (2). Review of last lecture Reynolds averaging: Separation of mean and turbulent components u = U + u’, = 0 Intensity.
The Atmosphere: Part 3: Unsaturated convection Composition / Structure Radiative transfer Vertical and latitudinal heat transport Atmospheric circulation.
Planetary Atmospheres, the Environment and Life (ExCos2Y) Revision Chris Parkes Rm 455 Kelvin Building.
Part I: Representation of the Effects of Sub- grid Scale Topography and Landuse on the Simulation of Surface Climate and Hydrology Part II: The Effects.
(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Climate Models (from IPCC WG-I, Chapter 10) Projected Future Changes Primary Source: IPCC WG-I Chapter 10 - Global.
EARTH SCIENCE Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE Tarbuck Lutgens 
General Circulation Modelling on Triton and Pluto
Large Eddy Simulation of PBL turbulence and clouds Chin-Hoh Moeng National Center for Atmospheric Research.
The Linear and Non-linear Evolution Mechanism of Mesoscale Vortex Disturbances in Winter Over Western Japan Sea Yasumitsu MAEJIMA and Keita IGA (Ocean.
Boundary Layer Clouds.
New Tools and Methods to fully Characterize the Atmospheric Environment for a Martian EDL. Application to the 2016 Exomars Descent Module. François Forget,
Quaternary Environments Paleoclimate Models. Types of Models  Simplify a system to its basic components  Types of Models  Physical Models  Globe 
Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer – Application to Martian atmosphere Helen Wang Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory April 2012.
UNIT 1: Weather Dynamics Chapter 1: Inquiring about Weather The Causes of Weather Chapter 2: Weather Forecasting.
Atmospheric and Oceanic General Circulation Dr. John Krasting NOAA/GFDL – Princeton, NJ Rutgers Physical Climatology October 18,
Atm S 547 Lecture 1, Slide 1 The Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL or PBL) The layer of fluid directly above the Earth’s surface in which significant fluxes.
Do we / why do we want to develop an ASM? Climate working group for WRF – workshop on model developments for climate studies with WRF (summary of.
Implementation of a boundary layer heat flux parameterization into the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System Erica McGrath-Spangler Dept. of Atmospheric.
Atmospheric Stability The resistance of the atmosphere to vertical motion. Stable air resists vertical motion Unstable air encourages vertical motion.
Transferência de Energia e de Massa Energy and Mass Transfer Lecture 1: Introduction to the subject and to the course 1.
ESSL Holland, CCSM Workshop 0606 Predicting the Earth System Across Scales: Both Ways Summary:Rationale Approach and Current Focus Improved Simulation.
Tropical dynamics and Tropical cyclones
Climate , Climate Change, and climate modeling
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
IPCC Climate Change Report
UCLA Regional Earth System Modeling for VOCALS
How will the earth’s temperature change?
New insights into turbulence dynamics under stabilizing
Characterizing the response of simulated atmospheric boundary layers to stochastic cloud radiative forcing Robert Tardif, Josh Hacker (NCAR Research Applications.
Presentation transcript:

Mars Atmospheric Research Meeting in Hokkaido Univ.

Participants Japan –Prof. Masatsugu ODAKA –Dr. Yoshiyuki TAKAHASHI –Prof. Yoshiyuki HAYASHI –Ms. Chihiro MITSUDA –Mr. KITAMORI America –Dr. Anthony Toigo –Prof. Mark Richardson (in absentia)

Toigo and Richardson Research Goals and Collaboration Ideas

Research Goals Dust Storms –Origin, evolution, dissipation –Interannual variability Dust lifting –Wind stress, dust devils Boundary Layers –Dust lifting, dust devils, convection, turbulence Water Cycle –Clouds Topographic clouds (volcanoes), equatorial belt of clouds –Ice Caps & Exchange with atmosphere & regolith –Regolith exchange Paleoclimate –Past climate on Mars: water content? Temperature? Structure of ice caps? Formation of polar layered terrains? –Climate change (if different, how did we get from past to present?) Toigo and Richardson

Research Tools Dust Storms –Link global & mesoscale models for full interaction on a variety of scales Dust lifting & Boundary Layers –Large eddy simulations (LES) of Martian boundary layer Water Cycle –Mesoscale simulations of water transport (polar simulations, topography-influenced, etc.) –Global model: link regolith water absorption and ice formation models with global atmospheric model Dust Storms & Water Cycle –Combine microphysics of water ice & dust ( 稲田愛 ) Paleoclimate –Run GCM simulations in past conditions Improvements in surface models? CO 2 & ice clouds? Other new physical parameterizations? Toigo and Richardson

High-resolution (≤ 1m) 3D LES simulations using WRF Science goals –Improve boundary layer parameterizations in larger scale models (mesoscale, GCM, etc.) –Resolve dust devils –Heat, momentum, volatile transports (compare with future data) –Compare and contrast with terrestrial boundary layer Notes –Will be undertaken, independent of collaboration status would like to include Japanese group in any way –Interested in coordinating efforts with Japanese turbulence and convection models and research –Interested in exchange of graduate students (America Japan). Mr. Kitamori is invited to Caltech. Odaka-san and Takahashi-san are welcome to visit Caltech at any time for any length of time. Toigo and Richardson

Collaboration Idea #1 Run an LES on the Earth Simulator, but operated by 北大 group Possible problems: –Foreign participation Principal Investigator issue? –Failure of model to run on unique architecture WRF is parallelized and vectorized … –Must apply and specify model in proposal Depends on previous question Toigo and Richardson

Global Simulations and Collaboration Ideas #2 & #3 High resolution GCM by 北大 group run with Earth Simulator Collaboration Idea #2 –Compare and contrast with lower resolution WRF GCM & GFDL MGCM Collaboration Idea #3 –Trade physical parameterizations and use them in each other’s models –Compare and contrast results Toigo and Richardson

Paleoclimate Past climate conditions –Is it warm enough for liquid water? –What is necessary to reach that condition? Old Mars GCM has been run with surface pressures up to 1 bar –Will be published in JGR in a month or two –Purpose was to investigate stability of transient liquid water (where and when it would be stable) Toigo and Richardson

Collaboration Idea #4 (vague) 小高 & Richardson (& JPL) have strong interest in this question Can they share work or ideas or results in some way? –Share/trade regolith model & CO 2 cloud model? –Share tools, but answer different questions (less work for each person) Toigo and Richardson

Odaka, Takahashi and Kitamori Research Goals and Collaboration Ideas

Research Goals Dust storms –Origin, evolution, dissipation –Circulation pattern before and after dust storm –Dust transport, dust cloud pattern Interaction between small and large scale –Gravity wave and its effect on general circulation Turbulence in boundary layer –Convection –Effect on large scale circulation (see above) Gravity wave excitation by thermal convection Paleoclimate –Wet and warm climate in early Mars (with 光田 and 倉本 ) –Circulation pattern in these climate Odaka and Takahashi

Dust Storms GCM simulation on the Earth Simulator –Regional to global –Investigate dust transport and dust cloud pattern on those scales Collaboration Idea #1 –Intercomparison with each other’s results? –Fundamental characteristics under simplified or standard conditions zonal wind Hadley circulation surface wind Odaka and Takahashi

Scale Interaction GCM simulation on the Earth Simulator –Perform simulations with several resolutions Coarse to fine Compare each result Collaboration Idea #2 –? –Now planning Since actual project has not been undertaken, it is unclear at present how collaboration might work Odaka and Takahashi

Turbulence in boundary layer Convection: dry vs. moist –Use non-hydrostatic model –Use relatively idealized conditions Gravity waves excited by thermal convection –Large vertical extent –Direct simulation of gravity wave breaking Collaboration Idea #3 –Introduce technique into WRF LES model Odaka and Takahashi

Paleoclimate Use one-dimensional model –Radiation model and radiative/convective model –Energy balance model Use GCM or mesoscale model –Simulation of moist convection due to CO 2 condensation –Wide range parameter study on atmospheric surface pressure Collaboration Idea #4 –Share basic ideas about theory or numerical model Odaka and Takahashi

Collaboration Ideas Compared Compare and contrast with lower resolution WRF GCM Share tools or methods for investigating paleoclimate Trade physical parameterizations and use them in each other’s models Run an LES on the Earth Simulator with 北大 group Intercomparison of results of two GCMs (basic state) Share basic ideas about theories or models for paleoclimate Introduce turbulence and convection scheme into WRF Interaction between large and small scale

Summary of Discussion 0 th : continue communication and discussion ½ th : meet at conferences and show results to each other 1 st Collaboration –Run two GCMs independently and compare output plots 2 nd Collaboration –Talk about methods and theories for paleoclimate –Early coordination will make work easier and less duplication –Need to discuss with 光田さん and 倉本先生 3 rd Collaboration –Longer term: talk about (trade?) physics schemes –Needs more thought and discussion Purpose of trade (what is the science question) How much work it would take to implement? Usefulness (how well did it answer the above question)

Final Message from Mark Richardson Sorry that I couldn’t make it to this meeting I’m happy to –have the chance to collaborate –have real interaction that can be productive –be working with international groups, instead of always being rammed together with Americans Excited that we share interests in modeling from the very largest to very smallest scales Thank you for inviting us and being such great hosts –Next time we should meet in California, so Anthony and I can repay your generous kindness Hopefully next time we meet in Japan, I will be able to come as well as bring my wife Thank you very, very much!