HUNTING ANALYSIS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER IN VERMONT BY COREY RICHARDSON.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RI Deer Management Strategy Brian Tefft Principal Wildlife Biologist.
Advertisements

Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Establishing GIS for Management in the Sauvie Island Wildlife Management Area, Oregon Jeremy Hruska Masters Degree in GIS Candidate Penn State University.
August WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT At WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY Environmental Office Code 250.
Bald Eagle Wildlife Study Using Geographical Information Systems.
Careers in Wildlife Management WORKING ON THE WILD SIDE.
Evacuation Safety Planners * Jason HaycockRobert Broussard Colleen Grentz Project Manager Analyst & Webmaster Analyst & Project Designer.
Winter Reproduction of Peromyscus in Rider Park, Lycoming Co., PA K.W Hopkins, A.K. Smolarek, and D.R. Broussard Department of Biology, Lycoming College,
Potential Sites in Virginia For Red Wolf Re-introduction Picture courtesy of NPCA.
May 17 th,  Overview of endangered species regulations  Purpose of Habitat Conservation Plans  Review Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan.
The Adirondack Park Blueline Expansion Meg Harris Geography 184 Fall Semester 2006.
Black Gum Swamp & Clyde River Wetlands
Introduction to GIS Ghassan Mikati, Ph.D GIS Expert.
GIS Study of the Kelsey-Whisky Logging Plan Jared Chapiewsky Matthew Bloch U of Wisconsin, Madison.
UNDERSTANDING SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF ASTHMA USING A GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM Mohammad A. Rob Management Information Systems University of Houston-Clear.
Advanced GIS Using ESRI ArcGIS 9.3 Arc ToolBox 5 (Spatial Statistics)
Appraising Inundated Properties.  How did we get there?  1. By Choice ◦ Sometimes we choose to take on unusual or unique appraisal assignments.
Australia’s Great Barrier Reef Region (GBR) Land based surveys A way forward.
IWC Database Overview of technology and application 13 th July 2010.
A SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC-PRIVATE CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP Jens C. Hilke Integrating natural resource and transportation agencies into the Staying Connected.
James Palma Maryland State Data Center Maryland Department of Planning 301 West Preston Street, Suite 702 Baltimore, Maryland September 20, 2010.
Florida Key Deer Land Acquisition
Preserving Farms and Forests in Sussex County, Delaware: Public Value Sussex Communities: Growing Better A Workshop Sponsored by the University of Delaware.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
The History of Wildlife Management in America
 “ Wildlife conservation is the practice of protecting endangered plant and animal species and their habitats. Among the goals of wildlife conservation.
The Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative or Y2Y is a joint Canada-US charitable organization that connects and protects habitat along the mountain.
Biodiversity: Habitat Quality and Rarity Brad Eichelberger.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
GIS 1 GIS Lecture 4 Geodatabases. GIS 2 Outline Administrative Data Example Data Tables Data Joins Common Datasets Spatial Joins ArcCatalog Geodatabases.
Wildlife Habitat Objective: Describe the basic requirements for fish and wildlife species and explain methods to improve habitat for fish and wildlife.
‘SUP! READ THE BOARD! PLEASE HAVE OBJECTIVES #16-19READY FOR A STAMP.
Growth and Land Use Planning Analysis for Washington County, Utah Presented by: Eric D Zimmerman.
The History of Wildlife
An-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department Analysis of the Water Distribution Network of howara- Nablus Submitted by: Rami Ahmad Mohammed.
There is a way that we can make environmental decisions based on our values. How would you vote on environmental issues? Would you just guess? We will.
Deer Management Plan: Hemlock Overlook Regional Park, Fairfax County Sean Campbell Craig Shafer Jessica Trice.
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
Wisconsin’s Forests and the Comprehensive Planning Law Preserving forests in the wilderness of Smart Growth.
Our Nation’s Forestlands On the Edge Susan Stein USDA Forest Service FREMO Workshop, Annapolis FREMO Workshop, Annapolis September 18, 2007.
Endangered Species By Tanmay Bhardwaj (VIII-A). An endangered species is a population of organisms which is facing a high risk of becoming extinct because.
Need for Hunting Laws By the 1930s activities had destroyed much of the habitat of wildlife Some species had been nearly wiped to extinction from uncontrolled.
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis Team: Kelly Blanton, Erica Tice, William Weldon, and Paul Starkel.
GIS 1 GIS Lecture 4 Geodatabases Copyright – Kristen S. Kurland, Carnegie Mellon University.
CREATED BY: CARA HILL & EAN DAVIS!! WHAT YOU NEED TO GET STARTED! MUST HAVE A GED MUST BE A U.S. CITIZEN MUST BE 21 YEARS OF AGE HAVE A VALID ALABAMA.
Seattle Monorail Impact Project A GIS Study on Impacts of the New Seattle Monorail By: Wiley Coffin, Kyle Crass, Kyle Freeman, Ken Hunziker, Tony Marti.
Mission Statements of Some Federal Land Management Agencies U.S. Forest Service The mission of the U.S. Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity.
U.S. Census Data Options for downloading and importing data into ArcMap Treg Christopher Oct 31, 2008.
Alternative Growth Futures Studio University of Colorado at Denver Sponsors: Custer Heritage Committee San Isabel Foundation Sonoran Institute.
Alberta’s National Parks. Banff National Park In 1883, three Canadian Pacific Railway construction workers stumbled across a cave containing hot springs.
2014 Highlights By: Paul Telander, Wildlife Section Chief To: 2015 Roundtable Participants 16 January 2015.
Monitoring Programme. What is monitoring? Environmental monitoring is the systematic observation, measurement and calculation of the condition of the.
Identifying the Role of Government in Forest Management.
The History of Fish and Wildlife Management Objectives: Describe the history of fish and wildlife management. Describe laws and the methods used by private,
Development of a process for setting Conservation Objectives Dr Rebecca Jeffrey Science and Biodiversity Section National Parks and Wildlife Service Ireland.
 Vermont's Big Game Mammals Mark Scott, Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department.
A Question of Hunting. Money for Wildlife Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act (1937) – Placed federal tax on hunting license, firearms, and ammunition.
© File copyright Colin Purrington. You may use for making your poster, of course, but please do not plagiarize, adapt, or put on your own site. Also, do.
Wildlife Recreational Activities. What is Hunting? Harvesting game for food or pleasure Harvesting game for food or pleasure Recreational activity Recreational.
Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.
NO NET LOSS of PUBLIC HUNTING LANDS in FLORIDA June 2008 Update.
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
A Question of Hunting.
Deer Management, Forest Management & Cooperatives
A Question of Hunting.
Communities Mapping Communities
Preparing the data for its use in a GIS software
Kentucky Fish and Wildlife Department
Module 61 Conservation of Biodiversity
Overview of Big Game Draft Regulation Proposals for 2020
Presentation transcript:

HUNTING ANALYSIS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER IN VERMONT BY COREY RICHARDSON

HUNTING & GIS “HUNTING GIVES RESOURCE MANAGERS A VALUABLE TOOL TO CONTROL POPULATIONS OF SOME SPECIES THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE EXCEED THE CARRYING CAPACITY OF THEIR HABITAT AND THREATEN THE WELL-BEING OF OTHER WILDLIFE SPECIES, AND IN SOME INSTANCES, THAT OF HUMAN HEALTH AND SAFETY” (U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE) “HUNTING GIVES RESOURCE MANAGERS A VALUABLE TOOL TO CONTROL POPULATIONS OF SOME SPECIES THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE EXCEED THE CARRYING CAPACITY OF THEIR HABITAT AND THREATEN THE WELL-BEING OF OTHER WILDLIFE SPECIES, AND IN SOME INSTANCES, THAT OF HUMAN HEALTH AND SAFETY” (U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE) THE APPLICATIONS OF GIS ARE CREATING DRAMATIC BENEFITS FOR WILDLIFE MANAGERS AT A VERY RAPID PACE THE APPLICATIONS OF GIS ARE CREATING DRAMATIC BENEFITS FOR WILDLIFE MANAGERS AT A VERY RAPID PACE “GIS IS A POWERFUL TECHNOLOGY FOR ANALYZING SPATIAL PATTERNS, HELPING TO ORGANIZE VAST DATA BASES, AND PRESENTING RESULTS IN A MANNER NOT OTHERWISE POSSIBLE. BECAUSE SPATIAL ANALYSES ARE SUCH AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE USFWS’s MISSION, GIS CAN GREATLY ASSIST MANAGERS IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF NATURAL RESOURCES”(U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE) “GIS IS A POWERFUL TECHNOLOGY FOR ANALYZING SPATIAL PATTERNS, HELPING TO ORGANIZE VAST DATA BASES, AND PRESENTING RESULTS IN A MANNER NOT OTHERWISE POSSIBLE. BECAUSE SPATIAL ANALYSES ARE SUCH AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE USFWS’s MISSION, GIS CAN GREATLY ASSIST MANAGERS IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF NATURAL RESOURCES”(U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE) THE FINDINGS IN THIS SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND OTHERS SIMILAR COULD BE USED TO COORDINATE FUTURE PLANNING FOR THE VERMONT FISH AND WILDLFE DEPARTMENT TO MONITOR DEER HUNTING TRENDS AND TO ADJUST REGULATIONS OR FUTURE POLICIES ACCORDINGLY THE FINDINGS IN THIS SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND OTHERS SIMILAR COULD BE USED TO COORDINATE FUTURE PLANNING FOR THE VERMONT FISH AND WILDLFE DEPARTMENT TO MONITOR DEER HUNTING TRENDS AND TO ADJUST REGULATIONS OR FUTURE POLICIES ACCORDINGLY IN ADDITION, FINDINGS SUCH AS THESE COULD BE USED TO SET ASIDE PROPOSED LAND FOR CONSERVATION IN ADDITION, FINDINGS SUCH AS THESE COULD BE USED TO SET ASIDE PROPOSED LAND FOR CONSERVATION

GIS HUNTING APPLICATIONS

VERMONT’S WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS (WMA’S) AND UNITS (WMU’S)

HUNTING IN VERMONT “IN ORDER TO BETTER MONITOR A SPECIES THAT HAS BEEN DESIGNATED TO HUNT, EACH STATE HAS BEEN GIVEN PRIMARY REPONSIBILTY AND AUTHORITY OVER ALL WILDLIFE THAT RESIDES IN ITS BOUNDARIES” (U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE) “IN ORDER TO BETTER MONITOR A SPECIES THAT HAS BEEN DESIGNATED TO HUNT, EACH STATE HAS BEEN GIVEN PRIMARY REPONSIBILTY AND AUTHORITY OVER ALL WILDLIFE THAT RESIDES IN ITS BOUNDARIES” (U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE) WHITE-TAILED DEER ARE THE MOST STUDIED AND MOST POPULAR ANIMAL TO HUNT IN THE STATE OF VERMONT WHITE-TAILED DEER ARE THE MOST STUDIED AND MOST POPULAR ANIMAL TO HUNT IN THE STATE OF VERMONT THE STATE SEAL DISPLAYING A BUCK IS A PROUD REMINDER OF THE IMPORTANCE VERMONTER’S PLACE ON THE ANIMAL THE STATE SEAL DISPLAYING A BUCK IS A PROUD REMINDER OF THE IMPORTANCE VERMONTER’S PLACE ON THE ANIMAL A GROWING PERCENTAGE OF HUNTERS PROUDLY PARTAKE IN THE HUNTING OF DEER EVERY SEASON THROUGH THE MEANS OF BOW, RIFLE, OR MUZZLELOADER A GROWING PERCENTAGE OF HUNTERS PROUDLY PARTAKE IN THE HUNTING OF DEER EVERY SEASON THROUGH THE MEANS OF BOW, RIFLE, OR MUZZLELOADER HOWEVER, AS MORE YOUNG HUNTERS BECOME INVOLVED WITH THE SPORT EVERY YEAR, IT IS VITAL THAT THE POPULATION BE MONITORED SO THAT THE TRADITION CAN CONTINUE HOWEVER, AS MORE YOUNG HUNTERS BECOME INVOLVED WITH THE SPORT EVERY YEAR, IT IS VITAL THAT THE POPULATION BE MONITORED SO THAT THE TRADITION CAN CONTINUE

OBJECTIVES  EVALUATE DEER HUNTING TRENDS BY MAPPING AVERAGE DEER HARVESTS BY TOWN  DETERMINE PUBLIC HUNTING GROUNDS BY TOWN BY MAPPING VERMONT’S CONSERVED LANDS  DETERMINE BEST “UNRESTRICTED” HUNTING GROUNDS FOR DEER BY TOWN

THE BEST “UNRESTRICTED” HUNTING GROUNDS METEDATA FOR VERMONT CONSERVED LANDS DATA LAYER DEFINES CONSERVED LANDS AS “LAND PARCELS THAT ARE EXPECTED TO REMAIN PROTECTED FROM LAND CONVERSION OR DEVELOPMENT” AND FROM PRIVATE OWNERSHIP(VCGI) METEDATA FOR VERMONT CONSERVED LANDS DATA LAYER DEFINES CONSERVED LANDS AS “LAND PARCELS THAT ARE EXPECTED TO REMAIN PROTECTED FROM LAND CONVERSION OR DEVELOPMENT” AND FROM PRIVATE OWNERSHIP(VCGI) THE CONSERVED LANDS DATA LAYER IS COMPRISED OF STATE AND FEDERAL LANDS THE CONSERVED LANDS DATA LAYER IS COMPRISED OF STATE AND FEDERAL LANDS STATE-OWNED LAND CONSIST PRIMARILY OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS, STATE FORESTS, AND STATE PARKS, WHICH “GUARANTEE PUBLIC ACCESS FOR HUNTING” (WITH A FEW EXCEPTIONS) ON MORE THAN 244,000 ACRES. STATE-OWNED LAND CONSIST PRIMARILY OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS, STATE FORESTS, AND STATE PARKS, WHICH “GUARANTEE PUBLIC ACCESS FOR HUNTING” (WITH A FEW EXCEPTIONS) ON MORE THAN 244,000 ACRES. FEDERAL LANDS, OWNED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, OWN MORE THAN 400,000 ACRES IN VERMONT, MOST OF WHICH IS OPEN TO HUNTING AS NATIONAL FOREST FEDERAL LANDS, OWNED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, OWN MORE THAN 400,000 ACRES IN VERMONT, MOST OF WHICH IS OPEN TO HUNTING AS NATIONAL FOREST THIS ASSESSMENT DOES INCLUDE HUNTING GROUNDS ON PRIVATE LAND BECAUSE THIS LAND WOULD BE CONSISDERED “RESTRICTED” UNLESS PERMISSION BY THE OWNER WAS GIVEN THIS ASSESSMENT DOES INCLUDE HUNTING GROUNDS ON PRIVATE LAND BECAUSE THIS LAND WOULD BE CONSISDERED “RESTRICTED” UNLESS PERMISSION BY THE OWNER WAS GIVEN

SOURCES & METHODS DATA COLLECTED FROM THE VERMONT FISH AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT DATA COLLECTED FROM THE VERMONT FISH AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT DATA COLLECTED FROM VCGI DATA COLLECTED FROM VCGI IMPORT DATA TO EXCEL AND CALCULATE AVERAGE DEER HARVESTS BY TOWN IMPORT DATA TO EXCEL AND CALCULATE AVERAGE DEER HARVESTS BY TOWN DOWNLOAD TOWNS FROM VCGI TO DISPLAY AVERAGE DEER HARVESTS DOWNLOAD TOWNS FROM VCGI TO DISPLAY AVERAGE DEER HARVESTS DOWNLOAD CONSERVED LANDS FROM VCGI TO DISPLAY COVERAGE OF PUBLIC HUNTING LANDS WITHIN TOWNS DOWNLOAD CONSERVED LANDS FROM VCGI TO DISPLAY COVERAGE OF PUBLIC HUNTING LANDS WITHIN TOWNS APPLY A SPATIAL JOIN TO DETERMINE AMOUNT OF CONSERVED LANDS WITHIN TOWNS APPLY A SPATIAL JOIN TO DETERMINE AMOUNT OF CONSERVED LANDS WITHIN TOWNS MULTIPLY AMOUNT AVERAGE DEER HARVESTS PER TOWN BY AMOUNT OF CONSERVED LANDS WITHIN A TOWN TO DETERMINE THE BEST “UNRESTRICTED” HUNTING GROUNDS MULTIPLY AMOUNT AVERAGE DEER HARVESTS PER TOWN BY AMOUNT OF CONSERVED LANDS WITHIN A TOWN TO DETERMINE THE BEST “UNRESTRICTED” HUNTING GROUNDS

TOWN DEER HARVESTS EXPORTED DATA FROM VT FISH AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT TO EXCEL TO DETERMINE AVERAGE FOR YEARS 2003, 2004, AND 2005 EXPORTED DATA FROM VT FISH AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT TO EXCEL TO DETERMINE AVERAGE FOR YEARS 2003, 2004, AND 2005 EXPORT TOWN NAME ATTRIBUTE TABLE AS DBF TO EXCEL EXPORT TOWN NAME ATTRIBUTE TABLE AS DBF TO EXCEL EDIT INCONSISTENCIES IN SPELLING OF TOWN NAMES AND CITIES WITHIN TOWNS SO HARVESTED DEER STATISTICS COULD BE ACCURATELY PORTRAYED IN ARCMAP EDIT INCONSISTENCIES IN SPELLING OF TOWN NAMES AND CITIES WITHIN TOWNS SO HARVESTED DEER STATISTICS COULD BE ACCURATELY PORTRAYED IN ARCMAP EXPORT NEW DATA TABLE AS TEXT FILE TO BE ADDED TO ARCMAP EXPORT NEW DATA TABLE AS TEXT FILE TO BE ADDED TO ARCMAP TRENDS ALONG BORDERS: NORTHWEST, SOUTHWEST, AND CONNETICUT RIVER TRENDS ALONG BORDERS: NORTHWEST, SOUTHWEST, AND CONNETICUT RIVER FINDINGS-TOP FIVE TOWNS WITH HIGHEST AVERAGE DEER HARVESTS: HIGHGATE, FRANKLIN, FAIRFIELD, ALBURGH, AND POWNAL FINDINGS-TOP FIVE TOWNS WITH HIGHEST AVERAGE DEER HARVESTS: HIGHGATE, FRANKLIN, FAIRFIELD, ALBURGH, AND POWNAL

CONSERVED LANDS

BEST HUNTING GROUNDS HAVING PERFORMED A SPATIAL JOIN TO DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF CONSERVED LANDS PER TOWN, THIS AMOUNT WAS THEN MULTIPLIED BY THE AVERAGE DEER HARVEST PER TOWN FOR A RESULT OF THE BEST HUNTING GROUNDS HAVING PERFORMED A SPATIAL JOIN TO DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF CONSERVED LANDS PER TOWN, THIS AMOUNT WAS THEN MULTIPLIED BY THE AVERAGE DEER HARVEST PER TOWN FOR A RESULT OF THE BEST HUNTING GROUNDS TRENDS: SPREAD OUT, BUT THE MAJORITY STILL LOCATED ALONG THE BORDERS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF STOWE TRENDS: SPREAD OUT, BUT THE MAJORITY STILL LOCATED ALONG THE BORDERS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF STOWE FINDINGS-TOP FIVE TOWNS TO HUNT ARE: HIGHGATE, POWNAL, STOWE, HARTFORD, AND FERRISBURG FINDINGS-TOP FIVE TOWNS TO HUNT ARE: HIGHGATE, POWNAL, STOWE, HARTFORD, AND FERRISBURG

CONCLUSIONS & SOME FLAWS TRENDS: HIGHEST DEER HARVESTS WERE GENERALLY ALONG STATES BORDERS IN THREE CORE AREAS TRENDS: HIGHEST DEER HARVESTS WERE GENERALLY ALONG STATES BORDERS IN THREE CORE AREAS HIGHGATE HAD THE HIGHEST DEER AVERAGE AND WAS CONSIDERED TO HAVE THE BEST HUNTING GROUNDS BASED ON COUNT OF CONSERVED LANDS HIGHGATE HAD THE HIGHEST DEER AVERAGE AND WAS CONSIDERED TO HAVE THE BEST HUNTING GROUNDS BASED ON COUNT OF CONSERVED LANDS DISCOVERED LATE THAT THE SPATIAL JOIN OPERATION ATUALLY COUNTED NUMBER OF CONSERVED LANDS AND NOT PIXEL CELLS WITHIN EACH TOWN DISCOVERED LATE THAT THE SPATIAL JOIN OPERATION ATUALLY COUNTED NUMBER OF CONSERVED LANDS AND NOT PIXEL CELLS WITHIN EACH TOWN DATASET ONLY DATING BACK THREE YEARS DATASET ONLY DATING BACK THREE YEARS DATA OMITS DESCRIPTION OF DEER’S WEIGHT AND SEX DATA OMITS DESCRIPTION OF DEER’S WEIGHT AND SEX MAKES ASSUMPTION THAT DEER ARE SEDENTARY MAKES ASSUMPTION THAT DEER ARE SEDENTARY MAKES ASSUMPTION THAT DEER POPULATION IS STAGNANT MAKES ASSUMPTION THAT DEER POPULATION IS STAGNANT MAKES ASSUMPTION THAT ALL CONSERVED LANDS ALLOW HUNTING MAKES ASSUMPTION THAT ALL CONSERVED LANDS ALLOW HUNTING

FURTHER EVALUATION DETERMINE AREA OF CONSERVED LANDS WITHIN TOWN BOUNDARIES DETERMINE AREA OF CONSERVED LANDS WITHIN TOWN BOUNDARIES DETERMINE WHERE LARGER DEER ARE HARVESTED DETERMINE WHERE LARGER DEER ARE HARVESTED DETERMINE HOW TOWN POPULATION HAS IMPACT ON PERCENTAGE OF HUNTERS DETERMINE HOW TOWN POPULATION HAS IMPACT ON PERCENTAGE OF HUNTERS DEER HABITAT RANGES (INCLUDING LANDCOVER) THROUGHOUT THE STATE AND TIME OF YEAR DEER HABITAT RANGES (INCLUDING LANDCOVER) THROUGHOUT THE STATE AND TIME OF YEAR SURVEY OF VERMONT HUNTERS WHO ACTUALLY DISCLOSE HUNTING GROUNDS SURVEY OF VERMONT HUNTERS WHO ACTUALLY DISCLOSE HUNTING GROUNDS

THE END… QUESTIONS?