Union County, North Carolina Update of Wastewater Treatment Capacity Alternatives Evaluation for the Yadkin - Pee Dee Basin of Union County, NC Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Plan Update Public Meeting Monticello High School September 21, :00 pm.
Advertisements

Wakulla County Sewer Project Eutaw Utilities Presentation April 7, 2011.
This presentation is an abbreviated version of the original PowerPoint presentation of June 23, This version was presented at the Commissioners’
Lunenburg CWMP Phase II – Management Techniques and Alternatives Identification and Screening Lunenburg Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan Workshop.
The Town of Discovery Bay Community Services District Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan NOVEMBER 9, 2011.
Berkeley Charleston Dorchester Water Quality Management (208) Program Vonie Gilreath, Regional Planner, BCDCOG Coastal Community Workshop February 7, 2006.
Floyd County Board of Commissioners Special Town Hall Meeting Topic: Update on status of Georgetown WWTP.
Article 41 Wastewater Planning Capacity Study To determine whether the Town will vote to adopt a resolution supporting the Town Manager’s allocation of.
STATUS OF CARLSBORG SEWER PROJECT Carlsborg Community Advisory Council Bob Martin June 6, 2013.
Water Services Department Arizona Mexico Commission Bi-National Meeting March 9-11, 2008 David Cavazos Deputy City Manager Water Services Department Arizona.
Farmland Preservation is essential to our Polk County lifestyle.
Collection Systems for Community Wastewater Systems CAWPCA Spring Meeting April 26, 2013 Dave Prickett, PE.
South Side Red River Bridge Corridor Study Phase III Preliminary Geotechnical Study Phase IV New Alignment Alternatives Evaluation.
CITY OF NORTH PORT US41 CORRIDOR UTILITIES MASTER PLAN US 41 Utility Corridor Study Presentation April 27, 2010.
Jordan Lake Partnership Western Intake Feasibility Study Jordan Lake Partnership Western Intake Feasibility Study 1.
February 24, 2015 Presented by: Heidi Springer, P.E. Brian Ginter, P.E.
Imagine the result Impact Study on MSD Rate Payers of Proposed Consolidation/Merger Phase II – Towns of Biltmore Forest, Montreat and Weaverville Presentation.
Water System Planning Study
Alaska By Region. Southwest Alaska Made up of the Aleutian and Pribilof Islands, the Kodiak Island group, and the Alaska Peninsula. Land is grassy tundra.
Michael Tamblin, P.E., BCEE Stearns & Wheler, LLC Protecting and Enhancing the Ramapo Watershed – A Designated Sole Source Aquifer Supplying New York and.
June 30, 2015 Land Use Meeting Heather Gutherless Jefferson County Planning & Zoning
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2006 Water Services National Training Group 10 th Annual Conference 7 th September 2006.
Waste Water Facilities Plan Update November 2, 2009 Palmer Engineering Company / Hazen & Sawyer / CDP Public Hearing Presentation.
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA Programming Meeting Water Consultants 5 th of March 2008 Novotel 1.
Middlebury Fire Department Facilities Analysis A Project by Middlebury College GG420 Students 17 March 2005.
Annexation Issues in Eden A History of Annexation in Eden Since 1968 NC Annexation History Current Annexation Issues in Eden January 2010.
Financial Impact of Drought March 5, 2008 Updated 3/17/08.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Il Problem CE 572 Spring 2006.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
Stormwater Overview Board of County Commissioners Planning Conference March 1, 2007.
Council Workshop, June 24, Image Date: 1/15/2014 Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD., Expandable to 6.0 MGD. Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD.,
North West Study Area Staff Recommendation Tuesday, September 22, 2009.
1 NORTH VALLEY REGIONAL WATER AND WASTEWATER PROJECTS MEETING OF THE NEW MEXICO-TEXAS WATER COMMISSION May 19, 2005.
November 17, 2015 Charting the Future of Water Reuse for the City of Raleigh Sheryl D. Smith, P.E. – CDM Smith Eileen M. Navarrete, P.E., PMP – City of.
Considerations and operational challenges in choosing Membrane Filtration for a Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Ed Cross Division Manager, Water Supply and.
Road Map to the Future: The Consolidation of Sewer Infrastructure in Rutherford County, NC November 16 th, 2015.
Ordinance Amending Chapter 37 Orange County Code Utilities Department October 21,
Implementing an Adaptive Capital Improvement Program
NC AWWA-WEA 95th Annual Conference
CONEWAGO CREEK GROUND WATER STUDY Base Flow and Impervious Cover November 7, 2007 Watershed Alliance of Adams County Joe McNally, P.G. GeoServices, Ltd.
Potential Consolidation of WMWD’s Murrieta Division into EMWD April 15, 2015 Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager, Eastern Municipal Water District
Santa Rita Wastewater Treatment Plant Alternative Site Investigation Addendum Sawmill Road Site.
Village of Naples and Hazlitt 1852 Vineyards Sewer Feasibility Study.
STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.
Kevin Colvett, PE Jonathan Childs, PE CH2M HILL, Nashville CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN AND ENGINEERING REPORT, PHASE III, FOR THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD, TN Presentation.
Tom Reeder Division of Water Resources.  SGWASA = South Granville Water & Sewer Auth.  Provides water & sewer service to south Granville County, Stem,
Remedial Measures Plans Response to EQC Questions June 21, 2011 Presentation to Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Environmental Quality Committee.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
STA 2 Expansion Project Conceptual Plan for Cell 4 STA 2 Expansion Project Conceptual Plan for Cell 4 Long-term Plan Communications Meeting November 18,
Snoqualmie Retail Market Analysis Presented July 2, 2007 City of Snoqualmie.
City of Farmersville Wastewater Project January 26, 2016 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
1 TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plans December 8, 2009 Presented to the City Council Jay Chapa Housing & Economic.
JEA’s Initiatives and Capital Improvements Program
Kings Bluff Raw Water System Parallel Raw Water Main Project
North Texas Municipal Water District “Regional Service Through Unity … Meeting Our Region’s Needs Today and Tomorrow” Water Supplies Vital for the Future.
Mangawhai Wastewater Strategy and Options 7 August 2017.
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities’ Request for Modification of Interbasin Transfer Certificate HEARING OFFICERS REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS Toya Ogallo Division.
Jon Risgaard, Wastewater Branch Rick Bolich, Raleigh Regional Office
Water Reclamation Plant Feasibility Study Update May 28, 2014
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
River Basins and Watersheds
An Innovative Approach for Increasing Lift Station Pumping Capacity
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Facilities Plan Update
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
Biltmore C Proposed Water & Sewer Improvement Project
2018 Water/Wastewater Rate Study and Financial Forecast
Presentation transcript:

Union County, North Carolina Update of Wastewater Treatment Capacity Alternatives Evaluation for the Yadkin - Pee Dee Basin of Union County, NC Presented to Union County Board of Commissioners Presented by CH2M HILL Bob Forbes, PE March 1, 2007

Union County, North Carolina Agenda Project background Alternatives evaluation overview –Non-economic parameters –Economic parameters Summary Questions

Union County, North Carolina

WWTF Alt. 3A

Union County, North Carolina Basis for evaluation of alternatives Non-economic factors –NPDES permit factors –Institutional issues –Long-term suitability of WRF site –Other environmental factors Capital costs Site issues

Union County, North Carolina WWTF Alt. 3A Alt. 3A Route

Union County, North Carolina Non-economic comparison RANKING OF NON-ECONOMIC FACTORS FOR THE WRF ALTERNATIVES TO SERVE NORTHERN UNION COUNTY (each alternative scored on scale of 1 to 5 for each criterion, with 5 being best, then ranked in order of Total Score) WRF AlternativeNPDES Permit Factors Institu- tional Issues Long-term Suitability of WRF Site Other Envir. Factors Total Score RankRank Other Considerations 1 - WWTF near Rocky River and mouth of Crooked Creek Good NPDES conditions, near service area, but partially developed site (forest, farm & residential) 1A – WWTF near proposed Crooked Creek Pump Station with Rocky River discharge Good NPDES conditions, near western service area, but close to residential and rural neighborhoods. 2- WWTF near Rocky River and mouth of Grassy Creek Good NPDES conditions, near service area, mostly undeveloped site (forest & farmland). 2A – WWTF near State Hwy’s 218 & 200, discharge to Rocky River Good NPDES conditions, centrally-located, sparsely populated, large parcels available. 3- WWTF near Rocky River at Sugar&Wine Road Good NPDES conditions but farther from service area. Proposed site is mostly farmland. 3A – WWTF near Rocky River at State Hwy 742 Bridge Crossing Large, undeveloped parcels available and good NPDES conditions. Farther from initial service area, but could potentially serve more of the County by gravity.

Union County, North Carolina Non-economic comparison (cont.) RankRank RANKING OF NON-ECONOMIC FACTORS FOR THE WRF ALTERNATIVES TO SERVE NORTHERN UNION COUNTY (each alternative scored on scale of 1 to 5 for each criterion, with 5 being best, then ranked in order of Total Score) WRF AlternativeNPDES Permit Factors Institu- tional Issues Long-term Suitability of WRF Site Other Envir. Factors Total Score Other Considerations 4- LRR WRF on Rocky River near Richardson Creek in Anson County Good NPDES conditions, much farther from service area, undeveloped site in Anson County 5- WRF on Richardson Creek at Salem Creek in Union County Difficult NPDES conditions (discharge to small creek, upstream WS and WWTP), close to service area, partially developed site 5A – WRF on Richardson Creek near Anson County line, discharge to RR Good NPDES conditions, near eastern service areas, but close to residential neighborhoods and smaller land lots. 6- Transfer wastewater to Twelve Mile Creek WRF Difficult NPDES conditions (discharge to small creek, existing WWTP), far from service area, partially developed site. 7- Transfer WW to CMUD McAlpine Creek WWTP Moderate NPDES conditions, farther from service area in Mecklenburg County, question of available capacity 8 – Transfer WW to Anson County WRF on Pee Dee River Best NPDES conditions, farthest from service area in Anson County, undeveloped site

Union County, North Carolina Cost Comparison – First 8 Alternatives TABLE 2 Summary of Potential Costs in Million Dollars (first eight alternatives, increased from 5 MGD to 6 MGD capacity in initial phase, decreased from 10 MGD to 9 MGD expansion capacity in 2 nd phase, and updated from March 2004 to November 2006 dollars) Initial Phase for 6 MGDAlt#1Alt#2Alt#3Alt#4Alt#5Alt#6Alt#7Alt#8 Force Main Costs$12.6M$14.2M$17.6M$29.0M$22.4M$44.3M$59.5M$53.1M Pump Station Costs$4.3M $6.4M Collection System Costs$26.7M 6 MGD ADF WRF Capacity$47.8M $37.5M$47.8M Initial Phase Capital Costs$91M$93M$96M$110M$103M$125M$130M$134M Ultimate Build Out-15 MGD Force Main Capacity Expansion (Booster Pump Stations) None $3.4M.$6.8M$3.4M Pump Station Capacity Expansion Cost $9.0M $14.1M Collection System Extension$26.7M 9 MGD ADF WWTF Capacity Expansion $71.6M Capacity Expansion Costs of Each Alternative $107M $112M $116M$119M$116M Ultimate Buildout Total$199M$200M$204M$222M$216M$241M$249M$250M

Union County, North Carolina Cost Comparison – Other 4 Alternatives TABLE 3 Summary of Potential Costs in Million Dollars (last four alternatives evaluated, with capacity increased from 5 MGD to 6 MGD in initial phase, decreased from 10 MGD to 9 MGD in 2nd phase, and updated from March 2004 to November 2006 dollars) Initial Phase for 6 MGDAlt#1AAlt#2AAlt #3AAlt#5A Force Main Costs$15.9M$16.0 M$24.0M$26.8M Pump Station Costs$4.3M Collection System Costs$26.7M 6 MGD ADF WWTF Capacity$47.8M Initial Phase Capital Costs$95M $103M$106M Ultimate Build Out for 15 MGD Force Main Capacity Expansion (Booster Pump Stations) None Pump Station Capacity Expansion Cost$9.0M Collection System Extension$26.7M 9 MGD ADF WRF Capacity Expansion$71.6M Capacity Expansion Costs of Each Alternative $107M Ultimate Buildout Total Costs$202M $210M$213M

Union County, North Carolina Evaluation Summary TABLE 4 SUMMARY RANKING OF NON-ECONOMIC FACTORS AND ESTIMATED COSTSFOR THE WRF ALTERNATIVES TO SERVE NORTHERN UNION COUNTY Alternative & DescriptionNon- economic Ranking Cost Ranking Total Score Overall Rank 1- LRR WRF on Rocky River near Crooked Creek A – WRF near proposed Crooked Creek Pump Sta. with discharge into Rocky River LRR WRF on Rocky River near Grassy Creek A – WRF near State Hwy’s 218 & 200, discharge to Rocky River LRR WRF on Rocky River at Sugar & Wine Road A – WWTF near Rocky River just downstream of State Hwy 742 Bridge Crossing LRR WRF on Rocky River near Richardson Creek in Anson County WRF on Richardson Creek at Salem Creek in Union County A – WRF on Richardson Creek near Anson County line, discharge to RR Transfer wastewater to Twelve Mile Creek WRF Transfer WW to CMUD McAlpine Creek WWTP – Transfer WW to Anson County WRF on Pee Dee River Non-economic rankings are from Table 1; cost rankings are in order of estimated costs (lowest to highest, from Tables 2 & 3), and the overall rankings of the 12 alternatives represent the sum of non-economic and cost rankings