Estimation of the Accuracy Obtained from CFD for industrial applications Prepared by Imama Zaidi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
Advertisements

1 CFD Workshop on Test Cases, Databases & BPG for Nuclear Power Plants Applications, 16 July CFD Quality & Trust: mixed and natural convection test.
Outline Overview of Pipe Flow CFD Process ANSYS Workbench
CFD II w/Dr. Farouk By: Travis Peyton7/18/2015 Modifications to the SIMPLE Method for Non-Orthogonal, Non-Staggered Grids in k- E Turbulence Flow Model.
DESIGN OF AIRFOILS FOR WIND TURBINE BLADES Presented by Parezanovic Vladimir Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Belgrade University.
1 Using ANN to solve the Navier Stoke Equations Motivation: Solving the complete Navier Stokes equations using direct numerical simulation is computationally.
1 Pressure-based Solver for Incompressible and Compressible Flows with Cavitation Sunho Park 1, Shin Hyung Rhee 1, and Byeong Rog Shin 2 1 Seoul National.
Copyright © Siemens AG All rights reserved. Fluistcom Project Meeting Belfast 24th of December FLUISTCOM Exchange Program at SIEMENS-Muelheim Daniele.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
1 Simulation of Micro-channel Flows by Lattice Boltzmann Method LIM Chee Yen, and C. Shu National University of Singapore.
Lectures on CFD Fundamental Equations
Numerical Uncertainty Assessment Reference: P.J. Roache, Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering, Hermosa Press, Albuquerque.
Introduction to numerical simulation of fluid flows
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester Aspects of Transitional flow for External Applications A review presented by.
Anoop Samant Yanyan Zhang Saptarshi Basu Andres Chaparro
1 * 2 conf. paper papers presented by Y. Addad (UoM) and R. Howard (EDF) April 26 – 1 May, 2009 Hammamet, Tunisia * Int. Symp on Convective Heat and Mass.
CFD Modeling for Helium Releases in a Private Garage without Forced Ventilation Papanikolaou E. A. Venetsanos A. G. NCSR "DEMOKRITOS" Institute of Nuclear.
Network and Grid Computing –Modeling, Algorithms, and Software Mo Mu Joint work with Xiao Hong Zhu, Falcon Siu.
PETE 603 Lecture Session #29 Thursday, 7/29/ Iterative Solution Methods Older methods, such as PSOR, and LSOR require user supplied iteration.
Verification and Validation Diagram of a Control Rod Guide Tube on top of a hot box dome that has been gradually heating up. A hole was drilled here to.
Numerical Investigation of Mixed Convection in AGRsBy Amir Keshmiri Supervisors: Prof. Dominique Laurence and Dr. Mark Cotton School of Mechanical, Aerospace.
Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations CAAM 452 Spring 2005 Lecture 9 Instructor: Tim Warburton.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
1 A combined RANS-LES strategy with arbitrary interface location for near-wall flows Michael Leschziner and Lionel Temmerman Imperial College London.
Numerical methods in flow metrology Sampo Sillanpää, Centre for metrology and accreditation.
Address: Washington street 40 B-1050 Brussels Belgium Tel: Fax: rehva Federation of European.
1 Calorimeter Thermal Analysis with Increased Heat Loads September 28, 2009.
Plane sudden expansion flows of viscoelastic liquids: effect of expansion ratio Robert J Poole Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, UK Manuel.
CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Multigrid accelerated numerical methods based on implicit scheme for moving.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Adaptive Meshing using STAR-CCM+
Mass Transfer Coefficient
© Fluent Inc. 11/24/2015J1 Fluids Review TRN Overview of CFD Solution Methodologies.
CFX-10 Introduction Lecture 1.
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Different numerical approaches to 3D transport modelling of fusion devices Alexander Kalentyev.
Compressor Cascade Pressure Rise Prediction
Lecture Objectives -Finish Particle dynamics modeling -See some examples of particle tracking -Eulerian Modeling -Define deposition velocity -Fluid Dynamics.
FALL 2015 Esra Sorgüven Öner
Reynolds Analogy It can be shown that, under specific conditions (no external pressure gradient and Prandtle number equals to one), the momentum and heat.
Turbulence Models Validation in a Ventilated Room by a Wall Jet Guangyu Cao Laboratory of Heating, Ventilating and Air-Conditioning,
© Ram Ramanan 2/22/2016 Commercial Codes 1 ME 7337 Notes Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers Lecture 4: Commercial Codes.
Lecture Objectives: Review discretization methods for advection diffusion equation –Accuracy –Numerical Stability Unsteady-state CFD –Explicit vs. Implicit.
AIAA th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on MAO, 09/05/2002, Atlanta, GA 0 AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES Serhat Hosder, Bernard.
Code verification and mesh uncertainty The goal is to verify that a computer code produces the right solution to the mathematical model underlying it.
1 Accuracy of present data. 2 Grid dependency (I) u rms y/D u rms at r/D=0.5 u rms at r/D=1 U at r/D=1 u rms U No. cells on M-G level 1 (): 194 x 98.
ERT 216 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/ Dr Akmal Hadi Ma’ Radzi School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis.
CFD Exercise 1 Laminar & turbulent flows with COMSOL.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
A V&V Overview of the 31st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
WATER AND LEAD-BISMUTH EXPERIMENTS: FLUENT AND STAR-CD SIMULATION
“Solve the equations right” Mathematical problem Validation :
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
Energy Loss in Valves Function of valve type and valve position
Workshop 6 Modeling of Catalytic Convertor
Introduction to CFD Analysis
Convergence in Computational Science
Introduction to CFD Analysis
Objective Review Reynolds Navier Stokes Equations (RANS)
Lecture Objectives: Advance discretization methods
Objective Numerical methods.
The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.
Effect of Non – Linear Averaging in Computed Tomography
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINITIES
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
QUANTIFYING THE UNCERTAINTY IN Wind Power Production Using Meteodyn WT
Objective Numerical methods Finite volume.
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
Objective Reynolds Navier Stokes Equations (RANS) Numerical methods.
Low Order Methods for Simulation of Turbulence in Complex Geometries
Presentation transcript:

Estimation of the Accuracy Obtained from CFD for industrial applications Prepared by Imama Zaidi

Sources of Uncertainty Computational Grid –Grid Spacing –Grid Topology Numerical Approximation User Errors Post Processing Turbulence Modelling Flow complexity (multi-phase flow, combustion… etc)

Problem Definition Rayleigh Number Ra= Reference Velocity V 0 =

Part I Laminar Flow

Flow inside Cavity

Types of Grids tested Square grid Polyhedral Skewed Butterfly type

Numerical Schemes tested Convection schemes: Second Order Upwind First Order Upwind Central Differencing Scheme Note: Runs are carried out in steady state mode

Richardson Extrapolation Grid independent solution Order of convergence Exact solution Targets: Nu and Mass flow across ½ section =>

Second Order Upwind Square grid

First Order Upwind Square grid

Central Differencing Scheme n=2.33 Ra=10 3

Effect of Order of Convergence Rich. Extrap. Using 10 2, 20, 40 Rich. Extrap. Using 20 2, 402, 802

Effect of Order of Convergence n=1.72 n=1.96

Richardson Extrapolation at Hot Wall

Post Processing Error

20X20 40X40

Example for user input Error Reference velocity is defined as:

Effect of Changing Reference Velocity

Effect of Numerical Scheme

Square Grid

Polyhedral Grid

Skewed Grid

Butterfly Type Grid

Why does error not always decrease? For square grid –Dx.Dt error > Dx2 ? But this is steady state –Residual normalisation? But increasing nb of iteration => no change For skewed grid –Error = constant, whatever h. –Need to test other “gradient reconstruction” methods for non-orthogonality

Part II Turbulent Flow

Flow inside Cavity

Type of Mesh

Low Reynolds Number Model Standard Low Reynolds Number Model (Lein et all) Abe Nagano Kondoh (ANK)Low Reynolds Model (Abe et all) V2f Model(Durbin et all) Model(Mentor) Spalart Allamaras (SA) Model (Baldwin et all)

Y+ from 40*40 Grid

Y+ from 80*80 Grid

Y+ from 160*160 Grid

Error From Different Turbulence Models For Nu Kω-sst model

Spalart Allmaras

V2f Model

K  -sst Model

Near Wall Grid Dependence Kw-sst Model Grid 80X80 and changing near-wall cell  x

Near Wall Grid Dependence V2f Model

Conclusions For distorted grids (Skewed Mesh), the refinement does not guarantee the accuracy The higher the order of scheme is, the higher will be the accuracy. Richardson extrapolation theory tested for laminar flow, seems to be in good agreement with the results for order of convergence nearly equals to 2

Conclusions K  SST model compared to the other models tested, seems more dependent on the grid refinement near the wall and grid independence is not reached even with 160x160 grid.