Recurrence Intervals Frequency – Average time between past seismic events – aka “recurrence interval” Recurrence Interval = Average slip per major rupture.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Earthquake recurrence models Are earthquakes random in space and time? We know where the faults are based on the geology and geomorphology Segmentation.
Advertisements

Done by: Zhu HuaYing 3A1 (31) Li ShiCheng 3A1 (16) Brian Teo Kian Peng 3A1(26) Han Xuyang 3O1 (003) Yu JiaKe 3O1 (29) Xu ZiHao 3O1 (27) SAN ANDREAS FAULT.
New paleoseismic data from the northern San Jacinto Fault Zone, southern California Nate Onderdonk (CSULB) Tom Rockwell (SDSU) Sally McGill (CSUSB) Gayatri.
Source: NPS Source: USGS Earthquakes. Seismic Hazard Source: USGS.
Report By: Grace Buehlmann
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region, 2002–2031 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, 2002 Chapters 1 & 2.
Earthquakes Presented you to by the Hazard Committee Madeline Galac Nicole Barstrom.
Earthquake Probabilities for the San Francisco Bay Region Working Group 2002: Chapter 6 Ved Lekic EQW, April 6, 2007 Working Group 2002: Chapter.
A New Approach To Paleoseismic Event Correlation Glenn Biasi and Ray Weldon University of Nevada Reno Acknowledgments: Tom Fumal, Kate Scharer, SCEC and.
Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.
Earthquake Predictibility, Forcasting and Early Warning Bill Menke October 18, 2005.
Chapter 4: The SFBR Earthquake Source Model: Magnitude and Long-Term Rates Ahyi Kim 2/23/07 EQW.
1 Can We Predict Earthquakes? Can We Predict Earthquakes? Andrea Nemeth Advisor: Dr. Mark Schilling.
Chapter 5: Calculating Earthquake Probabilities for the SFBR Mei Xue EQW March 16.
Tsunami Great Sumatra Earthquake Tsunami Death Toll ~ 250,000 Tsunami Death Toll ~ 250,000.
Earthquake Prediction Methods By Jason Long. Outline Background Statistical Methods Physical and Geophysical measurements and observations Conclusion.
Types of Plate Boundaries in California The Great California ShakeOut.
The San Francisco Earthquake of 1906 By Mrs. Cheney.
The San Francisco Earthquake of 1906 Learning from the Past to Advance the Future By Mrs. Cheney.
Earthquake potential of the San Andreas and North Anatolian Fault Zones: A comparative look M. B. Sørensen Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen,
The San Andreas Fault By Kevin Buckley And Nicholas Schuch, Esquire.
Segments of the San Andreas Fault Historically, the San Andreas has been divided up into individual fault segments that range from tens to hundreds of.
NA-Pa Plate Boundary Wilson [1960] USGS Prof. Paper 1515.
Southern California Earthquake Center Mini Grand Challenge Lindsay Arvin Daniel Philo Ryan Meier Jing Yuan Kelvin Vasquez Ngoc Kiem.
2007 NSTA: St. Louis, Missouri Earthquake Prediction and Forecasting: A Case Study of the San Andreas and New Madrid Faults Sponsored by: IRIS (Incorporated.
Forecasting Earthquakes ・ Difference between Predictions and Forecasts ・ Earlier Efforts in Earthquake Prediction ・ Long-term Probability Estimates.
Earthquake Predictions & Tectonic Environments
Earthquake Science (Seismology). Quick review of last lecture (fault, epicentre, seismic waves, magnitude) Quick review of last lecture (fault, epicentre,
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
Time-independent hazard-random process in time: used for building design, planning, insurance, probability Time-dependent hazard-a degree of predictability,
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Earthquakes Most destructive forces on Earth. But it is buildings and other human structures that cause injury and death, not the earthquake itself 1988.
Key Considerations in Modeling of Earthquake Risk in Turkey
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
GEO 6950 Reviews in Earth Science, Fall 2011 Topic 2 Tectonics of Western North America 11. San Andreas Fault System Carrie Welker and Alex Turner.
These boundaries are where plates “slide” past each other. In about 60 million years Los Angeles and San Francisco will be next to each other.
Part 8: Fold Types. Tensional Stress Compressive Stress Shear Stress Orientation of stress leads to different folds.
National Seismic Hazard Maps and Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast 1.0 National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project (Golden, CO) California Geological.
On which faults have major earthquakes have occurred since the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake? The Great California ShakeOut.
Earthquake forecasting using earthquake catalogs.
Scientific Drilling Into the San Andreas Fault zone San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD)
An earthquake of magnitude 7
Earthquake Risk in the Bay Area: The Hayward Fault Ellen Metzger BAESI March 23, 2013.
California Project Seismicity in the oil and gas fields Tayeb A. Tafti University of Southern California July 2, 2013.
The influence of the geometry of the San Andreas fault system on earthquakes in California Qingsong Li and Mian Liu Geological Sciences, 101 Geol. Bldg.,
Forecasting Earthquakes
112/16/2010AGU Annual Fall Meeting - NG44a-08 Terry Tullis Michael Barall Steve Ward John Rundle Don Turcotte Louise Kellogg Burak Yikilmaz Eric Heien.
19.4 – Earthquakes & Society. Damages  Death and injuries  Collapse of buildings  Landslides  Fires  Explosions  Flood waters.
Can we forecast an Earthquake??? In the next minute there will be an earthquake somewhere in the world! This sentence is correct (we have seen that there.
Forecasting Earthquakes ・ Difference between Predictions and Forecasts ・ Earlier Efforts in Earthquake Prediction ・ Long-term Probability Estimates.
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide simulations of synthetic seismicity Fred Pollitz, USGS Menlo Park Acknowledgments: David Schwartz, Steve Ward.
HAZARD EVENT PREDICTION. Write two sub-headings in your notes: 1. Estimates [predictions] of the probability [in space and time] of an earthquake occurring.
Understanding Earth Sixth Edition Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES © 2011 by W. H. Freeman and Company Grotzinger Jordan.
Earthquake Forecasting and Prediction. Parkfield, CA.
Earthquakes USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquake Basics
Fault Types ~Notes~.
Some issues/limitations with current UCERF approach
SAN ANDREAS FAULT San Francisco Bay Area North American plate
HOW ARE we “BLIND” TO some of our faults?
Understanding Earth Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES Grotzinger • Jordan
19.4 – Earthquakes & Society
Inside Earth 1.2 & 1.5.
San Andreas Fault Zone Mr. Kleinschrodt.
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
Earthquakes and Fault Types
The Parkfield Experiment
Aseismic Slip and Repeating Earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault
Chapter 12 Vocabulary.
Presentation transcript:

Recurrence Intervals Frequency – Average time between past seismic events – aka “recurrence interval” Recurrence Interval = Average slip per major rupture / Slip Rate Quote: The next large earthquake on the southern San Andreas Fault could affect 10 million people or more. “It could (The Big One) be tomorrow or it could be 10 years or more from now” -Yuri Fialko, September 2005

Prediction vs. Forecasting Recurrence Intervals – Past occurrence of random events. Prediction – Determining the hazard of seismic activity of given areas is important to predict future occurrences. Forecasting - Future likelihood of random events. – Using probability of seismic activity occurring in a given area during a given time – Assessing both the slip rate of the fault and the risk the fault presents

Recurrence Intervals Segments Northern Segment – Average slip rate (1.3 – 1.5 inches per year) – Meaningful average recurrence interval 200 with an uncertainty of 50 years – 1906 San Francisco Earthquake 7.8M Central Segment – Aseismic creep – slips continuously without causing earthquakes – 1857 Fort Tegon Earthquake 7.9M Few exceptions i.e. Parkfield Southern Segment (Mojave Segment) – Average slip rate (1.3 – 1.5 inches per year) – Meaningful average recurrence interval 200 with an uncertainty of 50 years – No major earthquake in over 250 years *( M) YIKES! Fun Fact: Probable Magnitudes on the SAF are M W (Hang on!) Creeping at Hollister, CA

References Furnal, Thomas E., Silvio K. Pezzopane, Ray J. Weldon, II, and David P. Schwartz. "A 100-Year Average Recurrence Interval for the San Andreas Fault at Wrightwood, California." Science 259 (1993): n. pag. Science. Web. "Information and Resources about the San Andreas Fault." Information and Resources about the San Andreas Fault. Ed. David K. Lynch. N.p., Web. 17 June Nester, Irene K. "San Andreas Transform Fault Zone." San Andreas Transform Fault Zone. Emporia State University, 25 Apr Web. 13 June Richardson, Eliza. "Different Methods for Determining Recurrence Interval." Welcome to the Dutton E-Education Institute!Pennsylvania State University, n.d. Web. 14 June