LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G070657-00-E1 Scattering Loss Hiro Yamamoto - Caltech LIGO LIGO I mirror loss estimation surface figure,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Hild, Andreas Freise University of Birmingham Roland Schilling, Jerome Degallaix AEI Hannover January 2008, Virgo week, Pisa Advanced Virgo: Wedges.
Advertisements

G v1 1 The reality of Mirrors? GWADW May 15, 2012 GariLynn Billingsley Liyuan Zhang Zygo… CSIRO…
Hiro Yamamoto LLO April 3, 2014 LIGO-G Core Optics related loss hierarchy of aLIGO Hiro Yamamoto LIGO/Caltech Introduction Loss related to geometry.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation Experience in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Virgo/LSC Meeting, Cascina, May 2007 LIGO-G Z.
Atmospheric Dispersion Correctors. ZnSe linear ADC Plots are for 60° zenith angle < 10 mas residual dispersion for λ= μ ZnSe transmission starts.
LIGO-G W LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting – LLO March Summary of recent measurements of g factor changes induced by thermal loading.
Scattering loss (Hiro CIT on April 11, 2007 G Extra loss ~ 40ppm / mirror microroughness = 4~5 ppm? Visibility, recycling gain, large.
FFT study of the realistic Optics of LIGO I July 12th, 2004 Commissioning meeting Hiro Yamamoto, Biplab Bhawal, Xiao Xu (CIT-SURF)  LIGO I mirror phase.
20 Nov 2008G v21 Optical & Vacuum Equipment Layouts Dennis Coyne Mike Smith Luke Williams 20 Nov 2008 Adv. LIGO Team Meeting, Caltech, Pasadena,
BS and Mirrors for the LCGT Norikatsu Mio, PSC Univ. of Tokyo Eiichi Hirose, ICRR Univ. of Tokyo December 13, 2011 CSIRO, Lindfield Australia.
Modeling beam and mirror distortions using modal models: FINESSE V.1 Charlotte Bond, Daniel Brown and Andreas Freise Tokyo Institute of Technology 21/06/2013.
1 G Mike Smith Gravitational Waves & Precision Measurements.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
Intermediate review - ERC – February 9, 2009 – L. Pinard 1 Mirrors Sub-System Overview  Introduction  Scope of the subsystem, main tasks  Job done since.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
Degeneracy for power-recycling and signal recycling cavities in Advanced Virgo.
1 The Status of Melody: An Interferometer Simulation Program Amber Bullington Stanford University Optics Working Group March 17, 2004 G D.
A. Bunkowski Nano-structured Optics for GW Detectors 1 A.Bunkowski, O. Burmeister, D. Friedrich, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel in collaboration with T.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
Thermal Compensation: The GEO and LIGO experience and requirements for advanced detectors Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT On behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
G v5 1 Core Optics Components Technical Status NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project April 2011 GariLynn Billingsley.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
LIGO- G R Telecon on June, Mach-Zender interferometer to eliminate sidebands of sidebands for Advanced LIGO Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
LIGO Laboratory1 Enhanced and Advanced LIGO TCS Aidan Brooks - Caltech Hannover LSC-VIRGO Meeting, October 2007 LIGO-G Z.
DFG-NSF Astrophysics Workshop Jun 2007 G Z 1 Optics for Interferometers for Ground-based Detectors David Reitze Physics Department University.
1 Mexican-Hat (Flat-Topped) Beams for Advanced LIGO LIGO-G Z Research by Sergey Strigin & Sergey Vyatchanin [MSU] (with advice from Vladimir Braginsky)
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 eLIGO Input Optics Characterization and Performance Kate Dooley University of Florida.
1st Advanced Virgo Review – November 3-4, 2008 – L. Pinard 1 Mirrors Sub-System Overview  Introduction  Scope of the subsystem, main tasks  Substrates.
LIGO LaboratoryLIGO-G R Coatings and Their Influence on Thermal Lensing and Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems Coating Workshop, March 21, 2008,
1 Reducing Thermoelastic Noise by Reshaping the Light Beams and Test Masses Research by Vladimir Braginsky, Sergey Strigin & Sergey Vyatchanin [MSU] Erika.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
S. ChelkowskiSlide 1LSC Meeting, Amsterdam 09/2008.
AdV Thermal Compensation System Viviana Fafone AdV/aLIGO joint technical meeting, February 4, 2004.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
Hiro Yamamoto GWADW Girdwood, Alaska LIGO-G Beam Splitter in aLIGO Hiro Yamamoto LIGO/Caltech BS02 to BS05? larger BS? BS in aLIGO IFO for.
First DR FFT Results on Advanced LIGO Using Perfect and Imperfect Optics By Ken Ganezer, George Jennings, and Sam Wiley CSUDH LIGO-G Z by Ken.
LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E1 AdvLIGO Static Interferometer Simulation AdvLIGO simulation tools  Stationary, frequency domain.
Coating Workshop, Caltech, March 21, 2008 G R 1 First Results from the Syracuse University Scatter Imaging Lab Joshua Smith, Matt West, Dave Evans,
TCS and IFO Properties Dave Ottaway For a lot of people !!!!!! LIGO Lab Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of.
LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Baton Rouge LSC Meeting, March 2007 LIGO-G Z.
1 Development schedule of Static IFO Simulation (SIS) Basic building blocks »Framework »mirror, cavity or propagator, detector FP cavity »Simple locking,
Equivalence relation between non spherical optical cavities and application to advanced G.W. interferometers. Juri Agresti and Erika D’Ambrosio Aims of.
G Z Mentor: Bill Kells Investigating a Parametric Instability in the LIGO Test Masses Hans Bantilan (Carleton College) for the LIGO Scientific.
Advanced Virgo: Optical Simulation and Design Advanced Virgo review Andreas Freise for the OSD Subsystem.
Effects of as-built Mirrors - analysis using FFT - Hiro Yamamoto, Biplab Bhawal, Xiao Xu, Raghu Dodda (SLU)  LIGO I mirror phase map  FFT tools  Thermal.
LIGO-G D1 Losses in LHO HR Surfaces W. Kells LIGO Laboratory, Caltech With assistance from: H. Radkins, V. Parameshwaraiah, D. Cook, L. Zhang,
G D Workshop on Optical Coating, March 20-21, The Coating Scattering and Absorption Measurements of LIGO I mirrors at Caltech Liyuan Zhang,
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Hiro Yamamoto LIGO seminar on Dec. 1st, 2015 LIGO-G aLIGO test masses, revisited  Scattering and loss by test mass  Discrepancy between the measured.
LIGO-G D Core Optics Components (COC) Polishing Pathfinder Kickoff Advanced LIGO Project GariLynn Billingsley Caltech.
1 Cascina – October 19, 2011 ASPERA Forum Laurent Pinard Substrates, Polishing, Coatings and Metrology for the 2 nd generation of GW detector Laurent PINARD.
Thoughts on an SPI for AdLIGO SPI: Suspension Point Interferometer, or Seismic Platform Interferometer with Rana Adhikari and Matt Evans.
Hiro Yamamoto LVC March 15 th, 2016, Pasadena CA LIGO-G Mirror scattering loss analysis by integrating sphere measurement  Scattering and loss.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
LIGO-G v1 Inside LIGO LIGO1 Betsy Weaver, GariLynn Billingsely and Travis Sadecki 2016 – 02 – 23 at CSIRO, Lindfield.
Characterization of Advanced LIGO Core Optics
A look at interferometer topologies that use reflection gratings
Advanced LIGO status Hiro Yamamoto LIGO lab/Caltech
LIGO Core Optics: a decade of development and experience
W. Kells LIGO Laboratory, Caltech C. Vorvick LIGO Laboratory, Hanford
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
LIGO Core Optics: a decade of development and experience
Overview of Advanced LIGO Coating Status
Modeling of Advanced LIGO with Melody
Scattering Loss Hiro Yamamoto - Caltech LIGO
W. Kells LIGO Laboratory, Caltech C. Vorvick LIGO Laboratory, Hanford
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype
ITM03; LHO ITMx Post O2 inspection LIGO-T v1
Presentation transcript:

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E1 Scattering Loss Hiro Yamamoto - Caltech LIGO LIGO I mirror loss estimation surface figure, micro roughness and larger angle scattering LIGO I mirror surface qualities polished surface data by CSIRO and coated surface data by LIGO Does not include new issues of LMA mirrors bubbles, AR coating, etc Advanced LIGO loss requirement implication of the LIGO I mirror quality Diffractive loss in stable Michelson cavity Loss due to the “effective long distance propagation” in the stable Michelson cavity

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E2 Crude estimation of loss budgets in a LIGO I arm 50ppm ? Recycling gain as a function of extra loss per mirror in FFT simulation Recycling gain, visibility, etc are consistent with 140 ppm loss per arm known loss per arm  surface figure (  10 ppm / mirror x 2  ETM transmission : 7 ppm  absorption : 4ppm / mirror x 2  diffractive loss : 2ppm 140ppm total loss - known loss = 100 ppm / arm or 50 ppm / mirror

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E3 Polished (CSIRO) vs coated (LIGO) surface data FFT Simulation A 300-mm aperture phase shifting fizeau interferometer CSIRO LADI CSIRO TOPO three dimensional noncontact optical profiler surface figure loss

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E4 surface figure CSIRO vs Phasemap PSD 1 / mm

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E5 Surface figure loss of AdvLIGO loss per arm : rms = 1nm vs 0.5nm LIGO I mirror phasemap in advLIGO arm rms = 0.44nm rms = 1nm rms = 0.5nm loss : ppm / mirror 30ppm based on 80 simulated surfaces each

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E6 Loss in the least investigated region :  FFT Simulation intermediate region loss by integral of CSIRO fit in 2~100 cm -1 = 26ppm low end : LIGO < CSIRO high end : LIGO > CSIRO

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E7 Orange peel - psd shows bumps at ~0.3 cm - 7 loss ~ 2.4 ppm new FFT grid size = 0.14 ~ 0.28cm loss ~ 1.3 ppm x 2 old FFT : loss(35cm/256) - loss(35cm/128) Caltech phasemap CSIRO PSD ~10ppm Bill K estimated

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E8 Large angle scattering loss FFT Simulation large angle scattering loss Bill Kells H1 ITMy June 2003 Valera L1 ITMxy&ETMxy October 2007 Scatterometer port Sr ITM Main arm beam In situ, large angle measurement : PD Liyuan Caltech OTF : integrating sphere

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E9 Large angle scattering LLO ITM/ETM by Valery Frolov loss : 3.6ppm loss : 22ppm loss : 20ppm loss : 1 ~ 50 degree

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E10 Integrating sphere data Liyuan, Herena (T070233) 1cm x 1cm 0.3mm beam size 0.1mm step 1.5 ° ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E11 Advanced LIGO total arm loss budget = 70ppm known loss : ~ 50 ppm / arm  diffraction : 0.4 ppm  absorption : 0.5 ppm x 2  surface figure : 20ppm x 2  ETM transmission : 7 ppm 11 ppm / mirror for micro roughness, large angle and all other losses LIGO I mirror : 50 ppm

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E12 Diffraction effect in Stable Michelson cavity

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E13 Beam profile on MMT3 coming from MMT2 230ppm 65ppm 40ppm MMT2RM MMT3ITM 26cm r=13cm diffraction tail r 2 (m 2 ) log(P) vs r 2 log(P) = -r 2 / w 2

LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E14 Summary LIGO I mirror loss estimation  Scattering loss per mirror in LIGO I arm (Power Recycling gain, etc) : 50ppm  Loss(λ>5mm) ~ 10 ppm/mirror  Loss(λ~1mm) ~ not well understood ( 3 ~ 30ppm/mirror?? )  Loss(λ<0.1mm) ~ 10 ~ 30ppm LIGO I mirror surface quality - some inconsistencies  λ>5mm : PSD(coated surface) ~0.1 PSD(polished surface)  λ~1mm : not well understood  λ<0.1mm : mesured loss ~ 10 x estimation by polished surface data Advanced LIGO loss requirement < 35ppm / mirror  Loss(λ>5mm) ~ 20~25 ppm/mirror with RMS < 0.7nm  Need to understand LIGO I mirror losses and to suppress losses or change the AdvLIGO specification to be more tolerant to extra loss Loss in stable Michelson cavity  Due to far field propagation in the cavity, ~500 ppm loss by diffraction with w(ITM)=6cm.  With asymmetric arm configuration (w(ITM)=5.5cm,w(ETM)=6.2cm), this is suppressed to ~50ppm. 14