Justice Data Lab: Facing the Third Sector How can we develop the capacity of third sector organisations to engage with data? Scottish Universities Insight.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Social Finance, 2011PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL 1 Drug Rehabilitation and Payment by Results: The role of social investment 27 April 2011 Social Finance is.
Advertisements

Will 2011 be the last Census of its kind in England and Wales? Roma Chappell, Programme Director Beyond 2011 Office for National Statistics, July 2011.
Measuring Impact: lessons from the capacity building cluster SWF Impact Summit 2 nd October 2013 Leroy White University of Bristol Capacity Building Cluster.
Equality Act 2010 The Public Sector Equality Duty - how will it affect the third sector? Overview of where we are with legislation that came into force.
Welcome to a presentation about
NOMS Grants Programme 2014/15
Study on the outcomes of teaching and learning about ‘race’ and racism Kish Bhatti-Sinclair (Division of Social Work Studies) Claire Bailey (Division of.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL LITERACY FOR YOUNG ENTREPRENEURS: EVIDENCE FROM BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA Miriam Bruhn and Bilal Zia (World Bank, DECFP)
Payment by results Innovation pilots 11 August 2011.
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
UQ Teaching and Learning Small and Large Strategic Grants Scheme 14 June 2007.
Justice Data Lab Joint winners of the RSS 2014 Excellence in Official Statistics Award RSS Professional Statisticians' Forum Meeting Georgina Eaton & Tillie.
Communicating the outcomes of the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise A presentation to press officers in universities and colleges. Philip Walker, HEFCE.
Evaluation of SEED in Romania and England Angela Sorsby Joanna Shapland University of Sheffield Funded by National Offender Management Service (England)
HRB Webinar Health Research Awards Content Objective of the call Scope and Panels Principal Investigator Response to peer-reviewers (rebuttal) Some.
Sponsored/Hosted by:. Your Guide to Intelligent Giving Where the Heart Meets the Mind Critical Friend to Charities.
Regulating the dental sector Tracy Norton Compliance Manager (Central Region) 4 October 2012.
Offender Health Exploring Alcohol Service Demand and Provision Linked to the London Criminal Justice System September 2010.
Teaching and Learning Grants Workshop Teaching and Learning Enhancement at UQ Professor Deborah Terry 8 February 2008.
Corporate Services Grants Programme 2013 – August 2012.
How to Critically Review an Article
REF Information Session August Research Excellence Framework (REF)
Triodos Corporate Finance E3M Social Enterprise Seminar New opportunities for partnerships 8 July
1 6-8 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update English Language Arts February 2012.
The Wheel Campus Engage Building Networks December 2013.
An outcome evaluation of three restorative justice initiatives delivered by Thames Valley Probation Wager, N a, O’Keeffe, C b., Bates, A c. & Emerson,
Total Place in Lewisham Use of Customer Insight Lesley Seary Executive Director for Customer Services Lewisham Council.
A different bank for people who want a different world SOCIAL INVESTMENT More Than The Sum Conference 14 March 2012.
Enhancing Practice in Work with Offenders: the Role of Evaluation Jean Hine, De Montfort University.
Transparency and Open Data: GSS Response Iain Bell HoP MoJ.
Paris Project Meeting January 2012 Item – Statistics Objective 5 B. Proia With financial support from Criminal Justice Programme 2008 European Commission.
QUICK OVERVIEW - REDUCING REOFFENDING EVALUATION PACK INTRODUCTION TO A 4 STEP EVALUATION APPROACH.
Evidencing Outcomes Ruth Mann / George Box Commissioning Strategies Group, NOMS February 2014 UNCLASSIFIED.
1 Tuesday, 13 October 2015 Until there’s a home for everyone Tim Moore, Head of Business Development Transforming Rehabilitation: Engaging with the New.
Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.
Funding to support Investment Readiness Jeff Scales Development Manager.
Evaluation of an ESF funded training program to firms: The Latvian case 1 Andrea Morescalchi Ministry of Finance, Riga (LV) March 2015 L. Elia, A.
Making an impact: making impact measurement work for you Chris Dayson, Sarah Pearson and Peter Wells 15 November 2012.
Low Carbon Infrastructure Transition Programme (LCITP) Background Programme aims Projects areas supported Eligible applicants Case Study What's next Contact.
© Nuffield Trust 22 June 2015 Matched Control Studies: Methods and case studies Cono Ariti
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Monitoring public satisfaction through user satisfaction surveys Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities Helsinki 6-7 May 2010 Steve.
Improving the Respondent Experience in the United Kingdom Julie Curzon/Debra Prestwood UK Office for National Statistics (ONS)
Changes to the Youth Re-offending Measure. YJB position statement The YJB supports the concept of the new measure and the advantages it presents for aligning.
Development Impact Evaluation in Finance and Private Sector 1.
Using propensity score matching to understand what works in reducing re-offending GSS Methodology Symposium Sarah French & Aidan Mews, Ministry of Justice.
Atlantic Innovation Fund Round VIII February 5, 2008.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Other Justice & Governance Agencies Part 1 Crime, Justice & Security Statistics Produced in.
DEMONSTRATING IMPACT IN HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE: HOSPITAL AFTERCARE SERVICE Lesley Dabell, CEO Age UK Rotherham, November 2012.
 SHS REVIEW Duncan Gray, Senior Statistician, Housing Statistics, Scottish Executive.
Research Fellowships. Overview Introduction Why apply for a fellowship Finding the right fellowship The application process Assessment criteria for funding.
Jane Holdsworth 20 January The terminology of outcomes and impact How to evidence outcomes and impact Methods for collecting evidence Sources of.
DECC Framework Contract for Innovation Delivery Support – presentation to potential contractors Thursday 20 October.
7/7/20161 The Public Sector Equality Duty for Schools in England Jonathan Timbers – Policy Manager, PSED Team, Equality and Human Rights Commission.
York, North Yorkshire & East Riding Local Enterprise Partnership Bio-economy Growth Fund Application process September 2016.
L. Elia, A. Morescalchi, G. Santangelo
Justice Data Lab: Facing the Third Sector
The Public Sector Equality Duty
Law Sub-panel Generic Feedback - Impact
Econometric analysis of the benefits of early legal advice
YOUTH ASPIRATION FUND 2017 INFORMATION SESSION
Social Justice Support for the most disadvantaged families and individuals Second chance society Getting on to the first rung of the ladder (progress.
Trevor Smale Grant Manager, South West
The issue of retention in distance learning: a strategic approach to using data to inform retention interventions Alison Gilmour and Avinash Boroowa The.
The Public Sector Equality Duty
Assurance of Quality of German National Accounts by Management
Understanding Impact Stephanie Seavers, Impact Manager.
Presentation to Primary Health Alliance 7 June 2019
Shared evaluation: NHS funders
Presentation transcript:

Justice Data Lab: Facing the Third Sector How can we develop the capacity of third sector organisations to engage with data? Scottish Universities Insight Institute Georgina Eaton & Tillie Paul, Ministry of Justice 4 th February 2015

What will be covered Aims and history of the Justice Data Lab How does the Justice Data Lab work and how can it be accessed? Findings to date Receptions of the service Challenges and successes

Aim of the Justice Data Lab Launched in April to improve the evidence base on successful rehabilitation....by giving organisations working with offenders secure and legal access to aggregate re-offending data..enabling them to better assess the impact of their work on re-offending

Why are we doing the Justice Data Lab? In 2012 we identified that charitable organisations in particular found it difficult to access re-offending data on their clients… … this meant that they could not understand how effective their services were at rehabilitating offenders… … and they were therefore unable to understand how their services could be improved, or have the evidence for further funding It soon became clear that there was intense interest in this initiative from both public and private sector organisations too

Project timeline April 2013: One year pilot goes live Justice Data Lab Pilot December 2012: Announcement that Justice Data Lab would be piloted October 2013: First publication of Justice Data Lab products January 2012: Ministerial Approval to look into the feasibility of the Justice Data Lab 2012: Feasibility Spring 2014: Pilot extended for further year and announcement of improvements to the service December 2011: NPC approach MoJ about Data Lab idea 2012

How does the Justice Data Lab work? Individual level data sent to MoJ Provider organisation MoJ Analysis and Matching Aggregate data return

Accessing the Justice Data Lab service Data upload template requirements: Sample size must be at least 60 needed for robust analysis Matching variables including: – full name – date of birth – gender – intervention start date Thorough information on the service they provide Send securely (CJSM or gsi account)

What does the Justice Data Lab not do? X We won’t disclose individual level data X We currently only give re-offending related outcomes X There are ethical and practical considerations for assessing interventions aimed at certain groups of offenders (e.g. sex offenders, vulnerable persons) that mean that a Justice Data Lab analysis is not appropriate

Processing and matching the data Match to Police National Computer for demographics, criminal histories Find correct sentence and re-offending follow-up period in MoJ administrative datasets Link to employment and benefits data - Data share with DWP/HMRC Create matched control group of similar offenders who have not had the intervention from MoJ administrative datasets

Processing and matching the data Propensity Score Matching to match individuals in the two groups to each other Test differences in re-offending for the groups Statistical significance testing to determine whether there is a true difference between the groups

What is provided to Justice Data Lab users? One year re-offending rate Frequency of re-offending Time to re-offending Information on characteristics of both the treatment and control groups The best estimates for the one year proven re-offending rate for offenders who received an intervention from WYJS, and a matched control group.

Cumulative findings to date Of the 121 reports published so far: 27 reports indicated statistically significant reductions in re-offending on the one year proven re-offending rate 87 reports indicated insufficient evidence to draw a conclusion about the effect on the one year proven re-offending rate Of these 87, 11 reports detail statistically significant reductions in the frequency of re-offending 7 reports indicated a statistically significant increase in re-offending on the one year proven re-offending rate

Specific reports – Blue Sky Short term, full-time employment contracts. Aims to move them into onward full-time employment elsewhere. The one year proven re-offending rate for 72 offenders employed by Blue Sky was 31%, compared with 43% for a matched control group of offenders with similar characteristics. A reduction in re-offending between 1 and 23 percentage points. One year proven re-offending rate The best estimates for the one year proven re-offending rate for offenders who received an intervention from Blue Sky, and a matched control group.

Specific reports – Prisoners Education Trust Prisoners Education Trust submitted data relating to offenders who had a grant for Open University, distance learning courses, or Art and Hobby materials between 2002 and We carried out one overall analysis and four sub-analyses, the results are in the table below.

Specific reports – Prisoners Education Trust “We have already changed our approach to funding different course types as a result of the findings.” “Our charity and our funders know that learning in prison works – but now we have the evidence to prove it with this robust, hard-edged report carried out by MoJ statisticians.” Rod Clark, Chief Executive of Prisoners Education Trust

Reception of reports Survey issued to organisations who have used the Justice Data Lab service showed that: The expectations around the Data Lab had been met, although our customer service could be variable The Justice Data Lab is a useful service for the third sector, helping to provide information on re-offending and impact More information on outcomes (severity, re-incarceration rates, employment and benefits) would be helpful Results had been used to understand / demonstrate impact internally and externally

Challenges First time the sector has had transparency about their effectiveness Claims about success vs. evidence Understanding technical aspects / statistical literacy Availability and quality of internal and external data Resources for MoJ and organisations Legalities for organisations 40% ↓ re-offending

Successes Positive feedback from users Organisations using results to change their services Continual demand for service Engaging with users Service developments Passing on experience to others

Award Winners! Government Finance Insight Award 2014 “Judges were impressed by the use of data in an innovative way, and the presentation of complex data in a way that is understood by all.” Royal Statistical Society Excellence in Official Statistics Award 2014 “Judges were impressed by the use of statistical techniques to assess success (or failure) in a critical area and by the exceptionally close way MoJ statisticians had worked with their users, mainly non- statisticians.”

How can we develop the capacity of third sector organisations to engage with data? Data collection Central data system – Charity Log? Data manager/analyst Access to data through government/local authorities Open data Asking for help – Academics, Government Statisticians and Think Tanks Don’t be scared of data!!

Contact Details Accessing the Justice Data Lab service: Published reports: statistics Government Statistical Service:

Propensity Score Matching Scale of propensity score 01 Control offenders Treatment offenders Key Matched offenders Control offenders are matched to treatment offenders if the control offender’s propensity score are within a specified range away from the treatment offender’s propensity score.