NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity ADVANCE Faculty Work Life Survey: Comparison of Statistically Significant Gender Differences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dual Purpose Use of Data by the MSU ADVANCE Project Outline Overview of the ADAPP Project Framework of the Project Use of a Work Environment Survey to.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure at the University of Washington Eve Riskin, Joyce Yen, and Denice Denton.
Akron’s Project Theme: Redesign faculty recruitment and hiring practices. Encourage faculty to scrutinize current practices and to gain an enhanced appreciation.
Women of Color Faculty in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM): Experiences in Academia* AERA 2013 San Francisco, CA Sylvia Hurtado.
T HE S TUDENT E XPERIENCE OF STEM VS N ON -STEM D EGREE P ROGRAMMES : A C OMPARATIVE S TUDY Chris Pawson.
Why Bother? Helping Women Achieve Full Professor Rank Christine A. Hult Utah State University.
UD ADVANCE PAID: Resources for Recruitment and Retention of Women Faculty in STEM Fields Heather Doty, PhD Program Manager, UD ADVANCE Assistant Professor,
ADVANCE Implementation Mentors (AIM) Network Women of Color Survey and Interview Results Funding for this presentation was made possible through the National.
Faculty Climate Survey 2013 Gesemia Nelson, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Sociology and Anthropology.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
Colleges of Science and Engineering The University of Texas at El Paso 1 of 18 Studying Engineering, Mathematics and Science at UTEP Dr. Benjamin Flores.
An Academic Model for SEM Student Success in an Urban Commuter Institution Connie Kubo Della-Piana, Evaluation Director Benjamin Flores, MIE Project Director.
The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education 2010 Survey of Pre-tenure Faculty.
Provost’s Leadership Retreat Things That Work! 18 November 2005.
1 Leadership Development Opportunities for Tenured Faculty Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Center for Faculty.
3rd Annual Provost’s Leadership Retreat 2 November 2006.
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
1 Faculty Leadership Development Programs at Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., Director, AdvanceVT.
New Department Chairs Orientation Nancy “Rusty” Barceló, Ph.D. Vice President and Vice Provost for Equity and Diversity Thursday, January 10, 2008.
University of Texas at El Paso Climate Survey: Methods and Procedures The University of Texas at El Paso April 2004 Manuela Romero, Ph.D.
WOMEN FACULTY AND THE SOCIAL–CULTURAL NEXUS IN HIGHER EDUCATION Karla A. Henderson, North Carolina State University To examine the social- cultural nexus.
NSF ADVANCE P.A.I.D. at the University of Delaware: RRR (Resources for Recruitment and Retention) of Women Faculty ADVANCE at the University of Delaware.
NSF ADVANCE Program Academic Careers in Engineering & Science (ACES) Lynn T. Singer (Provost’s Office), PI John Angus (Chemical Engineering), co-PI Mary.
Finding The Right Institutional Fit For You How To (Safely) Find Out About The Culture Of The Department And College.
Developing Diverse Departments at NC State NSF ADVANCE Project
HIGHLIGHTS OF SURVEY RESULTS OF TENURED AND TENURE TRACK FACULTY NDSU FORWARD Survey of Work/Life Balance:
Presentation Summary Presentation Summary Project Goals of NSF ADVANCE at WSU WSU ADVANCE Programs/Impact  External Mentors  PRO-NET  Social Science.
Response Rates Overall response rate of 60.3% (N=1340) Women: 68.4% Higher response from female nonwhites 63 URM*, 326 majority, 10 missing data Men:
Sex comparisons among science faculty at Hunter College Hunter College Gender Equity Project & Provost’s Office 2007 Science Faculty Survey Department.
University Senate August 26, 2014 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE COACHE FACULTY JOB SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Salary Equity: College of Arts & Sciences Mitzi Schumacher, Chair PCW Economic Opportunity Subcommittee.
Ethnicity and Gender in Academia Ann Q. Gates Associate Professor Computer Science The University of Texas at El Paso.
National Science Foundation ADVANCE Increasing the Participation and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers.
Ph. D. Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Data NSF AGEP Evaluation Capacity Meeting September 19, 2008 Robert Sowell Council of Graduate Schools.
WOMEN AND NETWORKING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Denice Denton, Dean College of Engineering April 20, 2004.
USING DATA FOR PRACTICES OF INSTITUITONAL TRANSFORMATION Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator Georgia Tech – NSF ADVANCE Initiative Session on “Using.
UW Faculty Retention Toolkit Joyce W. Yen, ADVANCE Program/Research Manager.
Scope ACES: Purpose and Goals The Academic Careers in Engineering & Science (ACES) program at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) is part of the National.
Measuring the Status of Women: Towards Cross-Institutional Analysis to Understand Institutional Transformation Lisa M. Frehill and Cecily Jeser Cannavale.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ARHU Report.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: A Quick Look at A Few Things that Matter to Faculty Presentation for NC State University Board of Trustees Academic Affairs.
Faculty Survey Highlights University Council Presentation Lynn McCloskey Edward S. Macias April 7, 2008.
Supporting Women Scientists and Engineers Abigail J. Stewart University of Michigan.
Retention and Advancement for Mid Career Faculty K.D. JoshiKelly Ward Associate Professor of Interim Chair and Information Systems Professor, Education.
The Mid-Career Mentoring Program at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte Kim Buch Associate Professor of Psychology ADVANCE Co-PI
ADVANCE AT UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY THE GOAL OF THE NSF ADVANCE PROGRAM IS TO PROMOTE INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FIELDS BY INCREASING.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Some Select Findings for Vice Provosts to Pique Curiosity in What the Data Can Tell Us Presentation for Vice Provosts.
Georgia Tech-NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Program Mary Lynn Realff, Director and Co-PI March 31, 2005.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ENGR Report.
Outline Survey overview Instrument Construction Survey Logistics Response Rates Uses of Survey Data Communication with campus groups Program evaluation.
Building an Inclusive Faculty: Stakeholders, Standards, and Strategies Luis Ricardo Fraga Associate Vice Provost for Faculty Advancement Russell F. Stark.
Recruiting, Retaining, & Mentoring Women Faculty 11/1/02.
ADVANCE: A Bottom Up and Top Down Approach to Diversifying College Campuses Spurty Surapaneni, BA, Lisa M. Larson, PhD, Bonnie Bowen, PhD, Luiza Dreashear,
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity The University of Texas at El Paso April 2004 Evelyn Posey, Department of English Libby.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: BMGT Report.
Bias Tidbits Multidisciplinary Work A forthcoming paper in the American Journal of Evaluation by Irwin Feller discusses the issues, noting that in disciplines.
ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS OF DEPARTMENTS AND DOCTORAL DEGREES AWARDED TO WOMEN IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Mary Frank Fox School of Public Policy Georgia.
Georgia Tech NSF ADVANCE Research Program Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator NSF ADVANCE Site Visit June 2004.
Technology’s Effect on Gender Equity in Science Education Deborah A. Kashy, Gerd Kortemeyer, & David Harris Michigan State University Analyses of Gender.
COACHE Spring 2015 Faculty Satisfaction Survey Overview of Results Presentation to NC State Faculty Senate January 26, 2016 Katharine Stewart, VP for Faculty.
Partial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE IT Program under Award HRD Any opinions, findings, and.
Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness
Case Western Reserve University
IDEAL-N Annual Plenary
The 2015 COACHE Survey YORK COLLEGE Faculty Satisfaction
Partial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE IT Program under Award HRD Any opinions, findings, and.
College of Business Scorecard
College of Computing & Informatics Scorecard
College of Health & Human Services Scorecard
College of Education Scorecard
Presentation transcript:

NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity ADVANCE Faculty Work Life Survey: Comparison of Statistically Significant Gender Differences Between 2004 and 2007 August 1, 2008 Igor Ryabov Ann Darnell

The University of Texas at El Paso 2 Overview Survey monitors changes in institutional climate since the beginning of the ADVANCE initiative Differences are documented across gender, ethnicity, position and discipline in Modeled after the ADVANCE climate survey at the University of Wisconsin- Madison

The University of Texas at El Paso 3 Targeted Population Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Biological Sciences Chemistry Computer Science Geological Sciences Mathematical Sciences Physics Civil Engineering Electrical & Computer Eng. Mechanical & Industrial Eng. Metallurgical & Material Eng. Social and Behavioral Sciences (S & BS) Communication Economics & Finance Information & Decision Sciences Languages & Linguistics Marketing & Management Political Science Psychology Sociology & Anthropology

The University of Texas at El Paso 4 Areas Addressed Basic Demographic Hiring Process Resources Interactions With Colleagues And Others Departmental Decision-Making Process Perceptions of Gender Diversity Tenure Process Satisfaction with UTEP

The University of Texas at El Paso 5 Survey Administration Method Wave 1 was administered in Spring 2004 as a paper survey in booklet format Wave 2 was administered in Fall 2007 and was entirely web-based

The University of Texas at El Paso 6 Results This presentation shows the statistically significant differences in responses on climate issues across gender only “Not Applicable” responses and cases with missing values were excluded from the analyses Full report available at

The University of Texas at El Paso 7 Basic Demographics Targeted PopulationRespondents N=301N=324N=126 (42%)N=149 (46%) Gender21% Female25% Female30% Female37% Female 80% Male75% Male70% Male63% Male Ethnicity60% White59% White64% White61% White 22% Hispanic27% Hispanic25% Hispanic28% Hispanic 18% Other14% Other11% Other Position 29% Professor 30% Professor26% Professor 24% Associate27% Associate25% Associate32% Associate 27% Assistant29% Assistant 33% Assistant 20% Lecturer15% Lecturer16% Lecturer10% Lecturer Department57% STEM58% STEM56% STEM54% STEM 43% S & BS42% S & BS44% S & BS46% S & BS

The University of Texas at El Paso 8 The Hiring Process

The University of Texas at El Paso 9

10

The University of Texas at El Paso 11

The University of Texas at El Paso 12 Resources

The University of Texas at El Paso 13

The University of Texas at El Paso 14

The University of Texas at El Paso 15

The University of Texas at El Paso 16

The University of Texas at El Paso 17 Interactions With Colleagues And Others

The University of Texas at El Paso 18

The University of Texas at El Paso 19

The University of Texas at El Paso 20 Departmental Decision- Making Process

The University of Texas at El Paso 21

The University of Texas at El Paso 22

The University of Texas at El Paso 23

The University of Texas at El Paso 24

The University of Texas at El Paso 25 Perceptions of Gender Diversity - Department, College, University* * Respondents were asked three series of identical questions to address gender diversity in their department, their college and the overall university level

The University of Texas at El Paso 26

The University of Texas at El Paso 27

The University of Texas at El Paso 28

The University of Texas at El Paso 29

The University of Texas at El Paso 30

The University of Texas at El Paso 31

The University of Texas at El Paso 32

The University of Texas at El Paso 33

The University of Texas at El Paso 34

The University of Texas at El Paso 35

The University of Texas at El Paso 36

The University of Texas at El Paso 37 Tenure Process

The University of Texas at El Paso 38

The University of Texas at El Paso 39

The University of Texas at El Paso 40

The University of Texas at El Paso 41 Satisfaction with UTEP

The University of Texas at El Paso 42

The University of Texas at El Paso 43 Summary

The University of Texas at El Paso 44 Findings (Wave 1, 2004) Hiring Process Women were significantly more likely than men to feel that:  their department did not obtain resources for them  faculty in the department did not make an effort to meet them  they did not negotiate successfully for what they needed Tenure Process Women were significantly more likely than men to feel that:  they were unsupported in their advancement towards tenure and promotion Decision Making Process Women were significantly more likely than men to feel that:  their department chair did not involve them in the decision-making process  they did not have a voice in how resources were allocated  they were not full and equal participants in decision-making Gender Diversity Women were significantly more likely than men to feel that:  their department did not make an effort to promote women into leadership positions  the climate for women in their college was not good  their college had not taken steps to enhance the climate for women  the university had too few women faculty in leadership positions

The University of Texas at El Paso 45 Findings (Wave 2, 2007) Hiring Process The majority of UTEP faculty, regardless of gender, were satisfied with the hiring process. However, men were more likely to feel that:  they negotiated successfully for what they needed However, the majority of women also believed that they negotiated successfully for what they needed. Tenure Process Women were significantly more likely than men to indicate that:  they received reduced responsibilities so they could build their research program  they were told about assistance available to pretenure/promotion faculty (e.g., workshops, mentoring) Men and women were equally likely to feel that:  they were supported in their advancement towards tenure and promotion ResourcesMen were significantly more likely than women to feel that they had sufficient research and teaching support. However, the majority of women also indicated that they had sufficient research and teaching support.

The University of Texas at El Paso 46 Findings (Wave 2, 2007), Continued Decision Making Men were significantly more likely than women to feel that:  their department chair involved them in the decision-making process  they had a voice in how resources were allocated  committee assignments were rotated fairly to allow for participation of all faculty Gender Diversity Men were more likely than women to indicate that:  their college and university had actively recruited women faculty  the university had taken steps to enhance the climate for women  the university had made an effort to promote women into leadership positions  the climate for women in their college and university was good  the university had made an effort to promote women into leadership positions Women were significantly more likely than men to indicate that:  their college and university had too few women faculty in leadership positions

The University of Texas at El Paso 47 Conclusion Among UTEP faculty, gender differences in assessment of the key climate components pronounced in 2004 have become negligible in 2007 The UTEP faculty, regardless of gender, became more appreciative of gender diversity at all levels The satisfaction with hiring, tenure and decision- making processes at the department level increased for both sexes, but more so for women The climate areas that need further improvement are resource allocation and departmental decision-making The overall results show continuous improvement in institutional climate at UTEP and increased satisfaction with working conditions