Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Elk Grove – Ranch Cordova – El Dorado Connector Joint Powers Authority Project Briefing JPA Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) for Jackson County Planning Commission May 9, 2013.
Advertisements

Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) for Jackson County Planning Commission May 9, 2013.
Great Western Corridor Feasibility Study
Presented by: Capital SouthEast Connector Joint Powers Authority Tom Zlotkowski Executive Director July 17, 2014 Presentation for.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
February 6, 2008 Phase 2: Achieving our Visions of 2050 In cooperation with:
Communities In Motion Blueprint for Good Growth Preferred Growth Scenarios March – April 2005.
Northwest Florida Transportation Corridor Authority.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
Welcome to El Dorado Hills. Goals of Presentation Summarize growth, traffic, and road network state affecting planning in EDH - Especially where not easily.
Miller Road Feasibility Study & Reconstruction Project Information and Kick-off Meeting Presented by: The Corradino Group of Michigan, Inc. ROWE INC. Genesee.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
August 2004 Hickory by Choice Linking Land Use and Air Quality Planning.
Multimodal Corridor Plan BCC Discussion Item Transportation Planning Division August 19, 2014.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Goods Movement and Traffic Issues In the SACOG Region The Effects of Congestion on Goods Movement in our Region February 9, 2006 Jason Crow.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
Department of Transportation Consideration of Potential City of Pasadena Position Related to SR710 Extension Alternatives Being Considered By Metro City.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
PUBLIC MEETING November 19, 2003 Lower Manhattan Redevelopment D015183, PIN NYCD NYSDOT, REGION 11 Route 9A Project.
“People should have transportation options.” TRANSPORTATION MOVING PEOPLE AND COMMERCE WHERE THEY WANT AND NEED TO GO.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
Connector Ahead Capital SouthEast Connector Project Sheldon/Wilton Community Workshop #3
RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA NATIONAL FORUM ON PERFORMANCE- BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Atlanta Regional Commission Tom Weyandt, Department Director Comprehensive Planning May 2008.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.
Subgroup Recommendations on draft Housing Goals & Objectives September 29, 2004 Subgroup Members: Don Eggert, Marianne Morton, Phil Salkin, & Alex Saloutos.
Regional Visions: 50-Year Transportation Demand Modeling Florida Model Task Force Meeting December 13, 2006.
Orht I-5 North Coast Corridor Project CA Transportation Planning Conference – New Directions in Planning Integrating Resource and Infrastructure Plans.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
Active Transportation Program California Transportation Commission Mitch Weiss 01/14/141.
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
What are Complete Streets?. Complete Streets place an emphasis on alternative modes of transportation being incorporated into the streetscape and design.
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study F ROM M ANDY L ANE TO T HOMAS D RIVE I NTERSECTION B AY C.
Updated Subgroup Recommendations on draft Housing Goals & Objectives October 20, 2004 Subgroup Members: Don Eggert, Marianne Morton, Phil Salkin, & Alex.
A presentation by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Broward Boulevard Presentation to the Broward MPO TCC and CIR March 2012 Agenda Item NA-1, Attachment.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
32 Transportation Midway City 2016 General Plan
Jeremy Area Transportation Plan
Project Management Team Meeting #3
MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN AND STREET DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017.
September 2011 Public Open Houses
September 2011 Public Open Houses
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Endorsement of the Recommended Design Concept (Preferred Alternative) for Transforming I-66 Outside the Beltway Board Transportation Committee October.
MPO Board Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Elk Grove – Ranch Cordova – El Dorado Connector Joint Powers Authority Project Briefing JPA Board Meeting – March 28, 2008

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project

Phase I Study Outcomes Draft Purpose and Need Statement Preliminary Project Development Draft Functional Guidelines Environmental Screening Costs and Funding Options (Limited) Governance Options (Selected)

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project General Need Mobility –To improve access to, and connections between, residential and employment areas lost or compromised due to increasing congestion Land Use –To assist in preservation of open space and habitat that may be threatened as the region develops.

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Draft Project Need Options: Insufficient transportation options for personal and goods/freight movement to, from, and within the corridor. Non-Local Traffic: Local streets increasingly subject to congestion and use by non-local traffic. Emergency Access: Study area needs an all-weather transportation facility to enable emergency vehicle access. Safety: Increasing traffic will degrade safety of existing facilities; improvements are needed to ensure safety and security of travel by all modes (automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian). Open Space Preservation: Development is encroaching on open space and wildlife habitat; planning is needed to preserve these resources and ensure access to open space. Jobs-Housing-Transportation Access: Well planned transportation improvements needed to accompany and support housing and job growth to ensure that growth proceeds along planned patterns.

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Draft Project Purpose Mobility Enhancement: Enhance mobility options within corridor to serve and support growth and development patterns and principles from the approved MTP land use allocations, while minimizing impacts to livability of communities along the corridor. Economic Development: Aid economic vitality by improving access to job centers and commercial areas, facilitating goods movement, and enhancing the attractiveness of existing and planned employment and commercial areas. Balanced Transportation System: Provide efficient transportation options that balance transportation needs between local access and regional demand; enable flexibility among modes, while incorporating ITS elements where possible. Open Space Preservation/Growth Management: Preserve open space, wildlife habitat, and productive agricultural uses and minimize growth inducement.

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Functional Guidelines Principles Improve Access and Connectivity Support MTP and General Plans Relieve Demand (Local and Regional) Control Access / Minimize Growth Inducement Enhance Mobility and Preserve Livability Provide Efficient and Safe Facilities for all Modes Minimize Physical Impacts Preserve Open Space / Support Approved Plans Permit Phased Implementation

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Functional Guidelines Subjects Connector Roadway –Capacity and Cross-Section –Access Characteristics –Profile –Design Aesthetics, Materials, and Maintenance Transit Services Non-Motorized Facilities Open Space Preservation Other Facilities

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Alternatives Alternative 1: Sunrise Alternative 2: Grant Line Alternative 3:Grant Line Alternative 4: Bradshaw Sheldon Variations (Apply to Alts 1, 2, and 3) –A: Bypass –B: Tunnel –C: At Grade

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Common Design Features Sheldon Community Jackson Hwy Bradshaw Sunrise Douglas White Rock Kammerer I-5 SR-99 US-50 Mather Field Grant Line 4 Lane 8 Lane I-5 to Bradshaw White Rock to US 50 50/Silva Valley Parkway I/C Hwy 99/Grant Line I/C 6 Lane A-Bypass B-Tunnel C-Direct

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Sheldon Community Jackson Hwy Bradshaw Sunrise Douglas White Rock Kammerer I-5 SR-99 US-50 Mather Field Grant Line Class I Non-Motorized Trail A-Bypass B-Tunnel C-Direct Alternative 1 Overview White Rock & Grant Line I/C Sunrise & Jackson I/C Sunrise & Grant Line I/C Conflicts w/Rancho Cordova Planning

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Sheldon Community Jackson Hwy Bradshaw Sunrise Douglas White Rock Kammerer I-5 SR-99 US-50 Mather Field Grant Line Class I Non-Motorized Trail A-Bypass B-Tunnel C-Direct Alternative 2 Overview White Rock & Grant Line I/C Grant Line & Jackson I/C

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Jackson Hwy Bradshaw Sunrise Douglas White Rock Kammerer I-5 SR-99 US-50 Sheldon Community Mather Field Grant Line A-Bypass B-Tunnel C-Direct Class I Non-Motorized Trail Alternative 3 Overview White Rock & Grant Line I/C Grant Line & Jackson I/C

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Alternative 4 Overview Sheldon Community Jackson Hwy Bradshaw Sunrise Douglas White Rock Kammerer I-5 SR-99 US-50 Mather Field Grant Line Class I Non-Motorized Trail Conflicts with Sacramento County Planning Conflicts with Rancho Cordova Planning Bradshaw & Grant Line I/C Bradshaw & Jackson I/C White Rock & Grant Line I/C Douglas & Grant Line I/C

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Environmental Screening Resource Data collection –Floodplains –Socio-economic issues –Land use data Preliminary Roadway Footprint Draft Quantitative and Qualitative Measures

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Screening Results Some Differences Among Concepts Natural Resources: Appear to be No “Fatal Flaws” Potential Land Use and Socio-economic issues –Alternatives 1 and 4 Alternatives Using Grant Line –Greater Growth Inducement Potential

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Project Cost ($2006 in Millions) Alternative 1: Sunrise$788 Alternative 2: Grant Line$712 Alternative 3A: Bypass$730 Alternative 3B: Tunnel$1,305 Alternative 3C: At-Grade$712 Alternative 4: Bradshaw$832

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Conceptual Project Phasing

Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Phase 1 Final Report Products Draft Purpose and Need Statement Project Conceptual Design Travel Demand Analysis Draft Functional Guidelines Environmental Screening Analysis Comparison of Concept Alternatives Conceptual Project Cost / Funding Options (limited) Project Phasing and Implementation