UNQUESTIONABLE NEED FOR PEER-REVIEWING 1. Visibility of major papers 2. Improvement of manuscript content 3. Identification of excellence Colloque de lAcadémie.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Évolution des publications scientifiques Bibliometry and mathematics Étienne GHYS Académie des Sciences mai 2007 Colloque de lAcadémie des sciences.

Advertisements

Evaluating journals in DOAJ Examples and problems 6 February Sonja Brage Lund University Libraries, Head Office.

Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.

1 Journal of Information Systems Why JIS exists FYI Statistics The future of AIS research.

AUTHORSHIP SKILLS: QUESTIONS SCIENTISTS FREQUENTLY ASK ABOUT THE WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF JOURNAL ARTICLES.

The Open Access landscape (and what might be over the horizon) Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro London LEAP Open Access conference, 11 June 2007.

The Open Access landscape (and what might be over the horizon) Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro London LEAP Open Access conference, 11 June 2007.

How to Review a Paper How to Get your Work Published

Factors influencing surgeons’ choice of journal for article submission Kjetil Søreide MD PhD Department of Surgical Sciences Department of Surgery Vougot,

How to write my paper and have it published in a computational biology journal? Phil Bourne University of California San Diego

Paris, May 2007 How good is the research base? New approaches to research indicators Colloque de l’Académie des sciences "Évolution des publications scientifiques"

What happens after submission? Sadeghi Ramin, MD Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

1) You as the publisher, submit the article directly to PubMed Central after acceptance. 2) The publication contract sent to the author,

ESU 20: How to write a manuscript and get it published in European Urology James Catto Editor in Chief European Urology.

How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.

By: Becky Gardner, Lucy Monigle, Tinus van Wyk, T.J. White.

Authors and criteria of authorship

Use of bibliometry for the evaluation of researchers and teams in medicine and biology A practical view from a School of Medicine Dean Patrick Berche Universitary.

River Campus Libraries Building an E-Publishing Model from the Stakeholders on Up Susan Gibbons Asst. Dean, Public Services & Collection Development River.

T H O M S O N S C I E N T I F I C Editorial Development James Testa, Director.

1 NIH Public Access Policy Policy on Enhancing Public Access to Archived Publications Resulting From NIH-Funded Research (Public Access Policy)

The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries -what Libraries Are doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee

Tranformation Of Scholarly Publishing In The Digital Era: Scholars' Point Of View Radovan Vrana Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Humanities.

Passive vs. Active voice Carolyn Brown Taller especializado de inglés científico para publicaciones académicas D.F., México de junio de 2013 SELECTING.

SCIENCE, RESEARCH DATA, AND PUBLISHING Stewart Wills Editorial Director, Web & New Media, Science 26 February 2013.

My journey to open access: Reflections of a newcomer Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams OpeningScholarship Project 26 March 2008.

Etienne Joly, CR1 INSERM, Equipe de Neuro-Immuno-Génétique Moléculaire IPBS, Toulouse Long standing advocate of Open Access - A proposal for evaluating.

How to Get Published in (better) International Journals Hui Wang, MD, PhD Editorial Director John Wiley & Sons.

Online Editorial Management On-line Management of Scholarly Journals Mahmoud Saghaei.

Ethical Issues in Journal Publication Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University

Sharing research GCSE Science. From ice to paper and beyond Field Research (gathering data) Laboratory work (futher analysis) Submit paper for publication.

From the lab to the public-the making of science news Thomas Abraham.

Georgia Institute of Technology Publish or Perish Gilda Barabino, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Academic Diversity Professor and Associate Chair for Graduate.

LYDIA SMITH-DAVIS ETEC 523 LESLEY S. J. FARMER FEBRUARY 26, 2013 Academic Journal Flowchart.

NDLTD Prior Publications Working Group Gail McMillan, Marisa Ramirez, Joan Dalton, Max Reed, Nan Seamans USETDA 2012 Conference June 14, 2012.

Which Journal to Publish in and How Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Professor, Texas A&M University Knowledge Community Editor, AuthorAID.

INANE Meeting –Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing Charon Pierson Geraldine Pearson August 5, 2015.

NDLTD Prior Publications Working Group Gail McMillan, Marisa Ramirez, Joan Dalton, Max Reed, Nan Seamans 14 th International Symposium on ETDs Cape Town,

Round Table Discussion Bibliometric Indicators in Research Evaluation and Policy Colloque Evolution des publications scientifiques Académie des sciences,

The Editor’s Perspective on Reviewing and Selecting Manuscripts for Publication Samuel F. Posner, PhD Editor in Chief, Preventing Chronic Disease Deputy.

Developing a successful journal One editor’s Tweets Struggle between editor and scientist Manami Inoue, MD, PhD Graduate School of Medicine, The University.

Copyright 2006 Thomson Corporation 1 Citation Analysis: Some Historical, Sociological And Philosophical Considerations Henry Small, Chief Scientist and.

Is a further increase in the number of scientific journals compatible with their utility? Colloque Evolution des publications scientifiques Académie des.

The David Sinclair Award American Association for Aerosol Research.

Being a journal editor: scholar or secretary? Liz Todd Co-editor of International Journal of Research and Method in Education

Publishing Addiction Science Kerstin Stenius & Thomas Babor

Getting Academic Works Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals

Writing for Professional Journals

The final steps to the HDA project

HOW TO MAKE YOUR PUBLICATION GREEN?

Scientific Publishing and SciPost

Turning Your Research Into Publications

Authorship initiatives

Role of peer review in journal evaluation

مقاله نویسی (شناخت مجلات و نحوه چاپ مقاله) تهیه کننده: عبدالرزاق مداحی

Firstly, you need to find your journal…

How to identify editorial articles

Increasing citation count to maximize impact

برنامج التميز في خدمة عملاء السادة موظفي مكاتب المساعدة القانونية

Publishing Legal Education Research

Journal evaluation and selection journal

IEEE Transactions Journals Scopus Viewpoint

Ethics in scholar publishing: The journal editor's role

Are foreign peer reviewers more rigorous than Brazilians? A case study

For physicists, by physicists, since 1986

SciELO Publishing Model – the evolving dimensions of sustainability

Journal editor perspectives

Table 4. Value creation (Y2)

Presentation transcript:

UNQUESTIONABLE NEED FOR PEER-REVIEWING 1. Visibility of major papers 2. Improvement of manuscript content 3. Identification of excellence Colloque de lAcadémie des sciences "Évolution des publications scientifiques - Le regard des chercheurs" des mai 2007

PROBLEMS LINKED TO REVIEWERS 1. Conservatism: fashion versus novelty 2. Priority given to technology 3. Duration of reviewing 4. Conflict of interest with authors

PROBLEMS LINKED TO PUBLISHERS 1. Search for scoops 2. Are editors in chief always competent?

PROBLEMS LINKED TO AUTHORS 1. Confusion between quality of a manuscript and impact factor of the journal 2. Excessive importance of impact factor for grants and career 3. Risk of transforming scientists into professionals of publication

POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS 1. Change in the editorial policy of major journals 2. Open peer-reviewing 3. Open archives preceding publication