Objective Point Base Classification Carol Mici Acting Deputy Commissioner Massachusetts Department of Correction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Florida Department of Corrections
Advertisements

1 Florida Department of Corrections Presentations to the Senate Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice Appropriations December 13, 2007.
Correctional Certification Subpart 1. Purpose: establish program certification requirements that govern facilities providing correctional program.
Massachusetts Department of Correction Bridgewater State Hospital Luis S. Spencer, Commissioner.
Aboriginal women’s access to diversionary programs in NSW Ruth McCausland School of Social Sciences University of New South Wales.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
California Static Risk Assessment (CSRA)
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
Ethics and Group Counseling Mary Saint, M.Ed., LPC.
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Risk Assessment Instrument And the Development of Detention Alternatives Primary.
Hamilton County, Ohio Correctional Master Plan Pre-architectural Program Analysis of Options.
Current Issues and Concerns 1.   We have a high rate of subjective overrides of the scored custody level. How high is too high?  My classification.
Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATION
Reporting Requirements POLICY DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT, AND SEXUAL MISCONDUCT FACULTY SENATE CONSULTATION, JANUARY 26, 2015.
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
Secretary Gary D. Maynard.  Security Classification Instrument  Originally developed in 1988 by Dr. Edward Letessa  Continually updated/reviewed for.
Robert Kurtz, PhDJodi Harrison, JD Justice Systems Innovations Jail Health Law Project Community Policy UNC School of Government Management Section Division.
November 5, 2014 New Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instruments – Status Update VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Housing: A Significant Reentry Barrier Nicole E. Sullivan NC Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning.
Housing Ex-Offenders: Identifying Barriers and Proposing Solutions Angela Lee ODRC Reentry and Family Program Administrator.
Evaluating a Research Report
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
1 All Directors Training All Directors Training Security Threat Group & Administrative Segregation.
A Comparison Study between the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2 RF Profiles of Convicted Stalkers McCullaugh, J.M 1.; Pizitz, T.D. 2 ; Stolberg, R. 1 ; Kropp, J. 1 1.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
Friends Outside Visitor Center Program. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is legally mandated to contract with a non-profit.
2007 CAS PREDICTIVE MODELING SEMINAR PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR PREDICTIVE MODELS BETH FITZGERALD, ISO.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Prison Education in Iceland The Spring Project Palladio /Treviso 2004.
Type II Workplace Violence in the Federal Bureau of Prisons Jennifer L. Edens, Ph.D. Chief, Behavioral Sciences Programs Department of Justice Federal.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 11 - Prisons and Jails.
Chapter 7 Prison Populations Size and Nature of Prison Populations Severity of legal sanctions General social-demographic trends –Aging of population.
1 Performance Management and Appraisal Chapter 9.
Arizona Department of Corrections
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Prison Statistics Part 1 Crime, Justice & Security Statistics Produced in Collaboration between.
Safe Prisons Program Offender Sexual Assault. Performance Objectives Define sexual assault as it occurs in prisons. Identify the traits and characteristics.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Evaluation Research Dr. Guerette. Introduction Evaluation Research – Evaluation Research – The purpose is to evaluate the impact of policies The purpose.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION AN OVERVIEW OF SECURITY HOUSING UNITS MATTHEW CATE, SECRETARY.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse ProgramsForever Free Evaluation Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Programs for Women Laurie Bright, National Institute.
Chapter 3 Selection of Assessment Tools. Council of Exceptional Children’s Professional Standards All special educators should possess a common core of.
OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATION AR’s 503, 521 & 523. Learning Objectives What is objective classification? What is objective classification? What is the purpose.
Department of Corrections Critical Response and Emergency Response Manual DON’T LEARN SAFETY BY ACCIDENT!!
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Principles, criteria and methods Part 1 Quality management Produced in Collaboration between.
 LO1 Describe the history of incarceration in Canada  LO2 Identify the goal of the correctional system in Canada  LO3 Describe correctional facilities.
Thinking About A Risk-Based Registry. Sex offender risk assessments are most often employed in applied forensic settings for purposes of decision-making.
CLASSIFICATION & RECEIVING OF OFFENDERS CLASSIFICATION DEFINED.
Administrative Segregation. 2 Performance Objectives 1.Define administrative segregation. 2.Define the four categories of administrative segregation.
Delaware Pretrial Risk Assessment Validation & Lessons Learned Presented at NCJA Baltimore Regional Meeting June 2016.
Link to Permanent Housing (Link) Overview At least 5% of a rental development’s total units are set-aside for ELI households with Special Needs that are.
Special Education in Adult Corrections Since IDEA 97 Regulations, issues, and one State’s response.
National Center for State Courts DETENTION ASSESSMENT.
CJS 230 EDU Experience Tradition/cjs230edu.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
ASCA Seminar for Recently Appointed Administrators Directors’ Issues and Expectations June 23 – 26, 2016 Reno, Nevada.
Copyright 2011 Curriculum Technology, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
11 Prisons and Jails.
Running head: Life of prisoners
The Use of Prisons in America
CJ 130 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CJ 130 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
Lesson 1 Foundations of measurement in Psychology
11 Prisons and Jails.
Federal Pretrial Services
Pilot Peer Mentoring Program at WSPF
Presentation transcript:

Objective Point Base Classification Carol Mici Acting Deputy Commissioner Massachusetts Department of Correction

Objective Classification  The standardized evaluation & custody assignment of an inmate based on objectively defined criteria  Rely on factors that have been scientifically proven to predict prison adjustment  Designed to match the security needs of each prisoner with the appropriate custody level institution  Addresses issues of over & under classification  The criteria are weighed, scored, and organized into a valid and reliable classification instrument  Applications of restrictions and/or overrides are done so in a systematic manner and are monitored for appropriateness

Initial Classification Variables Severity of Current Offense Severity of Conviction w/in last 7 years History of Escapes or Attempts to Escape History of Prior Institutional Violence w/in the last 7 years Age Education Employment

Reclassification Variables Severity of Current Offense Severity of Convictions within last 7 years History of Escape or Attempts to Escape History of Prior Institutional Violence w/in last 7 years Number of Disciplinary Reports w/in last 12 months –For females, it is within the last 6 months Most Severe Disciplinary w/in last 18 months –For females, it is within the last 12 months Age Program Participation or Work Assignment

Underclassification vs. Overclassification Housing high security inmates in too low a security setting presents obvious problems – escapes, assaults, intimidation, and other internal management problems The confinement of low security inmates in a high security setting is dangerous for those individuals –It unnecessarily subjects them to threats, and physical attacks from more aggressive, hostile inmates –It is more costly than necessary to house lower custody inmates in a maximum security

Benefits Greater consistency Better use of bed space Reduces inmate litigation Variables on this Objective Classification form all have statistical significance in predicting prison adjustment Variables and overrides may be modified

Non-Discretionary Overrides An override of a scored custody level, based on the agency’s policy of restricting the custody level of particular inmates. Classification staff has no discretionary power to disregard such restrictions Overrides used on inmates with exceptions Customized to your state

Discretionary Overrides An override of a scored custody level based on the professional judgment of trained classification staff. Should not exceed 15% May be used if appropriate and a detailed rationale is provided Coded, tracked and monitored

Lessons Learned Weights and points are different for the male and female populations Modifications to the MADOC tool: –Severity of Convictions within the last 7 years –Points for lower security –Permissible legal issues –Length of time to release

Continued Monitoring STG Members Escape Length of Time to Release