GPS Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team 02009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team Shane Stumvoll, Alex Willard, Robert Yarnell, Hubert Jayakumar, Tim Teal 1.
Advertisements

Miniature Modular Rack Launcher Combo Senior Design Group 3 Casey Brown Cyril John Keith Kirkpatrick Bryan Rickards.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
College of Engineering and Computer Science Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Wright State University Regular Class Aircraft SAE Aero.
Daniel Graves –Project Lead James Reepmeyer – Lead Engineer Brian Smaszcz– Airframe Design Alex Funiciello – Airfoil Design Michael Hardbarger – Control.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
Miniature Modular Rack Launcher Combo Senior Design Group 3 Casey Brown Cyril John Keith Kirkpatrick Bryan Rickards.
Autonomous Cargo Transport System for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, using Visual Servoing Noah Kuntz and Paul Oh Drexel Autonomous Systems Laboratory Drexel.
Vertical Launch UAV Project Plan. ∞ Construct an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a camera payload ∞ UAV must autonomously navigate with real-time video.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
High altitude airborne developments have presented huge advantages in the US military’s arsenal through: environmental monitoring precision navigation.
Daniel Graves (ME). Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems  Primary Customer: RIT College of Imaging Science ○ Currently.
University of the Pacific1 PFADS Project Team P.O.C. Gavin Saito Miguel Perez Michael Bruch December 5, 2002 University of the Pacific Introduction to.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08110 – UAV Based Digital Imaging System David Eells (Mechanical Engineering)
R I T Team Members: Dan Lester → Team Lead Chris Feuerstein → Lead Engineer/Electrical Lead Mike Schwec → Electrical Support Jacob Hillmon → Electrical.
2003 CSU RoverSat. RoverSat: Team Members Structures: Ehren Ehmann Christopher Mai Electronics: John Rhoades Jesse Wilson.
Project Status Update II R09230: Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems A. Benjamin Wager (ME) B. Michael Skube (ME)
Bangarang Musical Engineering University of Notre Dame Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Group Members: Roberto Ayala, Ryan Bradley, Pat.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08110 – UAV Based Digital Imaging System David Eells (Mechanical Engineering)
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P09122 Final Project Review Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Acknowledgments Summary of MAVs Design Criteria Design Solution Conclusions and Future Work Energy Harvesting for Micro-Air Vehicles Testing Harvesting.
Justin DeStories Aircraft Design. Objective/Requirements  The UAV team at Arizona State University is designing, optimizing, and building an autonomous.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
Tropos-1 Hybrid rocket Project
CanSat Concept Generation
Team HazardHawk Team HazardHawk 2008 April 24, 2008.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
Vanderbilt Aerospace Club Rocket Launched Reconnaissance UAV Design Team William Runge (ME) Kyser Miree (ME) Thomas Carroll (ME) Thomas Bowden.
Redesign of the STOL CH 701 Landing Gear Strut
Autonomous Air & Ground Surveillance Unit Objectives, Preliminary Specifications, and Option Analysis.
Verification Data (Spatial and Weight) Unguided MK66 Weight = 23.4 lbs. (7.14 lbs fuel) Length = 55 in. x (c.g.) = 30 in. y (c.g.) = 0.0 in. z (c.g.) =.002.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
High Altitude Balloon Michael Adams Alex Fletcher Jon Welch.
Improving Performance of a Heavy Duty Engine Cooling Drive Through Reduction of Drag Losses Design Recommendations & Future Analysis CFD Analysis It is.
Surveillance MAV Project – Road Map Research Testing & Documentation Finalize with Propulsion Team Wing Stability Analysis Wing Development Research –
P07108: METEOR Instrumentation Recovery System. Team Bash Nanayakkara – Project Manager (ISE) Scott Defisher – Fuselage Design (ME) Mike Kochanski – Software.
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
1 ASU Satellite Laboratory Fuselage Design Presenter: Eric Chen.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
RIT MAV System Review (P08121) Dr. Jeffrey Kozak – Faculty Guide Michael Reeder – Team Leader Kevin Hand – Lead Engineer Todd Fernandez – ME.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
P07122 – Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin (EE – Team Leader) Courtney Walsh (ME – Aero) Richard Nichols (EE) Glenn Kitchell (CE) Jeff Welch (ME) Dr.
SOAAR UAV: Small Object Avoidance Autonomous Rescue Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Team 12: Matthias Clarke, Devin justice, Trent Loboda, Cody Rochford, Marcus.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Advanced Aero Vehicle Group
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
Key Performance Characteristics
Dr. Marcos Esterman Faculty Guide W. Casolara Project Leader
AY: – Track Project Lead Airframe A Matt Greco P09231
College of Engineering
Leslie Elwood Erik Nelson Jacob East Joe Shields Brandon Bonner
P07521 BRDF Imaging Platform
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
COSGC-Summer Internship 2010
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter
Designing and Manufacturing of a hand operated plastic injection moulding machine envisioned for the mesoscale range. Freddy Travieso
COSGC-Summer Internship 2010
Unmanned Powerline Surveillance Aircraft Group Name: Watchmen
Presentation transcript:

GPS Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team 02009

Project Summary ► Motivation for the Project ► Objectives:  Accurate Tracking of a UAV  Wireless Data Transmission  Autonomous Function : Drop a Payload

Project Requirements ► Incorporate GPS technology onto a UAV; RIT Heavy Lift Plane. ► Utilize 2-way wireless data transfer. ► Graphical position tracking program on base computer. ► Coordinates for payload drop site selectable at base computer. ► Design a reliable payload retaining/release system. ► Confirm payload delivery, required target accuracy: 100ft. ► Collect data remotely from the aircraft. ► System range: 500 ft. ► Weight and volume capacity on board: 17 lbs., 300cc. ► Budget: $2000

Design Process ► Brainstorming/Concept Development Phase  Example: retaining/releasing the payload ► Concept 1 : Clamp ► Concept 1 : Clamp ► Concept 2 : Sliding Pin

Design Process ► Feasibility Assessment  Questions test feasibility of each concept. ► Example: Is the release system strong enough to reliably retain the payload during flight?  Rank the concepts relative to each other ► Concept 1: Clasp – rank 2 ► Concept 2 : Pin – rank 3  Plot the rank for each idea with respect to each feasibility question on a radar chart.  The concept with the most area on the plot is the best.

Design Process ► Concept 2 is the best choice.

Payload Fin Payload Retainer System Housing / Mount Release System Components

Features of Release Mechanism ► Very simple, Few parts ► Easy to manufacture ► Will be easy to mount to the Heavy Lift Plane with minimal modifications to the plane ► System requires little force from actuating mechanism

Payload Mold Construction POSITIVE MOLDFINISHED PAYLOAD SHELL

Payload ► The payload will be made out of a carbon- fiber shell and filled with shock absorbing foam for electronics.

DRAG CALCULATIONS ► Assume ideal flow for simplified calculations ► The total incompressible drag coefficient: Parameter Aero Team Senior Team CFD CLCLCLCL CDCDCDCD D 1.5 (lb) 1.69 (lb) (lb) L 27.7 (lb) (lb)

Payload Analysis ► FEA  The payload is modeled using properties of aluminum.  The force of impact is applied to a flat on the nose of the payload.  The areas of highest stress will be reinforced with extra carbon fiber.

Payload FEA

Payload Components ► Camera electronics  Camera  Transmitter  Battery

Video transmission ► Considerations for design  Light weight  Size ► Minimize drag  Range of transmitter – 500 ft  Robust configuration  Power consumption  Cost ► All parts donated by Dr. Arney, CIS

Parachute ► Design parameters for the parachute  Minimize chute diameter and impact load.  Assumptions ► C d of 0.8 ► Payload weight of 2lbs. ► Design Choice  Chute Diameter ► 31 in.  Descent Velocity ► 21 ft/s  Resulting Loading ► 5.2 lbs. ► 2.5 G’s Optimization of Parachute Surface Area vs. Impact Load

Electronic Control System

V MAV V long  X V lat Y

Conclusion ► The Design meets the requirements of the project. ► All components will be bought, borrowed, or built next quarter. ► The design’s concepts achieve the goal of advancing MAV technology. ► This system is a platform for further development.