(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. Mars CubeSat.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LightSail.
Advertisements

Mars Telecommunications Relay CubeSat Constellation David Spencer Space System Design Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology November 20, 2014.
Advanced Multimission Operations System (AMMOS)
Payload Design Criteria for the Space Test Program Standard Interface Vehicle (STP-SIV) Mr. Mike Marlow STP-SIV Program Manager Payload Design Criteria.
BillikenSat – II Pico-Satellite that conforms to the CubeSat standard Team Leader: Darren Pais Electrical Eng.: Ben Corrado Payload: Rob Arechederra MISSION:
Polar Highly Elliptical / Molniya Orbit Science (PHEMOS) Mission Phase 0/A Studies Mid-Term Review Meetings January 12-14th, 2011.
NEO Surveyor Thomas M. Randolph Jet Propulsion Laboratory
PHEOS PSRR Concept of Operations. 2 Scope The purpose of the PCW-UVI Concept of Operations (ConOps) is to communicate how mission systems will operate,
SAT- 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Mars CubeSat/NanoSat Workshop.
Alessandra Babuscia, Kar-Ming Cheung, Charles Lee, (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology) Mars CubeSat Workshop 20 th November2014.
Spacecraft Design and Sizing Dr Andrew Ketsdever MAE 5595 Lesson 14.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Justin M. Rhodes Avionics – Telecommunications Webmaster Telecommunications and Wiring.
Ares Aloft: Martian Atmospheric Entry and In-Situ Resource Use via CubeSat Jeffrey Stuart Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
1 08 January 2015 Stephen Horan Cube Quest Kick-off: Communications Rules PI for Avionics Space Technology Mission Directorate.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Centennial Challenges Program Space Technology Mission Directorate Cube Quest Challenge Lunar Derby and Deep.
Flying, Hopping and Perching Microbots for Extreme Environment Exploration Deployed Using CubeSats Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic.
Enabling Deep Space CubeSat Missions: Telecommunication challenge
Launch Opportunities for Standardized Payloads kg The 17th Annual Small Payload Rideshare Symposium June 9-11, 2015 Johns Hopkins University Applied.
Emerging Capabilities for the Next Mars Orbiter
Author Name Page 1 CNES’07 Peer Review 4/17/02 CNES’07 Mars Premier Peer Review Rendezvous and Sample Capture OS Beacon Electronics And Power System Mark.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Introduction Low mass, high speed impacting projectiles, performing science investigations from below surface. Objectives: ground truth, unique science.
Final Version Wes Ousley Dan Nguyen May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Thermal.
→ Potential ESA- Roscosmos Cooperation in Education Activities.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Saad Al-Shammari, Ibrahim Sheerah, Mansour Al-Tubaigi ME 594 ; Design of a Micro-Satellite Structure Using ANSYS Package Supervisor.
A Simple Entry, Descent, and Floating System for Planetary Ballooning Daisuke Akita Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
September 20th TJ Faculty Presentation 2006
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
DINO PDR 23 October 2015 DINO Systems Team Jeff Parker Anthony Lowrey.
Section Number - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Communication Systems Jason A. Soloff NASA/GSFC Code 567 August 16-17, 2005.
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
TRIO-CINEMA Meeting at KHU 1 October 19-23, 2009 CINEMA Operations Manfred Bester.
Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Infrastructure Earth Science Vision Session IGARSS 2002 Toronto, CA June 25, Needs for an Intelligent Distributed.
Universal Chassis for Modular Ground Vehicles University of Michigan Mars Rover Team Presented by Eric Nytko August 6, 2005 The 2 nd Mars Expedition Planning.
Kelley Case Concept Design Methods Chief JPL Innovation Foundry Caltech Space Challenge March 24, 2013.
Arizona Space Grant Symposium April 19, 2008 SWE Imaging Payload Command and Data Handling Jordan Cluster.
Prox-0.3 Georgia Institute of Technology Kiichiro DeLuca Richard Zappulla Matt Uhlman Ian Chen 1.
CubeSat for Ions, Neutrals, Electrons and Magnetic Fields PI Robert Lin, SSL Project Manager Thomas Immel, SSL System Engineer David Curtis, SSL STEIN.
© 2014 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. SPRSA Excess Capacity Panel Carol P. Welsch Orbital Sciences Corporation June 10, Welsch.
LuNet Integrated Network Architecture for Sustained Human and Robotic Exploration Gary Noreen Telecommunications Architect Communications Architecture.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
Amy Blas Hawaii Space Flight Laboratory University of Hawaii.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 Mission Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Be P16102 Constrain Subsystems House Internals Provide Access Mount components securely Stow Solar Panels Gather Solar Energy Expose Panels before Deployment.
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Ares V an Enabling Capability for Future Space Science Missions H. Philip Stahl, Ph.D. NASA MSFC.
Wayfarer Ryan Stelzer Dr. David Gaylor April 16 th, 2016 Arizona Space Grant Symposium.
Cloudland Instruments Hawkeye Mechanical Design Snapshot Compiled April 8th, 2016.
AAE 450 Spring 2010 AAE 450 2/11/2010 Kathy Brumbaugh Chris Spreen
Simplifying Customer Software Integration Tim Myers April 9 th, 2011 Colorado Undergraduate Space Research Symposium Payload Configuration GUI.
SmallSat Ground Systems, a C2 to RF Integrated Approach.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
USNA Standard CubeSat Bus USNA-P1 CubeSat (USNA-14)
NOAA Transition to New Direct Readout Systems for JPSS Presented to CGMS-44 Working Group 1, agenda item 3.2.
SOCEM: Sub-Orbital CubeSat Experimental Mission
Integrated Thermal Analysis of the Iodine Satellite (iSAT) from Preliminary to Critical Design Review October 20th 2016 Stephanie Mauro NASA Marshall Space.
Mini-RF Requirements Overview
Tomas Kohout, Antti Näsilä, Tuomas Tikka, Mikael Granvik, Antti Kestilä, Antti Penttilä, Janne Kuhno, Karri Muinonen, Kai Viherkanto, Esa Kallio VTT Technical.
PROJECT METEOR: RITSAT1 P08102
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Mission
Matthew Prevallet 4/26/16 Arizona/NASA Space Grant Symposium
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
CubeSat vs. Science Instrument Complexity
“Introduction to UPC-Orion” June 4, 2008
Presentation transcript:

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. Mars CubeSat Workshop 21 November 2014 Peter Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. SmallSats /CubeSats Interface Standard for Payloads and Hosting Spacecraft JPL Innovation Foundry

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. CubeSats as Mission Multiplier, Secondary Payloads Requirement to limit impact on the mothership sets the bar high  Grant navigation control and telecom responsibility on deployer

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. Purpose and Objectives of the PDCS Objectives: Develop and demonstrate a modular: 1) Deep Space Secondary Payload Data Handling and Relay Communications System Avionics 2) Mechanical Deployment & Containment System Purpose: Becomes the “standard” mechanical, data, and telecommunications interface for secondary, deployable payloads A system that enables unique science enhancements via secondary spacecraft for larger planetary missions Simplifies the integration of CubeSats or SmallSats with any hosting planetary spacecraft

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. OR Deep Space Qualified Standard Deployer Fits standard 1-6U “CubeSats” Provides mechanical containment & isolation, limited radiation shielding, and thermal control Launch Rail or Custom Separation Interface Light Weight (more payload mass) Increased volume envelope More flexible payload configuration Mounting Bracket & Connector Provides mechanical i/f to mothership, incl. vibration isolation Provides electrical & data i/f to PDCS for in-flight battery charging, heaters, health checks & software updates Optional deployment camera Payload Data & Communication System (PDCS) Commands payloads and provides relay telecom Manages payloads during cruise (electrical power, heaters, data monitoring & updates) Stores & forwards deployed payload data (on- demand or continuous read-out modes) Located on deployer or within mothership <2kg, <2L internal volume est. Relay Antennas Distributed on mothership for omnidirectional coverage Deep Space Deployable Payloads Architecture Mothership Deployable Payloads PDCS Avionics PDCS Deployer 6U 3U 1U June 25, Custom Deployer

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. Accommodation & Mission and Requirements Mass Allocation Estimate – ~5 kg Deployer (PDCS) + up to 10 kg payload (Cubesat) Power Allocation Estimate – ~15 W peak for transmit, ~2-5W standby/receive Mechanical Interface to Host S/C – Clear, unobstructed FOV to deploy secondary payload S/C Downlink allocation for packetized data – Store & forward or bent pipe capability Demonstration on Mars Missions Can be deployed at the end of primary science mission or earlier if preferred 2pi steradian antenna coverage possible (no demand on s/c attitude) Optional deployment camera 300 mm 260 mm 6U Cubesat (payload) Deep Space Deployer System (DS 2 ) Payload Data and Communications System (PDCS)

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. Simplifies the complex interface requirements of “mother-ship” integration Two-way telecomm and navigation Data handling and storage Maintains health of secondary payload during cruise (e.g. thermal, battery charging, radiation shielding) Supports in-flight Calibration Simplifies analysis of electromagnetic and mechanical interference via standardized form factor and interface (reduces risk) Can host 6U or 2x 3U, CubeSats as secondary payloads

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. PDCS Overview Deep Space Qualified Commercial CubeSat Dispenser (e.g. CSD derivative, 3U or 6U) Optional Additional Relay Antenna for Omni Coverage Relay Antenna (UHF or S Band) PDCS Avionics Power Board Relay Board (UHF or S-Band) + MSP430 Optional Deployment Camera Host Spacecraft Payload Connector Survival Heater LEON3 FT CDH Board Power RF Data

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. 8 DS 2 Deployed Configuration Details Standoff for thermal isolation from mothership + clearance for release door Nonexplosive door release mechanism ( Door hard stops Release door (deployed) Patch heaters Deployer designed for standard Cubesat interface Deployment spring can be sized for payload mass, ΔV requirements

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. 9 Mission Structural Accommodation Stowed Payload release

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. Not All Interplanetary CubeSats are actually “cubes”: PDCS need not be form-factor limited 10 November 11th, 2014 Aerocapture delivery concept of payloads to Mars orbit Notional Venus Aerocapture delivery concept

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. Current Dispenser Options 6U or 3U Planetary Systems Corp “Canisterized Satellite Dispenser” (CSD) – Includes proven separation connector – Options for MLI and vibration isolators as needed – TRL 9 – To be augmented with strip heater to provide survival heat to payload in “off” state 6U or 3U design by CalPoly SLO – Based on the existing P-POD design – Customized and light weight options may be available, e.g. If light-weighted, it offers no EMI/EMC shielding 3U CSD 6U Cal Poly PDSD

(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. Contributing Team Members Archer Eric D (337F) Telecommunications Banazadeh Payam (312D) Systems Barltrop Kevin J (349A) Avionics/C&DH Becker Raymond A (353J) Thermal Boland Justin S (382E) Instrument/Electronics Castillo-Rogez Julie C (3227) Science Duncan Courtney B (337G) Telecommunications/Radio Lead Dhack Muthulingam (3466) Electrical power System Frick Andreas (312E) Systems Lead ** Hansen David M (337H) Telecommunications Link Margins Jones, Stephanie (312D) Systems and RTB Lead for Cal Poly Project Klesh Andrew T (312A) Systems Komarek Tomas A (6100) Mars Applications Schone Harald (5100) Mission Assurance Thompson Mark K (5128) Mechanisms Tinto Massimo (3330) Telecommunications Wang K. Charles (352B) Configuration Ziemer John K (1510) Formulation Projects Coatta Daniel M (352B) Configuration Lead Henrikson, John (385G) CAD Design