Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Pad Weight: 28.1 Ib Length: 112.5 in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Advertisements

Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015.
Introduction  If you have ever been to shooting range before, you know that firing a gun is fun. Time flies when you’re sending hundreds of rounds down.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
St. Vincent – St. Mary CDR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
Launch Procedures No-Go Criteria 1.Winds exceeding 10 knots steady from any direction 2.Cloud ceiling below 10,000 ft AGL 3.Data acquisition systems not.
The Enforcer Laura Celentano Glenn Ramsey Michael Szalkowski.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 87.2N/19.6Ib Length: in. Diameter: 6in. Fin Semi-Span: 6in.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
Hemodynamics Star Splitters 4-H Club Two Rivers, WI Hemodynamics.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
Autonomous Ground Support Equipment – Project WALL-Eagle
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
FlowArm PLTW Motions © 2013 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Computer Integrated Manufacturing.
Introduction to VEX® components
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
FlowArm PLTW Motions Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
Critical Design Review February 2, 2015
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
2019 First Nation Launch – FRR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
2019 First Nation Launch – CDR Virtual Review
Plantation High SL team 1
University of Iowa USLI
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Project Λscension

Vehicle Dimensions Pad Weight: 28.1 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in

Key Design Features

Payload Containment Device

Key Design Features Piston Parachute Deployment

Key Design Features Piston Parachute Deployment

Final Motor Choice

AeroTech K1275R Thrust Curve

Static Stability Margin Center of Gravity (inches from nose): 71.8 Center of Pressure (inches from nose):89.7 Stability Margin (diameters):2.9

Mass Statement

Parachutes ParachuteSize (in) Descent Rate (fps) Drogue3054 Payload4221 Main7219

Kinetic Energy

RockSim Predicted Altitude

RockSim Predicted Drift

Test Plans

Full-Scale Flight Results Test Flight 1 Partial success Altitude of 3391 ft. Recovery parachutes deployed too early Stability of the rocket demonstrated successfully

Full-Scale Flight Results Test Flight 2 Complete success Altitude of 3446 ft. All recovery systems functioned properly Stability of the rocket demonstrated successfully

Piston Ejection Ground Test

Status of Requirements Verification

AGSE Design Overview

Wheel spindle shaft will sit tightly in an opening in the spindle. A screw and washer /lock nut will be used to provide additional support and friction. The spindle will be attatched to the motor with screws, allowing the wheel to be turned by the motor

AGSE Dimensions

AGSE Design Overview Pan/Tilt Servos Servo connections Pixy connection to Arduino ISCP connection Lens and Reset Button

AGSE Design Overview HS-422 Gripper HS 645 Wrist Servo HS-755 Elbow Servo C-Brackets HS-805 BB Shoulder Servo

AGSE Integration

AGSE Design Overview

AGSE Dimensions

AGSE Integration

AGSE Verification: Requirements RequirementDesign Feature Teams will position their launch vehicle horizontally on the launch pad.  The AL5D Lynxmotion robotic arm will have sufficient reach to load the payload into a horizontally positioned launch vehicle. A master switch will be activated to power on all autonomous procedures and subsystems.  A single poll triple throw (SPTT) switch has been wired into the AGSE between the main power sources and their respective components to act as a master power switch. After the master switch is turned on and all AGSE subsystems are booted, a pause switch will be activated, temporarily halting all AGSE procedures and subroutines.  A single poll single throw (SPST) switch has been installed and wired to the master controller. When this switch is activated, the master controller will send a signal back to itself, fulfilling a Boolean statement in code and therefore allowing the AGSE processes to continue. Disengaging this switch pauses the AGSE until the switch is engaged again. After setup, one judge, one launch services official, and the team will remain at the pad. During autonomous procedures, the team is not permitted to interact with their AGSE.  The onboard microcontrollers and logic boards will automate all AGSE processes. The main computer, an Arduino Mega, will be responsible for managing the activation / deactivation of other microcontrollers. After all nonessential personnel have evacuated, the pause switch will be deactivated.  Engaging the pause switch will allow the master controller to resume its processes of activating / deactivating other subsystems as necessary. Once the pause switch is deactivated, the AGSE will capture and contain the payload within the launch vehicle. If the launch vehicle is in a horizontal position, the launch platform will then be manually erected by the team to an angle of 5 degrees off vertical, pointed away from the spectators. The launch services official may re-enable the pause switch at any time at his/her discretion for safety concerns.  The camera subsystem and the payload retrieval subsystem will be responsible for navigating the AGSE to the payload and then retrieving the payload. The body will support all of these subsystems and will be made mobile through the use of 6, 12V DC motors and 4 servos for steering. The main computer will allow these subsystems to work in conjunction with one another by relaying relevant information between each of the subsystems.

AGSE Verification: Verification Procedures RequirementVerification Procedure Teams will position their launch vehicle horizontally on the launch pad.  Measurements have been taken to ensure that the launch vehicle will be with reach of the AL5D robotic arm from the AGSE body. A master switch will be activated to power on all autonomous procedures and subsystems.  The functionality of the switch has already been verified through testing. When activated, 0V and 0mA reach the logic boards, as indicated by voltage and current measurements. After the master switch is turned on and all AGSE subsystems are booted, a pause switch will be activated, temporarily halting all AGSE procedures and subroutines.  The functionality of the pause switch has been verified through testing. Upon activation, the switch successfully allows the Arduino Mega to send a signal back to itself, fulfilling a Boolean statement to activate a piece of code which halts all AGSE routines and subroutines. After setup, one judge, one launch services official, and the team will remain at the pad. During autonomous procedures, the team is not permitted to interact with their AGSE.  Subsystem level testing and inspection is being carried out to verify the AGSE’s ability to fulfill the mission goals without human intervention. These are detailed in the next slides. After all nonessential personnel have evacuated, the pause switch will be deactivated.  Deactivating the pause switch has been verified in the same manner as its activation. Once the pause switch is deactivated, the AGSE will capture and contain the payload within the launch vehicle. If the launch vehicle is in a horizontal position, the launch platform will then be manually erected by the team to an angle of 5 degrees off vertical, pointed away from the spectators. The launch services official may re-enable the pause switch at any time at his/her discretion for safety concerns.  The payload retrieval subsystem will be responsible for depositing the payload into the payload containment bay of the launch vehicle. This will be verified by the subsystem testing and verification specific to the payload retrieval subsystem. This is detailed in its respective subsystem level verification slide.

AGSE Subsystem Verification: Body Tested for:Verification Procedure Verification Status Structural SupportInspectionPartial Success MobilityTesting motor drive Partial Success Steering Servo Functionality Tested by servo panning under full load Success Autonomous Steering and Navigation Tested through field testing In progress

AGSE Subsystem Verification: Camera Tested for:Verification Procedure Verification Status Color signature detection TestingSuccess Object Differentiation Testing using aspect ratio algorithm In progress Tracking and Distance Calculations Testing using calibration curve In progress

AGSE Subsystem Verification: AL5D Arm Tested for:Verification Procedure Verification Status Servo Functionality Testing has been conducted on all servos individually to verify functionality Success Servo IntegrationManual override has been used to verify and test the arms ability as a whole, to lift the payload. Success Programmatic Consistency The custom made inverse kinematics software will be tested for its ability to consistently locate and pick up the payload. In progress

AGSE Subsystem Verification: Boards/Power Tested for:Verification Procedure Verification Status Safe Current and Voltage output Inspection using voltage and current measurements on battery outputs and power inputs on the boards Success Board Communication I2C port functionality was tested using sample code on the boards configured as slaves to the Mega Success Board Hardware/Progra m Integration Each board will be tested with its respective hardware to verify that they can all work together as an autonomous system In progress