UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Advertisements

Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
UAA Rocketry PDR Presentation NASA Student Launch
University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
St. Vincent – St. Mary CDR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Harvard-Westlake Rocketry Club SLI FRR.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
NASA USLI Preliminary Design Review
Critical Design Review February 2, 2015
November 7, 2014.
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
November 7, 2014.
Critical Design Review
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
Plantation High SL team 1
Target Altitude Safety Document
University of Iowa USLI
Presentation transcript:

UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation

Final Rocket Dimensions Overall Length: 77.7 inches Body Tube Diameter: 4 inches Weight Before Burn: 16.4 lbs Weight After Burn: 15.5 lbs 2

Final AGSE Dimensions 3

Important Design Features ●Linear Motion System o Stepper motor mounting solutions o Belt drive system o Ball nut/threaded rod interface to actuate linear motion ●Rotation o Stepper motor mounting solutions o 2:1 gearing ratio - 25 steps = 90 degrees o Allows convenient access to components 4

Important Design Features ●End Effector o Wide range of motion o Simplicity; one degree of freedom actuation o Robustness of design o Accommodates payload misplacement/misalignment ●Electronics Housing & Rocket Cradle o Storage for microcontroller, power supply, and other sensitive components o Convenient mounting solution for indicators/switches o Ensures repeatable alignment of AGSE elements 5

Final Motor Decision Aerotech J800T ●Propellant weight: 595 grams ●Total weight: 1134 grams ●Average thrust: 790 Newtons ●Peak thrust: 1256 Newtons ●Total impulse: 1265 Newton seconds 6

Final Motor Verification 7

Rocket Flight Stability in Static Margin Diagram Center of Pressure: inches from nose Center of Gravity: inches from nose Static Stability Margin: SSM = (CG-CP)/OD = ( )/4 SSM =

Other Flight & Stability Metrics ● Thrust-to-Weight Ratio: 9.2:1 ● Rail Exit Velocity: 86.4 feet/second o Based on 96 inch rail length ● Maximum Velocity: 494 feet/second ● Maximum Mach Number: 0.44 ● Maximum Acceleration: 484 feet/second^2 ● Apogee: 3206 feet o Allows for 23 oz. mass growth ● Stable Velocity: 43.9 feet/second ● Distance to Stable Velocity: 1.8 feet 9

Mass Statement/Mass Margin Final motor selection allows for 23 oz mass growth, or +10% current mass. After final assembly, mass will be added to target 3,000 foot apogee goal. SectionMass (oz) Nose/Payload62.09 Central Booster86.08 Total

Parachute Sizes and Descent Rates and Kinetic Energy Main Parachute: Fruity Chutes 60 inch Iris Ultra Drogue Parachute: Fruity Chutes 24 inch Elliptical Nosecone/Payload Parachute: Rocketman 36 inch 11

Recovery Harness ●⅜ inch Aramid rope ●Load limit 1480 lb ●Length: ○10 ft between forward section and main parachute ○30 ft between aft section and forward section 12

Predicted Drift Wind Speed (mph) Rocket Drift (ft) Payload Drift (ft)

Test Plans and Procedures ●System integration plan ●Component testing o Utilize FEA stress analysis of machine components ●Static and functional testing ●Use accelerometer flight data to verify the efficacy of our designs ●Test procedures o Safety o Checklists o Regimented testing schedule 14

Scale Model Flight Test ●Gained experience & expertise in: o Simulation accuracy o Accelerometer data recover and analysis o Parachute & harness packing o Launch procedures o Building methods 15

Staged Recovery System Tests ●Tested in flight configuration ●Charges sized: dependent on section volume ●Ensure separation: o Sub-scale: ensures coupler fits are not too tight o Full-scale: ensure shear pins fracture 16

Final AGSE Design Overview ●Subsystems: o Base Plate: platform for rigid attachment of components o Cradle: ensures rocket is placed within operating limits, enhances reliability, aids interfacing between AGSE and rocket. o Electronics compartment: weather-proof, allows for convenient access to microcontroller, power supply, switches and indicator lights 17

AGSE/Payload Integration ●Return to home position ●LMS system lowers end effector ●Servos actuate to close the end effector around the payload ●LMS raises the end effector to maximum height ●Stepper motor actuates rotation ●LMS lowers the payload into the payload bay ●Servos actuate to open the end effector, releasing the payload ●LMS raises the end effector to maximum height ●Servos on the payload hatch actuate to close the hatch ●Return to home position 18

Requirement Completion Status ●Mission success criteria: o Contain and ingress payload o Achieve desired apogee o Successful parachute and payload deployment o Achieve all criteria while adhering to competition rules, regulating authorities, and pre-determined safety practices (set forth in RFP and PDR) ●Methods of verification o CAD modeling o Ground testing o Field testing 19

Thank You! Questions? For more information: