Utility Axioms Axiom: something obvious, cannot be proven Utility axioms (rules for clear thinking)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Managerial Economics, 9e Managerial Economics Thomas Maurice.
Advertisements

Economics of Information (ECON3016)
Utility theory U: O-> R (utility maps from outcomes to a real number) represents preferences over outcomes ~ means indifference We need a way to talk about.
Decision Analysis (Decision Tables, Utility)
Paradoxes in Decision Making With a Solution. Lottery 1 $3000 S1 $4000 $0 80% 20% R1 80%20%
1 Decision Making and Utility Introduction –The expected value criterion may not be appropriate if the decision is a one-time opportunity with substantial.
DSC 3120 Generalized Modeling Techniques with Applications
Chapter 15: Decisions Under Risk and Uncertainty McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Decisions under Risk and Uncertainty.
Chapter 14 Decision Making
Rational choice: An introduction Political game theory reading group 3/ Carl Henrik Knutsen.
Behavioral Finance Uncertain Choices February 18, 2014 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
CHAPTER 14 Utility Axioms Paradoxes & Implications.
1 Utility Theory. 2 Option 1: bet that pays $5,000,000 if a coin flipped comes up tails you get $0 if the coin comes up heads. Option 2: get $2,000,000.
Decision making and economics. Economic theories Economic theories provide normative standards Expected value Expected utility Specialized branches like.
1 Modeling risk attitudes Objective: Develop tools to compare alternative courses of action with uncertain outcomes (lotteries or deals) A B $30 -$15 $100.

1 A Brief History of Descriptive Theories of Decision Making Kiel, June 9, 2005 Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
1 Introduction to Decision Analysis for Public Policy Decision-Making Ross D. Shachter Management Science and Engineering Stanford University Introduction.
Utilities: Transitivity, Multiple Dimensions, and the Voting Paradox Robert M. Hayes 2005.
CMSC 671 Fall 2003 Class #26 – Wednesday, November 26 Russell & Norvig 16.1 – 16.5 Some material borrowed from Jean-Claude Latombe and Daphne Koller by.
Copyright © 2005 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Managerial Economics Thomas Maurice eighth edition Chapter 15.
PGM 2003/04 Tirgul7 Foundations of Decision Theory (mostly from Pearl)
Decision making Making decisions Optimal decisions Violations of rationality.
Economic evaluation of health programmes Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Class no. 9: Cost-utility analysis – Part 2.
Homework due next Tuesday, September 22 p. 156 # 5-7, 5-8, 5-9 Please use complete sentences to answer any questions and make. Include any tables you are.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty and Risk 1 By Isuru Manawadu B.Sc in Accounting Sp. (USJP), ACA, AFM
Axioms Let W be statements known to be true in a domain An axiom is a rule presumed to be true An axiomatic set is a collection of axioms Given an axiomatic.
Decision Analysis Steps in Decision making
Ellsberg’s paradoxes: Problems for rank- dependent utility explanations Cherng-Horng Lan & Nigel Harvey Department of Psychology University College London.
Lecture 3 on Individual Optimization Uncertainty Up until now we have been treating bidders as expected wealth maximizers, and in that way treating their.
Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior Chapter 5. Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior 1.In order to compare the riskiness of alternative choices, we need to.
Models for Strategic Marketing Decision Making. Market Entry Decisions To enter first or to wait Sources of First-Mover Advantages –Technological leadership.
Chapter 16: Making Simple Decision March 23, 2004.
Axiomatic Theory of Probabilistic Decision Making under Risk Pavlo R. Blavatskyy University of Zurich April 21st, 2007.
IE 2030 Lecture 7 Decision Analysis Expected Value Utility Decision Trees.
L03 Utility. Big picture u Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from the set of affordable alternatives. u Budget.
MODULE 9 MANAGERS AS DECISION MAKERS “Decide first, then act” How do managers use information to make decisions and solve problems? What are the steps.
Chapter 11 – Introduction to Risk Analysis u Why do individuals, companies, and stockholders take risks?
Web-Mining Agents Agents and Rational Behavior Decision-Making under Uncertainty Simple Decisions Ralf Möller Universität zu Lübeck Institut für Informationssysteme.
L03 Utility. Quiz How much do you like microeconomics A: I love it (unconditionally) B: I cannot live without it C: I would die for it D: All of the above.
1 BAMS 517 – 2011 Decision Analysis -IV Utility Failures and Prospect Theory Martin L. Puterman UBC Sauder School of Business Winter Term
Decision Tree analysis. Decision making Decision making is the process of evaluating two or more alternatives leading to a final choice. It is closely.
Risk Efficiency Criteria Lecture XV. Expected Utility Versus Risk Efficiency In this course, we started with the precept that individual’s choose between.
Chapter 19 Statistical Decision Theory ©. Framework for a Decision Problem action i.Decision maker has available K possible courses of action : a 1, a.
QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
Behavioral Finance Preferences Part I Feb 16 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Von Neumann-Morgenstern Lecture II. Utility and different views of risk Knightian – Frank Knight Risk – known probabilities of events Uncertainty – unknown.
The Theory of Rational Choice
RISK AND UNCERTAINTY Scarce resources create opportunities costs, which renders the idea of a zero-risk society a noble but unattainable goal. 1.
Chapter 15: Decisions Under Risk and Uncertainty
Decisions Under Risk and Uncertainty
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATIONS OF FINANCE I: EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY
L03 Utility.
The Theory of Rational Choice
L03 Utility.
CS 4/527: Artificial Intelligence
Lecture 3 Axioms & elicitation.
Statistical Decision Theory
Rational Decisions and
L03 Utility.
L03 Utility.
13. Acting under Uncertainty Wolfram Burgard and Bernhard Nebel
L03 Utility.
Making Decisions Under Uncertainty
Chapter 15 Decisions under Risk and Uncertainty
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Chapter 15: Decisions Under Risk and Uncertainty
Making Simple Decisions
Presentation transcript:

Utility Axioms Axiom: something obvious, cannot be proven Utility axioms (rules for clear thinking)

The seven axioms (rules of clear thinking) 1.Ordering and transitivity 2.Reduction of compound uncertain events 3.Continuity 4.Substitutability 5.Monotonicity 6.Invariance 7.Finiteness

3 1. Ordering and transitivity You can order consequences for all alternatives in preference level from best to worst; some may be at the same level. A 1  A 2  means you prefer A 1 to A 2 A 1  A 2  means you are indifferent between A 1 to A 2 If A 1  A 2  and A 2  A 3 then A 1  A 3

2. Reduction of compound uncertain events Decision-maker indifferent between compound uncertain event and simple uncertain event determined by reduction of compound uncertain event using standard probability manipulations

5 3. Continuity For any three consequences, A 1  A  A 2, the decision-maker can set a probability p (preference probability) of receiving A 1 versus A 2 that will make you indifferent to receiving A for sure. A1A1 A2A2 A p 1-p 

6 4. Substitutability If the decision-maker faces the choice presented in the continuity axiom between receiving A for sure and a lottery that may produce A 1 (with probability, p, equal to his/her preference probability) or A 2 (with probability 1-p), then the decision-maker remains indifferent.

7 5. Monotonicity If you have to choose between two lotteries with the same two consequences, you will choose the lottery with the higher probability of the better consequence. A1A1 A2A2 q 1-q A1A1 A2A2 p 1-p I: II: I>II if A 1  A 2 and p>q

6. Invariance All needed to determine decision maker’s preferences among uncertain events are the consequences (payoffs) and the associated probabilities

7. Finiteness No consequence is infinitely good or bad

Theorem If a decision-maker accepts the seven rules of clear thinking then It is possible to find a utility function to evaluate consequences The decision-maker should select the alternative course of action with highest expected utility

Paradoxes Framing effect: preferences depended on the way the decision problem is framed Allais paradox: certainty effect Epistemic uncertainty aversion

Some rules of clear thinking for decision-making: a broader perspective Know your objectives Evaluate alternatives only on the basis of their consequences Structure a decision so that all issues, and only those issues, that matter are accounted for