Quantifying Protein Mobility in Living Drosophila Embryos Using Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) William Dempsey Shima Hajimirza.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Absorption of photon elevates chromophore to excited state.
Advertisements

What do FRAP curves tell us?
Online Counseling Resource YCMOU ELearning Drive… School of Architecture, Science and Technology Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra Open University, Nashik.
Session 6 (4/21/09) Dynamics of Genomic Organization & Function in Living Cells I Papers covered: 1.Zink et al., Hum Genetics 102 (1998)24 – Pliss.
Fluorescent Protein Reporters and Fluorescence Technology Josh Leung James Weis February 18th, 2010 Bio 1220, Gary Wessel.
Announcements Writing Assignment #1 returned in section This week in section: –Writing assignment #2 due (questions on your fig.) Group presentations of.
Fluorophores bound to the specimen surface and those in the surrounding medium exist in an equilibrium state. When these molecules are excited and detected.
Multifocal two-photon laser scanning microscopy combined with photo-activatable GFP for in vivo monitoring of intracellular protein dynamics in real time.
Methods, Part 2 February 9, Learning Outcomes Discriminate between different types of microscopy, and justify their use for answering research questions.
PALM/STORM How to get super-resolution microscopy.
Announcements I will be here on Wed. Unclear whether we’ll have special lecture by Klaus Schulten on magnetic orientation. Lec. 13 : SHREC, SHRIMP, PALM.
Total Internal reflection Fluorescence Microscopy: Instrumentation and Applications in Cell biology.
Molekulární biologie (KBC/MBIOG) Ivo Frébort Alberts et al. (2008) Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th ed. Garland Science, New York 12. Methods of molecular.
Fluorescence Techniques
Introduction It is known that pH is responsible for vasodilation of blood vessels in the cortex, however there is some evidence that CO₂ may also play.
Molecular Cell Biology Light Microscopy in Cell Biology Cooper Modified from a 2010 lecture by Richard McIntosh, University of Colorado.
Diffusion of CaM and CaMK-II Andrew Harrell Dr. Waxham Lab University of Texas Medical School.
The Plasmamembrane and Lipid Rafts 08/2007 Lecture by Dr. Dirk Lang Dept. of Human Biology UCT Medical School Room Phone:
Quiz (2/20/08, Chpt 3, ECB) 1. A chemical process where there is a net gain of electrons is called _______________. A chemical process where there is a.
Diffraction limited spot: Single Molecule Sensitivity
FLUORESCENT RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING Analysis and Applications Zareen Butt Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Windsor.
Supporting Fig. S1 OsRHR-GFP GFP ChlorophyllMerge GC Hoechst Merge GH Supporting Figure S1. The OsPHR-GFP fusion protein localizes to nuclei, chloroplasts,
Designing a Microscopy Experiment Kurt Thorn, PhD Director, Image from Susanne Rafelski, Marshall lab.
Homework 5 Early on during zebrafish development, many molecules are involved in patterning the embryo’s tissues and axes. One possible explanation for.
FRAP Group 3a Alessandro Borgia Juliane Winkler
An analysis of Plk4 centriolar dynamics.
This Week’s Schedule smFRET
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Stability and Nuclear Dynamics of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Philsang Hwang, Shih-Wei Chou, Zongwei Chen, Brian M. McDermott 
Molecular Dynamics in Living Cells Observed by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy with One- and Two-Photon Excitation  Petra Schwille, Ulrich Haupts,
Dynamics of interphase microtubules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
The TBP-like Factor CeTLF Is Required to Activate RNA Polymerase II Transcription during C. elegans Embryogenesis  Linda Kaltenbach, Michael A. Horner,
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Hermann Broder Schmidt, Rajat Rohatgi  Cell Reports 
Transiently Reorganized Microtubules Are Essential for Zippering during Dorsal Closure in Drosophila melanogaster  Ferenc Jankovics, Damian Brunner  Developmental.
Florian Mueller, Tatsuya Morisaki, Davide Mazza, James G. McNally 
Direct fusion lines allow fluorescent visualization of plasmatocyte nuclei, the cytoplasm, or the cytoskeleton in embryos from stage (St) 8 onwards. Direct.
Single-Molecule Microscopy Reveals Plasma Membrane Microdomains Created by Protein-Protein Networks that Exclude or Trap Signaling Molecules in T Cells 
Mark A. Hallen, Jianghai Ho, Christine D. Yankel, Sharyn A. Endow 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Live Imaging of Endogenous RNA Reveals a Diffusion and Entrapment Mechanism for nanos mRNA Localization in Drosophila  Kevin M. Forrest, Elizabeth R.
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Silvia Cermelli, Yi Guo, Steven P. Gross, Michael A. Welte 
Volume 113, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (April 2012)
The Bacterial Cytoskeleton
S. Chodagam, A. Royou, W. Whitfield, R. Karess, J.W. Raff 
Justin Crest, Kirsten Concha-Moore, William Sullivan  Current Biology 
Modes of Protein Movement that Lead to the Asymmetric Localization of Partner of Numb during Drosophila Neuroblast Division  Bingwei Lu, Larry Ackerman,
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
Yuri Oleynikov, Robert H. Singer  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
The FRAP mobility of EGFP-UAP56, but not its K95N mutant, is ATP-dependent. The FRAP mobility of EGFP-UAP56, but not its K95N mutant, is ATP-dependent.
Mobility of Synaptic Vesicles in Different Pools in Resting and Stimulated Frog Motor Nerve Terminals  Michael A. Gaffield, Silvio O. Rizzoli, William.
FRAP and FLIP analysis of GFP-ADAR2 and GFP-ADAR1C-Term.
Fig. 7. Analysis of dFMRP kinetics in dFMRP granules by FRAP
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (April 1998)
Hermann Broder Schmidt, Rajat Rohatgi  Cell Reports 
Brian L. Sprague, Robert L. Pego, Diana A. Stavreva, James G. McNally 
Integrated approach for the analysis of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) intensities in live cells Aliaksandr Halavatyi1, Ziad Al Tanoury1,
FRAP in NIH 3T3 β-actin-GFP cell
Label-Free Imaging of Lipid-Droplet Intracellular Motion in Early Drosophila Embryos Using Femtosecond-Stimulated Raman Loss Microscopy  Wei Dou, Delong.
Presentation transcript:

Quantifying Protein Mobility in Living Drosophila Embryos Using Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) William Dempsey Shima Hajimirza

Overview Days 1 and 2 Drosophila Introduction Protocol Results Conclusions Future Propositions References Acknowledgements

Fluorescence Microscopy CalibrationE. Coli

Gel Electrophoresis Ladder Kpn1/HindIIIKpn1Lambda EcoR1 Vector ControlHindIIILambda Control 10 Kilobases 5 Kilobases 3 Kilobases 1.5 Kilobases 1 Kilobases 2 Kilobases 0.5 Kilobases Appx. 42ng 42ng Ladder Info from:

FRAP Overview Excite Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) fluorophore with low energy 488nm Argon laser – Detect emission of a lower wavelength signal Maximum laser power is used to photobleach GFP for analysis Returning to low energy emission allows quantification of the remaining unbleached GFP-coupled proteins

Drosophila Embryos FRAP assay performed on two transgenic types: – Wild-type embryos ubiquitously expressing histone (H2A-GFP) – Wild-type embryos ubiquitously expressing nuclear localization signal (NLS-GFP)

Nuclear Labeling of NLS-GFP 100 µm Supatto, W et al. PNAS 2005

Protocol Embryo Preparation – De-chorionated and placed on microscope slide after 14 developmental cycles (2.5 hours) –After isolation, the nuclei remain as a single epithelial layer at the edge of the yolk for approximately minutes Gastrulation occurs after this stationary period

Protocol Imaging –63x, 0.9 NA water Acroplane Confocal Microscope objective –Seven 1.5 micron z-sections are taken between a nuclear layer to allow full planar photobleaching Bleaching and Time Lapse –Define a region of interest and bleach the middle section with 100% laser power –Take 7 z-sections every 10 seconds to quantify fluorescence recovery

H2A Experiment 1

Calculated D eff was between and μm 2 /sec

H2A Experiment 2 Calculated D eff was between and μm 2 /sec

NLS Experiment

Slope was calculated to be approximately sec -1

Control 1: Linearity

Control 2: Time Bleach No significant photobleaching at 2% laser power for 690 seconds

Control 3: Single Nucleus Bleach

Signal is restored above background levels after one entire nucleus is photobleached Calculated D eff was between and μm 2 /sec

Control 4: Five Nucleus Bleach

Central nucleus no longer regains signal in a diffusion-like manner

Conclusions Motion of H2A within Drosophila embryo nuclei can be modeled by simple diffusion –D eff was calculated to be between and μm 2 /sec –D eff of free GFP is approximately 87 μm 2 /sec –Kicheva et al (2007) reported Dpp-GFP to have a D eff of approximately 0.10 μm 2 /sec during Drosophila wing development

Conclusions NLS diffusion is too rapid for manual FRAP experiments –NLS fluorescence returns to a stable level in less than 1 second –Relative size (kDa) between GFP and NLS may contribute (GFP is 27kDa) –Better time resolution may be needed to observe an exponential recovery

Conclusions Single cell control indicates that H2A can migrate between nuclei – Cell membranes are not fully formed between nuclei – Multiple cell control verifies that production is unlikely – Since H2A is expected to constantly bind DNA, why is it diffusing between nuclei in the embryo?

Future Propositions H2A experiments must be redone – Include diffusion between nuclei – Perform a complete embryo bleach to be sure of no generation –Perform for longer time intervals (20 minutes instead of around 10) NLS experiment must be performed with higher time resolution

Future Propositions Nuclear bleach experiments must be performed to better quantify diffusion between nuclei –Bleach 1, then 2, then 3, etc. to see whether the D eff is approximately the same –Perform full nuclei bleaches at different stages of development Nuclei change size during different stages of development (larger at early stages)

References “1kb DNA Ladder,” from New England Biolabs webpage, Last accessed on Sept 22, 2007; URL: Axelrod, D et al. “Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics,” Biophys J, Vol. 16, , Davis, I; Girdham, CH; and O’Farrell, PH. “A Nuclear GFP That Marks Nuclei in Living Drosophila Embryos; Maternal Supply Overcomes a Delay in the Appearance of Zygotic Fluorescence,” Developmental Biology, Vol. 170, , Kicheva, A et al. “Kinetics of morphogen gradient formation,” Science, Vol. 315, No. 5811, , Kim, I et al. “Cell-to-cell movement of GFP during embryogenesis and early seedling development in Arabidopsis,” PNAS, Vol. 102, No. 6, , Supatto, W et al. “In vivo modulation of morphogenetic movements in Drosophila embryos with femtosecond laser pulses,” PNAS, Vol 102, No. 4, , 2005.

Acknowledgements Willy Supatto, Ph.D. – Scott Fraser Lab Periklis Pantazis, Ph.D. – Scott Fraser Lab Rob Phillips, Ph.D. – Caltech Professor Scott Fraser, Ph.D. – Caltech Professor Special thanks to all of the TAs who helped us this week