The Watershed Condition Framework Anne Zimmermann, USFS Director, Watershed, Fish, Wildlife, Air, and Rare Plants April 27, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Advertisements

080820_v1DP TRAVEL MANAGEMENT - PROCESS ON THE GILA NATIONAL FOREST.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
A Statewide Strategy for Restoring Arizona’s Forests A 20-YEAR ACTION PLAN.
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
Capitol Hill Oceans Week Wetlands Restoration Panel June 8, 2005 JOHN H. DUNNIGAN Ecosystem Goal Lead Capitol Hill Oceans Week June 8, 2005.
1 Watershed Condition Framework Overview SEAKFHP Strategic Planning Meeting Sheila Jacobson, Fisheries Biologist October 2012.
Science & Monitoring Team Meeting Sept 23rd. Agenda Introductions Overview of CPRW & CO Conservation Exchange Review draft charter/workplan Watershed.
Green Infrastructure Planning for working landscapes, natural resources and other open spaces.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
“ We are in the business of healthy ecosystems.” A Business Plan For Ecosystem Health & Large-Scale Watershed Restoration In the Northern Region.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Wallowa Whitman Forest Collaborative Nils D. Christoffersen Wallowa Resources.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative An Approach to Landscape Scale Conservation in Southwest Wyoming October 23, 2014.
Daniel Oppenheimer Tamarisk Coalition May 20, 2014.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Clackamas River Basin Council Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementer’s Perspective August 19, 2013.
The Invasive Species Threat. The National Strategy and Implementation Plan for Invasive Species Management -Forests Out of Balance- The Impact of Invasive.
Rick Swanson USDA Forest Service U.S. Forest Service: C&I’s for: The World’s Largest Water Company U.S. Forest Service: C&I’s for: The World’s Largest.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
A Land Preservation Framework for the Cacapon Watershed of West Virginia Michael P. Strager Charles B. Yuill Natural Resource Analysis Center West Virginia.
Montana Forest Stewardship “Empowerment of Forest Owners through Personal Involvement”
WASTE WOOD UTILIZATION WORKSHOP Forest Sustainability Program for Baltimore County, MD June 28, 2006 Donald C. Outen, AICP Natural Resource Manager
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
May 27 th, 2003FRCV Conservation Plan Summary and Status Rock Creek Valley Conservation Plan & Priorities Prepared by Friends of Rock Creek Valley with.
Accelerating Vegetative Treatments to Improve Condition Class (also known as our Fuels Strategy Meeting!!!)
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
INYO NATIONAL FOREST - TRAVEL ANALYSIS PROCESS Public Meeting – April 21, 2015.
Climate Change Impacts in the Interior Columbia Basin.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Bear Creek OR 1976 Bear Creek OR Burro Creek AZ 1981 Burro Creek AZ 2000.
RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.
CREEKS & COMMUNITIES Laura Van Riper – Social Scientist National Riparian Service Team.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
City of Suwanee 2030 comprehensive plan. TODAY’S AGENDA Process Update Community Agenda Framework “Compass” Review  Images and Questions  Comp Plan.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Landscape Scale Restoration Western Fire Managers & Community Protection Program Bureau of Forestry Assistance Mary Fritz –Forest Stewardship Manager Tyre.
Dungeness Watershed Action Plan Olympic National Forest.
Fran Dunwell Hudson River Estuary Coordinator Hudson River Estuary Program/NYSDEC.
Alachua County Forever Timber Harvesting Business Plan June 28, 2011.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
Problem Definition Exercise Summary & Discussion.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Restoration Under a Future Climate Understanding and managing climate change effects on federal lands Dr. Cynthia West, Director Office of Sustainability.
DELAWARE NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE Promoting stewardship of the nation’s coastal areas through science and education …
GOOD NEIGHBOR AGREEMENTS (AUTHORITY) MARCH 31, 2016.
Regional Peer Learning Workshop: Accelerated Landscape Restoration Siuslaw Stewardship Model and Collaborative Engagement.
CriteriaYesNoEffectiveness of CVC 1. Continuity of Participation4100% 2. Representation and Access3175% 3. Self Efficacy4100% 4. Information Exchange and.
USING STEWARDSHIP AUTHORITY TO ADVANCE RESTORATION Mae Lee Hafer Regional Stewardship Coordinator Collaborative Restoration.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
Bill Hubbard Southern Regional Extension Forester taking the urban forest to the next level.
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
The Oregon Watershed Council Model, USA
A Community-Based Approach to
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Landscape Approach to Resource Management
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Presentation transcript:

The Watershed Condition Framework Anne Zimmermann, USFS Director, Watershed, Fish, Wildlife, Air, and Rare Plants April 27, 2012

Secretary’s Vision "Clean, healthy forests are vital to our efforts to protect America's fresh water supply.” "Our nation's economic health, and the health of our citizens, depends on abundant, clean and reliable sources of freshwater.” “The Watershed Condition Framework and map will help provide economic and environmental benefits to residents of rural communities." “The Watershed Condition Framework and map will help provide economic and environmental benefits to residents of rural communities." -Secretary Vilsack, June 3, 2011, WCC Map Rollout

Forest Service Approach  Develop a comprehensive approach to strategically implement integrated restoration on watersheds on National Forests and Grasslands  Develop an outcome-based performance measure for documenting improvement to watershed condition at Forest, Regional, and National scales

The Watershed Condition Framework (WCF) is a comprehensive approach for: evaluating the condition of watersheds, evaluating the condition of watersheds, prioritizing watersheds for restoration or maintenance, prioritizing watersheds for restoration or maintenance, strategically implementing integrated restoration, and strategically implementing integrated restoration, and tracking and monitoring outcome based program accomplishments. tracking and monitoring outcome based program accomplishments. Forest Service Approach

Required Outcome Be able to demonstrate at a national scale that watershed condition has improved as a result of Forest Service integrated restoration activities

STEP A CLASSIFY Watershed Condition Watershed Condition STEP B PRIORITIZE Watersheds for Restoration STEP C DEVELOP Watershed Restoration Action Plans STEP D IMPLEMENT Integrated Projects STEP E TRACK Restoration Accomplishments STEP F VERIFY & MONITOR Watershed Condition Watershed Condition Framework

STEP A Classify Watershed Condition 1.National Forest-based reconnaissance-level office evaluation of watershed condition 2.Achievable within existing budgets and staffing 3.A core set of 12 national watershed condition indicators 4.Relies on professional judgment exercised by Forest interdisciplinary teams using available data. Classify Watersheds Rapid Assessment to achieve National Baseline

Watershed Condition Indicators 1. Water Quality 2. Water Quantity 3. Aquatic Habitat 4. Aquatic Biota 5. Riparian/Wetland Vegetation 6. Roads and Trails 7. Soils 8. Fire Regime or Wildfire 9. Forest Cover 10. Rangeland Vegetation 11. Terrestrial Invasive Species 12. Forest Health Watershed Condition : The state of the physical and biological characteristics and processes within a watershed that affect the hydrologic and soil functions supporting aquatic ecosystems. 8

Watershed Condition Class Watershed Condition Classification: The process of describing watershed condition in terms of discrete categories (or classes) that reflect the level of watershed health or integrity. The classes are: (1) Functioning properly, (2)ּFunctioning at risk, (3) Impaired function. The process of describing watershed condition in terms of discrete categories (or classes) that reflect the level of watershed health or integrity. The classes are: (1) Functioning properly, (2)ּFunctioning at risk, (3) Impaired function. 9

Map of Condition Class National Forest System Watersheds

National Watershed Condition Class (WCC) Results – NFS Watersheds Class 1- Functioning Properly7,88252% Class 2- Functioning at Risk6,75145% Class 3- Impaired Function4313% Total watersheds15,064

STEP A Classify Watershed Condition STEP B Prioritize Watersheds for Restoration Identify priority watersheds for restoration  A small number equivalent to a 5-year program of work (2- 5 per Forest)  Completed at the Forest/Grassland level using an interdisciplinary team process.  Initial designation of 247 priority watersheds completed September 30, 2011

STEP A Classify Watershed Condition STEP B Prioritize Watersheds for Restoration Identify priority watersheds for restoration  Public participation opportunity  Selection criteria:  Active collaboration and partnership opportunities  Ecological, social, economic considerations  Alignment with national/regional strategies and Forest Plan direction  Outside Agency efforts and partnership opportunities

Designated Priority Watersheds in FY11 - Distribution by Condition Class Class 1- Functioning Properly6326% Class 2- Functioning at Risk16366% Class 3- Impaired Function218% Total Priority Watersheds247

Interactive Map of Condition Class and Designated Priority Watersheds USDA Forest Service Watershed Condition Classification and Priority Watersheds Ratings based on assessment on National Forest System land in sixth-level watersheds November 15, 2011 Alaska Puerto Rico

STEP A Classify Watershed Condition STEP C Develop Watershed Action Plans Develop action plans for priority watershed  Collaboratively engage with potential partners  Field assessment to document specific problems  Identify essential projects that address the problems  Implementation schedule  205 Watershed Restoration Action Plans completed September 30, 2011 Essential projects are a discrete group of conservation actions and treatments that are implemented as an integrated suite of activities, focused primarily on restoring or protecting watershed health and therefore improving watershed condition class.

Information contained in WRAPs: List of active partnersList of active partners Key watershed issuesKey watershed issues Important ecological values within watershedImportant ecological values within watershed Description of essential projectsDescription of essential projects Estimate of project costsEstimate of project costs Watershed Restoration Action Plans (WRAPs)

 Overall condition classification ranking and the ranking of its 12 watershed condition indicators.  Location of Priority Watersheds  Downloadable copies of the watershed restoration action plans.  Information on selection criteria, list of active partners, and estimated costs.  Increases the public’s awareness of their local watershed conditions and the role they can play in improving them.  Shapefile available for GIS analysis. Interactive Map of Condition Class and Designated Priority Watersheds 18

Interactive Map of Condition Class, Designated Priority Watersheds, and Watershed Data (including WRAPs) 19

STEP A Classify Watershed Condition STEP D Implement Integrated Projects Implementation  May take 1-6 years or longer Planning, project design, NEPA, implementation Planning, project design, NEPA, implementation NEPA provides an opportunity for citizens to be involved in the planning and environmental review of projects NEPA provides an opportunity for citizens to be involved in the planning and environmental review of projects A watershed is considered to have moved to an improved condition class when all of the essential projects identified in a Watershed Restoration Action Plan are completed.

STEP A Classify Watershed Condition STEP E Track Restoration Accomplishments Tracking  Essential project completion in priority watersheds  Change in condition class due to other reasons (major disturbances, other agency’s actions, etc.)  Beginning to look at Outcomes as well as Outputs: Outputs still recorded for traditional accomplishment reporting. Outputs still recorded for traditional accomplishment reporting. Outcomes to be tracked for accountability. Outcomes to be tracked for accountability.

STEP A Classify Watershed Condition STEP F Monitor and Verification Two-tiered approach for monitoring Tier 1 – Performance accountability A sample of watersheds evaluated annually for classification process and project completion/anticipated results Tier 2 – Comprehensive monitoring Demonstrate that concentration of activities within watersheds improves stream and habitat conditions

STEP A CLASSIFY Watershed Condition Watershed Condition STEP B PRIORITIZE Watersheds for Restoration STEP C DEVELOP Watershed Restoration Action Plans STEP D IMPLEMENT Integrated Projects STEP E TRACK Restoration Accomplishments STEP F VERIFY & MONITOR Watershed Condition Watershed Condition Framework How can it be used?

U SING THE W ATERSHED C ONDITION F RAMEWORK A S A T OOL F OR C OLLABORATION

Sharing our new approach to restoration with partners to: provide a tangible assessment of watershed conditions to stakeholders, provide a tangible assessment of watershed conditions to stakeholders, show the thought process behind our prioritization of watershed restoration projects, show the thought process behind our prioritization of watershed restoration projects, and present vegetation management as part of watershed restoration in a suite of project opportunities and present vegetation management as part of watershed restoration in a suite of project opportunities U SING THE WCF AS A T OOL F OR C OLLABORATION A PLACE TO START THE CONVERSATION WITH S TAKEHOLDERS We think WCF is a good tool to demonstrate the prioritization of restoration But every stakeholder has a different perspective !

The Stakeholders Local Landowners Landowners Municipalities Municipalities Resource-based businesses Resource-based businesses Interest groups Interest groupsRegional Federal and State agencies Federal and State agencies Tribes Tribes Conservation Organizations Conservation Organizations

Use WCF to Frame Conversation WCF can show restoration needs Map results of watershed condition classification by attribute to show where problem areas exists. Map results of watershed condition classification by attribute to show where problem areas exists. Hit the road! Choose tour stops that demonstrate past restoration success and opportunities for future restoration. Hit the road! Choose tour stops that demonstrate past restoration success and opportunities for future restoration.

Overlay the Watershed Condition Framework A core set of 12 national watershed condition indicators.  Professional judgment  Existing information  GIS data Green = Class 1 (Properly Functioning) Yellow = Class 2 (Functioning at Risk) Orange = Class 3 (Impaired Function) How will WCF Results be Used?  Show changes (hopefully improvement ) in watershed conditions over time.  Develop restoration priorities at a broad Forest level (most useful at the indicator or attribute scale).  Communicate and integrate our restoration priorities and strategies with partners.

WCF Model Indicators and their ratings ABC 6 th Field HUC, XYZ National Forest Aquatic Biota ConditionPoor Riparian/Wetland Vegetation ConditionFair Water Quality ConditionGood Water Quantity ConditionGood Aquatic Habitat ConditionPoor Road and Trail ConditionPoor Soil ConditionGood Fire Regime Condition ClassFair Forest Cover ConditionGood Forest Health ConditionGood Terrestrial Invasive Species ConditionGood

Riparian/Wetland Vegetation Condition Data Sources: AREMP WCF riparian analysis Projects: Commercial thinning in Riparian Reserves – direct effect on structure and complexity. Non-commercial thinning in Riparian Reserves – direct effect on structure and complexity. Thinning and placement of small wood in- stream – fall and leave or fall and carry Riparian planting – direct effect over the long term Wet Meadow Treatment – direct effect on wetland dependent ecosystems but small number of acres. Respect the River Projects – direct and indirect effects, protection and restoration of riparian sites but small number of acres.

WCF Standards Open road density calculations were based on open system roads from all jurisdictions, (i.e., FS, State, County, private, etc.). Use operational maintenance level 2-5 roads. Use the following thresholds Good(1): Road density of < 1 mi/mi 2 Fair(2): Road density of 1 to 2.4 mi/mi 2 Poor(3): Road density of > 2.4 mi/mi 2 Open Road Density Projects: Road storage and decommission

Essential Projects to Address Problem Indicators: 1.Upland and Riparian Thinning 2.Road Treatments 3.Dispersed Campsite Treatments

Essential Project #1: Upland and Riparian Thinning The Situation The Solution Indicators addressed: aquatic habitat, riparian/wetland vegetation condition Potential Partner: Even age stands have little diversity in both upland and riparian habitats due to lack of historical fire regimes and past plantation management Increase species and structural diversity by pre-commercial thinning, or falling and leaving trees in both upland and riparian areas. 550 acres have been identified as high priority

Essential Project #2: Road Treatments Roads are located in steep terrain and riparian areas. Erosion from roads negatively impacts aquatic species. In addition roads impact connectivity for fish and other aquatic species. The Situation The Solution Indicators addressed: aquatic habitat, roads & trails Twenty eight miles of high aquatic risk roads will be closed or storm-proofed. Where necessary to protect aquatic resources fills will be removed. Culverts that are barriers to fish will be replaced or removed. Potential Partners:

Essential Project #3: Dispersed Camping Treatments Indicators addressed: aquatic habitat, riparian/wetland vegetation condition The Situation The Solution Potential Partners: Dispersed camping is common along lower Staley Creek decreasing riparian vegetation leading to lack of shade and increased soil erosion. Use Respect the River program to limit public access to fifteen acres of riparian floodplain, restore soil, re-plant vegetation and educate site users.

Field Trips……

….Lead to Ideas …. and to Consensus! Common Ideas Work towards common goals Work towards common goals Multiple benefits (win-win) Multiple benefits (win-win) Take advantage of tools that work Take advantage of tools that work Learn from those that didn’t Learn from those that didn’t

Watershed Restoration Action Plans Describes the features of the sub- watershed. Describes the features of the sub- watershed. Identifies the historic character that has been altered. Identifies the historic character that has been altered. Outlines essential projects that could be done to improve watershed condition class. Outlines essential projects that could be done to improve watershed condition class. This plan can be downloaded from the national website for WCF This plan can be downloaded from the national website for WCF Develop a plan

Looking to the Future Use WCF to collaborate, create jobs, and provide services. Socioeconomic Considerations: Provides both short and long-term benefits to the local area Ecosystem Services: A restored watershed can: Provide clean water, reducing costs for municipalities Provide clean water, reducing costs for municipalities Increase recreational opportunities Increase recreational opportunities Collaboration: WCF can drive project designs and stewardship opportunities Job Creation: The WCF can be used as a framework to create jobs by putting families back to work restoring the watershed.

STEP A CLASSIFY Watershed Condition Watershed Condition STEP B PRIORITIZE Watersheds for Restoration STEP C DEVELOP Watershed Restoration Action Plans STEP D IMPLEMENT Integrated Projects STEP E TRACK Restoration Accomplishments STEP F VERIFY & MONITOR Watershed Condition Watershed Condition Framework Socioeconomic Considerations

Summary of WCF  Throughout the appropriate steps of the WCF process, the participation of partners and the public is both expected and highly encouraged  The WCF is not perfect. It will evolve over time.  Active collaborative partnerships are essential to the success of WCF.

Why your engagement is important today  The emphasis on water and watershed restoration is critical to the Nation’s health and is the FS’s role.  The FS must be able to demonstrate accomplishment and accountability in watershed restoration.  We have tools to systematically demonstrate accomplishment.  We manage public land – we manage your land.

Questions and Discussion Anne Zimmermann, USFS Director, Watershed, Fish, Wildlife, Air, and Rare Plants

Treatment Effectiveness on the Wallow Fire 2011 Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest

Fuel Treatments

Alpine, AZ

Alpine home below fuel treatment

East side of Greer Community Assistance Grants WMS Treatments

West side of Greer Greer

Fire in Greer within treatment area

Eagar South WMS Pre/Post/Wallow

Summary Fire fighter efforts coupled with fuel treatments can save homes. Fuel treatments alone will not save homes. Treatments have evolved over the last 8 years to promote longevity. Treatments can be designed to meet multiple land management objectives. Homeowners who implemented “Firewise” principles aided in protection of homes.