 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Our Future:
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jonathan Doherty National Park Service.
Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency November 21, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Partnering, Leadership & Management Partnering, Leadership.
1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO Action Plan, Progress Report.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Update Chesapeake Action Plan – Report to Congress Strengthening the Management, Coordination, and Accountability of the Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team.
Community-based Education K-12 students serving as a resource for meeting community needs.
New England is one of 10 regions making up the 406 National Water Program, “A partnership of USDA CSREES and the Land Grant System”
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Extension Specialist University of Delaware Cooperative Extension.
Lake Superior Binational Program and Lakewide Management Plan Lynelle Hanson Lake Superior Binational Forum Meeting Ashland, Wisconsin March 23, 2012.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
Fisheries Goal Team (GIT 1) Management Board presentation 9/2/2012 Peyton Robertson, Chair Thomas O’Connell, Vice Chair Bruce Vogt, Coordinator.
GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Daniel Oppenheimer Tamarisk Coalition May 20, 2014.
Maryland Partnership for Children In Nature Name of Presentation Date of Presentation Environmental Literacy: Connecting Children with Nature Britt Slattery,
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure (and millions of dollars in savings): Balancing our investment in the Chesapeake by maintaining healthy.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
Coastal GEMS Virginia’s Coastal Geospatial and Educational Mapping System Nick Meade Coastal GIS Coordinator Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program George.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Environmental Literacy Plan Citizen’s Advisory Committee TO THE Chesapeake Bay Executive Council September 6th 2012.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
Bay Guidance Programs. The Bay Program partnership includes: 19 federal agencies Nearly 40 state agencies and programs in DE, MD, NY, PA, VA,
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Abridged Chesapeake Bay Agreement: Initial Reactions WRTC September 6, 2013.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Program Update Chesapeake Bay Program Citizens Advisory Committee Thursday, February.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
CBP GIT Implementation Workgroup Structure Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Goal Implementation.
Chesapeake Bay Program
CRC Staffer Update Megan Hession Habitat Goal Implementation Team.
Chesapeake Bay Program Updates
Local Planning Process…
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System (DRAFT) October 31, 2016 (DRAFT)
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System DRAFT August 29, 2016 DRAFT 12/4/2018 DRAFT.
Achieving the Goal of Stewardship
2016 – 17 Bay Barometer.
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Achieving the Goal of Stewardship
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Outcomes and Phase III WIPs
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
LGAC Input on Outcomes.
Monitoring & Assessment, Adaptation Outcomes
CBP Organizational Structure
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
Presentation transcript:

 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team

 Six-state, 64,000 square mile watershed  Home to 18 million people  10,000 miles of shoreline  Over 3,600 species of plants, fish and other animals  $750 million to local economies

 Within all 3 counties  Very rural character:  Developed 10%  Agriculture 48%  Rangeland 3%  Forest16%  Water 1%  Wetland21%  Other 1%  Small, but growing, towns

We are a partnership…  Federal agencies o Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) o US Department of Agriculture (USDA) o US Forest Service (USFS) o US Geological Survey (USGS) o US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) o And more  State agencies o Natural Resources/Environmental departments o Agricultural departments o Parks and Recreation groups o Fish and Wildlife agencies  Local Governments DNREC MDA DDA DCR DNR MDE DEQ DEP DCNR PDA DEC DAF Alphabet soup!

 Non-profit organizations o Chesapeake Bay Foundation o Center for Watershed Protection o Ducks Unlimited o National Fish and Wildlife Foundation o And more  Academic institutions o Land grant universities o Cooperative Extension programs o Sea Grant programs o Research centers and consortiums o And more

Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Partnering, Leadership & Management Maintain Healthy Watersheds Protect & Restore Water Quality Sustainable Fisheries Protect & Restore Vital Habitats Foster Chesapeake Stewardship Goal Implementation Teams Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Management Board Scientific & Technical Advisory Committee Local Government Advisory Committee Citizens’ Advisory Committee Action Teams Social Sciences Modeling Lab Action Team Diversity Action Team Chesapeake Executive Council Principals’ Staff Committee Communications Workgroup STAR Workgroups As of:

Mayor Gray, DC Gov Markell, DE Gov O’Malley, MD Admin. McCarthy, EPA Gov. Corbett, PA Gov. McAuliffe, VA Com. Miller, CBC Dir. Mandirola WV

Ches. Bay Stock Assessment Committee Stream Health Wkgp Fish Passage Wkgp Agriculture Wkgp Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Wkgp Wetland Wkgp Forestry Wkgp Land Use Wkgp Urban Stormwater Wkgp Wastewater Treatment Wkgp Watershed Technical Wkgp Decision Framework Implementation Workgroup Education Wkgp Public Access Planning Action Team Land Conservation Tracking / Landscape Team Milestone Wkgp Trading and Offsets Wkgp Maryland and Virginia Interagency Oyster Teams Invasive Catfish Task Force Tracking Wkgp BMP Verification Committee Evaluator Function Workgroup Local Engagement Wkgp Fish Habitat Action Team Forage Fish Action Team Toxic Contaminants Wkgp Citizen Stewardship Wkgp Local Leadership Workgroup Chesapeake Conservation Partnership Modeling Wkgp Indicators Wkgp Analytical Methods & Quality Assurance Wkgp Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Wkgp Nontidal Water Quality Wkgp Criteria Assessment Protocol Wkgp Building and Sustaining Integrated Networks Climate Change Wkgp Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Partnering, Leadership & Management Maintain Healthy Watersheds Protect & Restore Water Quality Sustainable Fisheries Protect & Restore Vital Habitats Foster Chesapeake Stewardship Goal Implementation Teams As of:

 Brings together diverse leaders and experts across numerous political boundaries to collaborate on achieving a common goal –a healthy bay o Consolidate and coordinate efforts o Share resources o Compliment efforts and avoid duplication  Partners come together to evaluate data, share best practices, report on progress toward goals, and make policy and management decision

 1983 Chesapeake Bay Agreement o Signed by governors of Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia; mayor of District of Columbia; administrator of EPA; chair of Chesapeake Bay Commission o Signatories became the Executive Council  1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement o 40% nitrogen reduction by 2000  Chesapeake 2000 o Goals to reduce pollution, restore habitat, protect living resources, promote sound land use practices, and engage the public o Headwater states (Delaware, New York, West Virginia) joined the water quality restoration efforts  2014 Agreement signed June 16 th (at 2014 EC meeting)

 The Chesapeake Bay Program partners envision an environmentally and economically sustainable Chesapeake Bay watershed with clean water, abundant life, conserved lands and access to the water, a vibrant cultural heritage and a diversity of engaged citizens and stakeholders.

 The signatories will collectively work on the following goals and outcomes to advance restoration and protection of the Chesapeake ecosystem and its watershed o Goals – articulate the desired high-level aspects of the Vision o Outcomes – specific, time-bound, measureable targets that directly contribute to achieving each Goal

 Goal: Protect, restore and enhance finfish, shellfish and other living resources, their habitats and ecological relationships to sustain all fisheries and provide for a balanced ecosystem in the watershed and Bay.  Outcomes: o Blue Crab Abundance o Blue Crab Management o Oyster o Forage Fish o Fish Habitat

 Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed.  Outcomes: o Wetlands Black Duck o Stream Health Brook Trout o Fish Passage o Submerged Aquatic Vegetation o Forest Buffer o Tree Canopy

 Goal: reduce pollutants to achieve the water quality necessary to support the aquatic living resources of the Bay and its tributaries and protect human health.  Outcomes: o 2017 Watershed Implementation Plan o 2025 Watershed Implementation Plan o Water Quality Standards Attainment and Monitoring

 Goal: Ensure that the Bay and its rivers are free of effects of toxic contaminants on living resources and human health.  Outcomes: o Toxic Contaminants Research o Toxic Contaminants Policy and Prevention

 Goal: Sustain state-identified healthy waters and watersheds recognized for their high quality and/or high ecological value.  Outcomes: o Healthy Watersheds

 Goal: Increase the number and the diversity of local citizen stewards and local governments that actively support and carry out the conservation and restoration activities that achieve healthy local streams, rivers and a vibrant Chesapeake Bay.  Outcomes: o Citizen Stewardship o Local Leadership o Diversity

 Goal: Conserve landscapes treasured by citizens in order to maintain water quality and habitat; sustain working forests, farms and maritime communities; and conserve lands of cultural, indigenous and community value.  Outcomes: o Protected Lands o Land Use Methods and Metrics Development o Land Use Options Evaluation

 Goal: Expand public access to the Bay and its tributaries through existing and new local, state and federal parks, refuges, reserves, trails and partner sites.  Outcomes: o Public Access Site Development

 Goal: Enable every student in the region to graduate with the knowledge and skills to act responsibly to protect and restore their local watershed.  Outcomes: o Student o Sustainable Schools o Environmental Literacy Planning

 Goal: Increase the resiliency of the Chesapeake Bay watershed, including its living resources, habitats, public infrastructure and communities, to withstand adverse impacts from changing environmental and climate conditions.  Outcomes: o Monitoring and Assessment o Adaptation

 Outline the means for accomplishing each Outcome as well as monitoring, assessing and reporting progress and coordinating actions among partners and stakeholders, as necessary. o How local governments, nonprofit and private partners will be engaged o Where actions, tools or technical support are needed to empower local governments and others to do their part o What steps will be taken to facilitate greater local participation in achieving each Outcome  Released for public comment today!

 Jennifer Volk,