Shale Gas Drilling Deep Creek watershed SURFACE DRILLING CONSTRAINTS SPATIAL ANALYSIS EXERCISE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Advertisements

1 Nicole Carlozo NOAA Coastal Management Fellow June 7, 2013 Integrating Water Quality and Coastal Resources into Marine Spatial Planning in the Chesapeake.
Well Permitting & Approvals
Maps Tell Us About Where We Live
Introduction to Reviewing Development Projects: Case Scenarios Thursday, June 25, 2009 Sullivan County Division of Planning and Environmental Management.
Aspen Falls Park Development Land Acquisition for Parks One Minute to Start.
South River Greenway A natural jewel in the heart of Anne Arundel County.
Chesapeake Bay Commission Meeting November 8, 2012 Vienna Community Center Protecting the Nanticoke River: Saving the Landscape Tim Brower Land Acquisition.
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Wetland Critical Areas - Draft Ordinance Overview 18.20: Definitions Many new definitions added for clarity when used in the regulations and several unnecessary.
Welcome to Wingfield. …a new vision for Lake Murray living Wingfield.
Best Local Land Use Practices A Project of the Ohio Lake Erie Commission The Countryside Program, Levin College of Urban Affairs Kirby Date, AICP Coordinator.
Shale Gas Drilling County-wide SURFACE DRILLING CONSTRAINTS SPATIAL ANALYSIS EXERCISE.
1 Public Lands Advocacy HOW TO REVIEW A FEDERAL PLANNING DOCUMENT.
State of Water: Minnesota’s Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands John Jaschke Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Nov 13, 2014.
Lecture 3: Vector Data Analysis Jianfei Chen School of Geographical Sciences GuangZhou University GuangZhou, China
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission ZOS Location Map Feet.
Single Family Development in City of Austin Since Passage of Watershed Regulations Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department April, 2008.
Assignment 2 -Lake Watersheds and morphometry Elkwater lake is a small lake situated near Cypress Hills Provincial Park. The watershed is mostly forested.
Every Acre Counts The Newfound Watershed Master Plan Land Conservation Priorities In the Newfound Lake Watershed January 23, 2015 Dan Sundquist GreenFire.
Site Scale Planning for Sustainable Forestland Development Lands for Tomorrow June 29, 2011.
Assignment 2 -Lake Watersheds and morphometry Elkwater lake is a small lake situated near Cypress Hills Provincial Park. The watershed is mostly forested.
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
Today’s Topic …. ? ? ? ? Dessertification? Noooo, Desertification!
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Transfer of Development Rights & Possibilities for Coastal Communities Steven Bruder, NJ State TDR Bank Monmouth University: Urban Coast Institute November.
11-4 How Should We Protect and Sustain Wetlands?
SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE REGULATIONS Planning Commission Workshop April 3, 2012.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
May 5, 2015 Water Resources Meeting Heather Gutherless Jefferson County Planning & Zoning
A Land Preservation Framework for the Cacapon Watershed of West Virginia Michael P. Strager Charles B. Yuill Natural Resource Analysis Center West Virginia.
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
The WLP must be consistent with these objectives 1.maintaining or enhancing an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from the woodlot licence.
Desktop Analysis Used To: Identify areas that meet certain criteria (e.g. contig forest 50 acres+, id gaps as well, or set lower value in urban area) Identify.
What is the Water Table? Zone of aeration • pore spaces contain air
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS PERMITTING FOR UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AREA ENDANGERED.
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity Prepared by the Center for Watershed Protection.
Conservation Easements: Preserving Agricultural Land and Water
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
The Windham Watershed Protection Group (WWPG)
University Storage and Office Orange County Board of County Commissioners Amendment S-5-1 and LUPA January 27, 2015.
Stormwater Overview Board of County Commissioners Planning Conference March 1, 2007.
Planning Zones to Protect People Near Pipelines Chuck Lesniak City of Austin Watershed Protection Department.
Cumberland Park CCB Project Virginia Department of Environmental Quality October 9, 2007.
Best Local Land Use Practices A Project of the Ohio Lake Erie Commission The Countryside Program, Levin College of Urban Affairs Kirby Date, AICP Coordinator.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
PART I: COMMUNITY PRESERVATION Stewardship and Maintenance Christine M. Chale, Esq. Rodenhausen Chale LLP
The Public Waterfront Act. Covering the basic questions Why? Purpose of Act and Regulations Where? Geographic Jurisdiction What? Activities Subject to.
Our Public and Federal Lands. The big picture 35% of US is public land 75% of that land is in Alaska.
Figures & Maps Documentation Floodplain (FIRM) Maps Wetland (NWI) Maps Site Maps Conceptual Site Development Plan.
The Community Preservation Act. Open Space Historic Preservation Affordable Housing Allows communities to establish a dedicated fund for: The Community.
June 6, 2012 Brian Reis, PE.  RPS Espey’s role in the planning process  Key state and federal requirements  Our unique water quantity and water quality.
CONSERVATION AND RESOURSE PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM NEVADA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Question 1.
GREEN GROWTH TOOLBOX Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Black-crowned night heron.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED LEVEL I STUDY SCOPING MEETING
Parks and Recreation Commission
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
Conservation Development Exercise 3.5
St. Croix County Land Acquisition Eckert Family, LLLP
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
Marcellus Water Issues
Water Quality Protection Zones
IMPLEMENTING AMENDMENT 1
Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Zoning
Agri-Nature Entrepreneurship

Presentation transcript:

Shale Gas Drilling Deep Creek watershed SURFACE DRILLING CONSTRAINTS SPATIAL ANALYSIS EXERCISE

Current Regulation – Deep Creek Watershed Zoning Ordinance 2000’ from the high water elevation line of Deep Creek Lake, measured at 2,462 feet above sea level

Current Regulation – Deep Creek Watershed Zoning Ordinance 1,000 feet from the property line of any lot not owned or leased to the entity responsible for the gas drilling, removal or storage operation. Moving target, so difficult to predict. Currently 3 properties have active leases, all in the area of the McHenry cove.

Currently Leased Properties As these properties are surrounded by unleased properties they would need to apply a 1000 foot inner setback around their property lines before they could locate a surface drilling operation. One property is already in a restricted area The other two properties are not large enough to accommodate both the setback and a drilling operation. If drilling were allowed today, based on the current leases, drilling could not occur in the watershed. As this situation can change, it’s necessary to look at the restrictions imposed by proposed state regulations

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #3: No well pad may be permitted on land with a slope, before grading, of greater than 15 percent.

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5b: the edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 450 feet from the edge of an aquatic habitat. Aquatic habitat is listed in Appendix D of the same document as streams, rivers, seeps, springs, wetlands, lakes, ponds, reservoirs and the 100 year floodplain.

Applying the buffer 450 foot buffer on aquatic habitat

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5c: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 600 feet from special conservation areas Appendix D defines these as wildlands and irreplaceable natural areas (INA) There are no wildlands in the Deep Creek watershed INAs are Tier 1 & 2 areas in the State BioNet Conservation Diversity Map

Applying the buffer 600 feet from Tier 1 & 2 BioNet Conservation Areas

What about land in currently in a conservation program? According to DNR/MDE sources these areas will most likely be prohibited from any surface drilling but no setbacks will be applied These lands include lands owned by the Nature Conservancy, Agricultural Preservation easements or MET easements

Applying the restriction Properties are classified as restricted but no setback is applied

Unleased Property? If one could make the assumption that if any property will remain unleased, it will most likely be those already protected by conservation easements, according to Deep Creek Watershed zoning regulations, that buffer will become 1000 feet

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5d: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 300 feet from a cultural or historic site, State or Federal parks, trails, wildlife management areas, wild scenic rivers and scenic byways. Appendix D lists only those historic sites on the National Registry There are no National Registry historic sites, federal parks or wildlife management areas within Deep Creek Watershed Only DNR Trails were mapped Wild scenic rivers were included in the 450 foot setback of aquatic habitat State parks, trails and scenic byways are shown

Applying the buffer 300 foot buffer from state parks and scenic byways

State Park Unleased? Note state land and state parks are different areas. State parks are all state land but not all state land is a state park. The restriction applies only to those properties under the Maryland Park Service not the Maryland Forest Service. If one assumes the state parks will remain unleased, the buffer will become 1000 feet.

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5e: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 1000 feet of known caves. There are no known, mapped caves in the DC watershed according to DNR cave data. Restriction #5f: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 750 feet on the downdip side of a limestone outcrop. This cannot be mapped at this time, for though Karst shows where outcrops could be, it doesn’t show where they are.

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5g: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 1000 feet from any occupied building, school or church. County addresses are assigned to residences and businesses. No structures where people do not live, work or regularly congregate should be assigned an address. Addresses are given to structures and not lots, therefore they are located in the center of building footprints. If the State defines ‘occupied buildings’ to include seasonal or rental homes, all addresses in the watershed would be included as occupied buildings.

Applying the buffer 1000 feet from occupied buildings, schools and churches

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5h: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 1000 feet of a wellhead protection area or a source water assessment area for a public water system for which a Source Water Protection Area (SWPA) has been delineated… There is one SWPA in Deep Creek watershed.

Applying the buffer 1000 feet from a SWPA

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5k: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 2000 feet from a private drinking water well. Since all addresses are located in the building footprint then the assumption is made that their location is close to the location of the well. All addresses not served public water would qualify for this setback. There are two public water systems in Deep Creek watershed – McHenry and Thayerville.

Applying the buffer 2000 feet from all addresses not served public water

Points of note This analysis did not include historic oil or gas wells, or other listed restrictions that could not be mapped. Restriction #7 states that the ‘setback restrictions for well pads also apply to all gas development activities that result in permanent surface alteration…’ The assumption can be made that these restrictions also apply to compressor stations and/or storage facilities. Restriction #5a calls for all well pads to be 1000 foot from the boundary of the property on which the well is to be drilled. As a consequence the areas left in the map must meet that restriction and only the property owned by Rock Lodge Trust meets that requirement.