YKL REA Northern Pike Model Photo: ADF&G. Fish Distribution Models Photo: USFWS Evaluate model performance Classification tree and random forest models.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Random Forest Predrag Radenković 3237/10
Advertisements

Potential Change in Lodgepole Pine Site Index and Distribution under Climate Change in Alberta Robert A. Monserud Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland,
APPLICATION OF LANDSCAPE-SCALE HABITAT SUITABILTY MODELS TO BIRD CONSERVATION PLANNING Frank R. Thompson III, USDA Forest Service North Central Research.
Development of DRAIN-WARMF Model to Simulate Water Flow & Nitrogen Transport From an Agricultural Watershed: “ Subsurface Flow Component” Shadi Dayyani.
A Quick Overview By Munir Winkel. What do you know about: 1) decision trees 2) random forests? How could they be used?
Aquatic Habitat Lakes and Oceans Lecture 15. Factors Influencing Lake Dynamics Hydrology Geology Morphometry Base chemistry Biology (food chain) Human.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Landslide Susceptibility Mapping to Inform Land-use Management Decisions in an Altered Climate Muhammad Barik and Jennifer Adam Washington State University,
Climatic and biophysical controls on conifer species distributions in mountains of Washington State, USA D. McKenzie, D. W. Peterson, D.L. Peterson USDA.
Sparse vs. Ensemble Approaches to Supervised Learning
Hydrology River Ecosystems and Humans. Dimensions of river ecosystems Longitudinal Lateral Vertical Temporal 2.
Field Museum CI AquaRAP Rapid Assessment of Aquatic Ecosystems An Interdisciplinary, International Program Developing Integrated Solutions For.
A landscape perspective of stream food webs: Exploring cumulative effects and defining biotic thresholds.
o What were we looking at? o The Pit Crew studied soil patterns throughout the landscape.
Development of Aquatic Ecosystem Models Lizhu Wang, Shaw Lacy, Paul Seebach, Mike Wiley Institute for Fisheries Research MDNR and U of M.
Prediction Methods Mark J. van der Laan Division of Biostatistics U.C. Berkeley
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Some Potential Terrain Analysis Tools for ArcGIS David G. Tarboton
Flow modeling on grid terrains. DEM Representations TIN Grid Contour lines Sample points.
Methods for Estimating Distributions Static Distributions –Polygon –Grid –Habitat Mapping.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
Ensemble Learning (2), Tree and Forest
Why calculate slope and Aspect? Study the flow of water Identify the habitats of plants Identify potential sites for urban growth Drainage patterns on.
Why collect GPS data How are we going To find this trap???
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
North Slope Rapid Ecoregional Assessment A Bureau of Land Management Project North Slope Borough Planning Commission Barrow October 30, 2014.
Rapid Ecoregional Assessment. Climate was primarily modeled using models and data from the Scenarios Network for Alaska and Arctic Planning. See
Conceptual Ecological Model of San Acacia Reach of Middle Rio Grande River – 2/13/07 1 st Draft Ibis Ecosystem Associates, Inc. Diversion & Regulation.
Benjamin Blandford, PhD University of Kentucky Kentucky Transportation Center Michael Shouse, PhD University of Southern Illinois.
Drivers of Global Wildfires — Statistical analyses Master Thesis Seminar, 2010 Hongxiao Jin Supervisor: Dr. Veiko Lehsten Division of Physical Geography.
The Biosphere: An Introduction to Biomes. Earths Biomes Ecology Organization Population Community Ecosystem -scientific study of the interactions between.
1 GIS in Hydrology Watershed management Definitions Algorithms Watershed delineation Automatically delineating watersheds Flow length Raster to vector.
Development of Conceptual Models for the ARCN Coastal Ecosystems Workshop Torre Jorgenson, ABR Diane Sanzone, National Park Service.
Models in GIS A model is a description of reality It may be: Dynamic orStatic Dynamic spatial models e.g., hydrologic flow Static spatial models (or point.
Predictive Modeling of Northern Spotted Owl Home Ranges Presented by Elizabeth Willy USFWS File Photo.
Design Workgroup Jeffrey L. ArmstrongOrange County Sanitation Distric Tyler BakerTVA Jerad BalesUSGS David BayneAuburn University Joe BoyerFlorida International.
Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds A GIS Assessment Greg Hamons Dr. Michael Strager Dr. Jingxin Wang.
Coupling between fire and permafrost Effects of permafrost thaw on surface hydrology between better- drained vs. poorly- drained ecosystems Consequences.
A Drought History of Alabama, Georgia and the Panhandle of Florida David Emory Stooksbury, Ph.D. State Climatologist – Associate Professor Engineering.
Development of a water temperature model to predict life- history expression and production of Oncorhynchus mykiss in the John Day River basin, Oregon.
Wetlands Investigation Utilizing GIS and Remote Sensing Technology for Lucas County, Ohio: a hybrid analysis. Nathan Torbick Spring 2003 Update on current.
To main objectives: Build a seamless, routed stream network across WAM tiles Apply a process based, riparian zone delineation tool Riparian Processes.
Flowing water.  vitally important geologically, biologically, historically and culturally.  contain only 0.001% of the total amount of the worlds water.
Climate Limnos / Ocean Biota Global –> Regional Climate Models (e.g. CGCM -> Great Lakes down-scaled projections) Air Temperature, Humidity, Precipitation,
IERM Overview Goals: 1. Development of an integrated, whole-system model for ecological response to water level/flow scenarios 2. Blend ecological research.
Population - 44,301 18% - Aged 65+ Household Median Income- $29,530 Jan.-March 2004 unemployment 14 % Demographics.
Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.
Random Forests Ujjwol Subedi. Introduction What is Random Tree? ◦ Is a tree constructed randomly from a set of possible trees having K random features.
Interfacing Vegetation Databases with ecological theory and practical analysis. Mike Austin, Margaret Cawsey and Andre Zerger CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
Sampling Matrix Transcends Scales:  Recreation : High, Medium, and Low Use  Road Size : Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Class 4, and Trail  Stream Class.
Project area covers the Quinault, Queets and the Raft Rivers.
Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE.
6. Drainage basins and runoff mechanisms Drainage basins Drainage basins The vegetation factor The vegetation factor Sources of runoff Sources of runoff.
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment.
Tree and Forest Classification and Regression Tree Bagging of trees Boosting trees Random Forest.
National Water Quality Monitoring Conference Session E4 April 29, 2014 Jonathan Witt & Britta Bierwagen, ORD/USEPA Jen Stamp & Anna Hamilton, Tetra Tech,
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
Indices of Road Erosion Bear Valley Watershed, Idaho
Predicting species distributions for New England invasives
Ungraded quiz Unit 6.
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Species distribution modeling ideas
Forest Fire Rehabilitation
Problem: Interpolation of soil properties
Prediction of Channel Response Areas due to Wildfire Disturbance using GIS and TauDEM Karen Williams GIS in Water Resources.
Environmental Modelling with RASTER DEMs: Hydrologic Features
Ensemble learning Reminder - Bagging of Trees Random Forest
Classification with CART
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Presentation transcript:

YKL REA Northern Pike Model Photo: ADF&G

Fish Distribution Models Photo: USFWS Evaluate model performance Classification tree and random forest models ADF&G AFFID species occurrence data GIS source data Predict species habitat across REA study area Fish distributions Create stream network and landscape predictor variables in GIS Process AFFID data for use in models

Stream Network Used TauDEM to process DEM 1.Add in additional HUCs on boundary of study area that flow into the study area 2.Fill pits 3.Calculate flow direction (D8 method) 4.Calculate contributing area 5.Create stream network based on curvature method and drop analysis

Predictor Variables Photo: USFWS Predictors of Fish Habitat Elevation Permafrost Gradient Floodplain Slope over area ratio Stream order Watershed area Average watershed annual precipitation Average watershed annual temperature Average watershed elevation Average watershed slope over area ratio Average watershed slope Percent permafrost cover in watershed Percent lake cover in watershed

Process AFFID data -Presences from AFFID and ADF&G/BLM telemetry project in Kuskokwim -Absences from projects in AFFID that listed fish community sampling as an objective -Resampled data in areas of high intensity (Pebble area and telemetry) -Shifted points along flow direction grid until they reached the stream network -Extracted all predictor variables to each data point

Classification Trees Photo: USFWS Classification Tree Analysis Steps: – Identify the groups – Choose the variables – Identify the split that maximizes the homogeneity of the resulting groups – Determine a stopping point for the tree – Prune the tree using cross-validation Absent 0.97 (263) Asterospicularia laurae Shelf: Inner, Mid Shelf: Outer Absent 0.78 (64) Location: Back, Flank Location: Front Depth < 3m Depth ≥ 3m (De'Ath and Fabricious 2000) Absent 0.56 (9) Present 0.81 (37) Misclassification rates: Null = 15%, Model = 9%

Random Forests Creates many classification trees and combines predictions from all of them: -Start with bootstrapped samples of data -Observations not included are called out-of-bag (OOB) -Fit a classification tree to each bootstrap sample, for each node, use a subset of the predictor variables -Determine the predicted class for each observation based on majority vote of OOB predictions -To determine variable importance, compare misclassification rates for OOB observations using true and randomly permuted data for each predictor

Run models in R ct1<-mvpart(pres.f~.,data=fish.pred1[s1,],xv="1se") rf1<-randomForest(pres.f~.,data=fish.pred1[s1,],ntree=999) Photo: USFWS CT trainingCT validationRF trainingRF validation summary

Model Performance Photo: USFWS Confusion Matrix 01Error % % Top five variables are watershed area, stream order, stream elevation, percent of watershed covered by lakes, and stream floodplain.

Northern Pike Results: ~ 10,900 km of predicted summer habitat (restricted to stream reaches > 1 km in length) PredictorPresenceAbsence Watershed area13,000 km 2 60 km 2 Stream elevation 60 m200 m Stream floodplainYesNo Watershed lake cover 2.8%2.1% Stream order4 th 1 st

Invasive Macrophytes Climate Change Precipitation Permafrost Fire Human Uses Mining Infrastructure Harvest Contaminants Temperature Permafrost thaw Reduction in age at maturity and shift in spawning season Bioaccumulation of mercury in adults Expanded ice-free season Temporary increases in nutrient inputs Elodea ssp could reduce quality of spawning habitat In creased toxicity Increased potential for establishment of invasive macrophytes and changing fire dynamics Increased contaminant sources Change in deposition rates Northern Pike Esox lucius Habitat Increase depth of active layer will increase lake drainage area Subsistence harvest pressures on overwintering populations Direct destruction of habitat, hindrance of migration routes, increased downstream turbidity and sedimentation Change Agents Drivers CE General Effect CE-Specific Effect Increased winter precipitation may increase overwintering habitat

Review Please review and provide comments: -Distribution models for fish and habitats -Conceptual models and text descriptions for fish Contact: Rebecca Shaftel Photo: USFWS