Setting long-range goals for Minnesota’s water resources Minnesota’s Clean Water Roadmap.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monitoring Watershed Restoration Effectiveness Nez Perce Tribe DFRM-Watershed Division Rebecca A. Lloyd, Project Leader.
Advertisements

Fish and Wildlife Losses and Hydroelectric System Responsibility January 2004.
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Planning for Our Future:
Clean Water Fund Interagency Leadership and Coordination Rebecca Flood MPCA Assistant Commissioner MN Water Resources ConferenceOctober 20, 2010.
What type of support is available to meet our school-community integration goals and improve student outcomes?
Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
Alberta’s Strategy for Sustainability presented to Prairie Water Policy Symposium Beverly Yee, Assistant Deputy Minister Alberta Environment September.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Our Water, Our Resource, Our Responsibility Module 2: Water Management Unit 1: Roles, Responsibility and Legislation Muckno Mill Lough.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Convention on Wetlands “The conservation and wise use of.
State of Water: Minnesota’s Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands John Jaschke Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Nov 13, 2014.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
The St. Croix Basin– Protecting an Incredible Resource St. Croix River Watershed Partners- The St. Croix Basin Team, U.S. Forest Service, Minnesota Forest.
EFFECTING THE NABCI VISION: EXPECTATIONS OF JOINT VENTURES Scott C. Yaich Director of Conservation Programs Ducks Unlimited, Memphis, TN.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Puget Sound Initiative 2007 At A Glance Jay Manning, Director Washington Department of Ecology April 26,
Kyle Abraham Effectiveness Monitoring Coordinator Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board.
Integrated Catchment Management Key Elements - Julie Burke.
Engagement + Accreditation + (X) + (X) = Performance Management
Integrating Evaluation into the Design of the Minnesota Demonstration Project Paint Product Stewardship Initiative St. Paul, MN May 1, 2008 Matt Keene,
The HCCC Integrated Watershed Plan Alliance for a Healthy South Sound Council 19 May 2015 Purpose: – Establish strategic priorities for the HCCC to implement.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
Lower Mississippi Valley Joint Venture Management Board Meeting the Expectations and Challenges of Joint Venture Implementation Buras, Louisiana June.
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
State of the Forest: Data harmonization and management Helping us to know whether we are getting the job done.
Understanding Sustainability at the State Level John R. Wells Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Allocating Water: Economics and the Environment July.
Alberta’s strategy for sustainability APEGGA February 17, 2004.
Water Quality Management in The Netherlands Bron: Rijkswaterstaat Nationaal Water Plan, dec Beheer and Ontwikkelingsplan voor de Rijkswateren
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
Integrating Evaluation into the Design of the Minnesota Demonstration Project Paint Product Stewardship Initiative St. Paul, MN May 1, 2008 Matt Keene,
The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update, 2007 The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update February 8, 2007.
How: Overview of Action Plan and Data Utilization Shane McNeill, Director Office of Healthy Schools.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Group Work IWRM Integrated River Basin Management.
Minnesota Hydrography Land of 10,000 Lakes (or so) Mark Olsen Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road N. St. Paul, MN 55155
…empowering communities through modeling and adaptive management Adaptive Management Conservation Strategies for Restoring Ecosystems.
Stream Health Outcome Biennial Workplan Neely L. Law, PhD Center for Watershed Protection Chesapeake Bay Program Sediment & Stream Coordinator Habitat.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
EPA and Agriculture: A New Era of Partnership NACD Summer Board Meeting July 21, Ellen Gilinsky Senior Policy Advisor Office of Water, US EPA.
Investing in Ocean Health Presentation to Ocean Protection Council (February 2016) Sara Aminzadeh, Executive Director, California Coastkeeper Alliance.
Environmental Progress in the EU Indicators: a communication tool.
April 4, 2011 Princesa VanBuren Hansen Environmental Quality Board.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Developing a guidance on water and climate adaptation for the.
Board of Early Education and Care Strategic Planning Update October 14, 2008.
CHRIS ZADAK AND RACHEL OLMANSON, METR0-ST. CROIX WATERSHED UNIT WATERSHED RESTORATION AND PROTECTION STRATEGY.
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
Athabasca Watershed Council Athabasca Watershed Planning and Advisory Council Water for Life.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
Clean Water Fund Grants
Clean Water Fund Competitive Program
Citizen Stewardship Index
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
Presentation transcript:

Setting long-range goals for Minnesota’s water resources Minnesota’s Clean Water Roadmap

In this presentation… Roadmap purpose – Why are we doing this? Who is it for? What will it contain? How will it be used? Roadmap goals – Lake water quality – River and stream water quality – Groundwater quality – Groundwater quantity – Progress towards goals

Communicate conditions, trends, and goals Assess progress Help guide implementation Help inform resource allocations Roadmap Purpose

Audiences Who is the Roadmap for? – State agencies – Interested and informed stakeholders – Other members of the public

Roadmap State Funding Priorities Watershed and Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies Local Water Plans STATEWIDE WATERSHED GOALS ACTIONS Clean Water Fund Performance Report

How will the Roadmap be used? Year Revisions ICT review Input from Clean Water Council as well as other interested stakeholders will be taken during the five year review periods.

Goal-setting process Goals should be ambitious, yet achievable Important values: Human health, ecological value, cost effectiveness Considered external factors and all available data

Goals were set by State Agency Leadership and the Interagency Coordination Team for: – Lake Water Quality – River and Stream Water Quality – Groundwater Quality – Groundwater Quantity Roadmap Goals

Lake Water Quality Measure: Trophic State Index 2034 Goal: Increase the percentage of Minnesota lakes with good water quality from 62% to 70%.

Basin Lakes in Baseline Population Lakes Baseline (percent acceptable) Total Number Lakes Baseline Acceptable Lakes Goals 2034 (percent acceptable) Outcomes Percent Change Lake Superior22479%17885%Improve 6% Upper Mississippi 1,67964%1,08174%Improve 10% Minnesota47236%17242%Improve 6% St. Croix18646%8559%Improve 13% Lower Mississippi 8021%1728%Improve 7% Cedar166%1 Progress Des Moines6125%1525%Progress Red44373%32284%Improve 11% Rainy64375%48380%Improve 5% Missouri138%1 Progress Total3,8172,355

River and Stream Water Quality Measure: Fish-Based Index of Biotic Integrity 2034 Goal: Increase the percentage of Minnesota rivers and streams with healthy fish communities from 60% to 67%.

Basin River/Stream Sites in Baseline Population River/Stream Sites Baseline (percent acceptable) Total Number River/Stream Sites Baseline Acceptable River/Stream Sites Goals 2034 (percent acceptable ) Outcomes Percent Change Lake Superior20076%15290%Improve 14% Upper Mississippi 47539%18345%Improve 6% Minnesota33929%9845%Improve 16% St. Croix9773%7180%Improve 7% Lower Mississippi 36585%31085%Progress Cedar9269%6375%Improve 6% Des Moines0N/A Red21938%8340%Improve 2% Rainy13483%11190%Improve 7% Missouri11743%5050%Improve 7% Total2,0381,121

Groundwater Quality Measure: Drinking water standards for arsenic and nitrate 2034 Goal: Reduce nitrate levels in groundwater by 20%. Reduce the percentage of new wells exceeding the arsenic standard by 50%

Groundwater Quality ProvinceArsenic CurrentArsenic GoalNitrate CurrentNitrate Goal Arrowhead95%97%-- Western81%91%-- Central89%95%-- Metro93%96%-- South Central85%92%-- Southeast99% -- Central Sands Network --96%98% Southeast Network --89%95%

Groundwater Quantity Measure: Changes over time in groundwater levels 2034 Goal: Ninety percent of groundwater monitoring sites affected by groundwater pumping will have either a steady or increasing trend

Progress towards Roadmap goals

Whether we are on-track or off-track to meet goals Whether or not any adjustments are needed to the indicators Whether or not adjustments are needed to management strategies, funding priorities, or the goals themselves Involvement of Clean Water Council and stakeholders Five-Year Review

Setting long-range goals for Minnesota’s water resources Minnesota’s Clean Water Roadmap