MODELING EARLY-SEASON CROP-GROWING ENVIRONMENT RAINFALL BASED SOIL MOISTURE STATUS AND CROP PROSPECTS Dr. M. Chakraborty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Adriana-Cornelia Marica & Alexandru Daniel
Advertisements

Quantitative information on agriculture and water use Maurits Voogt Chief Competence Center.
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre Extending Crop Growth Monitoring System (CGMS) for mapping drought stress at regional scale D. Buffet, R. Oger Walloon.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Analysis and Comparison of Selected Water-Budget Components of the High Plains, and
TranspirationEvaporation Rainfall Runoff Drainage Irrigation Root zone The Water Balance.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Sacramento Model Derivation of Initial Parameters.
The NAM Model. Evaporation Overland flow The excess rainfall is divided between overland flow and infiltration.
How to create Nitrate Leaching Potential (WA) Maps and Reports from Web Soil Survey Contact: Brad Duncan Assistant.
z = -50 cm, ψ = -100 cm, h = z + ψ = -50cm cm = -150 cm Which direction will water flow? 25 cm define z = 0 at soil surface h = z + ψ = cm.
Irrigation Water Requirement
Climate Change Impacts on the Water Cycle Emmanouil Anagnostou Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Environmental Engineering Program UCONN.
Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA)
Alberta Rainfall-Runoff Analysis September, 2002.
Water Balance Jae K. (Jim) Park, Professor Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison.
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Kathmandu, Nepal Mandira Singh Shrestha Satellite rainfall application in the Narayani basin CORDEX.
Famine Early Warning System Network (FEWS NET) Venkatesh Merwade Kristi Shaw.
Infiltration Infiltration is the process by which water penetrates from ground surface into the soil. Infiltration rate is governed by: rainfall rate hydraulic.
Surface Water Balance (2). Review of last lecture Components of global water cycle Ocean water Land soil moisture, rivers, snow cover, ice sheet and glaciers.
By Saleh A. Al-Hassoun Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Crop Yield Modeling through Spatial Simulation Model.
Application to the rice production in Southeast Asia Rice Production Research Program Agro-meteorology Division National Institute for Agro-Environmental.
Scheduling irrigations for apple trees using climate data Ted Sammis Go to Home.
Scheduling irrigations for lettuce using climate data Ted Sammis.
The Effect of Soil Hydraulic Properties and Deep Seepage Losses on Drainage Flow using DRAINMOD Debjani Deb 26 th April, 2004.
Development of a combined crop and climate forecasting system Tim Wheeler and Andrew Challinor Crops and Climate Group.
Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney
Crops to be Irrigated Factors for consideration
Flexibility of system to deliver water Level of control available to the irrigator e.g. ditch system on a fixed schedule vs. large capacity well supplying.
Dr. R.P.Pandey Scientist F. NIH- Nodal Agency Misconception: A DSS takes decisions ---(No)
El Vado Dam Hydrologic Evaluation Joseph Wright, P.E. Bureau of Reclamation Technical Services Center Flood Hydrology and Meteorology Group.
Early Season Crop Prospect Assessment Using Satellite Data Based Rainfall Estimates Jai Singh Parihar Dy. Director Earth, Ocean, Atmosphere, Planetary.
OUTFLOW COMPONENTS. Evapotranspiration (EVAP) l Evapotranspiration is the result of surface water and soil evaporation and transpiration from the plants.
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION.
Lecture 6 Crop water requirement - Crop coefficients for various crops. Estimation of Crop water requirement - field water balance.
From Rain into Water Peter Ewins Chief Executive Met Office.
Evaluation of Effective Parameters for Water Uptake through Roots of Trees Hedieh Salamat. University of Urmia, Department of water engineering, Parastoo.
Arctic Temperatization Arctic Temperatization : A Preliminary Study of Future Climate Impacts on Agricultural Opportunities in the Pan-Arctic Drainage.
Assessment of Hydrology of Bhutan What would be the impacts of changes in agriculture (including irrigation) and forestry practices on local and regional.
Streamflow Predictability Tom Hopson. Conduct Idealized Predictability Experiments Document relative importance of uncertainties in basin initial conditions.
Changes in Floods and Droughts in an Elevated CO 2 Climate Anthony M. DeAngelis Dr. Anthony J. Broccoli.
WUP-FIN training, 3-4 May, 2005, Bangkok Hydrological modelling of the Nam Songkhram watershed.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Evapotranspiration Partitioning in Land Surface Models By: Ben Livneh.
Dr. Naira Chaouch Research scientist, NOAA-CREST Nir Krakauer, Marouane Temimi, Adao Matonse (CUNY) Elliot Schneiderman, Donald Pierson, Mark Zion (NYCDEP)
The NOAA Hydrology Program and its requirements for GOES-R Pedro J. Restrepo Senior Scientist Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA’s National Weather.
Analytic Vs Numeric Ground Water Models Ray R. Bennett, PE Colorado Division of Water Resources.
A Soil-water Balance and Continuous Streamflow Simulation Model that Uses Spatial Data from a Geographic Information System (GIS) Advisor: Dr. David Maidment.
After completing this Lesson, you have learned to answer: 1.Why pearl millet yields are often low when grown under rainfed conditions? 2.How irrigation.
AGRICULTURAL DROUGHT INDICATORS AT REGIONAL SCALE BASED ON MODELS OF WATER BALANCE AT LEFT MARGIN OF GUADIANA RIVER N. Kotsovinos, P. Angelidis Democritus.
Preliminary Applications of the HL-RDHM within the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Ed Clark, Hydrologist Presented July 26 th, 2007 as part of the.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Scenario generation for long-term water budget.
Deep Percolation and Groundwater Level Response Following Surface Irrigation Carlos Ochoa, Sam Fernald, Steve Guldan, Manoj Shukla Funding sources: USDA.
Surface Water Applied Hydrology. Surface Water Source of Streamflow Streamflow Characteristics Travel Time and Stream Networks.
Load Estimation Using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)
Lecture 8 Irrigation efficiencies - conveyance - application - storage - water use – distribution.
J an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-- Applications of Medium Range.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
Global Irrigation Water Demand: Variability and Uncertainties Arising from Agricultural and Climate Data Sets Dominik Wisser 1, Steve Frolking 1, Ellen.
AE 152 IRRIGATION & DRAINAGE
Simulation of stream flow using WetSpa Model
Integrating Environment, Climate-Change & Water
Prof. DSc Eng. Zornitsa Popova, Assist. Prof. Dr Eng. Maria Ivanova
UW Civil and Environmental Engineering
Shraddhanand Shukla Andrew W. Wood
Paimionjoki River Basin
EVAPORATION MEASURMENTS EVAPORATION MEASURMENTS.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Systems and Components – A Process for Developing the Total Water Budget Handbook for Water Budget Development - With or Without Models CWEMF 2019 Annual.
Presentation transcript:

MODELING EARLY-SEASON CROP-GROWING ENVIRONMENT RAINFALL BASED SOIL MOISTURE STATUS AND CROP PROSPECTS Dr. M. Chakraborty

INPUTS: Daily spatial rainfall data over India (Sources: Kalpana IMSRA, NCEP/NOAA CPC daily rainfall estimation data adjusted to IMD station-wise daily rainfall data, IMD Gridded RF data) Climatic Potential Evapo-transpiration data (Source: Monthly PET data from IMD Agrimet Division, Pune) Survey of India Soil Texture Map – 1:6M Published Moisture Holding Values for each Soil Texture Class, Hydraulic Conductivities (Sources: 1. David R Maidment, Ed in Chief, Handbook of Hydrology 2. Carsel, RF and RS Parrish, Water Resource Res. 24: , TH. J. Bredero, Crop-Water Management Research – A Case Study for India) MODEL USED: DAILY SOIL MOISTURE BUDGETING (Compound Bucket Model, cm depth – Root Zone) - One-dimensional model (vertical direction) - Bunded (20 cm or more) agricultural fields. (No runoff from or to) - AET estimation from Climatic PET - Using Soil Moisture Availability, AET/PET Drying Curve, Crop Coefficients (k c ) - Percolation using Saturated and Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivities (K s, K c ) - Ponding of water in agricultural fields (input to flood assessment) - Provision for inclusion of Crop Calendar (Spatial Layers) and corresponding Crop Coefficients (Spatial and Temporal). - Rainfall based, provision for inclusion of irrigation water. Model was calibrated using reported field measured soil moisture in top 30 cm under saturated and unsaturated conditions (percolation and ET loss) for measured moisture holding capacities of the soil and PET. OUTPUTS: Root Zone Soil Moisture (v/v), Ponded Water, Estimated Daily AET, Deep Percolation

INPUTS: PWP SM % v/v FC SM % v/v SAT SM % v/v K s mm/d n (exponent for computing unsaturated K c ) Agricultural Area Crop Specific Area Administrative Area Met-subdivision Area River Basin Area Initial SM % v/v Initial Surface Water mm Daily PET mm (from Climatic, Monthly data) Daily k c (from crop calendar, empirical models) Daily RF mm Daily Irrigation mm OUTPUTS: Daily SM % v/v Daily Surface Water / Runoff mm Daily Deep percolation (Ground water) mm Derived Outputs (Daily, Weekly etc) Drought Status Crop Sowing Suitability Kharif Rice Kharif Coarse Cereals Crop Growth Suitability Irrigation Requirement in mm Flood Risk Assessment Reservoir Inflow / River Discharge Estimation

Root Zone Layer Depth 15 to 120 cm Top 10 cm Evaporation Layer Daily Irrigation Command Area Irrigation Schedules Daily Rainfall Model Estimation (Spatially Distributed) Kalpana IMSRA, NCEP CPC RFE, IMD Gridded RF Adjusted with IMD Station measurements Daily Evaporation Climatic PET (Published values) Crop Coefficient k c (dynamic, using Crop Calendar) Soil Moisture θ T, θ RZ Soil Drying Function Ponded Water (From previous day) Daily Saturated / Unsaturated Flow θTθT θ RZ SM θ (Average value) End of Evaporation Cycle Hydraulic Conductivities K S : Saturated K C = K S (θ / θ Sat ) n : Unsaturated Uniform Mixing Soil Properties Saturation θ Sat Field Capacity θ FC PWP θ PWP K s, n Output: Daily Soil Moisture values in % v/v Daily Available Soil Moisture (ASM) in % = (θ – θ PWP ) / (θ FC – θ PWP ) x 100 Compound Single-Bucket For each Day of the Season Soil Texture Class Map (SOI 1 : 6 M scale) Published PWP, FC, Sat. Moisture Values % v/v, Hydraulic conductivities K s and n for each Texture Class. Map layer output for each parameter. Antecedent Soil Moisture Ground-water Recharge AET

Agriculture Area Mask Crop and Season-specific District Area Mask (Significant crop proportion) Valid Area Mask for RF Models For each Day of the Season Crop Area for Statistics (Crop-specific) - Population Daily ASM 7-day Moving Average of ASM ASM AVG > Thres Crop Crop Area suitable for Sowing / Transplanting Crop Calendar Function (for sowing) (Crop, Season, Area specific) CCFS (0.0 to 1.0) (Cumulative Distribution Function) Accumulate Crop Suitable Area over time True Multiply by CCFS Crop Area Sown / Transplanted Jun 15Aug Kharif Rice (Winter) Include / Exclude specific areas

PWP SM in % v/v FC SM in % v/v Sat. SM in % v/v September PET in cm Sep 17, 2008 RF in mm Sep 17, 2008 SM in % v/v

Agricultural Area Kharif Rice Districts Kharif Coarse Cereal Districts

JUNE 2008JUNE 2009 JUNE 2010 JUNE 2011 Available Soil Moisture (ASM) in % (Rainfall-based Modified Bucket Model) Four-Year Monthly Comparison Colours indicate suitability for Agricultural Operations Colours Red to Yellow (ASM < 50 ): Not suitable for sowing of Crops. Requires irrigation for sowing. Colours Green to Blue: Suitable for Coarse Cereals. Colour Deep Blue: Suitable for Rice. Note: Suitability does not imply sowing of crops which additionally depends on various other factors all of which are reflected in the Crop Calendar of the Region. Not suitable does not imply that no crops are sown as irrigation of the fields is possible.

JUNE 2011JUNE 16-30, 2011 JUNE 26-30, 2011 Soil Moisture Model based Estimation Status as on June 30, 2011 Kharif Rice Area Sown:5.0 L ha (Corresponding Figures for 2010 /2009 /2008/ 2007 : 6.0/ 1.5/ 7.4/ 8.1 L ha) Coarse Cereal Area Sown:7.4 L ha (Corresponding Figures for 2010 /2009 /2008: 11.2/ 3.4/ 12.6 L ha) The problem districts appear in Yellow to Red (ASM < 50%). Gujarat, Saurashtra and Kachchh, Western Rajasthan met-subdivisions are unsuitable for sowing of coarse cereal for entire June. Status of last 15 and 5 day periods show Central Maharashtra, North Karnataka and South Andhra Pradesh are also not suitable for sowing of coarse cereal.

Note: Suitability does not imply sowing of crops which additionally depends on various other factors all of which are reflected in the Crop Calendar of the Region. Not suitable does not imply that no crops are sown as irrigation of the fields is possible. Soil Moisture Model based Estimation (Rainfall-based Modified Bucket Model) Status as on June 30, 2011 Kharif Rice June 16 – 30, 2011 Kharif Coarse Cereal June 16 – 30, 2011

July 01 – 15, 2010 July 01 – 15, 2011 Available Soil Moisture (ASM) in % (Rainfall-based Modified Bucket Model) Four-Year Comparison Colours indicate suitability for Agricultural Operations Colours Red to Yellow (ASM < 50 ): Not suitable for sowing of Crops. Requires irrigation for sowing. Colours Green to Blue: Suitable for Coarse Cereals. Colour Deep Blue: Suitable for Rice. Note: Suitability does not imply sowing of crops which additionally depends on various other factors all of which are reflected in the Crop Calendar of the Region. Not suitable does not imply that no crops are sown as irrigation of the fields is possible. July 01 – 15, 2009 July 01 – 15, 2008

Area Suitable Kharif Rice area July 01 – 15, 2011 Area Suitable Kharif Coarse Cereal area July 01 – 15, 2011 Soil Moisture Model based Estimation Status as on July 15, 2011 Kharif Rice Area Sown: L ha (Corresponding Figures for 2010 /2009 /2008: 116.1/ 135.7/ L ha) Coarse Cereal Area Sown: L ha (Corresponding Figures for 2010 /2009 /2008: 102.7/ 68.7/ 95.3 L ha)

Kharif Rice Area July 18, 2011 Area : L ha July 04 – 18, 2011

Kharif Rice Area Suitable Kharif Rice Area Fallow AUGUST 31, 2009 AUGUST 31, 2008 AUGUST 31, 2010

AUGUST 31, 2009 Coarse Cereal Area Suitable Coarse Cereal Area Fallow AUGUST 31, 2008 AUGUST 31, 2010

The above Soil Moisture Model Acreage is 12% higher than Rainfall-SM estimate to account for Autumn Rice and Irrigated areas Date of Release of SM Acreage : September 02 to 04 of each year

Status as on August 31, 2010: Kharif Rice Area Sown (Rainfed Winter Rice) L ha. (excludes Autumn Rice ~ 40 L ha and Rice Area with irrigation only) Comparison with last two years August 31, 2009 Figure: L ha14.7 % August 31, 2008 Figure: L ha 0.3 % August 31, 2007 Figure: L ha 0.6 % Kharif Coarse Cereal Area Sown L ha. Comparison with last two years August 31, 2009 Figure: L ha 1.6 % August 31, 2008 Figure: L ha -0.3 %

Disclaimers: 1. This all-India early crop forecasting results are output of three models used in sequence: (i)The spatial daily rainfall used in the model is a model-based estimated value using satellite observations of Kalpana VHRR and other satellites and adjusted to IMD ground station observations to remove bias and scaling. (ii)The estimated daily rainfall is the main input to a 1-dimensional soil moisture budgeting model which uses climatic potential evapotranspiration (PET), single set of all-India crop calendar and crop coefficients and representative soil-water holding capacities and hydraulic conductivities for each soil texture category obtained from 1: 6M SOI soil map. This model is used for bunded agricultural fields and does not consider surface runoff to / from the fields. It uses evapotranspiration and deep percolation for the water balance. (iii)The daily soil moisture status expressed as available soil moisture (ASM) in percentage is averaged over 5-day periods and tested for suitability of sowing/transplanting of crops using crop-specific thresholds and convolved with the crop-specific calendar function to forecast the crop area sown till that time. 2. Any irrigation water applied to the fields has not been included as its daily spatial distribution is not available as yet. (However, the model has provision to include it). 3. Area specific crop calendar and crop coefficients have not been used as they are not available. (However, the model has provision to include it). 4. Current/actual PET is not used as it is difficult to compute since it requires more daily weather observations which are not available on time. 5. The crop-specific thresholds for suitability for sowing are experimental and were determined in 2006 season and have been used unchanged for 2007 to 2009 and the current season. 6. Currently, the crop area forecasting is for all-India is available the next day of the date. 7. The current database grid size is approximately 4 x 4 km, suitable for 1: 6M mapping.

RCM RICE AREA 82.1% of Agricultural Area CPC RICE AREA 78.4% of Agricultural Area RCM rainfall : Average RF of CPC rainfall : Average RF of

RCM RICE CALENDAR CPC RICE CALENDAR BLUE – JUN 07 RED – AUG 26 Median Date of Transplanting : June 23 Duration of Sowing (90% of area) : 32 days Median Date of Transplanting : July 01 Duration of Sowing (90% of area) : 43 days RCM rainfall : Average RF of CPC rainfall : Average RF of Histogram of age of Rice Crop Sown as on Aug 31

RCM RICE STRESS DAYS CPC RICE STRESS DAYS Black (for rice area), Red : 0 %Blue : 100 % (Percent No. Days standing crop – Soil Moisture below Field Capacity) RCM rainfall : Average RF of CPC rainfall : Average RF of

MODEL USED: One-dimensional hydrological model (compound “bucket model”) with unsaturated / saturated flow and bunded agricultural fields (20 cm bunds) with overflow has been used to estimate daily soil moisture values in the top 100 cms of soil (root zone). The daily soil moisture model outputs are suitably averaged over past 7-day period of a given date to assess moisture stressed areas. INPUTS: Daily gridded rainfall data over India Climatic Potential Evapo-Transpiration data (Source: Monthly PET data from IMD Agrimet Division, Pune) Survey of India Soil Texture Map – 1:6M Published Moisture Holding Values for each Soil Texture Class, Hydraulic Conductivities