Suzanne Macey.  DEC looks at known occurrences with 1 mile  FWS looks at known occurrences plus the potential for suitable habitat  Contact DEC and/or.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Chevron 2005 Chevron Piceance Basin Natural Gas Development Program Northwest Colorado Oil & Gas Forum Presented by: Michael DeBerry June 5, 2008.
Advertisements

WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Dam Removal in Rhode Island: Present and Future David Chopy, DEM July 16, 2009.
Implementing Committee Meeting May 15 th, 2014 New Braunfels MS4 program and the HCP 1.
Wetland Critical Areas - Draft Ordinance Overview 18.20: Definitions Many new definitions added for clarity when used in the regulations and several unnecessary.
Cameron County Conservation District. Chapter 102 Rules and Regulations  Erosion is natural, so what’s the deal?  Accelerated Erosion is not natural.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Project Implementation.
CHAPTER 102 Plain English Guide to the Erosion and Sediment Control (E&S) Regulations Fulton County Conservation District 216 N. Second Street, Suite 15.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
April 14, Indicate every resource type proposed for impact on the Application: Tidal Wetland (short form for some projects) Nontidal Wetland Waterway.
Utah Watershed Coordinating Council Conservation Planning Workshop Navigating the Corps’ Permitting Process July 20, 2011 Jason Gipson Chief, Utah/Nevada.
Construction Storm Water Controls CET-3320 Hydrology & Hydraulics.
Introduction To The Highway Runoff Manual This introduction focus on: An overview of the Highway Runoff Manual. The definition of Minimum Requirements.
Proposed Statewide Baseline Groundwater Sampling and Monitoring Rules Staff Presentation Cause 1-R, Docket No RM-04 November 14, 2012.
USAID Africa Bureau EIA Procedures for Sub-Projects
Wes Marshall, P.E. University of Connecticut March 2007 CE 276 Site Design Chapter 10 – Soil Erosion & Sediment Control.
{Your District Name Here} District Small MS4/Municipal Storm Water Update {Date Here}
Env 247 Overview of Stormwater Management March 1, 2011.
CONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) CONSTRUCTION GUIDE TO CLEANER WATER Information compliments of: WaterWorks! WaterWorks! Center for Environmental.
Shale Gas Drilling Deep Creek watershed SURFACE DRILLING CONSTRAINTS SPATIAL ANALYSIS EXERCISE.
Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.
Chesapeake Bay Program Habitat Goals Implementation Team June 26, 2013.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Utah Field Office Guidelines for Inventory and Monitoring
1 Common Issues on Plans Recertification Training For Level II Introduction to Design Certified Plan Reviewers and Certified Design Professionals Issued.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DESIGN APPROACH- THE BASICS Issued May 2009.
AZPDES and Construction Sites Greg Wise Environmental Program Specialist Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (602)
SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges During Construction Activity GP Mike Jurkowski, CPESC, NYSDOT - Summary of Changes From GP
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
Low Flow Analysis & Water Use Plan Science & Community Environmental Knowledge Fund Forum June 10, 2004 Barry Ortman Diversified Technical Services Dawson.
SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE REGULATIONS Planning Commission Workshop April 3, 2012.
Protective Regulations Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices January, 2007 Kirby Date, Countryside Program Coordinator.
1 The Plan and Plan Review Issued May 2009 Level IB: Advanced Fundamentals Seminar Education and Training Certification Requirements for Persons Involved.
Module 6: Design Process Preliminary Field Review Preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Design Report, including Preliminary NOI Package Alignment and.
Creating a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan For Construction Activities.
EVALUATION TOPIC Coal Exploration Sites – Offsite Impacts and Reclamation Success.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
FN Cultural Heritage Resources The WLP must specify a strategy for conserving and protecting “cultural heritage resources” that are the focus of a traditional.
Implementing Conservation Measures to Reduce Impacts to Migratory Birds.
How Does Sprawl Affect Water Quality Eric Hammerling, Executive Director Farmington River Watershed Association.
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. April A. Ryan, PE.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Superstructure and Bridge Replacements in Regions 2 & 9 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900022) Herkimer,
River and Canal Maintenance Activities Allowed Under RIDEM Wetlands and Water Quality Regulations Russ Chateauneuf Chief Groundwater & Wetlands Protection.
MDOT Storm Water Management Plan Module 2: Best Management Practices
Regional and Local Bog Turtle Update Noelle Rayman Sandie Doran New York Field Office May 14, 2014.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Fish Habitat Restoration.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Stormwater Overview Board of County Commissioners Planning Conference March 1, 2007.
MEPA MEPA Regulations ( 301 CMR ) MEPA Regulations ( 301 CMR ) Large projects that require.
SW101 Large and Small Construction Denise Hamilton, EPA Region 6 8 th Annual Region 6 MS4 Operators Conference June 26, 2006.
UNIT 13 – Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring and Compliance UNIT 13.
UNIT 13 – Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring and Compliance UNIT 13.
Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) Community Systems Rychel McKenzie Jason Pushard December 2015.
Update: AUL Guidance Revisions Summary of Comments June 23, 2011 Peggy Shaw Workgroup Chair.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Clearing and Site Preparation and Site.
Fitzgerald Marine Reserve CA Coastal Trail California Coastal Commission May 12, 2011.
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Terrestrial Working Group November 6, 2007 TERR 1: Vegetation Communities and Wildlife.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
Pollution Control: For Field Office Construction Sites.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
ANIMAL CONCENTRATION AREAS WORKSHEET Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Rob Conley City of Hamilton
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Stormwater Management Program
Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion
Presentation transcript:

Suzanne Macey

 DEC looks at known occurrences with 1 mile  FWS looks at known occurrences plus the potential for suitable habitat  Contact DEC and/or FWS for assistance

 Use the following analytical approach: 1. Is the proposed project within an area identified by the FWS as known or likely to contain bog turtles (IPaC)?  If no, no further coordination for BT necessary  If yes, then…

2. Is the proposed project at an elevation of 1,000 feet or less?  If no, no further coordination for BT necessary  If yes, then…

3. Is there any suitable BT habitat present within the proposed project area?  Conduct Phase 1 survey – anytime, anyone  If results are no, submit results of Phase 1 survey report and field data sheets to NYFO for review  If results are yes, conduct analysis of effects and coordinate with NYFO to determine if Phase 2 or 3 surveys are necessary

 Data forms, including opinion on habitat  Topographic map of location of site  Details of project  Project design map  Show location of wetlands/streams  Wetland type (PEM, PSS, PFO, POW)  Designated survey areas  Color photos  Lead surveyor’s name  Date of visit  Description of hydrology, soils and vegetation, etc.

 Death or injury to bog turtles during construction activities  Filling/loss of nesting, basking, hibernation habitat  Fragmentation of habitat and alterations to dispersal  Introduction of contaminated surface water runoff  Temporary or permanent alteration of hydrology  Introduction of nutrients – septic, WWTP  Introduction of invasive species  Introduction of people, pets, and recreational vehicles into wetlands, etc.

 Should the proposed project have the potential to impact BT, then there are 2 options: 1. Assume BT presence and avoid wetland impacts, or 2. Conduct Phase 2 survey (or possibly Phase 3 trapping)

 Note: Phase 2 surveys are only to detect presence or probable absence  Recommend “qualified surveyor”  Qualified surveyor must be permitted by DEC for location and period of survey  Survey should focus in areas of wetland that meet 3 criteria  Areas meeting criteria are “designated survey areas”

 Note: Phase 2 surveys are only to detect presence or probable absence  Recommend “qualified surveyor”  Qualified surveyor must be permitted by DEC for location and period of survey  Survey should focus in areas of wetland that meet 3 criteria  Areas meeting criteria are “designated survey areas”

 Conduct only between April 15 – June 15  LPPPRU: May 1 – June 30  Minimum of 4 surveys per wetland site  At least 2 surveys in May  April 15 – April 30: separate by 6 or more days  May 1 – June 15: separate by 3 or more days  Survey time should be at least 4 to 6 person-hours per acre  Once a BT is found, Phase 2 ends

 Details of project  Topographic map of location of site  Project design map  Proposed conservation measures  Map with coarse vegetation types  Table of current vs. proposed future acreage of veg  Wetland delineations and proposed mitigation  Color photos  Lead surveyor’s name  Results of survey  Details on suitable habitat that extends off-site, etc.

 The results of the Phase 2 can go two ways: 1. Results are negative for BT detection = - Coordination with NYFO ends for BT 2. Results are positive for BT detection = - Avoid all wetland impacts OR - Formal consultation or HCP necessary

 Use when Phase 2 surveys fail to detect BT in:  Large wetland complexes  Areas of dense vegetation and/or  Low density  Must coordinate with NYFO – request protocol  Qualified surveyor must be permitted by DEC  Can trap concurrently with Phase 2 survey  Minimum 20 consecutive days – end by June 30  Minimum 20 traps per hectare

 See website for fact sheets:  LPPPRU  HHRU  Conservation Zones  Remove lot lines and associated construction activities from the 300 foot buffer around wetland (Zone 1)  Conduct pre-construction survey to remove any bog turtles from work area  Install silt fencing to prevent bog turtles from entering work area

 Keep all disturbance, including equipment, vehicles, staging areas, temporary roads, and soil stock piles out of Zone 1  Eliminate the use of basement window wells or require that window wells be covered or surrounded by a barrier to prevent trapping turtles  Use grate or catch basins with an opening size small enough to prevent trapping turtles  Ensure that uncontrolled runoff does not occur in the wetland and that water quality is protected

 Stabilize disturbed areas after construction is complete  Avoid stormwater basins in Zone 1  Construct retention basins on 3 to 1 slopes which would allow turtles of any species to escape  Place physical barriers between the useable area of each lot and the adjacent wetland buffer (e.g., natural fences, split rail, boulders)

 Phase 1 surveys – anyone can do  Phase 2 surveys – need to be qualified  Ability to find bog turtles  100 turtles in the last 20 years  Independently found at least 20 turtles at 5 sites within the past 5 years  Minimum 2 full field seasons of MS or PhD-related work at a minimum of 2 sites and has independently found at least 5 turtles  Completed 4 years of certified apprenticeship program under current surveyor

 Extent of field experience with bog turtles  At least 2 field seasons working with turtles (e.g., surveys, telemetry)  Written documentation  Demonstrate ability to produce accurate, comprehensive, well-organized written reports

 Experience with implementing survey protocols  Phase 1: within the past 5 years, surveyor independently conducted at least 10 Phase 1 surveys, accurately determining whether or not potential turtles were present  Phase 2: within the past 5 years, surveyor conducted at least 5 Phase 2 surveys in the capacity of principal investigator or 10 Phase 2 surveys as an assistant  References  Need 3 references

Surveyors need to submit updated info annually by December 31 List will be updated in early Spring annually, periodic updates within the year as necessary Contact: Noelle Rayman New York Field Office