Status, Trends, Distribution, and Functions of Wetlands in the New York City Water Supply Watershed Laurie Machung, Bureau of Water Supply, Watershed Protection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of Maps for Identifying Regulated Wetlands in Vermont Comments by Ralph Tiner U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Advertisements

National Wetlands Inventory Mapping In Vermont
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP Implications of Current Wetlands Policy and Management.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Landscape Level Conservation Planning for prioritizing conservation action in Mozambique Bruno Nhancale, PhD Conservation Science workshop, 21 st April.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Wetlands Assessment Virginia Engle, USEPA National Water Quality Monitoring Council March 20, 2007.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
The New York City Watershed Agreement “A commitment to Partnership”
Wetland and Riparian Mapping in Montana Karen Newlon, Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT Montana Wetland Council University of Montana-Missoula.
Hydrologic storage in seasonal, mineral flat wetlands across native prairie, farmed, and restored prairie land cover: structural controls and hydrologic.
Tifton Georgia Florida Gulf of Mexico Atlanta Athens SE Environmental Flows Conference Roles of Farm Ponds and Potential Impacts on Streams in the Coastal.
THE PROPOSED WOUS DETAIL DEFINITION “A PRACTITIONER’S VIEW” Presented by: Richard W. Whiteside, PhD, CWB, CSE Corblu Ecology Group, LLC.
Improved Assessment of Floodplain Location and Function Megan Lang USDA Forest Service Beltsville, MD.
Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.
EcoAtlas: A Technology Tool for Wetland Protection and Management Data Management Workgroup June 6, 2012 Meredith Williams Cristina Grosso.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Every Acre Counts The Newfound Watershed Master Plan Land Conservation Priorities In the Newfound Lake Watershed January 23, 2015 Dan Sundquist GreenFire.
Soil Classes default Only one soil type “D” modified District Key EARTHQUAKE LOSS ESTIMATION FOR THE NEW YORK CITY AREA Princeton NYCEM Research Group.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering NYC Watersheds 
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering NYC Water Supply System Overview How does NYC get the water it needs? Or How big is.
NYC Water Supply System Overview How does NYC get the water it needs? Or How big is NYC’s water footprint? How does NYC get the water it needs? Or How.
Urban Planning Applications of GIS GIS can be applied to many types of problem. Among these are representatives of both raster and vector data base structures,
TEMPLATE DESIGN © m Percentage of Surface Drinking Water from Intermittent, Ephemeral, and Headwater Streams in the Continental.
WETLANDS and LOCAL PROGRAMS Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
2010 Agricultural Water Resource Development Workshop Series HOW TO APPLY FOR ASSISTANCE “PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT – THE PROCESS”
The phased approach to the groundwater monitoring programme for the Drini River Basin.
Rick Swanson USDA Forest Service U.S. Forest Service: C&I’s for: The World’s Largest Water Company U.S. Forest Service: C&I’s for: The World’s Largest.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 - Attachment A California Red-legged Frog Site Assessment March 10, 2008.
Clean Water Act Section 404 How it affects your airport during project implementation.
The WLP must be consistent with these objectives 1.maintaining or enhancing an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from the woodlot licence.
Applying Stream Buffer Science to the Lake George Watershed Lake George Stream Corridor Management Stakeholder Meeting May 28, 2008.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
1 Gas Pipeline Monitoring in the Delaware River Watershed.
Fish and Wildlife Service’s Wetlands Geodatabase Mitch Bergeson Cartographic Applications and Processing Program Water Resources Division, US Geological.
David Nail USGS Geospatial Liaison to Indiana March 13 th, 2007 Update on National Hydrography Data.
Geomatics Tools for Inventorying and Assessing Headwaters Adam Hogg Inventory Monitoring & Assessment, Ministry of Natural Resources Eastern Region Headwaters.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
Extent and Mask Extent of original data Extent of analysis area Mask – areas of interest Remember all rasters are rectangles.
OREGON IDAHO WYOMING COLORADO NEVADA NEW MEXICO TEXAS UTAH ARIZONA CALIFORNIA US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® And Taking Care Of People! Proposed.
Surface Water An Erosional-Depositional System. Running Water When running water is confined to a channel, it is called a stream Smaller streams called.
ORSANCO Biological Programs Extra-curricular Updates EMAP-GRE ORBFHP NRSA.
LEQ: How can I determine watershed patterns and their divides on a map? Lesson Key terms: watershed, drainage basin, tributary, dendritic, elevation,
Trails, Watersheds and Wetlands An introduction to the science of Hydrology and its relation to hiking trails. Presented by: William Richardson.
AQUACULTURE FACILITIES [objectives]
What is geography? What is the location of the Atlantic Ocean relative to Africa?
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering NYC Watersheds.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Figures & Maps Documentation Floodplain (FIRM) Maps Wetland (NWI) Maps Site Maps Conceptual Site Development Plan.
Steve Todd WetSAG co-chair Suquamish Tribe Ash Roorbach CMER Riparian Ecologist August 5, 2010.
Josh Collins, Ph.D. San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center A Vision of Watershed Monitoring and Assessment.
Dr. Thomas Hardy Chief Science Officer River Systems Institute Texas State University.
Current Issues in Clean Water Act Alaska Miners Association 24 th Biennial Conference Fairbanks, Alaska Damien M. Schiff Pacific Legal Foundation.
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Headwaters of Red River ● Lower Demlow Lake ● Langlade County
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP
Dan Child CEE 5440/6440 Utah State University Fall 2003
Facts About The New York City Water Supply System
Shannon Clemens GIS for Water Resources December 2, 2008
NYC Water Supply System Overview
Land Use Land Cover Change in the Big Sioux River Watershed: Driving Forces, Connections and Consequences Dinesh Shrestha, Dr. Darrell Napton Department.
Landscape Approach to Resource Management
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Waters of the U.S. Updates and Changes
New York State Physical Regions
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP
Unit: Water and the Atmosphere
Prioritizing Watershed Protection in King County
Presentation transcript:

Status, Trends, Distribution, and Functions of Wetlands in the New York City Water Supply Watershed Laurie Machung, Bureau of Water Supply, Watershed Protection and Planning

Mapping and Research Programs  National Wetlands Inventory  Wetlands Status and Trends  Wetland Characterization and Preliminary Functional Assessment  Reference Wetlands Monitoring Program

National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)  USFWS first completed in 1996 using 1:58,000 scale mid 1980’s aerial photography  Updated in 2005 using 1:40,000 scale 2003 and 2004 aerial photography  Provides base data on the distribution, characteristics, and extent of wetlands

Wetland Status and Trends  Completed for the Croton Watershed in 1999, updated in 2005  1968 – 1984  1984 – 1994  1994 – 2004  Completed for Catskill and Delaware 12/08  Mid 80’s – mid 90’s  Mid 90’s – 2004

Wetland Characterization USFWS added LLW codes to each wetland polygon in the NWI database to depict: Landscape Position Lotic Lentic Terrene Landform Water flow path Throughflow Outflow Isolated Other modifiers (hw)

Wetlands Monitoring Program: East of Hudson – 6 reference sites West of Hudson – 22 reference sites Water Quality Water Table Vegetation Soils

Catskill/Delaware Reference Wetlands

Croton Watershed Palustrine Wetlands Approximately 15,355 acres (6% of land surface)

Catskill/Delaware Watersheds Palustrine Wetlands Approximately 9,565 acres (1% of land surface)

NWI vs. Delineated Area

Wetland Trends: East and West of Hudson Watersheds

Wetland Landscape Positions in East and West of Hudson Watersheds

Wetland Characterization Describes Wetland landscape settings Enables an estimate of wetlands potentially lacking federal regulatory protection SWANCC Isolated wetlands Rapanos and Carabel Significant nexus analysis required for Non-navigable, non-relatively permanent tributaries and adjacent wetlands To determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of TNWs

Wetland Characterization  Used USFWS LLW codes to estimate abundance of wetlands lacking perennial connections  Two approaches Water Flow path modifiers Water Flow path modifiers IS, IN = isolatedIS, IN = isolated OI, TI, OU = intermittentOI, TI, OU = intermittent Headwater modifiers Headwater modifiers IN and IS = isolatedIN and IS = isolated Headwater modifier - 1 st and 2 nd order streamsHeadwater modifier - 1 st and 2 nd order streams

Croton Watershed Flow Path Method Predicts that 24% of wetlands are ‘vulnerable’ isolated (5%) intermittently connected (19%)

Croton Watershed Headwater Method Predicts that 43% of wetlands are ‘vulnerable’ Headwaters 38% Isolated 5%

Catskill/Delaware Watersheds Flow Path Method Predicts that 38% of wetlands are vulnerable isolated (13%) intermittently connected (25%)

Catskill/Delaware Watersheds Headwater Method Predicts that 71% of wetlands are ‘vulnerable’ Headwaters (58%) Isolated (13%)

Proportion of NWI Wetlands not included on NYS FWW Maps 21% 68%

Percent of Non-DEC wetlands without perennial connections 52% 70% 40% 68% (11%)(15%)(27%)(46%)

DOC Export

DOC vs Color: East of Hudson Wetland Outflows

Conclusions  According to the NWI, Wetlands occupy 15,355 acres, or 6% of Croton Watershed 15,355 acres, or 6% of Croton Watershed 9,565 acres, or 1% of the Catskill and Delaware Watersheds 9,565 acres, or 1% of the Catskill and Delaware Watersheds  Reference Wetland monitoring identified margin of error in NWI mapping  Net rates of wetland loss have declined over the time periods studied  Pond construction was leading cause of wetland loss in all time periods, though rates have declined

Conclusions  Based USFWS LLW modifiers, an estimated 24% to 43% of Croton Watershed Wetlands and 38% to 71% of Catskill/Delaware Wetlands could lose federal protection and; 24% to 43% of Croton Watershed Wetlands and 38% to 71% of Catskill/Delaware Wetlands could lose federal protection and; 11% to 15% of Croton Wetlands and 27% to 46% of Catskill/Delaware wetlands would lack federal or state protection 11% to 15% of Croton Wetlands and 27% to 46% of Catskill/Delaware wetlands would lack federal or state protection

Conclusions  Reference wetland monitoring is a valuable tool to assess whether wetlands have a nexus to traditional navigable waters