WSDOT SR 520 Seattle Shoreline Permit Application Information for Comment Letters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of Tybee Island 2007 Master Plan Summary Report Area Character Maps and Area Development Recommendations.
Advertisements

WARD LAKE MASTER PLAN Public Input Workshop #1 July 14, 2011.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Flood Hazard Areas & the NJPDES Rule s © 2009 Fox Rothschild Land Use and Environmental Regulation in New Jersey October 14, 2009 Flood Hazard Areas &
Roger Williams Park Ponds Restoration Project. Project Update Concept Plans Developed for Structural and Non- Structural Best Management Practices Draft.
Regulatory Context Natural Environment Chapter Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
Proposed Stormwater Regulations Public Forum Richland County Government September 2009.
Capilano Road Improvement Project WELCOME TO THE OPEN HOUSE.
Florida Water Forum Everglades Restoration June 3, 2011.
April 14, Indicate every resource type proposed for impact on the Application: Tidal Wetland (short form for some projects) Nontidal Wetland Waterway.
Utah Watershed Coordinating Council Conservation Planning Workshop Navigating the Corps’ Permitting Process July 20, 2011 Jason Gipson Chief, Utah/Nevada.
Introduction To The Highway Runoff Manual This introduction focus on: An overview of the Highway Runoff Manual. The definition of Minimum Requirements.
8800 Richmond Highway Redevelopment working together to redevelop and clean up the environment.
Pine Valley Country Club Stream Restoration: Phase 2 Proposal Presented March 17, 2003 Greg Jennings, NC State Univ Barbara Doll, NC Sea Grant Dave Bidelspach,
Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.
Suzanne Macey.  DEC looks at known occurrences with 1 mile  FWS looks at known occurrences plus the potential for suitable habitat  Contact DEC and/or.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Mitigation Plan Public Meeting November 2, 2006.
Regional Industrial Wetlands / Wetlands Mitigation Solutions.
Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.
Watershed Forestry Initiative Ellen Kohler Attorney & Policy Specialist Funded in part by Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Urban.
Landscape Ecology, Urban Forestry & Wetlands.  Woody vegetation in populated places  25% of forest canopy in US.
PC Meeting July 1, 2015 CUP 15-02/DR 15-06/DR
Kitsap County Shoreline Master Program Update Task Force Work Group Meeting August 16, 2011.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
Team Tech meeting May 22, 2006 State Traffic Commission & DEP Storm Water Permitting State Traffic Commission Permitting & Storm Water Permitting State.
Opener 4/30 In your foldable, answer the following questions: 1. What do you see? 2. Where is it? 3. What do the colors mean?
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
Shoreline Master Program Update First Review of Preliminary Draft Shoreline Master Program City of Wenatchee April 15,
SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE REGULATIONS Planning Commission Workshop April 3, 2012.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Planning Area Standards May 18, Outline of today’s meeting Introductions Recap of previous community meetings Planning Area Standards Discussion.
Planning & Community Development Department Hillsides Residential Care and Educational Center Master Plan City Council July 20, 2015.
I-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project Tanya Lamb Urban Geography, GEOG 481 Description 15-mile stretch Hyak (MP 55.1) to Easton (MP 70.3) 2010 scheduled to.
Cedar Ridge Estates Green View Realty LLC Is Pleased to Present: Application for Comprehensive Permit 40B Residential Development.
River and Canal Maintenance Activities Allowed Under RIDEM Wetlands and Water Quality Regulations Russ Chateauneuf Chief Groundwater & Wetlands Protection.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Bricke Murfree Murfree & Murfree, PLLC Attorneys-at-Law 805 South Church St., Suite 21, Murfreesboro, TN Phone:
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Mitigation Plan Public Meeting November 2, 2006.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Low Impact Development [presenters name] [presentation date] Integrated Management Practices Controlling Stormwater Quality and Quantity using.
Washington Thoroughfare Study Proposed Improvement of Washington Street Hainesville Road to Lake Street Lake County Hainesville Road Lake Street Washington.
CEMEX Open Discussion March 10, Outline Background Background Issue Issue Proposed Actions Proposed Actions.
Photo Placeholder Bloedel Donovan Park Stormwater Retrofit Alternatives and Analysis May 31 st 2013.
Lake Raleigh Wetland Creation Feasibility Study NC State Centennial Campus Melanie Carter, Jennifer Burdette, Amanda Jones.
Prepared for: Prepared by: Masonville DMCF: Integrating Dredged Material Management with Environmental Restoration and Recreation Opportunities October.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
Update: Where We Are and Feedback Lake George Stream Corridor Management Stake Holder Meeting June 25, 2008.
Transportation Projects City Council Workshop May 14, 2013.
CDP Application No Integral Communities 500 California Hwy 75, City of Imperial Beach CCC Hearing Item Th24b August 13, 2015.
Fitzgerald Marine Reserve CA Coastal Trail California Coastal Commission May 12, 2011.
City of Dunnellon Comprehensive Plan Amendment  Future Land Use Element  Conservation Element  Concurrency Management System.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
Beth Kacvinsky - Lead Project Manager Office of Everglades Policy and Coordination March 1, 2016 IRL-S / C-44 Overview.
LAND Subdivie a 4.27 acres into 18 lots 17 detached single family homes One duplex Base density allows for unit Affordable housing bonus.
Vista Verde Ranch Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report Vesting Tentative Tract & Oak Tree Permit Project Description :70 unit single.
2035 General Plan Update Joint Study Session on Draft Conservation Element Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission December 1, 2015.
Restoration of the Swan Pond Embayment Michelle Cagley, Tennessee Valley Authority.
PORT OF TACOMA. 1. Background 2. City Process Update 3. Review Guiding Principles 4. Next Steps General Business: City of Tacoma Shoreline Master Program.
Green Stormwater Infrastructure and Park Improvements
Jefferson County SA Red Rocks Site Approval
Construction Management & Inspection
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Water Quality Protection Zones
Cedar Ridge Estates Application for Comprehensive Permit
Walker Street Reconstruction Project 25% Design Public Hearing
WSUP Arrowcreek Middle School Grading
Presentation transcript:

WSDOT SR 520 Seattle Shoreline Permit Application Information for Comment Letters

Part One Permit Process

Permit Schedule Public Comment Period ends 9/16/11 City Public Comment Meeting ??? Permit Approval (WSDOT wants Dec. 15, 2011) Permit Appeals of Shoreline Permits – to State Shoreline Hearings Board – Related MUP Permits to City Hearing Examiner Approved permit usually for 2 yrs. (plus 1 yr. extension) WSDOT has requested 6 yrs.

Separate Shoreline and MUP Permit Applications Submitted for 4 Project Areas and Mitigation Sites within Seattle Portage Bay Area Permit Number West Approach Area Permit Number Montlake Ship Canal Bridge Permit Number Floating Bridge Permit Number Magnuson Park (Wetland and Aquatic) Mitigation Permit Number UW Union Bay Site (Wetland) Permit Number Arboretum Peninsula Mitigation Site (Wetland) Permit Number Seward Park Mitigation Site (Aquatic) Permit Number Taylor Creek Mitigation Site (Aquatic) Permit Number

Part Two Project Impact Information

Seattle Shoreline Local Area Designations Union Bay Conservancy Preservation South Portage Bay Conservancy Recreation (all but west shoreline) Urban Residential (west shoreline south SR 520) Conservancy Management (Queen City and Seattle Yacht Club areas) Montlake Ship Canal Bridge Conservancy Management (shorelines) Conservancy Navigation (center of channel)

Shoreline Area Environmental Impacts Expanded Bridge – Fill (Mostly placement of support piers and bridge structure) – Increase in permanent shading Construction Impacts – Temporary clearing – Excavation for piers – Noise, dust and vibrations

Simplified Definitions Shoreline Area 200 feet from designated lake or river that also includes all of adjacent wetland Aquatic Area Permanent Water Body greater than 2 meters deep (6 feet 6 inches) with no water bottom supported vegetation Wetland Area Shallow permanent water body with bottom supported plants or shoreline or upland area so inundated that it has wetland plant, soil and hydrology characteristics Wetland Buffer 110 feet from wetland edge for class 1 85 feet from wetland edge for class 2

Local Wetland Areas Impacted Total Areas Impacted – Wetland bridge pier fill.06 acres – Wetland fill.22acres – Wetland Temporary shading 5.25 acres (temporary bridgework) – Buffer permanent fill 1.87 acres – Buffer permanent shading.75 acres – Buffer temporary clearing 2.33 acres – Buffer temporary shading.04 acres Most Affected Wetlands –.13 acre wetland fill.31 acre buffer fill buffer,.65 acre temporary buffer clearing and 1.23 temporary buffer shading in PBS1 (Montlake Playfield shoreline) –.1.21 wetland buffer fill and.40 acre temporary fill in in LWS-4 Union Bay Arboretum ramp area)

Local Aquatic Areas Impacted Bridge Piers (Portage Bay and Union Bay) – Total of 1.4 acres fill Expanded Bridge Shading – Total of 7.85 acres – 2.6 acres (34%) Zone 6 (Madison Park part of Union Bay) – 1.2 acres (16%) Zone 4 (Arboretum/Montlake part of Union Bay ) –.18 acres (2%) Zone 3 (Montlake Cut) – 3.72 acres (47%) Zone 2 (Portage Bay)

Proposed Mitigation Sites for Portage Bay and West Approach Aquatic areas On-Site Arboretum Wetland (WSDOT Owned Peninsula) 1.68 acres restoration, 2.33 acres enhancement,.83 acres buffer enhancement Aquatic Area (Arboretum Creek- Near but not onsite) 3.46 acres restoration (Not for shoreline area mitigation) Off – Site Magnuson Park Wetland 2.53 acres creation, 9.19 enhancement, buffer enhancement Aquatic Area For Temporary Impacts 12.6 acres Union Bay Wetland 2.53 acres creation, 9.19 acres enhancement, acres buffer enhancement Other Sites (Seward Park, Taylor Creek, Elliot Bridge/Cedar River) Wetland.02 acres buffer enhancement (Elliot Bridge) check Aquatic Area For Permanent impacts 5.26 acres, for temporary impacts acres

Stormwater Treatment Facilities for Some Existing and Additional Pollution Generating Surfaces Lake Union East Alison Street Outlet - a bioswale for basic treatment of 4 acres Portage Bay West Side-Frolund Property - a bioswale for basic treatment of 2.94 acres East Side-Area behind Adjacent Gas Station/Store –a constructed wetland for enhanced treatment of 8.70 acres Union Bay NE Montlake Cut – a bioswale for basic treatment of.14 acres Mohai Site – a constructed wetland for enhanced treatment of acres Oil control facilities at roadway intersections with average daily traffic (ADT) of 15,00 or more

Proposed Recreation Facilities Boat Street Park Site on North Side of Ship Canal selected to meet 6(f) requirements Bridge Bike Lane with Connections

Part Three Incomplete Application

Permit Submittal WSDOT submitted permit applications on August ? with cover letter marked Received August 29! Yet DDPD determined it was a complete application for 1 month public review period from August 15-Sept 16. Some submitted plan sheets appear preliminary and required reports are drafts. Some of the reports have missing pages and appendices Submissions apparently are on-going with additional or updated material to be received past public comment period

Examples No specific analysis found on how improved recreation which is a key component of Shoreline policy will be considered or provided. Seattle, Army Corps of Engineers, and Washington State of Ecology permit submission requirements include review of wetland edge delineation flags. No flags have been seen at impacted wetland sites. Flags seen at mitigation sites. However, they may be those for other mitigation activities planned in these site areas. Submitted plan sheets are preliminary with only area outlines for proposed aquatic mitigation areas. No wetland planting plans shown for Magnuson Park mitigation site. No wetland and aquatic planting/grading plans have been submitted. Small wetland on Frolund property not documented.

Statement that as State Essential Public Facility (EPF)City permits cannot be denied - just conditioned Exemptions requested from some Special Use Permits and Conditions Request for a 6 year Shoreline Permit (instead of 2 years plus possible 1 year extension) WSDOT Requests Special Consideration

Part Four Project Facility Concerns

Stormwater Facilities No specific stormwater design report in EIS or many specific documents. Proposed bioswales provide only primary treatment. Not appropriate for highway runoff for road with 100,000 Average Vehicles Per Day (AVD) The facilities may be undersized. No statement found in Biological Assessment that the stormwater facilities were designed for 100 year storm event. This has been a common standard. Statement in Biological Assessment Report that stormwater drainage in access of design capacity will flow through scuppers into Portage Bay. Outfall of sediment and heavy metals into bay may still continue.

Recreation South Portage Bay designated as Conservation Recreation Shoreline Environment. No recreation facility or habitat mitigation proposed for 5 year noise, vibration and visibility construction impacts With exception of Arboretum or bike lane access, no permanent recreation facility improvements in existing public shoreline access areas such as Montlake Playfield, East Montlake Park or shoreline street end sites. With exception of Arboretum, No shoreline recreation activity access improvements possible at shoreline wetland mitigation site since they are proposed for upland areas. Depending on design details, there may be no shoreline access improvements aquatic area mitigation sites.

Part Five Mitigation Sites

Aquatic Areas versus Wetland Areas Aquatic Impact area determined to be than wetland impact using 2 meter (6 foot, 6 inch) depth and associated plant growth criteria. Though the City requires 2 foot contour lines on plan sheets, submitted plans do not show depth of Portage and Union Bay Areas. Submitted Reports apparently do not document Portage and Union Bay depths. Major impact will be increased area of shading under widened bridge. More mitigation impact resources devoted to aquatic resources over wetland impacts. Wetlands include our neighborhood shorelines while aquatic impacts do not.

On-Site or Offsite Mitigation Outside of Arboretum, no documentation the WSDOT seriously considered wetland or aquatic mitigation at sites to project impact area on south side of Portage and Uno0nBays No documented consideration of possible opportunities at: At existing South Portage Bay and Union Bay park area shorelines Frolund property, Everett and other street ends

Upland Mitigation Used for Shoreline Mitigation Mitigation sites at Magnuson Park and UW Union Bay property upland sites do not provide equivalent functions and values not equivalent to area’s shoreline wetlands. These sites generally are rated as class 3 sites. Larger Shoreline wetlands typically rated as higher class 2..

Photos

Picture of South Portage Bay Wetland

Picture of Southside of Union Bay Wetland

Picture Of Boat Street 6(f) Mitigation Site

Picture of Magnuson Park Upland Wetland Restoration Mitigation Site

Picture of Union Bay Upland Wetland Mitigation Creation Site

Most Serious Example

Inadequate Consideration of Impacts to Wetland PBS 1 at Montlake Playfield Shoreline Re-examination needed of: Wetland (PBS1) adjacent to Montlake Playfield has almost half of permanent and temporary impact areas. Rated as a class 3 not higher class Questionable low rating given to its hydrology. The adjacent shallow water area determined to be an aquatic area. This removes of the largest impact - increased bridge water shading from wetland impact consideration.

No Mitigation at Portage Bay Wetland PBS 1. No mitigation provided at this Shoreline Conservation Designated area considering: Shoreline has native vegetation restoration site, plus shoreline trail and kayak launch. Shoreline habitat has several beaver lodges and large trees not found elsewhere in Lake Union basin. Wetland survey form notes there will be permanent habitat loss. Permanent aesthetic and water use impacts resulting from presence of a closer and larger bridge. Shoreline area and adjacent playfield recreation use will be impacted by noise from 5 year buffer tree clearing of part of site.