CCMP UPDATES & PDE GOALS STAC/EIC Meeting– Sept. 5 th, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:
A GIS Lesson. What is a Watershed? +15 Million People.
Legislative Oversight The House Bay Trust Study Commission Presented by Sandra T. Whitehouse, Ph.D.
Management Plan: An Overview
Narragansett Bay Estuary Program Narragansett Bay CCMP  Original done 1992  Stakedholder-developed goals, objectives, actions  Many key actions implemented.
Northwest Atlantic Coastal Indicators Workshop January 6-8, 2004 Durham, NH.
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO Action Plan, Progress Report.
Oregon’s Unique Approach Oregon’s Unique Approach to Watershed Restoration.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.
Spatial and temporal trends in dissolved oxygen concentrations and dissolved oxygen depletion (hypoxia) in the Delaware River Basin Demonstration Area.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
Natural Heritage & Urban Forest Strategy (NH&UFS) DRAFT STRATEGY Open House Presentation June 20 th, 2013.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Currents of Change Workshop Currents of Change Environmental Status & Trends of the Narragansett Bay Region May 1, 2009.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Being Accountable/Communicating Assessment Information to the Public in 2012 Update to the Management Board April 2012 Margaret Enloe, ACB CBPO and Nita.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
A New Partnership Working in Southeast Alaska 2013 Southeast Alaska Environmental Forum Deborah Hart, SEAKFHP Coordinator
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Overview 1.Types of monitoring 2.Partnership monitoring needs 3.Current monitoring coordination efforts.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 6, 2012 Beneficial Use Opportunities.
Citizen’s Advisory Committee / Local Government Advisory Committee Joint Meeting December 5, 2013 Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA)
RESTORE Act Local Advisory Committee (RAC) Gulf County, Florida June 23 rd, 2015.
Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean (MARCO) Presented to the 62 nd Annual Interstate Seafood Seminar Bob Connell New Jersey Department of Environmental.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
Salmon-Safe: Peer-reviewed standards for the management of urban parks and natural areas Carrie Foss WSU Puyallup.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
AHSS Council September Initial Recovery Strategy Deliverable Due to PSP in early October Focused on documenting / describing our work to date Will.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Fran Dunwell Hudson River Estuary Coordinator Hudson River Estuary Program/NYSDEC.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
Marilyn Latta North Bay Watershed Association Novato, CA June 3, 2011 San Francisco Bay Subtidal Habitat Goals Project.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
Department of Environmental Quality Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP) 2 Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management Commission.
Lake Management in Alberta. Lake Issues ~2500 lakes in total with 800 fish-bearing lakes in Alberta Many lakes have changed due to Watershed alteration.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Progress Under Guidance Documents Northeast Conservation Framework LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan USFWS Science Investment and Accountability.
DELAWARE NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE Promoting stewardship of the nation’s coastal areas through science and education …
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment Context for Council Activities – Action Plan Guiding Principles (p. 5) Ecologically sustainable development.
CCMP UPDATE and DRAFT of ACTION PLANS
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Comprehensive Conservation & Management Plan (CCMP)
Texas Water Resources Institute
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
A Company Perspective on Linking Science, Management and Policy for Addressing Issues of the Delaware Estuary. Ralph G. Stahl, Jr., Ph.D., D.A.B.T. DuPont.
Presentation transcript:

CCMP UPDATES & PDE GOALS STAC/EIC Meeting– Sept. 5 th, 2013

Ground Rules  Agenda Time: 1.5 Hour  No comments until after the presentation!  Schedule a Call with Priscilla

Origins: Delaware Estuary Program  Delaware Estuary was nominated by the three state governors for inclusion into the National Estuary Program PA, DE, NJ  Delaware Estuary joined the National Estuary Program  Original Partners: EPA, DRBC, NJ, PA, DE, NOAA, USACE  Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP)

Management Division DELEP Partnership for the Delaware Estuary (PDE) Oversee Management Plan (CCMP) Coordinate dozens of partners (Agency, NGO, Academic, Corporate) Science Policy Restoration Education Fundraising DRBC Water Quantity & Quality Monitoring State of the Estuary Advisory Committees States Various: Restore habitat, Monitoring, Land management, etc. Reorganization in 2005

Where is the Management Plan Now?  PDE annually reports CCMP implementation to EPA  State of the Estuary Reports: 1996, 2002, 2008, 2012  CCMP Updates (est )  EPA Requirement – Measurable Goals for the Delaware Estuary

Updating the CCMP Category Action Ref. StatusCCMP OriginalUpdate ClimateH7 Needs updating Protect Littoral Habitats from Sea Level Rise Threats Refresh language to reflect current climate program & partner efforts Badge & Mascot E21, E22 Not relevant Create Estuary Environmental Badge & Mascot Delete CCMP Actions WetlandsH4 Needs updating Coordinate/Enhance Wetlands Management New wetland monitoring programs & restoration  STAC/EIC feedback from 2012 workshop  Website to contain updates  Roll out – Winter 2013

PDE Measurable Goals Healthy Waters 1. Brownfields, Public Access, Ecotourism, Urban Forests, Public Participation, Estuary Engagement Healthy Communities 1. Wetlands, Forests, Riparian Buffers, Fish & Shellfish Healthy Habitats Toxics, Nutrients, Dissolved Oxygen, Flow, Salinity

Progress Update YearDateActivity 2013Oct. 3Steering Committee 2013Aug 22- Sept 26 STAC/EIC – Final Review Period 2013Sept. 5STAC/EIC Meeting 2013June 6Toxics Advisory Committee Meeting 2013Feb-JulySTAC Committees/Webinars/Interviews 2013Jan. 28Delaware Estuary Science & Environmental Summit - Polling 2012Oct. 11Steering Committee (13 Goals Accepted) 2012Oct. 1-2STAC/EIC Workshop 2012June- Sept STAC Committees

Goals: Healthy Habitats Wetlands, Forests, Riparian Buffers, Fish & Shellfish

Goals: Healthy Habitats Healthy Habitats = Measure – short termMeasure – long term Responsible Agencies: Assumptions/ Needs Functioning wetlands  Get a robust tidal wetland monitoring program with a regional body for coordination and consistency of tracking wetland health in place by 2020  Develop estuary-wide baseline for tidal wetland health by 2020 and goals to sustain tidal wetland health by  Identify and implement tactics to maintain high value tidal wetlands and limit acreage loss to 5% of 2006 acreage by 2025  Take aggressive action to limit net acreage loss of tidal wetlands to 15% of 2006 acres by 2040  Tidal wetland health TBD in 2022 based on short term actions  No net loss of non-tidal wetlands PDE, EPA, States, USFWS, NOAA - Sustain MACWA to track wetland acreage and health - Establish wetland regional body - Develop estuary-wide baseline for health by 2020 Contiguous/ connected forests  Stem forest loss to less than 1% per year by 2025  Develop metrics and tracking system for loss of buffers and connectedness by 2017  TBD in/after 2025 based on short term actions States, USFW, USFWS, DRBC, EPA, TNC, NFS, USFS Field station, DVRPC Work with partners and existing tools to track forests Healthy fish and shellfish habitat  Secure dedicated funding of $1million or more per year for oyster shell planting by 2015  By 2017 define, map and inventory and by 2030 protect the following critical species habitat: o Mussel habitat (fresh and marsh) o Vegetated nursery habitat for fish & crabs, particularly in shallow intertidal areas o Beach habitat for horseshoe crabs o Critical bottom habitat for sturgeon (and other fish)  Facilitate 1-2 fish passage projects per year  Maintain or increase oyster beds at 2012 acreage with 25% increase in productivity by 2030  Increase freshwater mussel abundance and habitat by year and amount TBD based short term results  Achieve goals established in recovery plans for Atlantic and short-nosed sturgeon to improve habitat PDE, States, EPA, USFWS, NOAA, USCG, USACE, DRBC, ASMFC - EPA cannot participate in solicitation of funding - Subject to completion of MOU with NJ Heritage Program to id/map mussel habitat - Collaborate with partners in the areas of sturgeon recovery, fish passage, and oyster recovery

Goals: Healthy Communities Brownfields, Public Access, Ecotourism, Urban Forests, Public Participation, Estuary Engagement

Goals: Healthy Communities Healthy Communities = Measure – short termMeasure – long term Responsible Agencies: Assumptions/Needs: Growth That Helps People and Living Resources  Assess and inventory urban waterfront brownfields (UWB) and public access opportunities by 2015  Prioritize and increase urban waterfront brownfield projects by 2017  Reclaim 50% of waterfront brownfields to include public access and living shorelines/wetlands by 2050 States, EPA, NOAA, DRBC, PWD, counties & municipalities, PDE - UWB = brownfields with frontage on tidal waters - Standardize use of term “brownfield” to align with EPA’s definition - Connect with existing brownfield partners to inventory, prioritize, and increase brownfield projects Restored/Protecte d Living Resources*  Establish goals and measures to reconnect the public to natural resources through ecotourism, urban forests, and protected lands with public access by 2015  Sustain or enhance existing public access points in bay- front communities, and increase access points (relative to 2012) in underserved urban areas to reconnect communities to the water States, USFS, EPA, PWD, DRBC, USFW, counties & municipalities, PDE, UWFP Connect with other organizations and partnerships working on similar goals Public Understand- ing and Participation  PDE marketing & communications plan completed by 2015  Begin implementing marketing/branding campaign by 2018 with means to measure results  TBD between 2015 and 2018 based on PDE marketing and communications plan PDE, States, EPA, USFWS,NPS - Coordinate with partners to connect with other regional marketing and communication plans - Contract with marketing professions - Include assessing feasibility of using public polling to determine increase in affinity for Delaware River and Bay and its major tributaries in planning

Goals: Healthy Waters Toxics, Nutrients, Dissolved Oxygen, Flow & Salinity

Healthy Waters =Measure – short-termMeasure – long-term Responsible Agencies: Assumptions/ Needs: Few or no toxic impacts  Assess the need for and establish biological endpoint criteria for contaminants of concern by 2020  Continue support for established monitoring programs, and achieve expansion of toxics monitoring with biological endpoints by 2025  Prioritize urban waterfront brownfield projects by 2015  Reduce PCB concentrations in fish tissue by 25% by 2050 (relative to 2013 levels) Notes – Establishing new biological endpoints by 2020 will help to guide long-term reduction goals. DRBC, States, EPA, NOAA, PDE -Inventory existing toxics monitoring programs by Conduct gap analysis of monitoring programs, funding needs -Identify relevant biological endpoints (eggs, blood, tissue, drinking water, etc.) by Total load reduction of PCBs by ~25% by 2025 Few or no nutrient impacts  Assess nutrient impacts on estuarine resources (e.g. wetlands and shellfish); establish criteria by 2015 and targets based on that assessment by 2020  Implement appropriate DO standards in Zone 2-6 for fish and other key aquatic species, with interim standards for existing use by 2015 and standards for highest attainable use by  By 2030, estuarine resource endpoints show improvement from targeted nutrient reductions.  Achieve highest attainable use for DO by 2030 DRBC, States, EPA, counties & municipalities, PDE Following EPA’s release of ammonia criteria, further assessment into other nutrient impacts Research nutrient impacts on shellfish (e.g. sediment ammonia and freshwater mussel erosion) Research nutrient impacts on wetlands by 2020 Flow to support drinking water and ecology  Utilize model-derived benchmarks for flow management as they become available  Establish and incorporate low flow/salinity benchmarks for natural balance and ecological highest attainable use in flow management by 2017  By 2025 achieve and maintain flow at benchmarks for drinking water and ecological highest attainable use in the face of changing watershed conditions, including climate change. DRBC, States, PWD, ACOE, NYC, water purveyors (WRADRB). PDE Biological inputs needed for flow model Goals: Healthy Waters

Goals: Comments Received  Request to add The Nature Conservancy as a partner for two goals: Restored/Protected Living Resources and Public Understanding and Participation  Request to remove climate change language from the Healthy Waters goals.  Concerns raised about the “criteria setting” language in the Healthy Waters goals, especially with “establishing biological endpoint criteria by 2020” (Healthy Waters Row # 1) and “nutrient criteria by 2015” (Healthy Waters Row # 2); Request to consider replacing with language establishing metrics upon which eventual criteria would be based in the future.