Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Updates to the ERICA Tool Barcelona – 10 th September 2014 Nick Beresford & Justin Brown (NERC-CEH,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nick Beresford (CEH) & David Copplestone (Stirling Univ.)
Advertisements

Application of ERICA outputs and AQUARISK to evaluate radioecological risk of effluents from a nuclear site J. Twining & J. Ferris Objectives of this study.
David Copplestone (University of Stirling). Whats the issue? Obtaining air concentrations for noble gases Estimating doses to wildlife from noble gases.
David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool
Integrated Assessment Working group or coordinated activity?
Do we have a problem with freshwater Kd values? B. Howard and E. Tipping CEH, UK Analysis for discussion only – do not quote.
Numerical benchmarks: proposed levels and underlying reasoning
Nick Beresford (CEH).  Give an overview of what may impact on assessment results using the available approaches  In part based on things we know are.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June 2012.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June 2012.
WSC Radioecology Research Group A new methodology for the assessment of radiation doses to biota under non-equilibrium conditions J. Vives i Batlle, R.C.
David Copplestone CEH Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
PROTECTFP Screening tier comparisons ERICA, RESRAD-BIOTA & EA R&D128 Follow-up actions from Vienna workshop.
Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Noble gas dosimetry for non-human biota International Conference on Radioecology and Environmental Radioactivity, Barcelona,
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June 2012.
Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Radiation Protection Division formerly the National Radiological Protection Board EMRAS II – Working.
Dose Assessments for Wildlife in England & Wales.
PROTECT Work Package 2 Meeting (June 2007) Institute for Sustainable Water Integrated Management and Ecosystem Research (SWIMMER) 1 Experiences of applying.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
PROTECTFP Terrestrial Assessment Comparison of human and non human dose assessments for prospective new nuclear power stations.
PROTECTFP PROTECT: First Proposed Levels for Environmental Protection against Radioactive Substances Definitions, Derivation Methods to Determine.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
Biota Modelling Group WG Leader: Nick Beresford Participants: Participants: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czech Rep., France, Korea, Norway, Russia, Spain,
Wildlife transfer handbook WG leader: Brenda Howard.
PROTECT Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context Oslo meeting, January 2008 OSPAR Convention for the Protection.
Overview of EFSA’s work on opinions and guidance
PROTECTFP Radioprotection of the environment in France: IRSN current views and workplan K. Beaugelin-Seiller, IRSN Vienna IC, June 2007.
International Atomic Energy Agency ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO INTAKES OF RADIONUCLIDES Interpretation of Measurement Results.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
IAEA EMRAS II : background and introduction. Environmental Modelling for RAdiation Safety (EMRAS II) General aim of programme To improve capabilities.
Experiences from testing the ERICA Integrated Approach Case study application of the ERICA Tool and D-ERICA.
“to provide and apply an integrated approach of addressing scientific, managerial and societal issues surrounding environmental effects of ionising.
Supported by the European Commission, contract number: Fission , and the Research.
Risk Analyses and the Development of Radiological Benchmarks Tom Hinton (IRSN)
IAEA plans with respect to environmental protection EC PROTECT Workshop Oslo, Norway, 28–30 January 2008.
Towards a protection of species at the population level: derivation of PNEDR values by modelling population responses to ionizing radiations Emilie Lance,
Climate Change Committee WG1 QA/QC procedures and – programme for the EC inventory process André Jol, EEA 2 September 2004.
EFFECTS WORKING GROUP Tom Hinton; IRSN; France Dose – Effect Modelling to assist Risk Assessments Mathematical Derivation of Screening Level Values / Protection.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011 Brenda Howard.
PROTECTFP Numerical Benchmarks for protecting biota against radiation in the environment Methodology to derive benchmarks, selected methods used.
 The IAEA EMRAS programme has compared predictions of various models, to each other and to site data.  Model-model intercomparison showed considerable.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
EMRAS Biota Working Group – Main findings. IAEA EMRAS Biota Working Group Regular participants: Belgium - SCK·CEN; Canada – AECL; France – IRSN; Japan.
RADIATION PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
Radionuclide dispersion modelling
Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION —————————————————————————————————————— ICRP And Protection of The Environment Dr Jack Valentin Scientific.
Supported by the European Commission, contract number: Fission , and the Research.
College of Engineering Oregon State University DOE’s Graded Approach for Evaluating Radiation Doses to Biota: Derivation of Screening and Analysis Methodologies.
TREE project, Challenges and Future Updates Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Supported by the European Commission, contract number: Fission , and the Research.
RAPID ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (RAP) Terrestrial Ecosystems Freshwater Ecosystems Marine Ecosystems.
A Tool for Estimating Nutrient Fluxes in Harvest Biomass Products for 30 Canadian Tree Species CONTEXT: With a growing interest in using forest biomass.
PROTECTFP Derivation of Environmental Radiological Protection Benchmarks an overview
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Contributing to the sustainable recovery of the Chernobyl affected areas S. Fesenko NAAL, IAEA.
BIOPROTA Biosphere modelling for waste repositories This presentation Objectives Participation and management What it has done and publications Projects.
CEH Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June What is a benchmark? Why are benchmarks needed? How are benchmarks derived? How are benchmarks used?
PROTECTFP PROTECT recommendations – application in practice.
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
Nick Beresford & David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Modelling noble gases Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Brenda Howard (CEH) Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Testing Biota Dose Assessment Committee Methodology with 1997 Hanford Surveillance Data by E. Antonio (PNNL) and J. P. Lair (TRP) August 1999.
Front page picture Change picture by marking Picture, right click and choose send to front. Click on the icon in the middle of the picture and locate the.
Comparison of MCNP and ERICA results in two different marine areas
Making the most of what we have: application of extrapolation approaches in radioecological transfer modelling Nicholas A. Beresford, Michael D. Wood,
Plenary Meeting of the Network on  Environmental 
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Updates to the ERICA Tool Barcelona – 10 th September Nick Beresford & Justin Brown (NERC-CEH, UK)

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE ERICA Tool updates Since 2007 release have been updates  Typically addressing ‘bugs’

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Since 2007 release have been updates  Typically addressing ‘bugs’ The 2014 release will have more substantial updates  Default radionuclides  CR & k d values revised  Reference organisms  EMCL values ERICA Tool updates

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Radionuclides Added: Ba-140, Ca-45, Cr-51, Cf-252, Ir-192, La-140, Pa-231 & Zn-65 ERICA now consistent with ICRP (Publication 108 & 114) radionuclide lists for their developing RAP approach CRs, k d s, DCC & EMCLs generated for the new default radionuclides

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Added freshwater reptile  There are European protected freshwater reptile species Removed bird egg  Lack of CR values and inconsistent with other organisms Marine macroalgae – geometry now consistent with ICRP 108 (increase in mass from kg to kg) Reference organisms

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Reference organisms Some changes in naming

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Transfer parameters December 2013 version of Wildlife Transfer Database used to revise ERICA Tool  Have used data at broad wildlife group level – no justification to use more refined categories on basis of analyses conducted to date

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Transfer parameters December 2013 version of Wildlife Transfer Database used to revise ERICA Tool  Have used data at broad wildlife group level – no justification to use more refined categories on basis of analyses conducted to date c CR values required for the ERICA Tool

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE CR wo-media – what’s changed

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Wildlife Transfer Database On-line CR database compiled - initially under remit of IAEA EMRAS WG

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Evolution to the IAEA/ICRP ERICA New & review data USDOE R&D128 EPIC FASSET IAEA 422 Wildlife Database Canadian U-mine industry COG monitoring data Russian language literature SKB reports Japanese estuaries Australian data Data from new studies Post ERICA literature review and more ICRP 114 & IAEA TRS CR wo values CR wo-sediment 71 elements

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Publications See JER website for others ‘analysing’ database &

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Evolution since 2011 Wildlife Database ICRP 114 & IAEA TRS CR wo values CR wo-sediment c. 17,000 additional CR values added (>80 elements) Barnett et al in-press ‘UK RAP site’ Sheppard studies Canada NIRS estuarine data USA plant and invertebrate data (Napier) Review of Australian data (Hirth/Johansen) US weapons test sites Pu data (Johansen) STUK monitoring data Post 2011 literature (not comprehensive) QC Repeat entries Outliers investigated Conversion errors ERICA revision Some refs out BUT ID numbers will not be reused

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Transfer parameters – ERICA Tool December 2013 version of Wildlife Transfer Database used to revise ERICA Tool  Have used data at broad wildlife group level – no justification to use more refined categories on basis of analyses conducted to date c CR values required for ERICA Tool  Approximately 50% derived from empirical data  Extrapolation/Guidance approaches to provide missing data still required k d received less attention than CR  Tried to minimise previous use of marine k d s in freshwater ecosystems

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Extrapolation in ERICA 2014 Option 10 – includes approaches to derive pdf (mean and standard deviation)

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Will change in ERICA 2014 version Option 10 – includes approaches to derive missing pdfs (mean and standard deviation) Information on how derived is given in Tool Data for elements not included in Tool used to derive default values for options 4 & 5 where appropriate (e.g. Cu used to provide some Ag CR values)

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Example changes in CR Provisional

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Example changes in CR

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Example changes in CR

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Example changes in CR Provisional

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Example changes in CR

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Example changes in Kd

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Example changes in Kd

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Distributions CR and k d Where an SD available then lognormal distribution assumed Original ERICA Tool assumed exponential distributions when  no SD value for CR or k d  data extrapolation approach used to derive CR value This did not make best use of available information and can likely lead to some extreme EMCL estimates For revised Tool database Tried to derive default SD values when not available and hence assume lognormal & not exponential distributions

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Marine k d – distribution change e.g. Ag

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Marine k d – distribution change e.g. Ag

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Corrections in Tool Terrestrial amphibian and reptile – default occupancy now 100% in soil Lichen & bryophytes – all external DCCs recalculated

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Revised EMCL values The EMCL is the media activity concentration that gives rise to the screening dose rate (10 µGy/h) to the most exposed organism – used in Tier 1 All need to be recalculated using revised parameters (k d & CR (+ associated pdfs), occupancy, DCCs)

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Revised EMCL values - terrestrial

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Revised EMCL values

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Revised EMCL values

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Revised EMCL values Freshwater - water

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Revised EMCL values Freshwater - sediment Provisional

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Benchmarks 40 µGy/h will apply to aquatic mammals & birds

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Tier 2 – uncertainty factors Current UF values of 3 and 5 used  Intended to approximate 95 th and 99 th %ile RQs Paper published suggesting that these should be 7 & 28

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Tier 2 – uncertainty factors Demonstrated that UFs of 7 and 28 approximate to 97.5 and 99.5 th percentiles

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Future changes  Multiple site/time entry functionality  Revised IAEA SRS dispersion models  Include ICRP DCRLs  Dosimetry – half-life rules?  Rn models?  Noble gases?  SRS approach for continuous terrestrial releases?

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE On-line Q&A

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE On-line Q&A

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Refresher course Intending to run a short update course once new Tool version released under the STAR NoE Will try to do this as webinar To register an interest Note also willing to tailor course to needs (e.g. two run in Australia)

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE See also: ICRER abstract on changes to the Wildlife Transfer Database: Beresford et al. P-104 ICRER abstract on updating Environmental Media Concentration Limits and Uncertainty factors in the ERICA Tool: Brown et al. P-127 From: meetings.com/amsysweb/publicacionOnline.jsf?id =146https://intranet.pacifico- meetings.com/amsysweb/publicacionOnline.jsf?id =146

Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Thanks to: B. Alfonso (Facilia Sweden) D. Copplestone (University of Stirling, UK) A.Hosseini (NRPA, Norway) E. Dagher (CNSC, Canada) G. Hirth (ARPANSA, Australia) M. Johansen (ANSTO, Australia) J. Napier (University of Oregon, USA) I. Outola (STUK, Finland) S. Sheppard (ECOMatters, Canada) S. Uchida (NIRS, Japan) C. Wells, C.L. Barnett (NERC-CEH, UK)