Community Governance Consensus Based Governance RECOMMENDATIONS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Advertisements

MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
Proposal for the Process of Faculty Selection to Committees in the School of Undergraduate Studies History As the School of Undergraduate Studies (UGS)
Conference for FOOD PROTECTION Promoting Food Safety Through Collaboration.
Revision of AS 4708 and AS  AFSL announces the 5-yearly revision process of the Australian Standards for Sustainable Forest Management (AS 4708)
School Community Council Overview & Orientation Hawaii Department of Education For Training Use Only Office of Curriculum Instruction and Student Support.
KNOWLEDGE BASED DECISION MAKING FOR AN INFORMED GROUP CONSCIENCE.
Copyright © AEA — Association of Enterprise Architects 2013 AEA Workgroup Procedures Version of 31 October 2013.
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013
1 Luca Moro, ECMP 2014, 11 – 14 September 2014, Athens, Greece CEN Standard on Medical Physics Services: CEN standardization procedure Luca Moro AIFM representative.
02/07/2015 MUNICIPAL FINANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME 1 FINANCE CHAIRPERSONS’ FORUM TYPES OF COMMITTEES.
Overview of NSF Standards Process and Joint Committee Formation Sustainable Water Contact Products Stakeholder Meeting October 30, 2012.
School Council Roles and Responsibilities Michele Giroux and Susan Klimchuk 05 October 2013.
URAC MEETING PERFORMANCE A presentation and discussion requested by individual members of the City Of Davis Utility Rate Advisory Committee August 14,
Performance Auditing at PPS: Guidelines and Success Factors Richard C. Tracy District Performance Auditor April 16, 2007.
Brainstorming Suggestions (1) Tutorials: – Extend the free access period for the recorded tutorials. – Have a special industry application tutorials track.
CSO engagement in policy process Hille Hinsberg State Chancellery Government Communication Officer
Proposal for Elections ISM-NVA – Spring Elections events Term for Present Board ends June 30, 2014 Need to elect new Board by June 20, 2014 to allow.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
Who are we? And what is it that we do? LCC--Business Department Advisory Committee.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Texas Regional Entity Update Sam Jones Interim CEO and President Board of Directors July 18, 2006.
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL TRAINING  A group intended to represent the broad school community and those persons closest to the students who will.
STANDARDS OVERVIEW Wednesday, April 30, 2015 KAREN RECZEK, STANDARDS COORDINATION OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
Click to add title SABS STANDARDS DIVISION Standards Development Natural Science.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
Greater Essex County District School Board Regulation: School Councils Reference NO: R-AD-03 Principal Chris Mills.
1 May 30, 2007 U.S. – China Symposium on Active Industry Participation in Standardization Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC.
SARC Individual and Institutional Participation 2013.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
VOTING 101 -IFTA. Membership Voting IFTA, Inc. Articles of Incorporation – Article 12 governs voting to amend the Bylaws IFTA, Inc. Bylaws – Article 3,
Chemical Contaminants & Residues in Food Community BRINGING SCIENTISTS AND INDUSTRY TOGETHER TO DEVELOP AND VALIDATE BETTER METHODOLOGIES Community Meeting.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning a Statistical Project Section B 1.
“Inspiring our students to reach their full potential.”
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Commission Procedures The Evolution Presented to the California Fish and Game Commission by Commission Staff on February 11, 2015.
The IEEE-SA Standards Process Dr. Bilel Jamoussi IEEE Standards Education Committee.
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits ISA Standards for Automation An Overview.
Effective Committees Governing Board Online Training Module.
Transfer of Standards To Inactive Status John Lemon.
© ASTM International Sino-U.S. Cooperation and the Internationalization of Standardization: Priorities and Opportunities Washington, D.C.
Chemical Contaminants & Residues in Food Community BRINGING SCIENTISTS AND INDUSTRY TOGETHER TO DEVELOP AND VALIDATE BETTER METHODOLOGIES Our Community.
Benefits of Advisory Panels Explore unmet needs Identify opportunities Review development plans Review protocols Understand patient needs Network PharmiKom.
1 1 Why are we doing this? Governance Update We need to evolve o Membership has increased by 16,000 members (almost doubled) in the last.
Community Governance Consensus Based Governance RECOMMENDATIONS.
Who Are We? A Forum of Stakeholders Who Come together to Develop Science-based Solutions.
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
PPIS TRAINING 2017.
Developing charter and covenants
Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC
Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel
Standards and Certification Training
The Standards Development Process
Setting Actuarial Standards
PPIS TRAINING 2017.
Be an Effective Council Member
School Community Councils
Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution
A Global Consensus Process
INTERNATIONAL FUEL TAX AGREEMENT (IFTA)
Standards Development Process
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
Presentation transcript:

Community Governance Consensus Based Governance RECOMMENDATIONS

AOAC and The Community AOAC Official Methods Board Method Committee Subgroups  Method Need Consensus  Method Performance Criteria  Method Selection  Validation Data  Collaborative Study Protocol

Community and Subgroups Voting Members 2 from each Subgroup 6-10 At-Large Community Chairs Subgroup A Subgroup B Subgroup C Subgroup D Assure fair, transparent & defensible decisions by consensus

Stakeholder Categories Consumers Government Industry Labor Non Government Organizations Other (Examples: Consulting firms, academia, professional societies, standards developing organizations)

Community Composition Food Production Industry Trade Organizations Export/Import Distributors Instrument/Test Kit Manufacturers Private Laboratory Scientists Government Regulators/Scientists Academic Scientists AOAC Volunteers and Methods Experts

Selection Criteria Perspectives Balance. Members represent a spectrum of experts from industry, government, academia, subject matter expert, end user, geography, etc. that are pertinent to the purpose of Subgroup. Expertise Match. Members relevant work experience supports the purpose of the Subgroup.

“DRAFT” Community Governance Submit governance suggestions to a volunteer Governance Subgroup Subgroup to prepare written procedures for Subgroup Submit for approval to the whole community via by Feb 2008 Approval requires at least 2/3 of community members

What are the duties of a Member? Follow AOAC policies & procedures Actively participate Be open, transparent and truthful Consider all opinions Respond to communications Accept and complete assignments Abide by consensus-based decisions Stay on track and within mission Work with AOAC-appointed method experts Work with AOAC staff

How are Stakeholder Subgroups formed? Initially, Chairs will appoint Subgroups for known areas of interest. Subgroups will continue based on annual approval of ½+ of Community voting members

How are Community Subgroups formed? Chairs notified of a method need (survey, AOAC…) Method = Chemical Contaminant in Food Multiple stakeholders have similar needs 3+ stakeholders will support a method Fiscal and/or analytical support possible Chairs ask stakeholders to present proposal Stakeholders introduce topic to Community Accepted by 1/2+ of Community voting members Chairs notify AOAC & stakeholders via

How are Subgroup Chairs appointed? Community Chairs appoint 1st Subgroup Chair Must be a Community & AOAC member Must be a Subgroup stakeholder Subgroup Chair recommends Subgroup Members Community Chairs approve Subgroup Members Subgroup members may recommend AOAC member as Subgroup Chair (2/3+ vote) Community Chairs approve new Subgroup Chair Chairs notify Community & AOAC of change

How to be a member of a Subgroup? Be a Community member Be a Stakeholder in Subgroup Topic Area Provide balance of background (international, industry, government, academia…) Submit request to Subgroup Chair Be recommended by Subgroup Chair Be accepted by Community Chairs Actively participate in the work of the Subgroup

Duties & responsibilities of Subgroups? Follow voluntary consensus standards Establish working structure Establish governance Identify and work with stakeholder sponsors Membership stakeholder balance Recommend two Voting Members to Community

Duties & responsibilities of Subgroups? Prioritize most needed methods Define method performance criteria Call for methods Recommend method actions to Community Recommend method “experts” to AOAC Work with AOAC-appointed “experts” Develop & recommend validation protocols Member with vested interest recluse self

How do Subgroups make decisions? Participate in discussions, studies, surveys… Share data, minutes, reports, etc with all subgroup members Try to achieve consensus Propose modifications, additions, compromises… Vote in-person, , written ballot… 100% approval preferred 2/3 minimum to approve Publish results on AOAC website

Who are Voting Members? Chairs of Community Two members from each Subgroup (recommended by Subgroup; approved by Chairs) 6 – 12 At-Large members of Community recommended by Chairs approved by 2/3 vote of Community May not out number subgroup voting members

What decisions are made by Voting Members? Community governance procedures Establishment of Subgroups Approve recommendations of the Subgroups Approve method protocols to AOAC OMB

How does Community make decisions? Receives recommendations as written or verbal reports Provides opportunity for comment from all community members Openly shares all communications Attempts to reach consensus Recommendations based on at least 2/3 approval of voting members