Quality Improvement Strategies Root Cause and Subgroup Analyses.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) Technical Assistance for Florida Medicaid PMHPs August 21 st, 2007 Christy Hormann, MSW PIP Review Team Project.
Advertisements

WELCOME to the PIP Technical Assistance Training for Florida HMOs/PSNs We will begin shortly. Please place your phone on mute, unless you are speaking.
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
The concepts/mechanisms/tools for developing a Joint Programme: Critical issues and UNDG Joint Programme Guidance and formats.
Title: What you are talking about. Background Current Situation Goal Analysis Recommendations Plan Follow - up Why are you talking about it? Where do we.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
1 Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA) Overview July 2013 NAVY CEVM.
Causal / Barrier Analysis Florida EQR Quarterly Meeting
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
Formative and Summative Evaluations
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
1 Software Quality Engineering CS410 Class 5 Seven Basic Quality Tools.
Step 6: Implementing Change. Implementing Change Our Roadmap.
Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.
Florida Quarterly Meeting Root Cause Analysis Florida Quarterly Meeting Root Cause Analysis January 12, 2011 Christy Hormann, MSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIPs.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
Office of Process Simplification May 20, 2009 Planning an Improvement Project.
Slide 1 Florida SIPP Quarterly Meeting Presenter: Jolene Rasmussen, MS Healthcare Analyst, PIP Review Team March 23, 2011.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.
Quality Strategy June 10, 2009 Presented by: Debby McNamara, LCSW, PMP Quality Coordinator, AHCA.
Making the Most of Your Data: Strategies for Evaluating Your Program Greta Colombi, NDTAC; and John McLaughlin, ED.
STEP 1: DEFINE THE PROBLEM Problem Statement: What is the problem? A problem is a discrepancy between a standard and the current situation. The ‘standard’
A partnership of the Healthcare Association of New York State and the Greater New York Hospital Association NYSPFP Preventable Readmissions Pilot Project.
 Performance assessments can:  help identify potential problems in the program  help identify areas where streamlining the process could be useful.
Care Management 101 Governor's Office of Health Care Reform October 28, 2010 Cathy Gorski, RN, BS, CCM.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Begin at the Beginning introduction to evaluation Begin at the Beginning introduction to evaluation.
Step 1 Teacher notices a behavioral or academic deficit: Identify specific areas of concern. Teacher implements interventions/strategies (see SAT Coordinator.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Selecting Evidence Based Practices Oregon’s initial attempts to derive a process Implementation Conversations 11/10.
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance Prepaid Mental Health Plans Thursday, March 29, :30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. Cheryl L. Neel, RN,
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance – PIP 101 Monday, June 18, :30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA Sr. Director of Statistical.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting PMHP Collaborative PIP Follow-up Within Seven Days After Acute Care Discharge for a Mental Health Diagnosis January 11, 2012 Presenter:
Prepared by: Program Inventory / Assessment: Summary of Findings Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium Tools.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team.
Developing a Project Proposal ACTRAV-Turin. Contents Concept of “Logical Framework Approach” SPROUT – model project proposal Individual activity Presentation.
Quality Improvement Tools for Intervention Determination Presenters: Kris Hartmann, MS Healthcare Analyst, Performance Improvement Projects Don Grostic,
Single Plan For Student Achievement January 27, 2016 Los Angeles Unified School District Local District Northwest “Building Academic Excellence Through.
Delaware Pretrial Risk Assessment Validation & Lessons Learned Presented at NCJA Baltimore Regional Meeting June 2016.
Funded by HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau Using Data for Quality Improvement for Part A & B Grantees Presented by: Barbara M. Rosa, RN, MS NQC Consultant.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ
Implementation of Clinical Guidelines Author: dr. Martin Rusnák
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
RRP6 Development Process
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Title: What are you talking about
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance Nursing Home Diversion Programs Thursday, March 29, :30 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Cheryl L. Neel,
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance – PIP 101
Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews
Performance Improvement Projects: PIP Library
Using Data for Program Improvement
Using Data for Program Improvement
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
Chapter 20 Evaluation Evaluation is the final step of the nursing process. In this step you determine if your client’s condition or well- being has improved.
Root Cause Analysis Identifying critical campaign challenges and diagnosing bottlenecks.
Presentation transcript:

Quality Improvement Strategies Root Cause and Subgroup Analyses

Root Cause Analysis A way of looking at unexpected events and undesirable outcomes to determine all of the underlying causes and recommend changes that are likely to improve them. 2

Root Cause Analysis  Also known as causal/barrier analysis.  The causes/barriers identified are the reasons (root causes) why the study indicator results are not meeting performance standards. 3

Root Cause Analysis Root cause analysis should: Primarily focus on systems and/or processes. Identify changes that can be made in systems and/or processes. 4

Root Cause Analysis Data analysis Root cause analysis Subgroup analysis Develop and implement solutions 5

Root Cause Analysis 1.Will help the organization understand the barriers to achieving desired outcomes. 2.Allows interventions to be streamlined and focused to address the barriers. 3.Required for PIP documentation (critical element). 6

Root Cause Analysis Tools  Brainstorming  Survey  Focus Group  Process Map/Flow Chart  Fishbone Diagram  Scatter Diagram  Pareto Chart  Run Chart 7

Subgroup Analysis Why perform a subgroup analysis? 1.Determine if any subgroup within the population has a disproportionately lower rate that negatively affects the overall rate. 2.Develop targeted interventions to the identified subgroups, allowing the implementation of more precise, concentrated interventions. 8

Population Subgroups  Race/Ethnicity  Age  Gender  Geographic Location  Provider 9

Factors to Consider  Are the data elements for the subgroups –Available? –Accurate? –Complete?  Is the size of the subgroup –Adequate for analysis? –Require grouping? –Require additional subgroup analysis?  Are the subgroups reasonable, i.e., do they make sense? 10

Measure-Specific Examples Follow-up after discharge for a mental illness o Age o Race and ethnicity o Geographic location –Zip codes Can be used as a proxy for race/ethnicity 11

Measure-Specific Examples Coordination of Care o Geographic location o Provider –High volume –Specific provider practice 12

13

Initial Subgroup Analysis Before implementing improvement strategies: 1)Identify disparities, i.e., do performance rates vary by subgroup? 2)Determine the impact of the disparity on the overall rate. 3)Identify subgroup-specific barriers, if applicable. –Root cause analysis –How can systems or processes be changed to improve performance? 14

Ongoing Subgroup Analysis After implementing improvement strategies: 1)Evaluate the effectiveness of the performance improvement strategy for all subgroups. –Monitor using interim measurements. –Consider rapid cycle improvement to test for changes in rates and make “real-time” refinements. 2)Reevaluate barriers. –Root cause analysis. 3)Revise or standardize interventions. 15

Activity VII-Implement Interventions and Improvement Strategies  Ensure that the root cause analysis process is completely documented in Activity VII.  Document when it was completed.  Include who was involved (e.g., quality improvement committee, work group, etc.).  Provide the tools that were used (e.g., fishbone diagram, brainstorming, etc.). 16

Activity VIII-Analyze Data and Interpret Study Results  If subgroup analysis is completed, document this in Activity VIII.  Include the outcome of the analysis as well as the follow-up activities planned as a result.  Subgroup analysis is not required; however, it is recommended as a way to target interventions. 17

PIP due dates  PIPs due to HSAG on 12/14/11.  Address all Partially Met and Not Met scores from last year, as well as all Points of Clarification.  Reference the PIP Summary Form Completion Instructions for guidance.  HSAG is available to provide technical assistance. Contact to 18

Questions/Comments 19