Understanding the Local Assistance Plan Schools Identification Data File August 2013 This webinar is available at:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services What happens after Focused Monitoring? -
Advertisements

Preparing for Cycle III School and District Accountability Ratings and AYP Determinations Information Sessions August 26 & 27, 2004 Juliane Dow, Associate.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.
NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Office of Accountability Ira Schwartz, Assistant Commissioner for Long Island Association for Supervision and Curriculum.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act Flexibility Waiver Renewal for March 6, 2015 Presented by Ira Schwartz, Assistant Commissioner.
Harry Hoag School LOCAL ASSISTANCE PLAN (LAP). PURPOSE In accordance with NYS Commissioner’s Regulations, “…a district in Good Standing that has LAP Schools.
Local Assistance Plan Schools: The Diagnostic Self-Review Document and Report Template August 2013 Presented by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education.
Subtitle Title I Federal School Accountability Office of School Improvement and Turnaround Indiana Department of Education March 2012.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
New DC OSSE ESEA Accountability. DC OSSE ESEA Accountability Classification Overview I. DC OSSE Accountability System II. Classification of Schools III.
Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability
NH Department of Education NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan April 15, 2011 Referencing requirements for Schools in Need.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
Information on Focus Schools Released/Retained Fall 2015.
New York State’s Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver Presented by Walter Woodhouse December 7, 2012
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
Wisconsin’s School Report Cards October Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
1 The Diagnostic Self-Review Process for Local Assistance Plan (LAP) Schools September 16 th and 17 th, 2015 Presented by the Long Island RSE-TASC.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
October 25, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Focus Districts: Identification, Requirements and Interventions Monday, February 1, 2016 Presented by Ira Schwartz, Assistant Commissioner Shibu Joseph,
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Local Assistance Plan Schools: Self-Reflection Process and Required Plan May 13, 2016 Presented by Alexandra Pressley Office of Accountability New York.
What just happened and what’s next? Presenters: Steve Dibb, MDE Debra Landvik, MDE AYP 2011.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.
AYP and Report Card.
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
ESEA Waiver: Summary of Key Provisions
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
AYP and Report Card.
Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the Local Assistance Plan Schools Identification Data File August 2013 This webinar is available at:

Local Assistance Plan School Identification Criteria A school may be identified as a Local Assistance Plan (LAP) school if it meets one of the following criteria: The school failed to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for an accountability group for three consecutive years on the same measure ( , and ); or The school’s largest gap between the subgroup and the non group students for any of the accountability groups is 100 or more points for the Performance Index (PI) or 50 percent or more for the Year graduation rate, and the largest gap is greater for an accountability group in than it was for an accountability group in ; or The school is in a district that is not identified as a Focus District, and has a combined English language arts (ELA) and math PI OR a Year graduation rate at or below the cut points established on an accountability measure for subgroups in Focus Districts. Progress Filters: Schools will not be identified as LAP for any subgroup in which the and combined Student Growth Percentile (SGP) or the Year or Year Graduation Rate is above the state average for that subgroup. Please see the LAP School Identification document for more details at:

Where Can I See My Data? On June 28, 2013 NYSED posted various data files to the district/charter school’s IRS portal at: Please open the following files from the portal: AccountabilityStatusfor xls DataDictionaryfor xls LocalAssistancePlanSchoolsfor xls (posted only for districts/charters with identified LAP schools) 3

This file posted to the IRS Portal has the accountability status for the district/charter and all schools within the district for the school year. It also has a column that indicates whether the school is a Reward school. Accountability Status for

Data Dictionary File for This file provides descriptions of the data elements used in the LAP identification file. 5

Local Assistance Plan Schools for This file has the data elements used to identify preliminary LAP schools. Identified schools will be indicated with “LAP” in column F. The school is not identified if column F is blank. The subgroup(s) that led to LAP identification is indicated with “Yes” in columns G to X. 6

Local Assistance Plan Schools for Columns AC to CD has the subgroups indicated with “Yes” that failed to make AYP for 09-10, and school years.

Columns CF to EG has the gap between the subgroup and students not in the subgroup. The data in columns CF to DX are in Performance Index points and DY to EG are in Graduation Rate percentage points. Local Assistance Plan Schools for

Column EH has the largest gap for , column EI has the largest gap for , column EJ indicates whether the gap increased from , and column EK indicates whether the school is identified for the gap criteria. group. Local Assistance Plan Schools for

Columns EM to EU has the combined ELA and math Performance Index for , columns EV to FD have the Year subgroup graduation rates, columns FE to FV indicate whether the group(s) PI or graduation rate is at or below the cut point. Local Assistance Plan Schools for

Columns FX to HO indicates whether the subgroup(s) met the progress filter, therefore making the school eligible for removal from identification. Local Assistance Plan Schools for

Submitting an Appeal for the LAP Status The deadline to submit an LAP determination appeal was July 12, To appeal the LAP determination for the 2013–14 school year, districts needed to submit a complete, signed, and dated LAP School Appeal Form (found at with all the required supporting evidence. 12

Next Steps for Districts with LAP schools In accordance with Commissioner’s Regulations, a district in Good Standing that has LAP schools will be required to work with the identified school(s) to complete the Diagnostic Self-Review Document and Report Template for each identified LAP school. A Focus District with LAP schools will also need to work with identified school(s) to complete the applicable sections of the Diagnostic Self- Review Document and Report Template, and incorporate the supports and interventions for the identified schools into its District Comprehensive Improvement Plan (DCIP).  Within the DCIP template, the district will be required to clearly identify the supports and interventions that are to be implemented in the identified LAP schools. These supports and interventions do not count towards satisfying the improvement set-aside or parent engagement set-aside requirements. SED will release a pre-recorded webinar in early August to assist districts with conducting the Diagnostic Self-Review and completing the Report Template. The Diagnostic Self-Review Document and Report Template can be found online at:

For Further Information about LAP Schools, Please To view the technical documentation on the identification of Focus Districts, Focus Schools, Priority Schools, LAP Schools, and Reward Schools, please visit: To view past webinars regarding the ESEA waiver, please visit: