Star Rating and Assessment Updates. Overview Review of AYP and Star Rating for SY1415 and SY1516 Overview of Recommended Achievement Levels for ISAT by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY Luci Willits Chief of Staff.
Advertisements

Iowa Assessment Update School Administrators of Iowa November 2013 Catherine Welch Iowa Testing Programs.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
CCSS-M IN MICHIGAN. Michigan K-12 Standards CCSS-M with Michigan “Welcome”
Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability
Division of Assessment and Accountability Reporting ISAT Summative Scores to Parents.
Smarter Balanced – An Overview Elementary Early Release January 7, 2015.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.
The Smarter Balanced Assessment System Luci Willits Chief of Staff TJ Bliss Director of Assessment & Accountability.
Getting Smarter About CAASPP. Overview of CAASPP  English Language Arts: Smarter Balanced Assessment  Math: Smarter Balanced Assessment  Science: California.
CCSS-M IN MICHIGAN. Michigan K-12 Standards CCSS-M with Michigan “Welcome”
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Jacqueline E. King, Ph.D. Director, Higher Education Collaboration California Community Colleges Early Assessment Program.
Creating a Movement Creating a Movement. Secondary Mathematics News and Next Steps Staff Development Day March 18, 2011.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Technology and The Smarter Balanced Assessment System One State’s Perspective TJ Bliss, Ph.D.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
High Quality Assessments – Supporting state goals and policies while developing a balanced assessment system Angela Hemingway Director, Assessment and.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
Top-performing urban school district in Florida State Assessment & Accountability.
Highlights of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver Renewal Application.
Idaho State Department of Education Accessing Your ISAT by Smarter Balanced Data Using the Online Reporting System (ORS) Angela Hemingway Director, Assessment.
Changes in Community Informational Meeting March 10, 2014.
Transition to Smarter Assessment January Why did Delaware need new academic standards?
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Santa Clara COE Assessment Accountability Network September.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Assessment and Accountability Division Angela Hemingway Director, Assessment and Accountability
Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
Transitioning to a Balanced Assessment System. Overview Professional Development in Assessment Smarter Balanced Logistics.
ISAT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. Why is OSBE making so many changes to the ISAT? The contract between NWEA & OSBE was due to expire. Even if the contractor.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
Star Rating Part 2 Growth, Graduation Rates and College and Career Readiness.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
1 1 Next Generation School Assessment and Accountability Thursday, November 17, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Understanding the 2015 Smarter Balanced Assessment Results Assessment Services.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee January 11, 2016.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
Paulding County School District Elementary Parent Presentation New Georgia Elementary Parent Informational Meeting All parents and guardians.
The State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness January 2012.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
End of Course Exams  In February, 2007 the Missouri State Board of Education approved End of Course (EOC) exams.  WHY?
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services November 21, 2014.
Corona-Norco Unified School District Accountability Update RAN Meeting May 15, 2015.
State of Alaska House Finance Subcommittee Department of Education and Early Development July 25, 2013.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
What about the Assessment System?
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Where Are We Now? ESSA signed into law December 10, 2015
Language Arts Assessment Update
Utilizing the ELA Results
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Summative: Formative resources: Interim Assessments:
Shasta County Curriculum Leads November 14, 2014 Mary Tribbey Senior Assessment Fellow Interim Assessments Welcome and thank you for your interest.
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Office of Strategy, Innovation and Performance
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Presentation transcript:

Star Rating and Assessment Updates

Overview Review of AYP and Star Rating for SY1415 and SY1516 Overview of Recommended Achievement Levels for ISAT by Smarter Balanced Idaho Involvement in Assessment Development

Accountability Comparisons AYP ( ) Pass/fail rates of statewide assessments and graduation rates Proposed proficiency rate goal was 100% for 2014 or the school would be “failing” Easy to calculate and to explain Star Rating (2012 & 2013) Multiple measures including growth Differentiation between elementary and secondary schools Goal: to measure what schools do well in the proper proportions More complicated, but more accurate reflection of our schools than AYP

Star Rating and Growth Recommendations No Star Rating Calculation for SY1314 No Star Rating Calculation for SY1415 –Allows for resetting the star rating to align to the new standards and new assessments No Star Rating Carryover from SY1213 –This rating reflects old standards and the old tests Calculate Biennial Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Create Student Growth Report

SY1314 Report Card Will display the following: –Cohort Graduation Rates –Participation Rates –Science proficiency in 5,7,10 by subgroups Will have Excel files displaying the following: –Advanced Opportunities (% the completed an advanced opp and % completing with C or better) –SAT (% meeting CCR benchmark) Will not display: –AMAOs or AAGs

Participation Rules for Report Card Display For the purposes of participation, the N count will be reported for groups equal to or greater than 10 on the school & district report cards. –Those groups/subgroups with less than 10 will be masked in these reports. Keep in mind, while a subgroup in a particular grade level may be masked, the collective population in that subgroup in a school will be reported for the School - All Grades if the total count is equal to or greater than 10. The same rules apply to the district report. The data in the appeals application is not published and includes all students in all groups/subgroups regardless of the N count.

Purpose of NCLB - Assessments No Child Left Behind (NCLB) seeks to ensure that ALL students, including students in subgroups, are moving toward Proficiency (NCLB §1111(b)(2)). –These targets vary by content area –These new target will be determined after receiving data in summer 2015 Spring Testing Window: March 30 – May 22

Purpose of NCLB - Participation To evaluate our progress towards proficiency, NCLB and Idaho’s ESEA Waiver requires Idaho to test 95% of all students and 95% of students in each sub-group (NCLB §1111(b)(2)(I)(ii)). Consequences of not meeting 95% –No Star penalty SY1415 (no state level consequence) –Possible calculation of a three year participation average for each subject –Districts not meeting 95% may have federal funding withheld, no guidance has yet been provided to SDE

SY1415 NCLB Testing Grades 3-8 and 10 in Math and ELA −This would include a combined score from the computer adaptive test (CAT) and the performance task (PT) −Optional grade 9 and 11 testing Grades 3-8 and 11 for ISAT-Alt Grades 5 and 7 for ISAT Science End of Course Assessments (EOC) in Biology and/or Chemistry for HS Science (Grades 10-12) Grades 5, 7 and 10 for ISAT-Alt Science

ISAT Science for Grades 5 and 7 Required under NCLB (NCLB §1111(b)(3)) at least once in each grade band The next science standards review will occur in Grades 5 and 7 will continue to take the Science ISAT based on current Idaho science standards. ISAT-Alt Science will continue to be available, and required where appropriate, in grades 5, 7 and 10

Science EOCs for Biology and/or Chemistry - Participation Required under NCLB (NCLB §1111(b)(3)) This year, the Grade 10 Science ISAT has been replaced with EOCs in Biology and/or Chemistry. EOC should be taken in April/May when a student in grades is enrolled in Biology and/or Chemistry. Participation in one test is required for graduation (IDAPA f).

Science EOCs for Biology and/or Chemistry – Pending Rules NOT YET FINALIZED! –Final approval or rejection will occur at the February State Board meeting For the class of 2017 and 2018, participation in one test is required for graduation (IDAPA j). For the class of 2019, proficiency in one test is required (IDAPA k).

Optional Grade 9 ISAT SY1415 NCLB requires testing one time in HS (NCLB §1111(b)(3)) 2014/15 required HS grade for ISAT is Grade 10 (ESEA Waiver) While Grade 9 is optional, it is highly encouraged −This will be the accountability group the following year −Gives students and test proctors additional practice on the summative assessment and testing format −Will allow for annual growth calculations

Grade 9 and 10 ISAT SY1415 ELA ELA Standards in HS are similar in grades 9 – 11 ELA Testing Blueprints would be the same Grades 9 and 10 were not originally in the scope of work of Smarter Balanced The item pool for HS ELA was not delineated for grades 9-11 In the past, grade 9 took the grade 10 ISAT

Optional Grade 9 ISAT SY1415 ELA Students in 9-11 would take the same HS ELA assessment this spring 2015 Grades 9 and 10 would have their own unique cut scores on the same vertical scale as 3-8&11 The adaptable nature of the assessment would adjust to the students’ ELA level

Grade 9/10 ISAT SY1415 MATH There WILL be on grade level testing for math in both grades 9 and 10 The blueprint will follow the integrated model Student cut scores will be on the same vertical scale as grades 3-8 and 11 Tests will be adaptable +/- two grade levels

Optional Grade 11 ISAT SY1415 Optional as these students have met their graduation requirements on the prior ISAT College and Career Readiness Measure College Remediation (or not) Peer comparisons across states, not just within Idaho Opportunity for schools to evaluate implementation of standards and preparation of students

Class of 2017 Class of 2018 Class of 2019 Complete ISAT in 11 th grade, no passing requirement Complete ISAT in 11 th grade AND pass at Grade 11 Proficiency level *Any student who passes the ISAT any year in high school at the 11 th grade college & career ready level (three) will be exempt from future tests. College & Career Ready Graduation Requirements (Under Review)

Presented in August 2014 New Math/ELA Proposal (Under Review) New Science Proposal (Under Review) Class 2017 Participate Class 2018 Pass at 9 th grade level Participate Class 2019 Pass at 10 th grade level Pass at 11 th grade level 3 (Proficient) Proficient in Biology or Chemistry Class 2020 Pass at 11 th grade level 3 (Proficient)

Computer Adaptive Tests The first 65% of the test is ON grade level and meets the blueprint −Student’s will receive a score for this on grade level portion which will be used in accountability −Details of the 9/10 ELA assessment are still being determined The additional portion of the test will use the expanded item pool −Allow for additional precision of score −Allow for adaptability +/- two grade levels

ISAT by Smarter Balanced Achievement Levels

Online Panel for Achievement Levels Approximately 100 Idahoans participated in the online panel in mid-October 2014 Nearly 10,000 from throughout the Smarter Balanced states –Included teachers, administrators, parents, business and community leaders GOAL: To set a Level 3 (Proficiency) cut score for the content area and grade level

In-Person Panel for Achievement Levels 20 Idahoan and 500 from throughout the Smarter states met in Dallas in mid-October 2014 –Included teachers, administrators, parents, business and community leaders GOAL: To determine achievement levels (aka cut scores) for Math/ELA across the grade levels State Chiefs and Leads voted to approve the Achievement Levels in November 14, 2014 State Board voted to approve these recommendations December 18, 2014

Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 ELAFromToFromToFromToFromTo ELA Recommended Cut Scores

English Language Arts/Literacy: Threshold Scale Scores

What Does This Mean For ELA? Estimates based on Spring 2014 Smarter Balanced field test in 21 states and USVI.

Comparison of Grade 4 and 8 ELA ISAT by Smarter to NAEP 2013

Comparison of Grade 11 ELA ISAT by Smarter to Grade 12 NAEP 2013

Math Recommended Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 MathFromToFromToFromToFromTo

Mathematics: Threshold Scale Scores

What Does This Mean For Math? Estimates based on Spring 2014 Smarter Balanced field test in 21 states and USVI.

Comparison of Grade 4 and 8 Math ISAT by Smarter to NAEP 2013

Comparison of Grade 11 ISAT by Smarter to Grade 12 NAEP 2013

Smarter Balanced Scale Scores Uses a four digit number –Range from 2000-to-3000 Avoids confusion with other, commonly-used scales such as: percentile ranks, percent correct, ACT, SAT, Lexiles, Legacy ISAT scores, etc. Provides adequate “space” on the scale to see growth in whole-number units

ISAT by Smarter Balanced Assessment Costs

Costs of ISAT by Smarter Balanced Legacy ISAT cost was ~$29 per student –MC only, three summative test (LU, Reading and Math) ISAT by Smarter will cost $26.69 per student –Includes Digital Library, Interim Assessments and Summative Assessments –Includes more complex item types as well as all hand scoring

Teacher resources for formative assessment practices To improve instruction A Balanced Assessment System All students leave high school college and career ready Idaho Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching and learning Interim assessments Flexible & open Can be used for action feedback Summative assessments Benchmarked to college and career readiness Formative Assessment to inform instruction

Assessing Deeper Knowledge Identify Define Memorize Organize Classify Compare Critique Revise Investigate Create Evaluate Design ISAT 90% 10% Identify Define Memorize Organize Classify Compare Critique Revise Investigate Create Evaluate Design Smarter Balanced 30% 70%

Assessing Deeper Knowledge Identify Define Memorize Organize Classify Compare Critique Revise Investigate Create Evaluate Design Selected Response Matching Short Answer Performance Tasks (Essay)

Item Types Selected Response Constructed Response Extended Response Performance Task Technology Enhanced SR CR ER PT TE

Idaho Portal idaho.portal.airast.org Summative (ISAT) –Test Window March 30-May 22 Optional Interim assessments –Test Window Jan 6- April 17 –ICA – Interim Comprehensive Assessment –IAB- Interim Assessment Blocks TIDE: Test Information Distribution Engine ORS: Online Reporting System

Idaho Portal

Smarter Balanced Scheduling Considerations

Estimated Testing Time* *Times are estimates of test length for most students. Smarter Balanced assessments are designed as untimed tests.

Possible Ways to Shorten The Test Step 1: Working to create the most efficient computer adaptive algorithms –Students are exposed to the fewest number of items possible to obtain a valid score –Will be running 2M computer simulations in January to test this algorithm and modify if necessary

Possible Ways to Shorten The Test Step 2: Revisit the ELA CAT –Once actual testing length data is available from the Operational 2015 assessment The Field Test was fixed form, not CAT –Fewer passages with more questions –Shorter passages

Bias and Sensitivity Committee GOAL: To review ALL summative assessment questions (Idaho Code § ) Members: –168 people applied, however, only 84 attended –Represents 45 different cities in 6 regions of Idaho –Includes educators, administrators, school board members and parents Entire group met Dec 15-18, 2014 Over 33,000 items were reviewed –All items were reviewed by at least three panelists –Panelists could flag items which were deemed to contain issues related to bias and/or sensitivity

Bias and Sensitivity Committee Criteria used: If items was flagged by more than one committee of the 84 members 30 panelist reviewed the 91 items which were double flagged –Representing 6 Regions and 25 different cities Criteria was set that if 1/3 of the 30 panelists flagged an item, the item would be discussed in January –19 items were flagged by 1/3 of the 30 Panelists Final recommendations to the Board –1 audio clip and one associated item

Upcoming Trainings In-Person Assessment Trainings –Boise, Tuesday Feb 17 th at the Red Lion –CDA, Wednesday Feb 18 th at Midtown Center –Idaho Falls, Friday Feb 20 th at Hilton Garden Inn Spring Testing Window: March 30 – May 22

Contact Information Angela Hemingway Director of Assessment and Accountability