OPSM 301 Operations Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Context Diagram Yong Choi BPA CSUB.
Advertisements

Performance Evaluation Using the Balanced Scorecard
Flow, Inventory, Throughput, and Little’s Law
Process Flow Analysis The Little’s Law The main source for preparing these slides is Managing Business Process Flow Anupindi, Chopra, Deshmoukh, Van.
OPSM 301 Operations Management
Process Design and Analysis
Chapter 2 Analyzing the Business Case.
Preparing the System Proposal Chapter 13 Topics: –Systems proposal –Determining hardware needs –Determining software needs –Decision to rent, lease, or.
11–1. 11–2 Chapter Eleven Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Network Design and Implementation
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Capacity Planning and Queuing Models.
Chapter 4 Process design Shenval. Alamy.
LOGO Process Flow Measures MM – OM Session 2a Henry Yuliando.
1 3. Process Flow Measures MBPF Inc.: Consolidated Income Statement.
Operations Management: Process Analysis and Applications Module
IV. Little’s Law and Labor Costs
1 Process Mapping BA 339 Mellie Pullman. 2 Objectives Service Process Differences Little’s Law Process Analysis & Mapping.
Process Analysis and Applications Module
from Prof. Goldsman’s lecture notes
Copyright © 1998 Wanda Kunkle Computer Organization 1 Chapter 2.1 Introduction.
Analyzing the Business Case
Little´s law Skorkovský ,KPH,ESF.MU
1 3. Process Flow Measures Process Flow Analysis-Basics 1 Ardavan Asef-Vaziri June/2011 Five Elements of the Process View Inputs Outputs Goods Services.
OPSM 501: Operations Management Week 3: Process measurement Little’s Law The House Building Game Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program.
Chapter 3 An Introduction to Operations Management
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 7: Process analysis Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Operations Scheduling. Scheduling in a Process-Focused Environment.
1 3. Process Flow Measures Assignment, Problem 1 Solution 1. Bank XYZ receives 20 loan requests per hour on average. Each loan request goes through an.
1 3. Process Flow Measures Assignment, Problem 1 Solution 1. Bank XYZ receives 20 loan requests per hour on average. Each loan request goes through an.
1 TRADITIONAL PRODUCT COSTING METHODS Accounting Principles II AC Fall Semester, 1999.
Operations Management Contemporary Concepts and Cases Chapter Thirteen Scheduling Operations Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1.
OPSM 301 Operations Management
OPSM 301: Operations Management
The Essence of Process Flow Process Measures
The Essence of Process Flow Process Measures
Matching Supply with Demand: An Introduction to Operations Management Gérard Cachon ChristianTerwiesch All slides in this file are copyrighted by Gerard.
OPSM 501: Operations Management Week 4: Process analysis Kristen’s Cookie Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin
Queueing Analysis of Production Systems (Factory Physics)
OPSM 301 Operations Management Class 2: Business process flows: Measurement Koç University Zeynep Aksin
1 Slides used in class may be different from slides in student pack Chapter 5 Process Analysis  Process Analysis  Process Flowcharting  Categories of.
OPSM 405 Service Operations Management
CDA COLLEGE BUS235: PRINCIPLES OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Lecture 10 Lecture 10 Lecturer: Kleanthis Zisimos.
Process Analysis CHAPTER 5. Learning Objectives 1. Recognize three basic types of processes: a serial flow process, parallel processes (such as what happens.
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 19: Flow variability Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Process Characteristics
IE450 Models Relating Cycle-time, Throughput, WIP and Batch Sizes
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 8-1 Chapter Eight Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application.
Scheduling. Scheduling: The allocation of resources over time to accomplish specific tasks. Demand scheduling: A type of scheduling whereby customers.
COSTING AND THE VALUE CHAIN CHAPTER 18 PAGE# 794 Faisal
CHAPTER 13 COST ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING SYSTEMS McGraw-Hill/Irwin©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002.
Solved Problem An inspection station for assembling printers receives 40 printers/hour and has two inspectors, each of whom can inspect 30 printers per.
Foundations of Information Systems in Business. System ® System  A system is an interrelated set of business procedures used within one business unit.
Operations Fall 2015 Bruce Duggan Providence University College.
Direct Cost Variance and Management Control Lecture 17 1 Readings Chapter 10,Cost Accounting, Managerial Emphasis, 14 th edition by Horengren Chapter 5,
1 3. Process Flow Measures 1. Coffee Shop You enter a Starbucks coffee shop. You have experienced that in this time of day the entrance door opens two.
Key Learnings: Little’s Law
Your own footer Your Logo.
Financial Statement Analysis
Example: A Hospital Emergency Room
Process-Flow Analysis
Process Design and Analysis
CHAPTER 8 Operations Scheduling
Developing Information Systems
Every minutes one customer comes in and one customer leaves.
Chapter 5 Process Analysis.
Process Costing Chapter 04 Chapter 4: Process Costing
Process Analysis “If you cannot describe what you are doing as a process, you do not know what you are doing.” W.E. Deming.
SDLC (Software Development Life Cycle)
Chapter 5 Process Analysis.
Presentation transcript:

OPSM 301 Operations Management Koç University OPSM 301 Operations Management Class 4: Business process flows: Measurement Zeynep Aksin zaksin@ku.edu.tr

Announcements New module: business process flows Chapter 3 Study questions and examples

Performance Measurement External performance strongly depends on output, input, and resource markets, and transformation effectiveness of the process Internal performance measures: processing cost, flow time, variety, service availability...

The Dynamics of a Process We examine processes from the perspective of flow To study process flows, we first answer three important questions: On average, how many flow units pass through the process per unit time? On average, how much time does a typical flow unit spend within process boundaries? On average, how many flow units are within process boundaries at any point in time?

THROUGHPUT or FLOW RATE (R) Operational Measures On average, how many flow units pass through the process per unit time? THROUGHPUT or FLOW RATE (R)

Terminology Throughput or Flow Rate (R) The average output of a production process per unit time. At the firm level, it is defined as the production per unit time that is sold. 1 2 3 4

FLOW TIME (T) Operational Measures On average, how much time does a typical flow unit spend within process boundaries? FLOW TIME (T)

Terminology Flow Time (T) The flow time (also called variously throughput time, cycle time) of a given routing is the average time from release of a job at the beginning of the routing until it reaches an inventory point at the end of the routing. Flow time 1 2 3 4

INVENTORY (I) Operational Measures On average, how many flow units are within process boundaries at any point in time? INVENTORY (I)

WIP (9 for this realization) Terminology Work in Process inventory (I) The average inventory between the start and end point of a product is called work in process Inventory 1 2 3 4 WIP (9 for this realization)

Slope (R), verical distance (I), horizontal distance(T)

Question Koç University as a process: How many students are enrolled on average? (within the process) Need more information? Program length is 4 year. What if program length were 6 years?  Inventory= Throughput x Flow Time X students enrolled 600 students graduate on average 600 new students admitted on average

LITTLE’S LAW Relating throughput rate, flow time, and inventory ... Inventory I [units] Throughput Rate [units/hr] ... Flow Time T [hrs]

Understanding Little’s Law: Consider a first come first served Queue ... Inventory I [units] Throughput Rate [units/hr] Flow Time T [hrs] Time=0 ... Inventory I [units] Throughput Rate [units/hr] Flow Time T [hrs] Time=t ... Inventory I [units] Throughput Rate [units/hr] Flow Time T [hrs] Time=FT

An Intuitive Argument for Little's Law Consider a process with the FCFS queue discipline An order departs the process: At this moment there are I (Inventory) orders within the process The orders that are in the process now are the ones that came after our departing order had arrived, in other words, they arrived during the waiting period of the departing order Since order arrival rate is equal to the throughput rate, we have the following relationship: Inventory = Throughput Rate x Flow Time

Little’s Law basics Little’s Law is for a system in steady state: input rate = output rate Applies to most systems, even those with variability Uses AVERAGE values

Example: flow unit is material Fast food restaurant processes an average of 5000kgs, of hamburgers per week. Typical inventory of raw meat in cold storage is 2500kg. Throughput R=5000kg/week Average Inventory I=2500 kg. Average flow time T=I/R=2500/5000=0.5 weeks

Example: flow unit is customers A café in Beyoglu serves on average 60 customers per night. A typical night is about 10 hours. At any point there are on average 18 customers in the café. Throughput R=60 customers/night; 6 customers/hour Average Inventory I=18 customers Average flow time T= I/R= 3 hours

Example: flow unit is cash A steel company processes $400 million of iron ore per year. The cost of processing is $200 million per year. The average inventory is $100 million. How long does a typical dollar spend in the process? R=$600 million/year I=$100 million T=I/R=1/6 year or 2 months

Example: Auto-Moto Financial Services Auto-moto provides loans to qualified customers. The company receives about 1000 loan applications per 30-day working month and makes accept/reject decisions based on an extensive review of each application

Auto-Moto Financial Services Currently, Auto-Moto processes each application individually. On average, 20% of all applications received approval. An internal audit showed that, on average, Auto-Moto had about 500 applications in process at various stages of the approval procedure, but on which no decisions had yet been made. In response to customer complaints about the time taken to process each application, Auto-Moto called in OPSM Consulting Inc.

Current System 20% accept 200/month 1000/month review 500 80% reject

Example: cont’d OPSM Consulting found out that although most applications could be processed rather quickly, some took a disproportionate amount of time because of insufficient and/or unclear documentation. They suggested the following Process II: Because, the percentage of approved applications is fairly low, and Initial Review Team should be set up to pre-process all applications according to strict but fairly mechanical guidelines.

Auto-Moto Financial Services Each application would fall into one of three categories: type A (looks excellent), type B (needs more detailed evaluation), and type C (reject summarily). Type A and B applications would be forwarded to different specialist subgroups Each subgroup would then evaluate the applications in its domain and make accept/reject decisions

Example: (cont’d) Process II was implemented on an experimental basis. The company found out that, on average, 25% of all applications were of type A, 25% were of B, and 50% were of C. Typically, about 70% of type A and 10% of B were approved on review.

Example (cont’d) Internal audit checks showed that, on average, 200 applications were with the Initial Review Team undergoing preprocessing. Only 25 were with the Subgroup A Team undergoing the next stage of processing and approximately 150 were with the Subgroup B Team Auto-moto would like to determine if the implemented changes have improved service performance.

Proposed System Subgroup A review 70% 200 /month accept 25% 25 10% 30% accept 25% 25 10% Subgroup B review 25% 1000 /month initial review 90% 800 /month 50% 150 reject 200 C

Proposed System Subgroup A review 70% 200 /month accept 25% I=25 10% 30% 10% Subgroup B review 25% R=1000 /month initial review 90% 800 /month 50% I=150 reject I=200 C

New process Flow units: applications Initial review: R=1000, I=200 T=0.2 months or 6 days Team A: R=250, I=25, T=3 days Team B: R=250, I=150, T=18days Type A: 9 days Type B: 24 days Type C: 6 days Average: R=1000, I=375, T=11.25 days

New process: different flow unit definition Flow units: approved/rejected applications Approved: 70% of Type A and 10% of Type B= 0.7(250)+0.1(250)=175+25=200 applications/month Tapproved=175/(175+25)*(TIR+TA)+ 25/(175+25)*(TIR+TB) = (175/200)*9 +(25/200)*24=10.875 days Rejected: 30% of Type A and 90% of Type B and all C= 75+225+500=800 applications/month Treject=11.343 days

Key learnings: Little’s Law Relates three leading performance measures based on process flows: throughput, inventory, flow time Applies to processes in steady state Important to First determine process boundaries for analysis Then identify appropriate flow unit for your analysis