A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

1 R-2 Report: Read and write at the end of third grade Review of Progress and Approval of Targets A presentation to the Board by Vince.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
AVID Excel Goal To interrupt students’ path to long-term ELL status, accelerate their language acquisition, and put them on the path to AVID and college.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November, 2012 Maria G. Cervantes, Principal.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Math Reality vs. Math Myth: A Partnership for Student Success Dianne Siegfreid, Concurrent Enrollment, Weber State University, Utah Dixilee Blackinton,
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS STAR RESULTS Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September.
Evaluating a Literacy Curriculum for Adolescents: Results from Three Sites of the First Year of Striving Readers Eastern Evaluation Research Society Conference.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Qatar Comprehensive Educational Assessment (QCEA) 2007: Summary of Results.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Annual Report School Year Principal: Russ Facione Annual Report Meeting: Tuesday, September 24 th PM.
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships: FY 2005 Summary.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Cambrian School District September 17, 2015
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting.
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.
Provincial Assessment Results Anglophone West School District November 26, 2015.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
091 Equity Initiative Status Indicators_March Lodi Unified School District Equity Initiative Status Indicators Prepared by the Assessment, Research,
A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.
California Standards Tests (CSTs) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Grade 10 Census Report Data to inform the evaluation of the district’s.
Provincial Assessment Results
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review Plan Year 1/2
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Dalton Middle School Data Review
Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Academic Achievement Alameda County School Districts
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Presentation transcript:

A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve Science Education (WISE) Gibson & Associates External Evaluators

WISE Program  )WISE is a collaborative partnership formed between San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) and San Francisco State University (SFSU) and includes City College of San Francisco (CCSF), the University of California Museum of Paleontology, and the California Academy of Sciences.  The WISE program began in the Summer of 2004 with 15 schools and 44 teachers. In this fourth year of funding, there are 14 sites and 33 teachers involved in the program. The mission of Working together to Improve Science Education (WISE) is to improve student achievement in science through content and pedagogy professional development for grade four and five teachers.

Intensive Content Knowledge WISE teachers received an average of 50 hours of professional development content from partner faculty.  Focused on grade level Earth, Life, and Physical science standards.  Included hard-to-teach/grasp subjects.  Combined inquiry-based hands-on activities with lectures.  Conducted during summer sessions and release days throughout the year.

Coaching Support WISE teachers receive an average of 20 hours of coaching support annually from 2 district coaches: Each site had at least two teachers involved in the program. Coaching support included team-teaching, materials preparation, curriculum pacing, and assessment preparation, and support. Coaches visited each classroom at least once a month. Coaches conducted monthly meetings at each site with WISE teachers.

2007 Science CST Results 5 th grade science proficiency rates for students in classrooms with WISE teachers with 50 or more hours of WISE Professional Development, and those with a minimum of 20 professional development hours, surpassed 5 th graders at the same school site not participating in the program, students throughout the district, and the state.

Results The graph below represents the percent of students achieving proficiency on the 5th grade California Standards Test in Science for WISE teachers and a control group matched by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and 2004 science and literacy achievement. The N for each year is approximately 260 WISE students and 400 Control group students. While there was growth for each group of students, the treatment students continued to outperform the control group and the state every year.

Results The graph below shows the distribution of average raw scaled scores for the WISE treatment group, the control group, and the state. As evidenced by this data, students of 5 th grade WISE teachers with at least 50 hours of WISE professional development surpassed achievement of students in the control group and the state’s classrooms.

2007 Science Results by Gender The graph below indicates the average raw scaled scores of the WISE treatment group, as compared to those of the control group of students and the state. Both boys and girls in the treatment group outperformed the control group and the state.

Results by Gender The graph below indicates three years of average raw scaled scores in Science for MALES in the WISE treatment group, as compared to males in the control group of students and in the state.

Results by Gender The graph below indicates three years of average raw scaled scores in Science for FEMALES in the WISE treatment group, as compared to those of the control group and in the state.

Achievement Gap Analysis In 2007, targeted subgroup populations (African American and Hispanic-Latino) in treated classrooms outperformed the control group and the state. However, due to the subgroup population fluctuations, it is impossible to make year to year comparisons for treatment subgroup and control group populations. Data for subgroup populations is presented for the year 2007 only.

2007 Science Results by Ethnicity The chart below indicates the average scaled science scores by significant ethnic subgroup populations of the treatment group as compared to the control group and the state.

Reducing the Achievement Gap The graph below compares the percent of students with below basic science scores from control classrooms and WISE treatment classrooms. WISE treatment classrooms had a far lower percentage of students with low scores.

Reducing the Achievement Gap The graph below indicates raw-scaled scores on the 5 th grade Science CST for targeted subgroup populations.

Literacy and Science Data A key component of the WISE professional development program has been the use of science literacy notebooks. As the charts below indicate, there is a pattern of proficiency decline for 5 th grade English Language Arts for the control group, but no significant pattern of change in achievement for WISE teachers in the area of English Language Arts.

Literacy and Science Data The percentage of 5 th grade students with proficient scores in English Language Arts decreased for the control group, but there was no significant overall change for the WISE treatment group or the state.

2007 ELA Results by Gender The graph below indicates the average raw scaled English Language Arts scores by gender for the WISE treatment group, as compared to those of the control group and the state.

ELA Results by Gender The graph below indicates three years of average raw scaled scores in English Language Arts for MALES in the WISE treatment group, as compared to males in the control group and in the state.

ELA Results by Gender The graph below indicates three years of average raw scaled scores in English Language Arts for FEMALES in the WISE treatment group, as compared to females in the control group and in the state.

2007 ELA Results by Ethnicity The graph below indicates the average raw scaled scores in English Language Arts of the WISE treatment group, as compared to control group and the state. The two targeted subgroups, African American and Hispanic-Latino students, are exceeding the state and the control group.

Reducing the Achievement Gap African American and Hispanic-Latino students in WISE classrooms outperformed the control group and the state in English Language Arts as indicated by average raw scaled scores for 5 th graders on the CST.

Contact Information For more information contact Jeanne D’Arcy, Supervisor, Mathematics & Science San Francisco Unified School District or Nada Djordjevich, Senior Associate, Gibson & Associates