07/26/2010 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study - Task Group/Subgroup Overview September 20 - 21 CSC Meeting Engines-Vehicles Subgroup.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NPC Future Transportation Fuels Study Overview of Light Duty Vehicle Analytical Models and Tools April 25, 2012 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study.
Advertisements

1 © 2008 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. The Power to Reduce CO 2 Emissions The Full Portfolio Energy Technology Assessment.
Environmental aspects of using alternative fuels and biofuels Vladimír Vlk Adviser for sustainable energy and transport 13 th – 14 th October 2011 Prague,
GM Diesel Technology Charles E. Freese V Executive Director, Diesel Engineering General Motors Corporation.
Key Factors in the Introduction of Hydrogen as the Sustainable Fuel of the Future John P Blakeley, Research Fellow Jonathan D Leaver, Chairman Centre for.
8/5/2010 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study - Engines/Vehicles Subgroup Overview (part of Supply & Infrastructure Task Group)
Presentation to 40 th Meeting of the APEC Energy Working Group Brunei Darussalam November 2010.
Transportation Issues. US Cars and Drivers US Population: 300 million Licensed drivers 190 million Cars and light trucks. 210 million.
Impacts of Driving Patterns on the Life Cycle Performance of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Leon Raykin Supervisors Heather L. MacLean Matthew J. Roorda.
Well-To-Wheels Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Amgad Elgowainy, Andy Burnham, Michael Wang, John Molburg, and.
1Presenter, Event, Date1Richard Newell, SAIS, December 14, October 14, 2010 John Maples, Nick Chase, Matt Tanner Energy Information Administration.
1 MET 12 Global Warming: Lecture 12 Transportation Shaun Tanner Outline:   Energy use   Petroleum   Hybrid   Electric   Fuel Cell   Biofuels.
11/4/ National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study Hydrogen Base Case Commentary Guidelines and Template FINAL.
National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study Supply & Infrastructure Task Group 1 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion.
10/26/2010 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Fuels Study Discussion Only 1 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study Engine/Vehicles.
07/26/2010 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study - Task Group/Subgroup Overview September CSC Meeting Hydrogen Subgroup.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Voluntary Agreements as Drivers of Technological Change in the Transport Sector Lewis M.
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Fuels Study Discussion Only 1 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study Natural Gas Team – Insights.
07/14/2010 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only 11 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study CSC Meeting – Houston.
09/20/2010 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study - Supply and Infrastructure Task Group Update September 20, 2010 Shariq Yosufzai.
07/26/2010 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study - Biofuels Subgroup Framing Questions 1.
1 Introduction to Alternative Fuels Technology. 2 Why are we doing this ?
The Race to a Renewable Future Who is Going to Get There First? Terry Penney, Technology Manager NREL’s FreedomCAR & Vehicle Technologies Program November.
Opting for “Long Term Operations” Technical, economic and regulatory considerations MARC Conference June 8, 2010 Sean Bushart, EPRI Sr. Program Manager.
What Does the Future Hold for Advanced Technologies?
1 Alternative Fuel School Buses: A View for Local Governments.
10/12/2010 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Fuels Study Discussion Only 1 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study Base Case Commentary.
© OECD/IEA 2010 Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Prague, 7 October.
Developing the New Zealand Energy Strategy IPS Roundtable Series on energy sustainability 4 August 2006 Stuart Calman.
10/3/2011 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only 1 FTF Coordinating Subcommittee Meeting Model Structure Discussion Deanne Short October.
Transportation - Alternative Fuels, Hydrogen Fuel Cells David Cancel, University of California, San Diego, Urban Studies and Planning Program INTRODUCTION.
Research Program Overview From the University of California, Davis H2H2.
Research Program Overview From the University of California, Davis H2H2.
California Energy Commission Overview of Revised Vehicle Attributes and Demand Scenarios Energy Demand Cases and Forecast of Vehicle Attributes for 2015.
Low carbon scenarios for the UK Energy White Paper Peter G Taylor Presented at “Energy, greenhouse gas emissions and climate change scenarios” June.
Long-Term Electricity Report 1 Susan Gray September 27, 2010.
Energy security Professor Jim Watson Director, Sussex Energy Group University of Sussex Research Fellow, The Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
07/26/2010 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study - Task Group/Subgroup Overview September CSC Meeting Engines-Vehicles Subgroup.
Supply chains for the UK to 2050 A. Bauen (*), R. Slade, S. Jablonski and C. Panoutsou The context The aim of this work is to explore the potential for.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Competition To The Diesel Engine? David E. Foster Engine Research Center University of Wisconsin - Madison SAE Congress 2002, March 7, 2002.
Weathering the Change Action Plan 2 ACT Climate Change Council 8 November 2011.
Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Providing Fuels of the Future Catherine Reheis-Boyd President October 24, 2011 WESTERN STATES PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION.
09/21/2010 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study - Task Group/Subgroup Overview September CSC Meeting Demand Task Group.
SPSC Low Carbon Tool: Interim Status Report CREPC/SPSC meeting San Diego, CA October 5, 2012 Arne Olson.
By Shalnev Dmitry Class 9 A Pervomaisk Secondary School Tambov Region 2014.
1 Climate Change: Impact on Transportation (And Transportation Impact on Climate Change) August 14, 2008 Mike Clifford Metropolitan Washington Council.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHALE GAS PRODUCTION AND CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE UNDER CO2 TAXES: MARKAL MODELING Nadja Victor and Chris Nichols Pittsburgh,
Subset of 2011 to 2013 Model Year Vehicles: Who Buys What Car? Analysis of Feebates and Household Impacts in California Julie Schiffman and Lew Fulton.
Sam Spofforth, Executive Director, Central Ohio Clean Fuels Coalition (614) Presentation to Great Lakes Regional Pollution.
California Energy Commission Medium and Heavy Duty Truck Prices and Fuel Economy Energy Demand Cases and Forecast of Vehicle Attributes for 2015.
Integrated Energy-Environmental Modeling for Regional Scenario Analysis Timothy Johnson U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development Research Triangle Park,
Technology Task Group Update 30 September
California Energy Commission Transportation Electrification IEPR Workshop on the Revised Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts November 24, 2015 Aniss.
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Slide 1 Takao Onoda International Energy Agency 4 th informal group.
National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study Supply & Infrastructure Task Group 1 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion.
Technology Task Group Update – 31 Mar 1 TTG Call Reviewed list and discussed classification of white papers. Stephen will discuss on CSC chairs call Follow-up.
1 DRAFT DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Resource Study Discussion Only NPC Demand Task Force – Residential and Commercial Findings & Recommendations January.
How University Transportation Work Can Contribute to California Greenhouse Gas Goals Nic Lutsey Institute of Transportation Studies University of California.
Western States Biofuels Production Scenarios 2015 October 10, 2007.
Electrifying Transportation: A National Legislative Imperative Brian Wynne September 5, 2008.
© OECD/IEA Do we have the technology to secure energy supply and CO 2 neutrality? Insights from Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 Copenhagen,
09/20/2010 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study Supply and Infrastructure Task Group Update November 9, 2010 Joseph Caggiano 1.
Contacts: Energy, environment and climate assessment using the MARKAL energy system model U.S. EPA Office of Research.
Considerations in using NEMS (and other input…) Alison Bailie Associate Scientist December 2003.
Energy Demand Analysis and Energy Saving Potentials in the Greek Road Transport Sector Dr. Spyros J. Kiartzis Director Alternative Energy Sources & New.
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
Bioenergy Supply, Land Use, and Environmental Implications
Decarbonisation objective
Presentation transcript:

07/26/2010 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study - Task Group/Subgroup Overview September CSC Meeting Engines-Vehicles Subgroup draft

07/26/ Engines-Vehicles Subgruop – Final Framing Questions Supply, Volume and Mix/Portfolio  What constraints are there on vehicle/engine technology implementation, including volume, ramp-up, …?  What scenarios of propulsion mixes in the vehicle parc are able to meet the energy and emissions goals of the study? (Integration Effort ; Demand team)  What assumptions and drivers underlie different projections? (see also question 1 above)  How do the propulsion options compare in ability to meet transportation needs of consumers? (Integration Effort)  What is the potential impact of changes in driver behavior, such as reduced speed limits, on energy consumption and emissions?  How will vehicles/engine types phase in and out to enable greater usage of vehicles/engine types which utilize low-carbon fuels? (Integration Effort) Technologies, Barriers and Pathways  What technologies are needed for transitioning to vehicles and engine types that utilize low-carbon fuels?  What are potential vehicle increases in fuel efficiency over the period of the study?  What technology options will be combined in the portfolio to achieve this fuel efficiency?  What impact will fuel efficiency improvement have on vehicle cost?  Which fuel /engine synergies generate the greatest efficiency gains in 2050? (Integration Effort)  What are the development pathways for these technologies? Environmental Considerations  How do each of the vehicle options compare in potential for zero or near-zero tailpipe emissions? (Integration Effort)  Of the scenarios that meet the energy and emissions goals which has the lowest criteria emissions? (Integration Effort) Infrastructure Considerations  Of the scenarios that meet the energy and emissions goals: (Integration Effort)  which provides the lowest total well-to-wheels cost of transportation?  which requires the lowest investment (fuel infrastructure plus vehicle cost)?  How should gaps between the current state and future state be addressed? (Integration Effort)  What fuels or energy carriers are required to enable the greatest fuel efficiency increases?  What are the investment and financing requirements for the future state of engines and vehicle types?  What are the incremental costs of producing the new portfolio of engines and vehicles? Policy: What are the state and regional implications of the 2050 future state of engine and vehicle types? Security: Are there security implications? What could disrupt the supply chain /infrastructure and what mitigations could be in place, for eg, supply of raw materials, nationalization? Any infrastructure vulnerabilities (Assume rare earth metal subject handled by electrical subgroup) DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only

07/26/ Engines-Vehicles Subgroup – Final Scope Final Scope Engines/Vehicles Subgroup - Scope The focus of the Engines/Vehicles Subgroup will be to analyze and summarize studies assessing the fuel consumption benefits and costs for a range of engine and vehicle technologies. Included are: a range of spark ignition and compression ignition engine technologies; improved transmissions; reduced accessory loads; vehicle enablers such as low rolling resistance tires, improved aerodynamics, and mass reduction; and a range of hybridization options. Also included will be an investigation of how alternative fuels, such as ethanol, or changes in fuel properties, such as increased octane and cetane, can enable improved vehicle efficiency and how alternative fuels impact driving range and refueling time. Alternative combustion technologies, such as turbine and Stirling engines will be discussed briefly along with impacts of changes in driving behavior and Smart vehicles that can avoid congestion. Finally, the subgroup will establish a common vehicle baseline for evaluating vehicle technologies across the subgroups to ensure equitable treatment and evaluation of all the vehicle and propulsion system technologies included in this study. Technologies that are out of scope because they are covered by other teams include engines operating on gaseous fuels, plug-in electric vehicles, fuel cells, free-piston engines.. DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only

07/26/2010 Engines-Vehicles – Membership Core Team Alan Taub/Britta GrossChairGeneral Motors Norman BrinkmanAssistantGeneral Motors Clay PhillipsGeneral Motors Gary OshnockChrysler Jeff Jetter Honda Bill ReinertToyota Eric KoehlerFEV Mike LeisterMarathon Dominic DiCiccoFord Stuart JohnsonVolkswagen Charlie SchleyerExxon-Mobil DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only

07/26/ Engines-Vehicles- 60 Day Timeline Task DescriptionActual Date Finalize Draft Scope and Framing Questions30 August 2010 Core Team Bi-weekly Meetings Launched3 September 2010 Complete database of literature matched to scope30 September 2010 Complete outline of report15 October 2010 Compile first draft of findings for fuel economy and incremental cost30 October 2010

07/26/2010 Compare NRC study and EIA AEO2010 – Small Cars

07/26/2010 Compare NRC study and EIA AEO2010 – Large Cars

07/26/2010 Compare NRC study and EIA AEO2010 – Large Trucks

07/26/2010 Alignment required with Electric, Natural Gas, Hydrogen, and Demand on granularity of the light-duty vehicle fleet: small car, large car, large truck, etc. Need input on liquid fuel prices and greenhouse gas footprint from Hydrocarbon liquids subgroup for gasoline, diesel including impacts of octane/cetane increases and desulfurization Biofuel subgroup for various biofuels Interaction with multiple groups required to complete framing questions involve interactions with other subgroups and task groups 9 Barriers/Pinch Points/Dependencies

07/26/ Technology Lead Requirements / Recruiting Status Tier 3 - Stakeholders or Focus Group Members (tent.) Joan Ogden (UC Davis) Dennis Assanis (UM) Sandia: Jay Keller/Art Pontau (basic combustion) Oak Ridge: Ron Graves (applied combustion) Argonne: Larry Johnson (WTW, veh sim, hybrid) Tier 2 - Specialized Team members/ Contributors: EIA: John Maples CAR: Brett Smith EPA: Bill Charmley

07/26/ Current List of Reference Documents