WESTEST 2 SCHOOL REPORTS. WESTEST 2 school reports are used to make programmatic level decisions –School administrators are encouraged to use other data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WESTEST 2 School Reports 1. WESTEST 2 SCHOOL REPORTS WESTEST 2 school reports are used to make programmatic level decisions Use other data and information.
Advertisements

Instructional Materials: The Future is Here.. What is Happening Nationally?
Using Acuity to Guide Instruction Sandra Foster Office of Assessment and Accountability Leatha Williams Office of School Improvement.
School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
21 st Century Balanced Assessment: What Does It Mean to My School? WVDE 2008 Fall Regional School Counselors Workshop West Virginia Department of Education.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Analyzing Student Work
Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
A Guide to Implementation
Student Learning Targets in the CCSS Classroom: Mathematics.
Teacher Leadership Initiative Trainings
Grade 3 Portfolio Implementation Guide Training for School Test Coordinators and Instructional Coaches NHCS Implementation Support Discussion Group Edmodo.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Principal Performance Evaluation System
Denver Public Schools Teacher Compensation Design Team April 23,
Elementary Science Bellringers
Facilitating Teacher Growth for State-wide Student Success in Mathematics Professional Learning for Intermediate Grades.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Pomona Unified School District Standard Practices for Data Analysis Silvia San Martin Teacher Specialist Research and Assessment.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
FOCUS… Formative, Ongoing, Classroom Understanding of Students and Standards An assessment system giving new directions to schools desiring to positively.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Using Data to Make Decisions Regarding Professional and Personalized Learning: WV General Summative Assessment – Part 1 County Chief Instructional Leadership.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Predicting Patterns: Lenawee County's Use of EXPLORE and PLAN DataDirector 2011 User Conference Dearborn, Michigan.
Creating SMART Goals Refer to pgs in spiral conference binder.
Timberlane Regional School District
School Improvement Plans School Improvement  The Vision  Progress  Plan Components  Problem-Solving What is our vision for school improvement.
Instructional Coach Training September 30, 2010 AIMS: Generating Reports to Use with CFIP 1.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Smarter Balanced and Accountability Assessment and Accountability Evolution and Implications.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
Lancaster County School District. Student Learning Objectives are the product of an interest in extending the available data for educators throughout.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
- 0 - Collaborative Inquiry via Professional Learning Communities MSDF Impact Assessment.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
When dealing with colleagues in PLC’s…. Welcome Professional Learning Communities Presenters: Pam Hughes & Kristin Magee
CURRICULUM RENEWAL EDD 7913 CRN BY JAMIE LEEDER, GENEVIEVE LEYDIG, KEITH MABE NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY APRIL 4, 2013.
Instructional Principals’ Meetings August 9 and 10, 2012 Instructional Principals’ Meetings August 9 and 10, 2012 Berkeley County Schools. 401 South Queen.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Setting SMART Goals for The central purpose of the Professional Learning Community (PLC) is for the teacher to develop a new understanding.
WESTEST 2 SCHOOL REPORTS. WESTEST 2 school reports are used to make programmatic level decisions –School administrators are encouraged to use other data.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Welcome to the Interim Assessment Training Office of Assessment.
On The Right Road Moving Forward From a Lowest Achieving School to a High Progress Rewards School Fitzgerald High School Ben Hill County.
MID-YEAR STAKEHOLDER’S ASSESSMENT REVIEW TWIN LAKES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY JANUARY 23, 2014.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Q2 Benchmark Report1 Lodi Unified School District Benchmark Assessment Results (Mid-Year Student Achievement Monitoring) Prepared by.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Value-Added Calculation
J. Sterling Morton High Schools
Lou Maynus Mathematics Coordinator WVDE Office of Instruction
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
WESTEST 2 SCHOOL REPORTS
2013 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
WESTEST 2 SCHOOL REPORTS
JACKSON SCHOOL DISTRICT Middle School Math Informational Night
Presentation transcript:

WESTEST 2 SCHOOL REPORTS

WESTEST 2 school reports are used to make programmatic level decisions –School administrators are encouraged to use other data and information to make programmatic decisions -- not just WESTEST 2 reports Acuity Benchmark reports support programmatic decision making as well as determine areas of weakness by content and objective on a quarterly basis during the year Writing Roadmap 2 assists teachers in determining areas of weakness in writing after each writing session

Schedule of Delivery WESTEST 2 schedule of delivery of reports are as follow: July 24, Phase I -- Electronic Reports sent to County Test Coordinator to retrieve on secure FTP site for immediate release to school principals - Confidential Summary Report (CSR) - Confidential Item Analysis Summary (CIAS) - Confidential Roster Report August 6, Phase II -- paper reports sent to County Test Coordinator to immediate release to school principals - Student reports - Individual Right Response Record (IRRR) - Student labels

Delivery Model It is recommended that School Leadership Teams and Grade Level/Content Collaborative Teams review and act on summative assessment results. –WESTEST 2 reports are confidential data because the reports include all students tested in the school –All teachers can view, study and use grade-level data Researchers have consistently found that it is more effective to use systematic methods of data delivery/review with teachers and to develop systematic methods for using data in order to promote increased student achievement and learning (Berhnardt; 2009; Harrison & Bryan, 2008; Means, Padilla, DeBarger, & Bakia, 2009; Walser, 2009; Wohlstetter, Datnow, & Park, 2008; Weinstock, 2009).

Critical Questions  What do we want students to learn?  How will we know if students have learned it?  What will we do if they don’t learn?  What will we do if they do learn?

We want students to learn CSOs WESTEST 2 measures each standard per content area, but not each objective –R/LA measures 71% of the objectives per grade level –Math measures 86% of the objectives per grade level –Science measures 78% of the objectives per grade level –Social Studies measures 80% of the objectives per grade level There are two forms with different objectives measured on each form. Therefore, it is crucial to teach all of the CSOs - not just the tested information – in order for students to learn the needed skills and content for progression to the next grade level.

How will we know if students have learned it? One way schools, the educational community, and the public determine if students have learned the content is through statewide summative assessment data as well as national assessment data. WVDE provides two school reports to the County Test Coordinator for release to school principals –Confidential Summary Report (CSR) –Confidential Item Analysis Summary (CIAS)

What do you look for in this WESTEST 2 report ? Confidential Summary Report (1)*Subgroup Performance: –Using Grade Level Mastery Data, review subgroup performance: % of students At or Above Mastery by subgroup Which subgroup(s) in this grade level and for this content area need additional time and support? * Repeat for each tested grade level in the school

What do you look for in this WESTEST 2 report ? Confidential Summary Report (2) * Content Standard Performance –Review grade level mastery of the content standards: % of students At or Above Mastery by standard Which standards require extra time and attention? * Repeat for each tested grade level in the school

Reflection Here’s What… What do the data appear to be telling you? What patterns do you see? So What?... What are the possible reasons or explanations for the data? Now What?... How will your leadership team use these findings to establish school SMART Goals? (Strategic  Measurable  Attainable  Results oriented  Time- bound)

Directions: Working in pairs, discuss the data from the CSR reports using the reflection questions as your guide. Develop SMART goals for “your” school. School SMART Goals (Strategic  Measurable  Attainable  Results oriented  Time-bound)

School SMART Goals School:All StudentsContent Area: Mathematics Current Data Source: WESTEST Confidential Summary Report Standards Algebra I Content Clusters or Standards Grade Level Tested / % At or Above Mastery Expressions and Equations Linear Equations and Functions50 Polynomials and Nonlinear Functions Radicals and Rational Functions5558 Data Analysis / Exploration SMART Goal (s): (Strategic  Measurable  Attainable  Results oriented  Time-bound) At least 60% of all students will perform at or above mastery on the standards of geometry and measurement and show improvement on the other three standards in mathematics as measured by WESTEST 2, Which subgroup(s)* need additional time and support? Students with Disabilities and Econ. Disadvantaged *For more in-depth information about subgroup performance on content standards, see the Confidential Item Analysis Summary Report.

What do you look for in this WESTEST 2 report? Confidential Item Analysis Summary (CIAS): Subgroup Performance on Content Standards (Grade level and/or content collaborative teams use this report to gather more specific data for each subgroup.) –For subgroups identified on the CSR as needing additional time and support, compare School and County Mean Percent Correct for each standard. –Identify the standards that fall below the County Mean Percent Correct as target areas for identified subgroup(s).

How do you use the information ? Confidential Item Analysis Summary (CIAS): Subgroup Performance on Content Standards (Grade level and/or content collaborative teams use this report to gather more specific data for each subgroup.) - Collaborative teams review the complete set of objectives for the identified standards - Plan their instructional cycle to include extra time and support for identified subgroup(s). West Virginia CSOs may be found on the *TEACH 21 site - Teams monitor progress toward school SMART Goals using periodic school-based and district-wide benchmark assessments. *Teach 21

Reflection Here’s What… What do the data appear to be telling you? What patterns have emerged among subgroups? So What?... What are the possible reasons or explanations for subgroup performance on a particular standard? Now What?... How will the collaborative teams use these and other data to establish grade level/content course SMART Goals? (Strategic  Measurable  Attainable  Results oriented  Time- bound)

Data Based Decisions District SMART Goals Impact What Happens in Schools School SMART Goals Impact What Happens in Grade Levels and Content Courses Team SMART Goals Impact What Happens in an Individual Teacher’s Classroom Summative Assessment Data are used to make district level decisions Summative/Periodic Benchmark Data are used to make school level decisions Benchmark/Common Assessment Data are used to make team level decisions

Where do we go next? Leadership Team uses summative data to set school-level goals by content area –Bring School SMART goals to collaborative teams in September of each year for implementation –Build into strategic plan Collaborative Teams use data to establish grade level/content SMART goals to align with School SMART goals –Monitor progress toward goals using current assessment data and adjust focus as students progress –Avoid “drill and kill” for the next year on the weaknesses targeted on WESTEST 2 results – use all data sets available to you throughout the year to improve instruction.

Confidential Roster Report Student Reports College Readiness Indicator Other WESTEST 2 Reports

School Confidential Summary Reports (CSR) (Place grade level CSRs in Appendix A for training purposes) Appendix A

School Confidential Item Analysis Summary (CIAS) (Place grade level CIAS in Appendix B for training purposes) Appendix B

SCHOOL SMART GOALS SHEET (You will need to make copies of this sheet for the number of people you are training) Appendix C

School SMART Goals School:Subgroup:Content Area: Current Data Source: WESTEST Confidential Summary Report Content Standards/ClustersGrade Level Tested / % At or Above Mastery SMART Goal (s): (Strategic  Measurable  Attainable  Results oriented  Time-bound) Which subgroup(s)* need additional time and support? *For more in-depth information about subgroup performance on content standards, see the Confidential Item Analysis Summary Report.