ESEA Flexibility: College & Career Readiness Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 7 of 8.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Advertisements

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma Jennifer Felker, Associate Superintendent Division of Learning and School Choice November 7, 2014.
OVERVIEW OF H.B HB 555  Revises benchmarks for Indicators Met and Performance Index to 90% for A  Raises performance proficiency benchmark to.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
Jon Gubera Chief Accountability Officer
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) Reading and Mathematics 2012 Carolyn Wood, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
School Performance Measure Calculations SY Office of Achievement and Accountability.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
January Virginia Strategies for Reducing the Need for Remediation After Graduation Education Commission of the States January 7, 2010 Dr. Patricia.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
ESEA Renewal Title I Coordinators Meeting May 13, 2015 Mary Gable Assistant State Superintendent, Academic Policy and Innovation Chandra Haislet Director,
2009 Closing the Expectation Gap Fourth Annual 50-State Progress Report on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
State Teacher Evaluation Model Professional PracticeStudent Growth Planning and Preparation 12.5% Instruction 12.5% Classroom Environment 12.5% Professional.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 2 of 8 1.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
ESEA Renewal What does it Mean for Title I? Program Improvement and Family Support Branch Title I Administrative Meeting September 17, 2015.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Welcome to the AHS PCF! September 12, :00 a.m. Room 92 TOPIC: New State Report Card.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Fall Regional Curriculum and Instruction Meeting September 2015.
ESEA Flexibility: Student Growth Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 6 of 8.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8.
Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS James Madison Middle School MSA Data Presentation 2012 Marcie L. Gray, Testing Coordinator Courtney.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
March 2013 Training Session The content of this PowerPoint is contingent upon approval of the Alabama PLAN 2020 ESEA Flexibility Request by the USDOE.
Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Assessment Results.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
ESSA and School Accountability in Alaska Brian Laurent, Data Management Supervisor.
Louisiana’s Participation in the College and Career Policy Institute September 21, 2009.
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
FY 11 School Grade Calculation
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
State Teacher Evaluation Model
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
Overview of Ohio’s Career-Technical Planning District Report Card
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Media Briefing School Progress 2012 Results Mary L. Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy July 10, 2012 Meeting the requirements.
Spencer County Public Schools
Chief Accountability Officer
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Presentation transcript:

ESEA Flexibility: College & Career Readiness Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 7 of 8

Lillian M. Lowery, Ed.D. State Superintendent of Schools Dr. Charlene M. Dukes President, Maryland State Board of Education Martin O'Malley Governor Carolyn Wood Assistant Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems Maryland State Department of Education Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems 200 West Baltimore Street Baltimore, Maryland MarylandPublicSchools.org MarylandPublicSchools.org 2

Maryland Accountability Program 3  School Progress  Reduce by half the percentage of students in the “all students” group and in each subgroup who are not proficient within six years  School Progress Index  Achievement  Gap Reduction  Growth  College & Career Readiness  Differentiated Recognition  Reward  Priority  Focus

33.3%- Mathematics Proficiency (Algebra/ Data Analysis HSA) 33.3%- English Proficiency (English HSA) 33.3%- Science Proficiency (Biology HSA) Achievement* 40% Gap* College-and Career-Readiness** 40% 20% 60%- Cohort Graduation Rate 40%- College and Career Preparation (CCP) Advanced Placement Career and Technology Education (CTE) Concentrators College Enrollment Gap between lowest subgroup and highest subgroup within a school: 20%- Mathematics Proficiency (Algebra/ Data Analysis HSA) 20%- English Proficiency (English HSA) 20%- Science Proficiency (Biology HSA) 20%- Cohort Graduation Rate 20%- Cohort Dropout Rate Gap* 40% 33.3%- Mathematics Proficiency (MSA) 33.3%- Reading Proficiency (MSA) 33.3%- Science Proficiency (MSA) 50%- Mathematics Proficiency (MSA) 50%- Reading Proficiency (MSA) Gap between lowest subgroup and highest subgroup within a school: Achievement* 30% Growth* 30% 33.3%- Mathematics Proficiency (MSA) 33.3%- Reading Proficiency (MSA) 33.3%- Science Proficiency (MSA) Percent of students making one year’s growth: *ALT-MSA is included in the index component **Revised 9/17/2012: To be submitted to USDE for Approval Maryland School Progress Index** Grades 9-12 Grades PreK-8 Meeting Performance Targets (AMO) Meeting Performance Targets (AMO) 4

SPI Indicator: College & Career Readiness Grades 9-12  Four-Year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate  College and Career Preparation (CCP)  Advance Placement  Career and Technology Education (CTE) Concentrators  College Enrollment  Met annual targets on measures that assure students are ready for college or career upon graduation 5

Cohort Graduation Rate  Reduce by half the percentage of students in each subgroup who are not meeting 95% graduation rate by 2020  Four Year Cohort Graduation Rate  Lagged one year 6

College and Career Preparation (CCP) – Advanced Placement  Students who have exited high school with a Maryland State High School Diploma who earned a score of 3 or greater on an Advanced Placement (AP) exam  AP Data  Lagged 2 years 7

College and Career Preparation (CCP) – Career and Technology Education Concentrators  Students who have exited high school with a Maryland State High School Diploma and attained advance standing in a State-approved Career & Technology Education program of study  CTE Enrollment Data  Lagged 2 years 8

College and Career Preparation (CCP) – College Enrollment  Students who have exited high school with a Maryland State High School Diploma and subsequently entered a post-secondary institution  Clearinghouse Data  Lagged 2 years 9

College and Career Preparation (CCP) – Calculation  Student is included in numerator if they met at least ONE of the following conditions  AP of 3 or greater  Career and Technology Education (CTE) Concentrators  College Enrollment  Lagged 2 years CCP= (AP score of 3 or greater) OR (CTE Concentrator) OR (College Enrollment) All students who have exited high school with a Maryland State High School Diploma (C60 or C70) 10

SPI Calculation Example: High School 11 VariableAchievementGapCCR AssessmentMathEngSciMathEngSciGradDropGradCCP % Proficient CY Target % Prof of Target Content Weight Weighted % Prof of Target Indicator Weight Indicator Contribution School Index1.004 % Prof of Target = % Proficient CY ÷ Target Weighted % Prof of Target= % Prof of Target x Content Weight Indicator Contribution= (Math + Read + Sci) x Indicator Weight School Index= (Achievement + Growth + Gap)

Maryland Accountability Program 12  School Progress  Reduce by half the percentage of students in the “all students” group and in each subgroup who are not proficient within six years  School Progress Index  Achievement  Gap Reduction  Growth  College & Career Readiness  Differentiated Recognition  Reward  Priority  Focus

Questions?  Please forward questions and comments to: Doug Strader, Ed.D