Overview of Wyoming Accountability in Education Act (WAEA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Advertisements

11 th Grade Parent Meeting – ACT Plus Writing and ACT WorkKeys Wausau East High School October 8, 2014.
PRESENTATION FOR DIRECTORS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION (12/17/13) MICHAEL FLICEK, ED.D. EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY CONSULTANT Wyoming School Accountability.
OVERVIEW OF H.B HB 555  Revises benchmarks for Indicators Met and Performance Index to 90% for A  Raises performance proficiency benchmark to.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
2014 Assessment Update Deb Lindsey, Administrator State Assessment.
PACT Tests Administration Guide. What is the PACT Test? Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test Standards-based accountability For curriculum and teaching.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Brad Neuenswander, Interim Commissioner Kansas State Department of Education 2014 Summer Leadership Conference.
November 7, 2014 WILLMAR PUBLIC SCHOOLS WORLD’S BEST WORKFORCE SUMMARY.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
Dr. Michael Flicek Education Consultant October 8, 2013 Wyoming School Performance Rating Model Report to: Wyoming State Board of Education.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Setting Performance Standards for the Hawaii State Alternate Assessments: Reading, Mathematics, and Science Presentation for the Hawaii State Board of.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
HAWLEMONT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2012 STATE OF THE DISTRICT ADDRESS Presented by: Michael A. Buoniconti Superintendent of Schools Hawlemont Regional.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.
Communication Webinar:
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Legislative Requirement 2013
Proficiency Assessments for Wyoming Students
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
Alaska Superintendents Association Fall Meeting 2016
House Bill 22 Overview ESC PEIMS Coordinator Summer Training | August 1, 2017 Texas Education Agency | Academics | Performance Reporting.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS and 2017 Accountability Results
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Kansas Elementary and Secondary Education Act Advisory Council (ESEA)
Mississippi Succeeds Madison County Business League & Foundation
Accountability for Alternative Schools in Wyoming
Leader SLTs
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Starting Community Conversations
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
WAVE Presentation on Draft ESSA Plan.
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
ESSA accountability & Report Card Proposed regulations
English Learner Accountability Component
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Wyoming Accountability in Education Act (WAEA) Wyoming Department of Education Overview of Wyoming Accountability in Education Act (WAEA) Julie Magee, Ph.D. Division Administrator Standards & Accountability

Goals of WAEA WAEA established during 2011 legislative session (W.S. 21-2-204) with the following goals in mind: Become a national education leader among states Ensure all students graduate career or college ready Recognize and increase student growth for all Recognize student achievement and minimize gaps Improve teacher and leader quality Maximize efficiency of WY education Increase credibility and support for WY schools

Indicators Defined Indicators for Grades 3-8 Achievement: performance in reading, math in grades 3-8 (PAWS); science in grades 4, 8 (PAWS); writing in grades 5, 7 (SAWS) Growth: change in students’ achievement as they progress from year to year (grades 4-8); based on 2 consecutive years of state test scores; “academic peers” Equity (measured by growth): grades 4-8 based on consolidated subgroup (students who were below proficient in math and/or reading in prior year); proficient within 3 years or by end of grade 8

Indicators Defined Indicators for High Schools Achievement: performance in reading, math, science, English/writing in grade 11 (ACT) Readiness: consists of 4 sub-indicators (grad rate, scores on ACT assessments, grade 9 credits earned, Hathaway eligibility) Equity (measured by Δ achievement gap): consolidated subgroup based on performance on Plan test in grade 10; equity score is measure of subgroup’s achievement level in reading/math at end of grade 11

Participation Rate Participation rate is computed for all enrolled students and all enrolled students in consolidated subgroup Minimum annual participation of 95% required in both student groups Participation rate of 90-94.9% results in school performance being docked one level Participation rate below 90% results in school performance rating of “not meeting expectations”

Ratings Defined 2014 PLDs for Grades 3-8 Exceeding Expectations: school exceeded targets on achievement and one additional performance indicator while meeting target on other indicator (equity or growth) Meeting Expectations: school met or exceeded targets on multiple performance indicators Partially Meeting Expectations: school performed below target on multiple performance indicators or were below target on achievement Not Meeting Expectations: school had unacceptable performance on all indicators

Ratings Defined 2014 PLDs for High Schools Exceeding Expectations: school exceeded state targets for overall readiness and performance indicator (achievement + equity) Meeting Expectations: school met or exceeded target for overall readiness or exceeded target for achievement/equity indicator Partially Meeting Expectations: school performed below target on achievement/equity indicator Not Meeting Expectations: school had unacceptable performance on all indicators

Role of PJP Professional Judgment Panel (PJP) is comprised of educators and community members Role is to establish target levels for school performance for each performance indicator New target levels are established based on changes to the model or assessments

Representatives Appointed by state superintendent to serve as liaison between school district leadership and department Review and approve improvement plans Provide support to schools based on SPR Meeting Expectations Partially Meeting Expectations Not Meeting Expectations