Red Oak CSD August, 2010. District / School ReadingMath Other Academic Indicator Red Oak Community School System ParticipationMet AYP Goal AssessmentMet.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Elementary Principals Meeting Data Presentation August 6, 2010.

Advertisements

School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?

IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.

Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD. Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA.

Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement Summary of 2007 Statistics Prepared by NORMES, University of Arkansas Presented to the Joint Adequacy.

1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.

Nevada Transitioning from measuring status and reporting AYP, to measuring growth and reporting on School Performance.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.

Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.

Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.

Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.

Urbana Middle School School Improvement Plan

Special Education Summit 2010 Board of Education Presentation on Special Education Within District, Out-of-District, and Performance Levels on Mastery.

Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.

Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.

2011 – 12 AYP & PSSA. AYP = Adequate Yearly Progress Requirement of NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Federal Legislation that will require 100% of students.

A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.

School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.

Adequate Yearly Progress Report (AYP) BARBARA SIMS – AUGUST 2013.

AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10,

A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.

AYP Prediction By Diagnostics in the Educational Data Warehouse.

Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.

Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.

Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services Shelton School District State, School District and individual school results for AYP results can be found.

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.

Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.

School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.

Corvallis School District 509J School Board Presentation October 10, 2011.

AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.

Annual Student Performance Report September

August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.

Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets).

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

AERA March 25, 2008 Delaware’s Growth Model and Results from Year One.

School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.

Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.

2nd QUARTER DATA REVIEW Pacoima Charter NOVEMBER 2012.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.

1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.

Adequate Yearly Progress DE/AEA Mini Summit.

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – New Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in the school year, fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation.

AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.

Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.

 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development.

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.

Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.

Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.

Barrow County Schools AYP Results AYP Results out of 13 schools met AYP System did not meet AYP out of 13.

CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.

NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005

Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?

Presentation transcript:

Red Oak CSD August, 2010

District / School ReadingMath Other Academic Indicator Red Oak Community School System ParticipationMet AYP Goal AssessmentMet AYP Goal Red Oak High School ParticipationMet AYP Goal AssessmentMet AYP Goal Red Oak Middle School ParticipationMet AYP Goal AssessmentMissed AYP Inman Primary School ParticipationMet AYP Goal AssessmentMet AYP - Biennium Washington Intermediate School ParticipationMet AYP Goal AssessmentMissed AYPMet AYP - Safe Harbor Webster Alternative School ParticipationMet AYP Goal AssessmentMet AYP Goal

Other Academic Indicator K-8 Attendance Rate K-8 StatusGraduation Rate Graduation Status Other Academic Indicator Status 94.9Met76.8Not MetMet Other Academic Indicator K-8 Attendance Rate K-8 Status Graduation Rate Graduation Status Other Academic Indicator Status NANot Met85.9Met 95.8% K-8 attendance Rate is our goal 81% Graduation Rate is our goal

Participation Display Assessment Display Subgroup Number Tested / Enrolled = % Tested Participation Status # Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = % Prof + GrowthAssessment Status Summarized School Math Totals All Students81 / 81 = 100Met AYP Goal (53+0)/78=67.95 Met AYP - Biennium Low SES51 / 51 = 100Met AYP Goal (33+0)/49=67.35Met AYP Goal White74 / 74 = 100Met AYP Goal (49+0)/71=69.01Met AYP Goal Summarized School Reading Totals All Students81 / 81 = 100Met AYP Goal (48+0)/78=61.54 Met AYP - Biennium Low SES51 / 51 = 100Met AYP Goal (28+0)/49=57.14 Met AYP - Biennium White74 / 74 = 100Met AYP Goal (45+0)/71=63.38 Met AYP - Biennium Trajectory Goal rd Grade math: 80.5% (73.9 last year), Reading: 80.6% (74.1 last year)

Summarized School Math Totals All Students170 / 170 = 100 Met AYP Goal (125+1)/156=80.77Met AYP Goal Low SES 93 / 93 = 100 Met AYP Goal (61+1)/87=71.26Met AYP - Safe Harbor Summarized School Reading Totals All Students170 / 170 = 100 Met AYP Goal(103+1)/156=66.67 Missed AYP Low SES93 / 93 = 100 Met AYP Goal(53+0)/87=60.92 Missed AYP White150 / 150 = 100 Met AYP Goal(93+1)/138=68.12 Missed AYP Trajectory Goals for next year: Math: 4 th Grade % (74.4 last year)5 th Grade – 82.5% (76.6 last year) Reading: 4 th Grade – 82% (76 last year)5 th Grade – 82.3% (76.4 last year)

Subgroup Number Tested / Enrolled = % TestedParticipation Status # Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = % Prof + GrowthAssessment Status Summarized School Math Totals All Students244 / 244 = 100Met AYP Goal (161+3)/221=74.21 Met AYP Goal Low SES105 / 105 = 100 Met AYP Goal (62+3)/93=69.89Missed AYP Spec Ed. (IEP)35 / 35 =NAEnrolled on test date < 40 (8+1)/31=29.03 Missed AYP White226 / 226 = 100Met AYP Goal(150+3)/207=73.91Met AYP Goal Summarized School Reading Totals All Students244 / 244 = 100Met AYP Goal (151+3)/221=69.68 Met AYP - Biennium Low SES105 / 105 = 100Met AYP Goal (56+2)/93=62.37 Missed AYP Spec Ed. (IEP)35 / 35 =NAEnrolled on test date < 40(6+3)/31=29.03Missed AYP White226 / 226 = 100Met AYP Goal (139+3)/207=68.6 Met AYP - Biennium

 Trajectory Goals: Reading: 6 th Grade – 77.3% (69.7 last year) 7 th Grade – 78.7% (71.5 last year) 8 th Grade – 80% (73.3 last year) Math: 6 th Grade – 79.6% (72.8 last year) 7 th Grade – 79% (72 last year) 8 th Grade – 79% (72 last year)

Subgroup Number Tested / Enrolled = % TestedParticipation Status # Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = % Prof + GrowthAssessment Status Summarized School Math Totals All Students90 / 90 = 100Met AYP Goal(66+0)/84=78.57Met AYP Goal White83 / 83 = 100Met AYP Goal(60+0)/77=77.92Met AYP Goal Summarized School Reading Totals All Students90 / 90 = 100Met AYP Goal(68+0)/84=80.95Met AYP Goal White83 / 83 = 100Met AYP Goal(61+0)/77=79.22Met AYP Goal Trajectory Goals 11 th Grade: Reading: 84.5% (79.3 last year)Math: 84.5% (79.3 last year) Graduation Rate – 81% (76.8 last year)