Student Achievement Snapshot November 2012 Rich Pepe – Director of C&I Freehold Borough School District.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION UPDATE DECEMBER 7, 2011 AYP DETERMINATIONS ESEA WAIVER.

Advertisements

Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.

AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.

1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.

Understanding the Role of Data in the RttT Initiative Copyright Erie 1 BOCES RttT Network Team Presentation. January 2013.

Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.

Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?

Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets

1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.

Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.

1 School Designation Detailed Methodology Reward Identify the “highest-performing schools” and “high-progress schools” based in all-students group over.

Nevada Transitioning from measuring status and reporting AYP, to measuring growth and reporting on School Performance.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Estimation Goal: Use sample data to make predictions regarding unknown population parameters Point Estimate - Single value that is best guess of true parameter.

MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.

Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)

Dr. Michael Flicek Education Consultant October 8, 2013 Wyoming School Performance Rating Model Report to: Wyoming State Board of Education.

UNDERSTANDING HOW THE RANKING IS CALCULATED Top-to-Bottom (TTB) Ranking

Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.

NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Math Grade 4  4 /5 Students Improved 2/5 Improved 2 levels 2/5 Improved 1 level 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4  8/9 Students Improved.

Joint Meeting of the Commissioner’s and AYP Task Force October 14, 2010 NH DOE 1Joint Task Force Meeting: October 14, 2010.

1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.

1 Differentiated Accountability. 2 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability Model On July 28, 2008, Florida was named one of six states to pilot a differentiated.

MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.

Composite Index Scores (CIS) Understanding Accountability for Strategic Goal Setting August 24, 2015 Andrew Milligan | RIDE Office of Transformation.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.

ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.

ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.

What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.

CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN

New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.

Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.

Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.

School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.

Grade/School Level WVEIS Based Reports School Level Growth Model Summary.

Understanding the Rhode Island Growth Model An Introductory Guide for Educators May 2012.

August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.

Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets).

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.

MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.

District Name FOCUS AND PRIORITY SCHOOLS SIP – CYCLE # REVIEW SCHOOL NAME DATE 1.

Target Practice with AMAOs 1, 2, 3. AMAOs 1,2,3 District level targets for EL under Title III Accountability They show how all of the EL in a cohort are.

- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.

Performance Pay: Forging Ahead with Race to the Top Miami-Dade County Public Schools.

District Name FOCUS AND PRIORITY SCHOOLS SIP – CYCLE # REVIEW SCHOOL NAME February 30, 2013.

MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.

Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.

1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.

Freehold Borough Public Schools ESEA/Title I Presentation

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012

2012 Accountability Determinations

Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005

NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)

Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010

Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System

Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status

Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System

Danvers Public Schools: Our Story

Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System

Evaluation weights for

Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System

Estimation Goal: Use sample data to make predictions regarding unknown population parameters Point Estimate - Single value that is best guess of true parameter.

Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?

Presentation transcript:

Student Achievement Snapshot November 2012 Rich Pepe – Director of C&I Freehold Borough School District

A New Approach to Reviewing Student Achievement Data ESEA Waiver => No more…ESEA Waiver => No more… –AYP –SINI / DINI Annual Progress TargetsAnnual Progress Targets –FLC: Met! –PAE: Met! –FIS: Met! Student Growth PercentilesStudent Growth PercentilesStudent Growth PercentilesStudent Growth Percentiles –Student SGP –Teacher SGP –School SGP

Step 5: 95% Confidence Interval A confidence interval (CI) is a statistical method to minimize the risk of falsely identifying any marginal school as not meeting the Progress Target, a confidence interval at 95% probability is applied to the actual results for the total population as well as each student subgroup for each content area as an additional criteria in meeting Progress Targets. To calculate a confidence interval using actual test results for the total and each subgroup, perform the following computations: 1.Calculate the Percent Proficient (p). 2.Calculate CI. The factor for 95% confidence (Z 95) is Find the Upper Limit of Confidence = p plus CI. 4.Compare the Upper Limit of Confidence to the Yearly Target. a.If the Upper Limit of Confidence equals or exceeds the Yearly Target, Progress Target is met. b.If the Upper Limit of Confidence is less than the Yearly Target, Progress Target is not met.

NJ ASK STUDENT GROWTH PROFILE (SA*) State Snapshot Report: Jun 30, 2012 (Generated: 11/19/2012) FREEHOLD BOROUGHTest Year: Subject: LAL Total Students Low Growth: (1-34) Typical Growth: (35-65) High Growth: (66-99) Student Characteristics # of Students Median SGP # of Students % of Total# of Students % of Total# of Students % of Total Grade 4 (PAE) %2433.3%1723.6% Grade 5 (PAE) %2543.9%2238.6% Grade 4 (FLC) %1931.1%1626.2% Grade 5 (FLC) %2137.5%1628.6% Grade 6 (FIS) %4034.5%2219.0% Grade 7 (FIS) %3829.2%5743.8% Grade 8 (FIS) %3933.3%4336.8% Median SGP’s (ELA)

NJ ASK STUDENT GROWTH PROFILE (SA*) State Snapshot Report: Jun 30, 2012 (Generated: 11/19/2012) FREEHOLD BOROUGHTest Year: Subject: LAL Total Students Low Growth: (1-34) Typical Growth: (35-65) High Growth: (66-99) Student Characteristics # of Students Median SGP # of Students % of Total# of Students % of Total# of Students % of Total Grade 4 (PAE) %1622.2%1013.9% Grade 5 (PAE) %1933.3%2136.8% Grade 4 (FLC) %2032.8%1626.2% Grade 5 (FLC) %1933.9%2544.6% Grade 6 (FIS) %4538.8%2420.7% Grade 7 (FIS) %4131.5%5441.5% Grade 8 (FIS) %5143.6%2218.8% Median SGP’s (Math)

Focus School 3 Categories3 Categories –Low Graduation Rate –Largest Within-School Gaps (>43.5%) –Lowest Subgroup Performance (<29.2% Tot Prof) FIS => Within-School Gap (46.0%)FIS => Within-School Gap (46.0%) –School Improvement Plan –Regional Achievement Center (RAC) Partnership

PROGRESS & GROWTH The New Vision for Achievement Data Review