CEMS School Profile 2009. 2006-2009 The following line graphs represent 2006-2009 MEA scores in reading and math for each grade level. It is important.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Analyzing and Using ISAT Data - Mathematics C MATH 2, Inc. Claran Einfeldt Cathy Carter.

Advertisements

San Diego Unified School District High School Survey Summary Graphs Percentage of students who: Note: This graph contains weighted results. See the corresponding.

Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.

RIPTS 9 Artifact Parts 3 and 4. Rubric Record of Performance of Sub-Group.

1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent.

L.O. identify different types of graph Bar chart Bar line (spike) Line graphPictogram.

Envision Math - 3rd Grade - Topic 4 Data Topic 4.1

Norton Park Elementary Math Data Overview for 3 rd grade By: Amanda Gilbert.

NECAP Results 2006 Chichester Central School Never Enough Children At Proficient!

DISTRICT MCAS RESULTS November 19, Charts by Grade vs. The State Charts by Grade Comparing 2001 through 2007 Longitudinal Comparisons CONTENTS.

Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.

Olympia School District School Board Study Session September Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Steps of School Improvement 2014 Results MSP-HSPE-EOC.

Kaiserslautern District In order to meet the demands and provide the ongoing quality service to our educators and schools the following data is provided.

Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.

Grade/School Level WVEIS Based Reports School Level Growth Model Summary.

 Graphs Math 8. Introduction to types of graphs  Graphs are pictures of data  They can help you communicate your ideas  We are going to identify advantages.

NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.

Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.

James A. Farley School Report Card Presentation May 19, 2008 High Achieving School.

ESI: Education Statistics Investigations Sarah McKenzie PhD TOSA: Data and Assessment Fayetteville Public Schools.

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

1 Monroe County School District Spending vs. Student Achievement John R. Dick School Board District 4.

SDBQ Reports - Extreme By Randy Mudd October 2015.

NJASK Comparison Scores to Essex Fells, J Districts, & Statewide (Slides 2-9) Tracking NJASK Scores for 3 rd, 4 th,& 5 th Grades (Slides ) Tracking.

West Virginia Middle School Survey Summary Graphs Percentage of students who: Note: This graph contains weighted results. See the corresponding summary.

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

International Day of Disabled Persons - prompt slides.

Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.

Graphing Basics. Why do we graph? Visual representation of data “Short hand” for presenting large amounts of information at once Easier to visualize trends.

MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.

Graphing Basics. Why do we graph? Visual representation of data “Short hand” for presenting large amounts of information at once Easier to visualize trends.

School Improvement Plan Review Galloping to Success Minneola Elementary Presented by Mrs. Watts.

What are the differences between bar graphs and picture graphs?

DATA ABOUT US DAY 5 Histograms. Differences between a Bar graph and a Histogram Histograms are a great way to show results of continuous data, such as:continuous.

Test Scores Comparison completed using Spring CRCT reports Natalie Hayes.

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 ADMINISTRATIONS 1.

Virginia Middle School Survey 2015 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results Percentage of students who: Note: This graph contains weighted results. See the corresponding.

Millbrae Elementary School District

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Interpretation of PIPS Feedback For Experienced Users

The Ethical Community Charter School

Totals For December 2008.

Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3

Measuring College and Career Readiness

FSA DATA ANALYSIS

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Envision Math - 3rd Grade - Topic 4 Data Topic 4.1

Measuring College and Career Readiness

West Virginia Middle School Survey

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Created by Jena Parish Austell Intermediate July 2011 School Faculty

Measuring College and Career Readiness

West Virginia Middle School Survey

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Education Services October 3, 2017.

Kearny School District •

Los Angeles Middle School Survey

Which graph should I use?

Rockville Centre Schools

Data Overview Shiver Elementary School Faculty and Staff July 21, 2013

Willie J. Williams Middle School For Staff Use July 14, 2014

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Objective - To make a histogram.

Changing the Intervals and Scale on a graph

Public Charter School Student Achievement Increases Annually

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Presentation transcript:

CEMS School Profile 2009

The following line graphs represent MEA scores in reading and math for each grade level. It is important to note that this data represents three different classes per chart.

2009 MEA School Comparison The following tables represent a comparison of 2009 MEA scores for similar districts - Falmouth Middle School, Frank Harrison Middle School (Yarmouth), Greely Middle School (MSAD 51), and CEMS.

2009 MEA Performance Level Three and Four-Year Review The following bar graphs represent the performance level percentages- exceeds (E), meets (M), partially meets (PM), and does not meet the standard (DNM) - for reading and math. This data represents MEA performance of the same class over time.

MEA Two-Year Subgroup Comparison The following bar graphs represent performance level comparisons of the same subgroup - Identified Disability- for the 2008 and 2009 test sessions.